TL in snow? Otherwise MDX or ZDX better?
#1
TL in snow? Otherwise MDX or ZDX better?
So I'm about to graduate (Bachelors in Nursing) and I start my new job in January. I'm lucky enough to have nailed down a job in the ER and ICU for Night shifts, which means I get every differential known to man, have no kids, and thanks to the government- minimal debt. I'm not saving for a house because I don't know what grad school I want to go to, and if I would be staying in that area for an extended period of time. Unfortunately, I am the only person with a car (and a job) out of most of my friends. Half are in med-school and the other half are interns. So I know I can't drive a 2-seater as I'd like to haul people around occasionally for fun (2 hour distance tops). Plus, they've complained enough about my Civic Coupe.
I know I want an Acura. I just love the feature/tech:price ratio compared to German cars. Curious if anyone has any TL Snow driving experience, as I live in Wisconsin where we get up to a foot of snow...
I guess my issue is that I should plan on getting the TL SH-AWD Tech...but when I look at the MSRP, it's just so close to the MDX Tech Package ($3k is negligible to me). And then when I hear that the ZDX's are going for MDX prices, those becomes even more intriguing. Especially with that increased ground clearance. The gas mileage SUCKS though, which why I'm trying to convince myself the TL is a better decision. Also that mom-mobile factor, as I am a dude...but black MDX's still look classy.
I've come to realize that my wants are drive-ability in snow (because I have to drive to work when the plows haven't even started yet), luxury, and technology.
Any thoughts on the snow issue (besides snow tires) or input on this model decision? I don't know anyone with a TL that has snow experience so I thought I'd ask you guys. Thanks.
I know I want an Acura. I just love the feature/tech:price ratio compared to German cars. Curious if anyone has any TL Snow driving experience, as I live in Wisconsin where we get up to a foot of snow...
I guess my issue is that I should plan on getting the TL SH-AWD Tech...but when I look at the MSRP, it's just so close to the MDX Tech Package ($3k is negligible to me). And then when I hear that the ZDX's are going for MDX prices, those becomes even more intriguing. Especially with that increased ground clearance. The gas mileage SUCKS though, which why I'm trying to convince myself the TL is a better decision. Also that mom-mobile factor, as I am a dude...but black MDX's still look classy.
I've come to realize that my wants are drive-ability in snow (because I have to drive to work when the plows haven't even started yet), luxury, and technology.
Any thoughts on the snow issue (besides snow tires) or input on this model decision? I don't know anyone with a TL that has snow experience so I thought I'd ask you guys. Thanks.
#2
Racer
In my opinion the TL is lighter and lower center of gravity, so it should do the best.
BUT. and this is a big BUT.
The MDX has better ground clearence. so if you are in more than 6 inches of show you want to be in the MDX.
BUT. and this is a big BUT.
The MDX has better ground clearence. so if you are in more than 6 inches of show you want to be in the MDX.
The following users liked this post:
Deltaflaze (10-31-2011)
#3
grats on the degree man! My cousin just graduated as BSN, he's going to work in mid November. He's also deciding between CRNA or NP for the future. That's a good career, however I hate the hospital environment so I went with the teeth instead :P
I don't know much about driving in snow but all my friends up north own a SUV. I think the RDX/MDX will fit you perfectly.
I don't know much about driving in snow but all my friends up north own a SUV. I think the RDX/MDX will fit you perfectly.
The following users liked this post:
Deltaflaze (11-01-2011)
#4
Hey Thanks - I'm looking into the same things. ER/ICU opens up lots of options. Hah - yeah... I wasn't as good with my teeth when I was young, figured it was kinda like some really skinny person being a chef. Doesn't work.
Yeah, I'm hoping the 2013 RDX looks good...waiting for that camo to come off...but yeah, just hate thinking I'm gonna get around 17mpg's from the MDX in the middle of the summer when it's 90 degrees out and I wanna gun it. But that ground clearance is going to be huge when I have to get into work throughout the winter months...
Yeah, I'm hoping the 2013 RDX looks good...waiting for that camo to come off...but yeah, just hate thinking I'm gonna get around 17mpg's from the MDX in the middle of the summer when it's 90 degrees out and I wanna gun it. But that ground clearance is going to be huge when I have to get into work throughout the winter months...
