Does The 4G TL Ride Too Hard? (Try To Be Honest)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-09-2010, 01:04 PM
  #41  
Racer
 
TechnoCat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Pacific NorthWe(s)t
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by compewterbleu
(to MyCarIsntInMyWifesName )
Quick question, why are you on this board? Almost everything I've read that you right is negative about the 4G TL or you question someones positive views about it.
Wow! The FanBoy Attack!

Is it your opinion that this board has no place for facts or anything other than fawning opinion? Are you so insecure that you have to attack people for not seeing things as myopically as you do? Do you wear Depends under-garments for protection when you go out in public? Seriously, grow up! You will be exposed to dissenting opinions here; it's a discussion board, not (at least officially) a Kool-Aid board.
Old 06-09-2010, 01:06 PM
  #42  
Racer
 
TechnoCat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Pacific NorthWe(s)t
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by eazy
When your Audi gets electrical problems we'll see if reliability was your excuse
I've had three Audis and 14 years of Audi ownership. Never had any electrical issues. Very reliably cars in my experience. Though I do acknowledge that not everyone has this experience, they're still not bad.
Old 06-09-2010, 02:30 PM
  #43  
Mademoiselle Chanel!!
 
compewterbleu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: GA
Posts: 1,129
Received 43 Likes on 35 Posts
Originally Posted by TechnoCat
Wow! The FanBoy Attack!

Is it your opinion that this board has no place for facts or anything other than fawning opinion? Are you so insecure that you have to attack people for not seeing things as myopically as you do? Do you wear Depends under-garments for protection when you go out in public? Seriously, grow up! You will be exposed to dissenting opinions here; it's a discussion board, not (at least officially) a Kool-Aid board.

I think you mean does your attack...

Look, I'm not seeing things myopically nor do I wear depends nor am I insecure, funny how you counter with an attack. Or are you above the law? Call it a Fanboy attack if you like. I just noticed that someone who doesn't own a product is always the main amperage of heated debates. If you don't own the car then your view is limited by the fact you don't drive it daily. Perhaps you need to view other replies this person wrote and how others on the board were "attacked" and how this person knows no quit with the assaults when once again he doesn't own the product. As far as facts go from this individual where are they written as gospel. Thanks Technocat.
Old 06-09-2010, 05:01 PM
  #44  
Racer
 
TechnoCat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Pacific NorthWe(s)t
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by compewterbleu
I think you mean does your attack...
<snip>As far as facts go from this individual where are they written as gospel. Thanks Technocat.
I have no idea what any of that meant, so I'll just raise a drink in honor of spirited debate and conversation.

The TL isn't a perfect car. It is a pretty good car, but it has too many flaws to be a great car. The thread topic - the ride - is fine by me though a bit jittery. But Acura left out too many finishing touches for my taste. Meanwhile, Audi left out too much power in the A4 series (and a rational price in the S4), and BMW left out having units in stock and salesmen without rectally-embedded heads. No, no perfect cars out there.

Trouble is, there are a few board members here that view pointing out the TL limitations as inappropriate for this board. They reply with nonsense like, "Why did you buy it?" or "Why don't you sell it?" Not very friendly.
Old 06-09-2010, 05:16 PM
  #45  
Advanced
 
Jim 2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 85
Received 31 Likes on 12 Posts
Just curious--how does the SHAWD ride compare to the M3 or the S4?
Old 06-09-2010, 05:25 PM
  #46  
Three Wheelin'
 
PetesTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Chicago suburb, IL
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Jim 2004
Just curious--how does the SHAWD ride compare to the M3 or the S4?
I test drove a M3 last year and a S4 several months ago. I would say the M3 has a slightly better ride than the SH-AWD on most road conditions. Bumps and ruts are better damped in the M3 with no rattles or creaks whatsoever. This is what I love so much about BMW's.....their ability to balance ride and handling is so perfect in pretty much all their models. The S4 on the other hand, rode about the same as the SH-AWD in my opinion....that is, firm and somewhat jittery on uneven roads.
Old 06-09-2010, 07:01 PM
  #47  
Advanced
 
RIneuron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 97
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
My last Acura was a 1998 CL. This was a great car in its combination of handling, power, and comfortable ride. Especially for its day.

