SH-AWD with J-pipe + CT Icebox

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-20-2014, 05:11 PM
  #1  
CLS^6
Thread Starter
 
suspekt360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 262
Received 30 Likes on 21 Posts
SH-AWD with J-pipe + CT Icebox

Question for the guys with modded TL's.... does anyone have just the:
1. Long-tube J-pipe and
2. CTE ice box.

DO THESE 2 MODS EFFECT LOW RPM THROTTLE RESPONSE OR TORQUE? In other words, does the car feel a little more sloppy in responsiveness down low on the rev range?

And in the absence of dyno data, would you say the car's 50mph-100mph time was improved significantly?

I really like the low-end responsiveness of the motor and would hate to gain some top end HP at the expense of low rpm mid-throttle responsiveness.

I also personally think the Crank pulley does a good job of helping the motor spin up faster; its one of those mods that has a great subtle effect on the character of the motor.
Old 11-20-2014, 05:38 PM
  #2  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
justnspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Received 16,263 Likes on 11,973 Posts
BECAUSE our engines are MADE to make peak power at 6k RPM, Any modding you do, short of F/I WILL, I repeat, WILL move the power band upward!

this means you wont lose torque down low. Butt, you'll make more power up top past 4K RPM.


its just like your CL, man.
Exactly like the J32.
Old 12-29-2014, 09:10 PM
  #3  
CLS^6
Thread Starter
 
suspekt360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 262
Received 30 Likes on 21 Posts
I am happy to report both mods are now done.

To recap:
- bought 2009 TL SH about 2 months ago (waited about 3 years since my CLS6 was written off).
- added XLR8 V2 J pipe about 2 weeks ago
- added CT icebox today

So far, very pleased. I would say mid range torque "without a doubt" has been noticeably increased. The j pipe definitely let the car rev harder and the icebox has made the car feel snappier. With the icebox, I can tell that right after a gear shift is completed, the car surges easier.

I will provide a more comprehensive review in the coming days.

The biggest issue with the car truly is........ It isn't a 6 speed manual.
These cars/motors beg for a close ratio 6 speed manual.

No matter what you do, after the 3rd gear is maxed, the party is over.

I have put easily 2,000 miles (Several round trips from Victoria BC to Port Alberni BC on Vancouver Island) on the car the past 4 weeks in some severe conditions (mountains, significant rain, snow) so feel that I know the character of the gearbox and engine well now.

I will provide a fuller review soon.

Next mod: Lightweight pulley. Let me know if anyone feels this is a bad idea. On the CLS6, it was a nice improvement to the reviness of the motor.
Old 12-29-2014, 09:19 PM
  #4  
Moderator
iTrader: (7)
 
paperboy42190's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Alhambra, CA
Age: 34
Posts: 6,992
Received 1,162 Likes on 847 Posts
what do you mean by "rev harder"? I havent heard that before...
Old 12-29-2014, 09:29 PM
  #5  
CLS^6
Thread Starter
 
suspekt360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 262
Received 30 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by paperboy42190
what do you mean by "rev harder"? I havent heard that before...
I think the motor spins up quicker and can actually hit/bounce-off the 7k rev limiter. Before mods, it would run out of breath by 6,000 and lazily shift at 6,500.

After I do the LW pulley I will be done with power mods.

I'd like to believe the car can trap at 100mph now but probably unlikely.
Pretty sad considering a bone stock CVT V6 Altima can trap at 95-99 and a V6 Accord the same.

Having said that, SH-AWD has given me thrills that faster cars I've driven can't match. The ability to rip through twists or take sweeping turns is exhilarating.

I think the blend of all-weather performance, interior layout/space, and engine character (amplified by mods) makes this a unique car worth buying.

Again, just wish it was a 6MT but that isn't an option for me at this stage if life with family considerations.
Old 12-29-2014, 11:25 PM
  #6  
Drifting
 
BDoggPrelude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,437
Received 591 Likes on 427 Posts
On one hand, I wish I had gotten the 6-MT...but then I look around at how much it costs to replace the clutch and I'm like . Thanks but no thanks. I'm trying to get my RL J-Pipe sold so I can get the CT Icebox for my car next.
Old 12-30-2014, 10:21 AM
  #7  
Subsonic
 
Teddybear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 743
Received 51 Likes on 43 Posts
OP, would you say the power band moved up? do you feel more low end torque (below 3k) with the jpipe alone?
Old 01-02-2015, 03:22 PM
  #8  
Cruisin'
 
MiguelY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 15
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Any chance you can post an audio clip of this combo? I am curious about the sound of the icebox. But I am looking for lots of induction noise, kind of leaning toward the takeda.
Old 01-06-2015, 11:58 AM
  #9  
CLS^6
Thread Starter
 
suspekt360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 262
Received 30 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by Teddybear
OP, would you say the power band moved up? do you feel more low end torque (below 3k) with the jpipe alone?
I have no empirical data to back this up, but my thoughts are:
- J Pipe added power at top of power band. No power was lost but low rpm throttle response was slightly affected making an impression of lost torque.

