MPG Report - Actual vs TL Computer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-08-2013, 11:04 AM
  #1  
lmc
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
lmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 46
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
MPG Report - Actual vs TL Computer

CAR: TL Advanced AWD, 2013 Automatic

There was an earlier discussion about MPG actual versus trip computer numbers, and so I've done a detailed set of record keeping to report back.

Over the last couple of months, we've take some family trips around Oregon/Washington; and then just last week completed a round trip vacation from Portland, OR to LA and back.

Below is the table of stats, but here is a couple of conclusions: Car Trip Computer seems to be "under reporting" actual MPG about 5%. This conclusion is based on over 3,000 miles and 9 fillups.

Also, "pure" highway driving MPG will average over 28 MPG. This included mulitple climbs up to 4,000 ft mountain passes, mix of hot AC use and fresh air, two to three passengers and mix of speed limits of 65 and 75 MPH.

Also, in 60-65 MPH highway driving with BIG hills, no AC, 2 people, I get 29 MPG.

(I have the spreadsheet if anyone cares. Doing a table in the forum is messy.)

Attached is a Excel Text file and an image of the Excel data.


Gallons—Odometer--Calculated---Computer---driving--------Notes
------------------------MPG---------MPG--------Type
07.68-----2,557- ---First-official-tracking-entry---
15.26-----2,967-------26.9-----------25.6--------Mixed
10.26-----3,275-------30.0-----------28.3--------Hi-way---75-degrees-two-people,-some-freeway-traffic
13.10-----3,619-------26.3-----------25.1--------Hi-way---No-AC
15.60-----4,042-------27.1-----------26.4--------Hi-way---Some-mountains,-some-AC
13.86-----4,406-------26.3-----------25.7--------Hi-way---Some-Mountains,-AC
11.52-----4,646-------20.8-----------20.0--------Mixed ---LA-driving,-AC,-Traffic,-90-degrees
17.00----4,975--------19.4----------22.8---------City------LA-driving,-AC,-Traffic,-90-degrees,-2-hr-Traffic-Jam
12.25-----5,390-------33.9----------26.1--------Hi-way ---AC,-80-degrees
09.90----5,668--------28.1----------27.3--------Hi-way ---AC,-80-degrees

-------------Average--26.5----------25.3-

Attached Thumbnails MPG Report - Actual vs TL Computer-gas_mileage_record_tl.png  
Attached Files
The following 4 users liked this post by lmc:
C8N (10-04-2013), Georgiey22 (11-03-2018), jim_c (09-08-2013), TheOMan (09-09-2013)
Old 09-08-2013, 12:27 PM
  #2  
Advanced
 
jason60050's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
Yea the city mpg is pretty horrific...then again the hwy mileage is pretty good.
Old 09-08-2013, 12:31 PM
  #3  
Drifting
 
JM2010 SH-AWD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 2,383
Received 565 Likes on 364 Posts
Thanks. This is about what I get with my 6MT.

Although I have to say, I still believe it's really difficult to get an accurate reading with the "calculate by hand" method. Even if you use the same pump every time you fill up, depending on temperatures, how the pump is set up, how quickly it's filling the tank, etc., it's virtually impossible to ensure you're always filling it up to the same exact point every time. That is why I believe the on-board computer could be more accurate.

Either way, this is excellent mileage for a large, AWD, 305 hp car, no?
Old 09-08-2013, 12:44 PM
  #4  
Advanced
 
jason60050's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
I think the hwy mileage around 28-30 is fantastic. Having said that I think 19 in the city is pretty bad in my opinion. I drive 90% city and my computer has never gone over 20.3.
Old 09-08-2013, 02:19 PM
  #5  
Burning Brakes
 
jim_c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: ancaster ontario
Posts: 819
Received 124 Likes on 107 Posts
it's virtually impossible to ensure you're always filling it up to the same exact point every time.
That's true but the OP calculated the average over 3,000 miles which should make for a pretty accurate result.