To give you an idea of my tastes, I hate full size SUVs in terms of ride and handling.

IMHO, the SH-AWD has fabulous handling. You feel positively glued to the road on turns. The seats are great. IF you want a sports sedan.

The ride is harsh but not jarring under most conditions. On good roads it's great. In the northeast with chewed up roads, the harshness is noticeable. This may be an inevitable trade-off with AWD and handling (although I have not owned a BMW 5). I also agree that this car is a great bargain for what you get (especially if you got through USAA car buying).
Old 06-09-2010, 07:05 PM
  #48  
Advanced
 
RIneuron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 97
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by RIneuron
My last Acura was a 1998 CL. This was a great car in its combination of handling, power, and comfortable ride. Especially for its day.

To give you an idea of my tastes, I hate full size SUVs in terms of ride and handling.

IMHO, the SH-AWD has fabulous handling. You feel positively glued to the road on turns. The seats are great. IF you want a sports sedan.

The ride is harsh but not jarring under most conditions. On good roads it's great. In the northeast with chewed up roads, the harshness is noticeable. This may be an inevitable trade-off with AWD and handling (although I have not owned a BMW 5). I also agree that this car is a great bargain for what you get (especially if you got through USAA car buying).
P.S. I think the power and responsiveness are awesome. I just think something and the car seems to do it. Fanboy mode off.
Old 06-09-2010, 10:25 PM
  #49  
Racer
 
SSGHutch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Texas, Ft. Hood area
Age: 40
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
I am completely satisfied with the ride of my TL AWD. After installing HR Sport springs and RJ 20'' wheels, I really expected the ride to be way to stiff. Instead, I am surprised to say the ride quality is still quite nice even with these mods. To this day I get compliments from passengers on how well my vehicle rides. The roads here are crap and I must admit I baby my car more than most when avoiding potholes and slowing for bumps ect... Could it be softer? yes. However, I think the ride is more than acceptable as I have been on 2 15hr+ trips since the mods and haven't had an issue. Just my two cents, hopefully I will avoid the mudslinging event lol.
Old 06-09-2010, 11:10 PM
  #50  
Drifting
 
ostrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 2,540
Received 364 Likes on 190 Posts
It's funny because before I test drove the TL SH-AWD, I read that its suspension was too harsh, blah blah blah.... then I drove the car, and I was wondering why people said that at all - in my opinion it was not harsh at all! Maybe I am just used to a "harsh" ride in my TSX! LOL! To me the base TL was a little too soft. Anyway, I think that it's just a matter of personal taste and opinion, and everyone will think differently about it.
Old 06-10-2010, 08:00 AM
  #51  
Pro
 
graphicguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 583
Received 181 Likes on 73 Posts
Originally Posted by ostrich
It's funny because before I test drove the TL SH-AWD, I read that its suspension was too harsh, blah blah blah.... then I drove the car, and I was wondering why people said that at all - in my opinion it was not harsh at all! Maybe I am just used to a "harsh" ride in my TSX! LOL! To me the base TL was a little too soft. Anyway, I think that it's just a matter of personal taste and opinion, and everyone will think differently about it.
I concur. Everybody has different tastes though.

IMHO, the ride/handling balance is just about right with the TL SH AWD. I have a 2 year old Accord (4 cyl) that certainly rides harsher. Then again, I like the ride/handling of Honda/Acura vehicles in general.

Probably the closest to the TL SH AWD in ride characteristics would be the BMW 3 Series without the run flat tires..

For comparisons sake, a Cadillac CTS with the F3 handling package is very harsh. Audi S4 is also harsh.
Old 06-10-2010, 12:24 PM
  #52  
Three Wheelin'
 
smarty666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,372
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by graphicguy
I concur. Everybody has different tastes though.

IMHO, the ride/handling balance is just about right with the TL SH AWD. I have a 2 year old Accord (4 cyl) that certainly rides harsher. Then again, I like the ride/handling of Honda/Acura vehicles in general.