#5
Racer
In Seattle we don't get a ton of snow, but in the past two years we've had more snow than usual, I've been very impressed with the drive-ability of the TL in the snow and ice, especially since I purchased snow tires last year, I was able to drive on the notoriously bad hills full of snow and ice and I wasn't deterred at all with the SH-AWD working. That being said I'm not familiar with Wisonsin winters. If you need ground clearance, the MDX is the way to go, but both options have SH-AWD so whichever one you choose should handle admirably in the snow
#6
grats on the degree man! My cousin just graduated as BSN, he's going to work in mid November. He's also deciding between CRNA or NP for the future. That's a good career, however I hate the hospital environment so I went with the teeth instead :P
I don't know much about driving in snow but all my friends up north own a SUV. I think the RDX/MDX will fit you perfectly.
I don't know much about driving in snow but all my friends up north own a SUV. I think the RDX/MDX will fit you perfectly.
Trending Topics
#8
Racer
The RDX AWD Turbo might be a good choice. BTW, the turbo goes away in 2013. You should be able to find a clean 2009-2010 model with low mileage for a very good price ... $24-26k depending.
#9
Three Wheelin'
iTrader: (1)
You won't be disappointed with anything rocking the SH-AWD system - basically the same on the current generation MDX/ZDX/TL.
I had a prior gen MDX (02) with the AWD (pre SH-AWD) that was still very good. The ground clearance might be bonus if you're getting more than 6-8 inches of snow.
I had a prior gen MDX (02) with the AWD (pre SH-AWD) that was still very good. The ground clearance might be bonus if you're getting more than 6-8 inches of snow.
#10
Rich and Famous
I have owned and driven TL and MDX in snow and sun areas.
The TL is good in light snow but not heavy.
Low ground clearance and lightness is why its not a great snow mobile.
This car was made for sunbelt touring.
The MDX is great in snow with its clearance and weight.
Of course its heavy and more expensive.
You should pick based more on your style - SUV or Sport Sedan.
But based on where you live ... MDX is a better choice.
I would consider a ZD but again your need for clearance is clear.
The TL is good in light snow but not heavy.
Low ground clearance and lightness is why its not a great snow mobile.
This car was made for sunbelt touring.
The MDX is great in snow with its clearance and weight.
Of course its heavy and more expensive.
You should pick based more on your style - SUV or Sport Sedan.
But based on where you live ... MDX is a better choice.
I would consider a ZD but again your need for clearance is clear.
#11
#12
Racer
In Seattle we don't get a ton of snow, but in the past two years we've had more snow than usual, I've been very impressed with the drive-ability of the TL in the snow and ice, especially since I purchased snow tires last year, I was able to drive on the notoriously bad hills full of snow and ice and I wasn't deterred at all with the SH-AWD working. That being said I'm not familiar with Wisonsin winters. If you need ground clearance, the MDX is the way to go, but both options have SH-AWD so whichever one you choose should handle admirably in the snow
What kind of snow tires, and how much did they run you?
Thanks!
#13
I am in Wisconsin and did not have any issues with my SH-AWD TL last winter. However I was not that impressed either. I was told by the dealer and others that snow tires make a big difference and the dealer in Milwaukee has snow tire packages with wheels.
MGG
MGG
#14
Autofahrer
Deltaflaze,
I used to live in Madison, and let me tell you: the TL works fine, But... and that's a big BUT: the roads in Dane County just suck donkey-balls.
Now I live closer to Chicago, and it's not much better there.
Anyways,
no probs with the SH-AWD, even without winter-tires and the standard M&S, even though I'll buy some winter-tires this year!
Don't forget,
it's not just because of the snow and their profile: the rubber-mixture is different as well and works waaaaay better in those icy badass Mid-West-Winters.
I used to live in Madison, and let me tell you: the TL works fine, But... and that's a big BUT: the roads in Dane County just suck donkey-balls.
Now I live closer to Chicago, and it's not much better there.
Anyways,
no probs with the SH-AWD, even without winter-tires and the standard M&S, even though I'll buy some winter-tires this year!
Don't forget,
it's not just because of the snow and their profile: the rubber-mixture is different as well and works waaaaay better in those icy badass Mid-West-Winters.
#15
Awesome - thanks all for the replies. It sounds like it's coming down to ground clearance. I guess I'm just nervous since I'll be working nights and I have to drive on county roads to get in to downtown Madison and it will be either starting at 7pm or 11pm shifts.