That's quite impressive hwy mileage but it would be even better in Canada. Our "gallon" is 20% bigger! lol

Thanks for posting and doing the math!
The following users liked this post:
lmc (09-08-2013)
Old 09-08-2013, 03:15 PM
  #6  
Racer
 
amill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 357
Received 40 Likes on 33 Posts
I've noticed in my last few acura/honda products that their fuel consumption computer was the closest to "real world calculation" out of any cars I've ever owned. They do usually read a little low, but due to many factors they may be right. Either way, I average nowhere near that kind of mpg. I think the best I've ever gotten was 22.X mpg overall on a tank. I do drive about 60/40 city/highway.
Old 09-08-2013, 04:25 PM
  #7  
lmc
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
lmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 46
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by amill
Either way, I average nowhere near that kind of mpg. I think the best I've ever gotten was 22.X mpg overall on a tank. I do drive about 60/40 city/highway.
Note that my daily drive car is an electric Nissan Leaf. The TL is our weekend, long drive car. So no real city driving or short hops.
Old 09-08-2013, 06:06 PM
  #8  
Instructor
 
Cygnus_X1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 103
Received 20 Likes on 15 Posts
My 2013 TL gets about 14 mpg driving around town? I admit I mostly make short trips but even my 2007 Avalon got 20 mpg in the same environment? I think my next car will probably be a hybrid....maybe a TLX hybrid if they make one.
Old 09-09-2013, 10:48 AM
  #9  
Suzuka Master
 
Mr Marco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 8,490
Received 609 Likes on 493 Posts
Old 09-09-2013, 11:28 AM
  #10  
Racer
 
emanon256's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Displaced New Yorker living in Denver
Posts: 281
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by Cygnus_X1
My 2013 TL gets about 14 mpg driving around town? I admit I mostly make short trips but even my 2007 Avalon got 20 mpg in the same environment? I think my next car will probably be a hybrid....maybe a TLX hybrid if they make one.
I was getting 17-18mpg in town until I did the transmission software update, now I get around 14mpg in town. I figured the 2013 would be better with then 6 speed. My 3.2 1G TL got about 22Mpg and my S2000 got about 25Mpg.

I too am hoping for a TLX hybrid.
Old 09-09-2013, 11:36 AM
  #11  
Advanced
 
mightl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 95
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Thanks for sharing.
My computer mpg matched to my manual calculation in the first few thousand miles, hence I trusted it ever since. I'm surprised that some of yours presented huge gap in between. I guess it's about time for me to do some cross check at 20K.
Old 10-03-2013, 09:34 PM
  #12  
Burning Brakes
 
jim_c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: ancaster ontario
Posts: 819
Received 124 Likes on 107 Posts
I've been tracking my mileage and it seems that the trip computer result is very close to what I calculate "manually" with miles travelled over actual gas at fill-up. Computer seems to be very slightly lower than what I calculate. My question is :
Does anyone here understand how the car "knows" how much gas is being used? The trip computer calculates average consumption and also instantaneous consumption. How does it know the rate of gasoline usage? Does the ecu do an ongoing calculation of fuel flow through the injector system and integrate over time? It's pretty sophisticated.
I know there is a mass air flow sensor which feeds the ecu continually. Is there also a "fuel mass sensor"? It seems there must be, right? The computer must keep track of fuel usage over time during the course of a tankful of gas and save that data until it resets. (?)
Old 10-03-2013, 09:38 PM
  #13  
Burning Brakes
 
jim_c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: ancaster ontario
Posts: 819
Received 124 Likes on 107 Posts
And similarly, how does the computer know to set the "A" mileage odometer back to zero when you get gas? (If it's programmed to do so) Perhaps the gas guage in the tank sends a message to the computer to say that gas has been added, so go back to zero. (?) What if you just open and close the gas cap but do not add any gas. Would the computer be fooled into resetting? (I don't think so....) Just curious as to how the car does these tricks!
Old 10-03-2013, 10:01 PM
  #14  
Moderator
 
potmilkz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern Cali 626 area
Age: 36
Posts: 7,101
Received 1,021 Likes on 793 Posts
only resets if you add gas, not sure how much you need to add to make it reset but ive added half a tank and it reset on me..
ive always used this method..