Probably the closest to the TL SH AWD in ride characteristics would be the BMW 3 Series without the run flat tires..

For comparisons sake, a Cadillac CTS with the F3 handling package is very harsh. Audi S4 is also harsh.
Very good points graphic! Most things with cars are very subjective, as like we have been talking about with ride quality. Some, like myself, find the ride quality of the ES350 and LaCrosse to mushy, soft, floaty, and nauseating, while others find it absolutely perfect and exactly the comfort they look for while driving a car, whereas, others find the Acura ride qualities too firm/jarring, while others find them comfortable and a great blend of comfort and firmness!
Old 06-10-2010, 01:01 PM
  #53  
Advanced
 
Jim 2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 85
Received 31 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by PetesTL
This is what I love so much about BMW's.....their ability to balance ride and handling is so perfect in pretty much all their models.
So, what is BMW doing that the other guys aren't?
Old 06-10-2010, 01:11 PM
  #54  
Banned
 
jasonwdp10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 933
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by ostrich
It's funny because before I test drove the TL SH-AWD, I read that its suspension was too harsh, blah blah blah.... then I drove the car, and I was wondering why people said that at all - in my opinion it was not harsh at all! Maybe I am just used to a "harsh" ride in my TSX! LOL! To me the base TL was a little too soft. Anyway, I think that it's just a matter of personal taste and opinion, and everyone will think differently about it.
Actually, the TSX is quite firm/jarring. Read any review and they'll say it's on the "sporty" side of vehicles. It's actually more jarring than my base tl and is one of the reasons i did not consider it.

you guys do know.. the avg car buyer doesn't want firm/sporty suspension right?
Old 06-10-2010, 01:12 PM
  #55  
Mademoiselle Chanel!!
 
compewterbleu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: GA
Posts: 1,129
Received 43 Likes on 35 Posts
Being BMW...the status symbol car it's bee since the days of yuppies.
Old 06-10-2010, 02:02 PM
  #56  
Three Wheelin'
 
smarty666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,372
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by jasonwdp10
Actually, the TSX is quite firm/jarring. Read any review and they'll say it's on the "sporty" side of vehicles. It's actually more jarring than my base tl and is one of the reasons i did not consider it.

you guys do know.. the avg car buyer doesn't want firm/sporty suspension right?
That is exactly what I felt, even back in 2008 when I got my TL, I originally was going to be in a TSX but while the firmer/more jarring ride of the TSX would be fun for a few hours, I could not take it over and over on a daily basis so that is another reason why I went the base TL route at that time. Felt the same way, even now with the 2010 TSX compared to the 2010 Base TL suspension.

The TSX is still just a little too firm for my taste but others love it so again, its a highly subjective thing!
Old 06-10-2010, 02:04 PM
  #57  
Three Wheelin'
 
smarty666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,372
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Jim 2004
So, what is BMW doing that the other guys aren't?
Why BMW definitely has a good ride/handling balanced, it is what they aren't doing that keeps me away still to this day, such as having such cramped, so-so interiors, in regards to styling, etc. Also, I don't care for all that orange dash and console lighting they still have on their models. I can understand having that on coupes, and sport specific models, but they really should have white/blue lighting on their sedans!
Old 06-10-2010, 02:35 PM
  #58  
Burning Brakes
 
NwTSXmt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 828
Received 54 Likes on 42 Posts
The Auto SH-AWD I test drove this past Saturday was not even close to being harsh
Old 06-10-2010, 03:29 PM
  #59  
Drifting
 
BLEXV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,637
Received 117 Likes on 99 Posts
Originally Posted by PetesTL
I test drove a M3 last year and a S4 several months ago. I would say the M3 has a slightly better ride than the SH-AWD on most road conditions. Bumps and ruts are better damped in the M3 with no rattles or creaks whatsoever. This is what I love so much about BMW's.....their ability to balance ride and handling is so perfect in pretty much all their models. The S4 on the other hand, rode about the same as the SH-AWD in my opinion....that is, firm and somewhat jittery on uneven roads.
Well, you cannot compare an M3 or S4 to a TL.
Old 06-10-2010, 03:31 PM
  #60  
Drifting
 