So many experiences of being almost stranded with my Civic coupe - then again that thing is like a hockey puck on ice. Good to hear the TL does well in the snow otherwise.
So many experiences of being almost stranded with my Civic coupe - then again that thing is like a hockey puck on ice. Good to hear the TL does well in the snow otherwise.
#16
I have a TL and a MDX and I live in Vancouver. The TL is WAY more fun to drive, but whenever I head up to Whistler, I'm always glad to have the MDX. But, that being said, I would wait for the re-design of the MDX.
#17
Beeper - thanks, I completely agree about re-design. Just hoping that the 2013 model will be the new one. I'd prefer not to wait another year after next winter. Maybe I'll get a used TL and play with it all summer till the 2013 MDX's come out before winter. =P
#18
Autofahrer
Again,the roads in Dane County suck and you know that.
Don't worry about the clearance, it's the suspension which counts. The TL is harder than the MDX...
Go to Zimbrick and test-drive them around there.
Don't use the beltline or downtownm those are newly paved.
Go up Fish-hatchery towards Fitchburg, so you hear the "clongs" .
Don't worry about the clearance, it's the suspension which counts. The TL is harder than the MDX...
Go to Zimbrick and test-drive them around there.
Don't use the beltline or downtownm those are newly paved.
Go up Fish-hatchery towards Fitchburg, so you hear the "clongs" .
The following users liked this post:
Deltaflaze (11-01-2011)
#19
Team Owner
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO (Overland Park, KS)
Posts: 36,545
Received 6,470 Likes
on
5,162 Posts
My 3G is front wheel drive and handles well in snow, but I still wish I had an SH-AWD.
#20
Also, OP, I know you said the $3k difference doesn't mean that much to you, but also compare things like gas mileage... I think the MDX is probably the best looking vehicle Acura makes, but God that's some sucky mileage. You'll keep paying for it after buying it and the difference will be more than $3k. lol.
#21
I haven't had much issue in the freakish snow and ice that hit Dallas every once in a while in my 3G, either.
Also, OP, I know you said the $3k difference doesn't mean that much to you, but also compare things like gas mileage... I think the MDX is probably the best looking vehicle Acura makes, but God that's some sucky mileage. You'll keep paying for it after buying it and the difference will be more than $3k. lol.
Also, OP, I know you said the $3k difference doesn't mean that much to you, but also compare things like gas mileage... I think the MDX is probably the best looking vehicle Acura makes, but God that's some sucky mileage. You'll keep paying for it after buying it and the difference will be more than $3k. lol.
#22
Racer
The MDX gets poor gas mileage but it is a very good car to drive and live in. It's pretty fast with the 6 speed, but its definetely not as light or tossable as the TL.
#23
Deltaflaze,
as someone who owns both (RDX & TL) I can say I'd much rather drive the TL. My lady was the primary driver on the RDX, until we bought the TL, now I never get to drive it. It is just a faster, better handling vehicle. It will run circles around the RDX, and I've driven the MDX, it's a truck.
The TL is the best vehicle in the current Acura line IMHO.
as someone who owns both (RDX & TL) I can say I'd much rather drive the TL. My lady was the primary driver on the RDX, until we bought the TL, now I never get to drive it. It is just a faster, better handling vehicle. It will run circles around the RDX, and I've driven the MDX, it's a truck.
The TL is the best vehicle in the current Acura line IMHO.
#24
I'm excited to see how the Acura TL AWD handles a Minneapolis winter. I'm used to driving Jeeps and Subarus, and except for the Wrangler they were great in the snow. If the snow is deep, we'll be parking the TL and taking the Outback with snow tires out instead.
#25
#27
Burning Brakes
With the recent blizzards on the east coast, I can understand the sentiment, especially when the snow is above your bumper.
When he said that to me, it was just after I purchased my G. Going from a Subaru to a G I was kind of wondering the same thing. In this regard the TL and G are equals in how they make through deep, deep snow.
Last edited by g37guy01; 11-03-2011 at 09:50 PM.
#28
Until the snow is dragging the undercarriage, they're very similar, once the snow is dragging the undercarriage they're very similar, but the snow starts dragging the undercarriage a bit sooner on the TL.
I'm sure the MDX is nice, but if I were worried that a TL weren't enough for the conditions, I would probably skip over the MDX and find something with a little more clearance and that was compatible with some more serious rubber.