if you arrive into a gas station with your gas light on, just look at mileage A for example 380, then pump your gas, see how much gallons you just pumped.. lets say 17 gallons, divide 17 gallons into 380 miles and you get your rough mpg. which should be about 22.35 mpg
The following users liked this post:
Georgiey22 (11-03-2018)
Old 10-03-2013, 10:07 PM
  #15  
Moderator
 
potmilkz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern Cali 626 area
Age: 36
Posts: 7,101
Received 1,021 Likes on 793 Posts
Originally Posted by jim_c
The computer must keep track of fuel usage over time during the course of a tankful of gas and save that data until it resets. (?)

i cant answer all your questions, but i can tell you what i set for my A and B sections of my display

A is for my tank of gas that i use till i fill up my next tank. it resets every time i fill up..

B is for my overall tanks of gas i use before i get my next oil change. Right now my B side has about 6000 miles which is rated at 23.4mpg. My B side shows my overall MPG over the course of many tanks of gas used.
Old 10-03-2013, 10:20 PM
  #16  
Racer
 
emanon256's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Displaced New Yorker living in Denver
Posts: 281
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
I do the exact same as Pot with my A and B. Also, I have topped it off before been down 3 or 4 gallons, but about to go on a long trip and filled it before I left, and my A still resets.

I listen to Car Talk religiously and they were recently saying that modern cars actually do have a fuel flow sensor that constantly monitors the volume of fuel as its being used. This is how they calculate the instant and average MPG, as well as miles until empty.

One thing I don't like about the TL is how the miles until empty jumps all over the place. Other cars I have driven use a much longer time frame to calculate it. When I am driving uphill, it can drop my 40 to 60 miles until empty and then when I am going back down hill, it jumps up my 50 to 100 miles until empty. I finally stopped using it and always keep the instant MPG up to try and use less fuel.
Old 10-03-2013, 11:40 PM
  #17  
lmc
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
lmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 46
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
I believe the "auto reset" with fill up is an option that can be turned on or off. I've got mine OFF so that I can capture all the data after pulling away from the pump to manually record the data.
Old 10-04-2013, 09:51 AM
  #18  
Touge Chaser
 
DefMunkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 340
Received 100 Likes on 80 Posts
Yes it can.

Trip B is my overall calculator throughout car ownership and Trip A is on Auto reset to calculate per tank.
Old 10-04-2013, 10:10 AM
  #19  
Racer
 
emanon256's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Displaced New Yorker living in Denver
Posts: 281
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by lmc
I believe the "auto reset" with fill up is an option that can be turned on or off. I've got mine OFF so that I can capture all the data after pulling away from the pump to manually record the data.
I pull it all while I am filling up and let it reset on its own. I'm a rebel, I ignore the signs that say do not get back into your car while filling up.
Old 10-04-2013, 12:27 PM
  #20  
Moderator
 
potmilkz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern Cali 626 area
Age: 36
Posts: 7,101
Received 1,021 Likes on 793 Posts
Originally Posted by emanon256
I pull it all while I am filling up and let it reset on its own. I'm a rebel, I ignore the signs that say do not get back into your car while filling up.

The following users liked this post:
emanon256 (10-04-2013)
Old 10-04-2013, 03:23 PM
  #21  
Burning Brakes
 
jim_c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: ancaster ontario
Posts: 819
Received 124 Likes on 107 Posts
Thanks for the replies. Yeah, I have mine set so A is the current tankful and B is the total since I got the car. I have the A set so that it rests at fillup. It takes a couple seconds after you put it in drive and start to pull away from the pumps, then it goes back to A=0. I was curious as to how the car can calculate fuel usage "on the fly". I guess as Emanon said, there must be a fuel flow sensor and the data is captured and saved by the trip computer.

