Stock brake rotor diamter: anyone have it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-21-2010, 04:05 PM
  #1  
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
MrHeeltoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pac Northwest
Posts: 6,944
Received 509 Likes on 323 Posts
Stock brake rotor diamter: anyone have it?

Need this measurement in mm. We have some parts in the works.
Old 06-21-2010, 06:08 PM
  #2  
Trolling Canuckistan
 
black label's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 100 Legends Way, Boston, MA 02114
Age: 50
Posts: 10,453
Received 811 Likes on 644 Posts
2010 model....
12.6" ventilated front
13.2" solid rear

It's the same on front track and SHAWD.

Now get to work and build us something

edit, just realized you asked for it in metric, hmmm, would you trust a conversion table or do want a from the factory spec in mm?

Last edited by black label; 06-21-2010 at 06:11 PM.
Old 06-21-2010, 06:13 PM
  #3  
Trolling Canuckistan
 
black label's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 100 Legends Way, Boston, MA 02114
Age: 50
Posts: 10,453
Received 811 Likes on 644 Posts
Take 2:

Front Brake Rotors 12.6 in (320 mm) diameter ventilated rotor; 1.1 in (28 mm)
rotor thickness; functional front mounted cooling ducts

Rear Brake Rotors 13.1 in (334 mm) diameter solid disc; 0.43 in (11 mm) rotor thickness

http://www.hondanews.com/categories/733/releases/5192
Old 06-21-2010, 10:12 PM
  #4  
Advanced
 
Scotten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago Burbs
Posts: 73
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Okay, why is the rear larger (diameter and thickness) than the fronts? I've never seen that on (m)any cars, and likely only rear engine Porsche 911's.
Old 06-22-2010, 09:47 AM
  #5  
Trolling Canuckistan
 
black label's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 100 Legends Way, Boston, MA 02114
Age: 50
Posts: 10,453
Received 811 Likes on 644 Posts
Originally Posted by Scotten
Okay, why is the rear larger (diameter and thickness) than the fronts? I've never seen that on (m)any cars, and likely only rear engine Porsche 911's.
I don't have a good answer for that one. Typically your front brakes provide about 80% of your stopping power. Even on a rear or mid engine Porsche the front rotors are typically larger than the rears.
Old 06-22-2010, 10:30 AM
  #6  
Suzuka Master
 
KeithL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 63
Posts: 5,172
Received 740 Likes on 435 Posts
Originally Posted by Scotten
Okay, why is the rear larger (diameter and thickness) than the fronts? I've never seen that on (m)any cars, and likely only rear engine Porsche 911's.
Maybe becasue theyre solid and don't dissapate the heat as well
Old 06-24-2010, 08:32 AM
  #7  
Grandpa
 
George Knighton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia, Besieged
Age: 68
Posts: 7,596
Received 2,609 Likes on 1,475 Posts
Originally Posted by Scotten
Okay, why is the rear larger (diameter and thickness) than the fronts? I've never seen that on (m)any cars, and likely only rear engine Porsche 911's.
It's not very well publicised, but the 4G TL has a more or less "active" anti-nose dive system that helps the car to make better use of the braking force on the rear, so you need rotors and calipers big enough to make such use of the braking force.

You don't really need the rears to be ventilated, because even though they're going to be taking more heat than regular cars, they're not going to be taking as much heat as the front rotors, and won't really need to be ventilated to dissipate heat...and even if you wanted to go to vented rotors you'd have a hard time directing air to them properly.

Especially with the 6-6 version of the car when it is being used in high performance applications, you really want enough braking force on the rear to keep the nose up and control the car's attitude when trail braking and other high performance use.

I don't know if you guys have noticed or not, but the 6-6 stops amazingly well for a two-tonne car, even in repeated applications on the track.

And turning off VSA does exactly what you'd expect and what you'd want it to do. :-)
Old 06-24-2010, 08:33 AM
  #8  
Grandpa
 
George Knighton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia, Besieged
Age: 68
Posts: 7,596
Received 2,609 Likes on 1,475 Posts
Also, for whatever it is worth, we basically totally de-bunked the theories about the uselessness of the rear brakes in Honda Challenge.

People learned very quickly that the rear brakes are very, very important.
Old 06-24-2010, 11:20 AM
  #9  
Advanced
 
Scotten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago Burbs
Posts: 73
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by George Knighton
Also, for whatever it is worth, we basically totally de-bunked the theories about the uselessness of the rear brakes in Honda Challenge.

People learned very quickly that the rear brakes are very, very important.
When I tracked my S2000 (yes, I miss it), I went through (stock) rear pads much quicker than front, but that's not uncommon. I'm pretty sure they went for small and quiet pads which are fine for the street but not repeated hard braking.
Old 06-24-2010, 11:34 AM
  #10  
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
MrHeeltoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pac Northwest
Posts: 6,944
Received 509 Likes on 323 Posts
Larger diameter brakes produce more brake torque. It increases the braking without changing the pad size or caliper.


I need to know if the front pads actually rub all the way to the extreme OD of the front rotor. The "OD of the friction circle" is probably the best way to say it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
yesSIR-S
Car Parts for Sale
11
05-13-2016 05:42 PM
mav888
1G RDX (2007-2012)
10
09-08-2015 11:49 AM
asahrts
Member Cars for Sale
0
09-04-2015 05:55 PM



Quick Reply: Stock brake rotor diamter: anyone have it?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:23 AM.