Used TL FWD costing more than SH-AWD?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-03-2023, 02:19 AM
  #1  
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
CraigRL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 27
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Used TL FWD costing more than SH-AWD?

We have been looking this past week at Gen 4 TL models (particularly 2012-2014) and have been surprised in several cases: the best deals seem to be on the comparatively rare SH-AWD models, coming in at a couple grand less than comparatively equipped/mileage FWD models. I'm in the Los Angeles area, where AWD isn't a necessary feature. (We were at 81 on Christmas Day while the nation froze!)

Outside of weather demands that might otherwise drive AWD pricing higher in "weather" parts of the country, can anyone surmise as to why SH-AWD versions (circa 2013) would be bargains compared to the FWD standard versions? Are there increased repair costs once the RDXs reach a decade in age or certain mileage? Is this related to the 3.7 engine oil consumption problems?

Also, is there anyone who, having bought a SH-AWD, wished that you had bought FWD instead?

Thank you for any input!
Old 01-03-2023, 10:29 AM
  #2  
Safety Car
 
BROlando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,778
Received 1,184 Likes on 891 Posts
The SH AWD system aids handling. Its not just a "bad weather" AWD.

Usually, apples to apples, SH AWD cars cost a bit more than FWD.

The 3.5 in FWD cars is less problematic, though. And the FWD gas mileage is better (which is why they may be more expensive in CA at the moment).

The FWD ride quality is also softer and more forgiving.
The following users liked this post:
altair47 (01-03-2023)
Old 01-08-2023, 07:32 PM
  #3  
Intermediate
 
Joblack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Age: 51
Posts: 39
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Aside from 3.7 oil consumption issues the AWD system has a very expensive prop shaft driving the back wheels. When the non serviceable centre bearing fails the whole prop shaft requires replacement. With no aftermarket support that has a dealer cost around $1800 Cdn up here in Canada. I bought my car because it has a manual transmission and am very happy with it. The front wheel drive auto would be a very nice ride as well.
Old 02-15-2023, 10:18 PM
  #4  
Pro
 
mossman77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 693
Received 48 Likes on 44 Posts
As others have said, the 3.7L engine in the SHAWD burns oil. Steer clear and get the 3.5L FWD model.
Old 02-16-2023, 02:10 PM
  #5  
Racer
 
dregsfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 447
Received 93 Likes on 71 Posts
I'd ask for documentation that the oil consumption repair (new rings and piston crowns) has been performed. If it has, oil burning is no longer an issue to be concerned about.
Old 02-16-2023, 03:01 PM
  #6  
Racer
 
vertigo2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 344
Received 108 Likes on 92 Posts
Originally Posted by mossman77
As others have said, the 3.7L engine in the SHAWD burns oil. Steer clear and get the 3.5L FWD model.
If you just need A to B transportation, sure, but if you care about the drive the AWD models are a much better choice.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Skirmich
1/2G MDX (2001-2013)
6
12-16-2017 03:32 PM
PiFive
4G TL (2009-2014)
25
07-18-2017 02:26 PM
kar90z
4G TL (2009-2014)
78
04-24-2015 03:12 PM
vhtran
5G TLX (2015-2020)
24
09-30-2014 05:19 PM
TampaRLX-SH
2G RL (2005-2012)
10
11-06-2007 06:15 PM



Quick Reply: Used TL FWD costing more than SH-AWD?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:10 PM.