- CT Icebox restored throttle response and added a bit of power throughout powerband

My general concern right now is that the ECU might be undoing the gains.

I think both mods are worth it depending on what your goal is. My goals were:
1. Bring the character of the engine out more without making it obnoxious
--> accomplished. You cannot tell anything is modded on the car unless you give it some throttle and rev over 3,000rpm

2. Get the car to make more power when being wound out
--> accomplished. The car is way more fun to wind out through a few gears especially over 5,000rpm
The following users liked this post:
Teddybear (01-06-2015)
Old 01-06-2015, 12:00 PM
  #10  
CLS^6
Thread Starter
 
suspekt360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 262
Received 30 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by MiguelY
Any chance you can post an audio clip of this combo? I am curious about the sound of the icebox. But I am looking for lots of induction noise, kind of leaning toward the takeda.
Cant place a clip but induction noise is minimal. Because I had the J pipe first, I cannot discern the difference between the intake sound of the Icebox versus J Pipe alone. The combo definitely sounds mean when you want it.

I would recommend the Takeda to you if you want that classic J series wail however it might not give you much gain.
Old 01-08-2015, 03:22 PM
  #11  
Panda
 
Pandayo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 48
Received 18 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by suspekt360
I am happy to report both mods are now done.

To recap:
- bought 2009 TL SH about 2 months ago (waited about 3 years since my CLS6 was written off).
- added XLR8 V2 J pipe about 2 weeks ago
- added CT icebox today

So far, very pleased. I would say mid range torque "without a doubt" has been noticeably increased. The j pipe definitely let the car rev harder and the icebox has made the car feel snappier. With the icebox, I can tell that right after a gear shift is completed, the car surges easier.

I will provide a more comprehensive review in the coming days.

The biggest issue with the car truly is........ It isn't a 6 speed manual.
These cars/motors beg for a close ratio 6 speed manual.

No matter what you do, after the 3rd gear is maxed, the party is over.

I have put easily 2,000 miles (Several round trips from Victoria BC to Port Alberni BC on Vancouver Island) on the car the past 4 weeks in some severe conditions (mountains, significant rain, snow) so feel that I know the character of the gearbox and engine well now.

I will provide a fuller review soon.

Next mod: Lightweight pulley. Let me know if anyone feels this is a bad idea. On the CLS6, it was a nice improvement to the reviness of the motor.

Nice! I'm looking to put in the RV6 jpipe and PCDs in the next few months. If you're looking, I've got a brand new UR lightened crank pulley for sale if you're interested.
Old 01-08-2015, 03:39 PM
  #12  
CLS^6
Thread Starter
 
suspekt360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 262
Received 30 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by Pandayo
Nice! I'm looking to put in the RV6 jpipe and PCDs in the next few months. If you're looking, I've got a brand new UR lightened crank pulley for sale if you're interested.
Interested in the pulley. I live in Van, BC too. PM me
Old 01-09-2015, 12:43 PM
  #13  
Drifting
iTrader: (1)
 
ucf_bronco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Orlando, FL
Age: 43
Posts: 2,364
Received 554 Likes on 387 Posts
Originally Posted by Pandayo
Nice! I'm looking to put in the RV6 jpipe and PCDs in the next few months. If you're looking, I've got a brand new UR lightened crank pulley for sale if you're interested.
This is on my list too. Just curious, why are you not installing it?
Old 01-11-2015, 03:25 PM
  #14  
Team Owner
iTrader: (2)
 
Steven Bell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO (Overland Park, KS)
Posts: 36,545
Received 6,470 Likes on 5,162 Posts
Old 01-12-2015, 11:36 AM
  #15  
Panda
 
Pandayo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 48
Received 18 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by ucf_bronco
This is on my list too. Just curious, why are you not installing it?
Wasn't sure if I wanted it installed then I just never got around to it.
Old 01-21-2015, 04:41 PM
  #16  
Drifting
 