BLEXV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,637
Received 117 Likes on 99 Posts
Originally Posted by smarty666
That is exactly what I felt, even back in 2008 when I got my TL, I originally was going to be in a TSX but while the firmer/more jarring ride of the TSX would be fun for a few hours, I could not take it over and over on a daily basis so that is another reason why I went the base TL route at that time. Felt the same way, even now with the 2010 TSX compared to the 2010 Base TL suspension.

The TSX is still just a little too firm for my taste but others love it so again, its a highly subjective thing!
The TSX is way harsher than the TL SH-AWD
Old 06-10-2010, 04:36 PM
  #61  
2010 TL AWD 6MT: New King
 
docboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: WA
Age: 47
Posts: 1,821
Received 165 Likes on 104 Posts
Originally Posted by BLEXV6
The TSX is way harsher than the TL SH-AWD
I'm surprised. I'm guessing the suspension in the 2G TSX is stiffer than the 1G TSX.

I had a 2005 TSX (which I miss dearly). Coming from a lowered Integra to the TSX, the TSX felt a little floaty at first. Then going from the TSX to the 2010 TL 6MT, IMHO, the TSX is more forgiving of bumps/imperfections than the TL. Again IMHO.
Old 06-10-2010, 06:09 PM
  #62  
Three Wheelin'
 
PetesTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Chicago suburb, IL
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by BLEXV6
Well, you cannot compare an M3 or S4 to a TL.


I was comparing ride quality, not performance.......next time, read the post.
Old 06-10-2010, 07:08 PM
  #63  
2010 TL AWD 6MT: New King
 
docboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: WA
Age: 47
Posts: 1,821
Received 165 Likes on 104 Posts
Originally Posted by BLEXV6
Well, you cannot compare an M3 or S4 to a TL.
Well, Road & Track did compare the S4 to the TL 6MT (and 335i and G37S) The M3, yeah, another league IMHO

http://www.roadandtrack.com/index.ph...door-firepower
Old 06-11-2010, 08:58 AM
  #64  
Pro
 
graphicguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 583
Received 181 Likes on 73 Posts
Originally Posted by smarty666
Why BMW definitely has a good ride/handling balanced, it is what they aren't doing that keeps me away still to this day, such as having such cramped, so-so interiors, in regards to styling, etc. Also, I don't care for all that orange dash and console lighting they still have on their models. I can understand having that on coupes, and sport specific models, but they really should have white/blue lighting on their sedans!
smarty....you and I are on the same page. I know I felt the ride of my 330i with the run flats was harsh, and I like a firm ride. The run flat sidewalls have to be stiff. It really made going over broken pavement quite jarring. Had to put "normal" tires on it to get the ride/handling I wanted. I know that BMW saved themselves a couple of hundred by going to run flats and not including a spare tire in their cars. But, they really screwed the pooch with that decision.

BMW doesn't hasn't put much money into the design of their interiors. They change some minor things around, but that's about it. You've seen on BMW interior, you've pretty much seen them all, with minor tweaks between the different models.
Old 06-11-2010, 09:10 AM
  #65  
Three Wheelin'
 
smarty666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,372
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by graphicguy
smarty....you and I are on the same page. I know I felt the ride of my 330i with the run flats was harsh, and I like a firm ride. The run flat sidewalls have to be stiff. It really made going over broken pavement quite jarring. Had to put "normal" tires on it to get the ride/handling I wanted. I know that BMW saved themselves a couple of hundred by going to run flats and not including a spare tire in their cars. But, they really screwed the pooch with that decision.