The range until empty is just an estimate and it fluctuates because (I think) the computer figures what usage you are averaging now and how much fuel is left. Obviously if you drove very slowly your range might be 50 miles (e.g.) but if you drove faster the range would be reduced. If you coasted all the way the range would increase.
Old 10-04-2013, 05:32 PM
  #22  
Moderator
 
potmilkz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Southern Cali 626 area
Age: 36
Posts: 7,101
Received 1,021 Likes on 793 Posts
yea i think the "range" calculates realtime data as your driving.. im sure you notice when your light is on, it will say 50 range, then as you cruise or gas it you will see the range move up or down.
Old 10-05-2013, 12:11 AM
  #23  
an adult perspective
 
Six Shifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: York, Pa
Age: 72
Posts: 1,784
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts
in my experience, the computer calculation was always around .5 miles low when compared to the manual calculation. Also ... mine reset each/every time based on (I used to think) the simple removal of the gas cap ... although I never bothered to test it. However, I pulled the car up on racing ramps to install my Nexson grill, and when I backed off the ramps, the fuel gauge had reset, telling me the float play some part in the process.
The following users liked this post:
jim_c (10-05-2013)
Old 10-05-2013, 10:26 AM
  #24  
Advanced
 
sluzynsk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 77
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Six Shifter
in my experience, the computer calculation was always around .5 miles low when compared to the manual calculation. Also ... mine reset each/every time based on (I used to think) the simple removal of the gas cap ... although I never bothered to test it. However, I pulled the car up on racing ramps to install my Nexson grill, and when I backed off the ramps, the fuel gauge had reset, telling me the float play some part in the process.
I've had it reset when the level was low from coming off a steep hill, so I believe that the float resets it as well.
Old 10-05-2013, 10:30 AM
  #25  
Suzuka Master
 
Mr Marco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 8,490
Received 609 Likes on 493 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr Marco
I see cheif of delete has been trolling my posts again...


Old 07-09-2018, 09:03 AM
  #26  
Advanced
 
TLMDXRDX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Illinois
Age: 46
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
I will be getting my new RDX in another week or so and am curious if anyone that does mainly all city driving is getting near 21 MPG on the AWD model? My current 2010 MDX was rated 16 city and 20 highway and I am averaging just over 15 MPG for 95% city driving. I am hoping the new RDX will get me close to 20/21 for the same 95% city driving...but that might require I get rid of my lead foot.
Old 07-09-2018, 09:45 AM
  #27  
Latent car nut
iTrader: (2)
 
horseshoez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Southern New Hampshire
Age: 68
Posts: 7,853
Received 2,008 Likes on 1,410 Posts
Originally Posted by TLMDXRDX
I will be getting my new RDX in another week or so and am curious if anyone that does mainly all city driving is getting near 21 MPG on the AWD model? My current 2010 MDX was rated 16 city and 20 highway and I am averaging just over 15 MPG for 95% city driving. I am hoping the new RDX will get me close to 20/21 for the same 95% city driving...but that might require I get rid of my lead foot.
Hmmm, you might want to post in the appropriate area; you've just revived a 5-year old thread for an Acura TL.
Old 07-09-2018, 10:22 AM
  #28  
Drifting
iTrader: (1)
 
losiglow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Age: 42
Posts: 3,490
Received 852 Likes on 605 Posts


I think it's good to resurrect a thread if it's a pertinent comment. But I'm not sure yours has much to do with the original topic. I'd probably post in the general 3G RDX forum with your question. Not many 3G RDX'ers are going to be checking out the 4G TL forums.
Old 07-09-2018, 10:25 AM
  #29  
The inconvenient truth
 
dopeboy1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Age: 34
Posts: 1,449
Received 438 Likes on 323 Posts
Im sure he knows the difference between a new RDX and a 4G TL lol. This resurrection wreaks of being an infinite scroll victim.

But while were here I've started tracking my actual MPG and im at 17.5. All city with very short hops on the highway. Some vtec and reving.... not bad.