23109VC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Age: 52
Posts: 2,112
Received 103 Likes on 79 Posts
do a sound clip / video and upload it!
Old 01-23-2015, 11:51 AM
  #17  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
MrHeeltoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pac Northwest
Posts: 6,944
Received 509 Likes on 323 Posts
The pulley is one of those great "invisible" mods. You get the benefit of a bit more acceleration without NVH drawbacks! I'd install it Have one on my MDX and think it was a good addition.
Old 01-23-2015, 12:48 PM
  #18  
Drifting
 
23109VC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Age: 52
Posts: 2,112
Received 103 Likes on 79 Posts
how much does the pulley cost / how much to get installed?

any possible risks / harms to the car/engine by installing a pulley on a TL?
Old 01-23-2015, 06:19 PM
  #19  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
MrHeeltoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pac Northwest
Posts: 6,944
Received 509 Likes on 323 Posts
They are a couple hundred bucks:
http://www.heeltoeauto.com/xlr8-performance-stock-diameter-crankshaft-pulley-2009-14-acura-tl-fwd-sh-awd-ua8-ua9.html

You'll get a lot of people giving you warnings but on your modern Honda engine there is literally NOTHING that should keep you from doing it. They don't hurt the engine.
The following users liked this post:
ExcelerateRep (01-28-2015)
Old 01-23-2015, 07:28 PM
  #20  
CLS^6
Thread Starter
 
suspekt360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 262
Received 30 Likes on 21 Posts
Ran LW pulleys on my CLS6 no problems whatsoever. Made the car rev easier without a doubt.

However on the TL, Honda has already lightened up the crank pulley quite a bit over the J32. Therefore, I feel the returns are diminishing.
Old 01-28-2015, 11:38 AM
  #21  
Former Sponsor
 
ExcelerateRep's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Branford, CT
Posts: 2,228
Received 350 Likes on 287 Posts
As Heeltoe said, our lightweight aluminum crank pulley is a great addition and won't cause any harm or imbalances.

XLR8 Aluminum Pulleys - Excelerate Performance - Japanese and European Performance Specialists!!
Old 04-16-2015, 03:24 AM
  #22  
Pro
 
CruzanTLSH-AWD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Age: 39
Posts: 606
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by suspekt360
I have no empirical data to back this up, but my thoughts are:
- J Pipe added power at top of power band. No power was lost but low rpm throttle response was slightly affected making an impression of lost torque.

- CT Icebox restored throttle response and added a bit of power throughout powerband

My general concern right now is that the ECU might be undoing the gains.

I think both mods are worth it depending on what your goal is. My goals were:
1. Bring the character of the engine out more without making it obnoxious
--> accomplished. You cannot tell anything is modded on the car unless you give it some throttle and rev over 3,000rpm

2. Get the car to make more power when being wound out
--> accomplished. The car is way more fun to wind out through a few gears especially over 5,000rpm
Do you feel the J pipe was worth after these few months?
Old 04-16-2015, 11:03 AM
  #23  
CLS^6
Thread Starter
 
suspekt360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 262
Received 30 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by CruzanTLSH-AWD
Do you feel the J pipe was worth after these few months?
Short answer: Yes
- stock exhaust just sounds so much better
- climbing through the revs sounds so much better
- can't comment on power increase because I've had it on literally since I bought the car
- I would do the j pipe again a heartbeat. Especially if you want an exhaust upgrade without swapping out the car back
- note: I paid under $300 for mine but am so curious to swap it out and try the RV6 one.

Also, I love the CT Icebox. If nothing else, it makes the car sound right.

I think both mods together just make the car more enjoyable. The sounds they make TOGETHER are subtle when you want and aggressive when you want.

I will post a video of a tunnel run sometime soon.
The following users liked this post:
JDMCRX (04-22-2015)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
copmagnet82
4G TL Problems & Fixes
5
06-29-2016 08:09 AM
ExcelerateRep
4G TL Performance Parts & Modifications
8
10-14-2015 08:20 AM
AJRozsa
4G TL (2009-2014)
7
10-05-2015 07:50 PM
c1souk
5G TLX (2015-2020)
17
09-28-2015 11:20 AM
saturno_v
5G TLX (2015-2020)
21
09-27-2015 08:13 AM



Quick Reply: SH-AWD with J-pipe + CT Icebox



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:53 AM.