(I also personally wouldn't buy cars as heavy as either the TL or the MDX with transversely oriented automatic transaxles, so for me it would be a manual TL only)
I'm sure the MDX is nice, but if I were worried that a TL weren't enough for the conditions, I would probably skip over the MDX and find something with a little more clearance and that was compatible with some more serious rubber.
(I also personally wouldn't buy cars as heavy as either the TL or the MDX with transversely oriented automatic transaxles, so for me it would be a manual TL only)
#29
Racer
I have a BSN (Temple U class of 97) as well. CONGRATS!!!
I have a 2010 6MT AWD with the 19 inch rims (from the summer wheels package) fitted with michelin pilot sport all seasons. it was HORRIBLE in the snow...
...but, after I bought winter tires from tire rack, it was perfect...so i guess it was all about the tires
I have a 2010 6MT AWD with the 19 inch rims (from the summer wheels package) fitted with michelin pilot sport all seasons. it was HORRIBLE in the snow...
...but, after I bought winter tires from tire rack, it was perfect...so i guess it was all about the tires
The following users liked this post:
Litt (11-03-2011)
#30
My coworker has a recent model, think 2010, with sh-awd. Says he's getting rid of it, because he wants a better snow car.
With the recent blizzards on the east coast, I can understand the sentiment, especially when the snow is above your bumper.
When he said that to me, it was just after I purchased my G. Going from a Subaru to a G I was kind of wondering the same thing. In this regard the TL and G are equals in how they make through deep, deep snow.
With the recent blizzards on the east coast, I can understand the sentiment, especially when the snow is above your bumper.
When he said that to me, it was just after I purchased my G. Going from a Subaru to a G I was kind of wondering the same thing. In this regard the TL and G are equals in how they make through deep, deep snow.
#31
6G TLX-S
^^^^^ Low ground clearance is a major disadvantage for sedans in deep snow when compared to the high hanging SUV's/trucks.
#32
Burning Brakes
^^^ That's why the op has to decided if a sedan or something else is warranted for his situation. You can probably "make it through" any winter with any car.
#33
Drifting
This - the car is amazing in the snow - get some winter tires if you are really concerned, but I often am out in the snow when others who have SUV's are not.
#34
Senior Moderator
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,641
Received 2,329 Likes
on
1,309 Posts
If you need the ground clearance and interior space, the MDX is a great choice. Otherwise I don't see the TL, especially with AWD being a bad choice at all. Snow tires make or break a vehicle's performance in inclement weather.
After all, you wouldn't wear construction boots to a dance. Get all the traction you can get to start, stop and corner. In addition, snow tires stay malleable and grippy in cold weather. All seasons and especially performance tires might as well be hockey pucks.
After all, you wouldn't wear construction boots to a dance. Get all the traction you can get to start, stop and corner. In addition, snow tires stay malleable and grippy in cold weather. All seasons and especially performance tires might as well be hockey pucks.
The following users liked this post:
Mr Marco (11-07-2011)
#36
TL SH-AWD with four snows goes through about anything. Also four snows stop much better than the all season tires.
Steve
#37
Grandpa
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia, Besieged
Age: 68
Posts: 7,596
Received 2,609 Likes
on
1,475 Posts
We had a very bad winter in Virginia last year, and my car did wonderfully.
The only thing I wonder about is that you said, "...before the plows." So I'll just mention, as another poster did, the higher ground clearance of the ZDX and MDX.
Since you are alone, you probably can consider the ZDX more seriously than most of us would. The back seat of a ZDX is hopeless except for children, it seems to me.
The driving experience of the TL will be better than that of either the MDX or ZDX. They have some of the better McPherson designs out there, but they can't keep up with an SH-AWD TL in a hurry.
The only thing I wonder about is that you said, "...before the plows." So I'll just mention, as another poster did, the higher ground clearance of the ZDX and MDX.
Since you are alone, you probably can consider the ZDX more seriously than most of us would. The back seat of a ZDX is hopeless except for children, it seems to me.
The driving experience of the TL will be better than that of either the MDX or ZDX. They have some of the better McPherson designs out there, but they can't keep up with an SH-AWD TL in a hurry.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
IIDXholic
3G RLX (2013+)
23
10-19-2015 09:40 PM