Last edited by dopeboy1; 07-09-2018 at 10:27 AM.
Old 07-09-2018, 10:36 AM
  #30  
Drifting
iTrader: (1)
 
losiglow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Age: 42
Posts: 3,490
Received 852 Likes on 605 Posts
That's not bad if you're pushing it a bit and in the city. I rarely get less than 25, even in the city. But I drive like a grandma 90% of the time and my "city" driving tends to be on less congested roads at lower speeds with traffic lights that are pretty well timed
Old 07-09-2018, 10:46 AM
  #31  
The inconvenient truth
 
dopeboy1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Age: 34
Posts: 1,449
Received 438 Likes on 323 Posts
I think I read that the sh-awd is rated at 18 mpg city. So im pretty happy with 17.5 considering how im driving. But dang 25mpg city is impressive. I know some of that is being FWD but that's still really good.
Old 07-09-2018, 11:26 AM
  #32  
Advanced
 
TLMDXRDX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Illinois
Age: 46
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by horseshoez
Hmmm, you might want to post in the appropriate area; you've just revived a 5-year old thread for an Acura TL.
Oh I am sorry. I thought I selected the 3G RDX forum. I will go back and try that one instead.
Old 11-02-2018, 06:31 PM
  #33  
Intermediate
 
Pearl77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Maryland
Posts: 41
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
After 1100 miles in my new Advance, I am getting about 24mpg (+or- about .5 mpg) on 93 Octane Top Tier gas, mostly in Comfort mode. This is mixed suburban/highway driving. I have made an effort not to "waste gas" by timing lights and otherwise driving carefully and only occasionally using the power. I am sure that I would get 2-3mpg less if I got on it more. Nice car that I like to drive, but it will not win any mpg contests against the best in this class.
Old 11-02-2018, 07:29 PM
  #34  
Latent car nut
iTrader: (2)
 
horseshoez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Southern New Hampshire
Age: 68
Posts: 7,853
Received 2,008 Likes on 1,410 Posts
Originally Posted by Pearl77
After 1100 miles in my new Advance, I am getting about 24mpg (+or- about .5 mpg) on 93 Octane Top Tier gas, mostly in Comfort mode. This is mixed suburban/highway driving. I have made an effort not to "waste gas" by timing lights and otherwise driving carefully and only occasionally using the power. I am sure that I would get 2-3mpg less if I got on it more. Nice car that I like to drive, but it will not win any mpg contests against the best in this class.
Interesting, I'm kind of surprised the newer cars get such low mileage; the absolute worst tank my 2006 TL has gotten is 27 mpg, and that was with a majority of bumper to bumper urban traffic.
Old 11-05-2018, 09:57 AM
  #35  
Drifting
iTrader: (1)
 
losiglow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Age: 42
Posts: 3,490
Received 852 Likes on 605 Posts
Originally Posted by horseshoez
Interesting, I'm kind of surprised the newer cars get such low mileage; the absolute worst tank my 2006 TL has gotten is 27 mpg, and that was with a majority of bumper to bumper urban traffic.
I frequently got >30MPG with my 3G 6MT. I've never gotten better than 27 in the 4G. But it's heavier and an automatic so that sort of explains it.
Old 11-05-2018, 12:40 PM
  #36  
dv-
Instructor
 
dv-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Age: 42
Posts: 160
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by losiglow
I frequently got >30MPG with my 3G 6MT. I've never gotten better than 27 in the 4G. But it's heavier and an automatic so that sort of explains it.
I'll get 31+ on long highway trips (4G 6AT FWD), but city driving kills it. :-(
Old 11-14-2018, 08:12 AM
  #37  
Intermediate
 
kickarsmann's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 44
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2009 TL (5AT) here averaging around 22-25mpg between traffic and highway. I get 27-28mpg highway.
Old 11-14-2018, 09:49 PM
  #38  
Advanced
 
mdb007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: OH (Ohio)
Age: 61
Posts: 72
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
My 12 I just bought was showing 26mpg going to Michigan from ohio while cruising into headwind at 80mph with cruise on. On way back was cruising at 74 and it went back to 28mpg and when I filled up that was what i got 28mpg for trip! So much better than my inefficient 07 maxima which got 24-25mpg on hwy and 22-23 around town. and with my 235lb weight pushes car to almost 4000lbs, that pretty good in my book.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jinkazetsukai
2G RL (2005-2012)
6
11-21-2015 05:28 PM
Sarlacc
Console & Computer Gaming
5
09-30-2015 02:15 PM
AcuraKidd
Non-Automotive & Motorcycle Sales
0
09-25-2015 11:18 PM



Quick Reply: MPG Report - Actual vs TL Computer



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:19 AM.