BMW doesn't hasn't put much money into the design of their interiors. They change some minor things around, but that's about it. You've seen on BMW interior, you've pretty much seen them all, with minor tweaks between the different models.
Yeah, what is the deal with these run flat tires? Is that all BMW offers on all their models now or do you still have the option of getting regular tires? Because most of what I've read about them, people complain about how harsh and rough they have made the ride now so I don't see any advantage to going that route if they sacrifice ride quality that much?
Old 06-11-2010, 09:29 AM
  #66  
Mademoiselle Chanel!!
 
compewterbleu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: GA
Posts: 1,129
Received 43 Likes on 35 Posts
Originally Posted by NwTSXmt
The Auto SH-AWD I test drove this past Saturday was not even close to being harsh

I concur. Being a person with lower back issues I have yet to exit my vehicle moaning or groaning. And that's after numerous 2.5 hr trips to the A-T-L. In fact the ingress/egress is nice. Crappy roads = crappy ride. And around the A-U-G we have a southern combination of railroad track, rail road ties, road kill, pot holes, tree branches, clumps of Georgia clay, and gravel to contend with. Call it "Deep South Road Mash."
Old 06-11-2010, 09:45 AM
  #67  
The Sicilian
 
jspagna1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: CT
Age: 63
Posts: 1,632
Received 47 Likes on 43 Posts
I find that any car with AWD is going to have a stiffer ride, luxury or not! Also tires do have a LOT to do with the ride quality of any car as well.
My sister has a 2007 G35X and it has a very harsh ride. Meanwhile our 2003 Maxima SE has a much harsher ride since I replaced the tires with Toyo Proxies Summer tires.
It is all in personal preference. you want a nice cushy ride, go buy a Lexus or an Avalon. But then you would be complaining about the numbness and no road feel.
Old 06-11-2010, 11:42 AM
  #68  
Racer
 
stagefoursurvivor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 485
Received 58 Likes on 38 Posts
Yeah, I'm going to put 14" wheels/tires on our new SH-AWD to soften the ride, it shouldn't effect handling, right?
Old 06-12-2010, 04:41 AM
  #69  
I feel the need...
 
Fibonacci's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Motown
Posts: 14,957
Received 515 Likes on 363 Posts
Previous car was first gen TSX on A-Spec on OEM 17's. Compared to that, my 6MT on OEM 18's can occasionally feel stiff legged, but certainly wouldn't describe the ride as "harsh". Definitely firm and sporty.

I miss the "tossable" feel of the TSX. Similar level of grip, just more body roll and motion because of the added weight of a larger car. TSX had much better steering feel and weight - I hate the overboosted, artificial feel of EPS, that's my main beef. Otherwise, love the TL overall.
Old 06-12-2010, 07:01 AM
  #70  
Back From The dead
 
NJ SHAWD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NJ
Age: 60
Posts: 2,038
Received 49 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by compewterbleu
I concur. Being a person with lower back issues I have yet to exit my vehicle moaning or groaning. And that's after numerous 2.5 hr trips to the A-T-L. In fact the ingress/egress is nice. Crappy roads = crappy ride. And around the A-U-G we have a southern combination of railroad track, rail road ties, road kill, pot holes, tree branches, clumps of Georgia clay, and gravel to contend with. Call it "Deep South Road Mash."
+1
2 bad discs and repeated spinal cord injections. I don't find the ride bad even on 8 hr rides to Brampton.
Old 06-12-2010, 09:49 AM
  #71  
Racer
 
TJ Zooker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Edmonton, AB
Age: 40
Posts: 295
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
speaking of harsh my 03 rsx is pretty bad. If you hit the right kind of bump you almost hit your head on the roof liner. Not to mention the incredibly stiff seats. Makes my TL feel like your riding on clouds. I find the ride pretty nice. A good balance of softness and rigidity, accept with the fugly 17" winters on, then its too sloppy.
Old 06-12-2010, 10:31 AM
  #72  
Grandpa
 
George Knighton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia, Besieged
Age: 68
Posts: 7,596
Received 2,609 Likes on 1,475 Posts
I do not have any problem with how the car rides. I think it's about as perfect as it can get without resorting to expensive magneto-dampers.

I still think this car's great after 15,000 miles, and would still say that it's almost as if they consulted me personally about what I would want in a big sedan.
Old 06-12-2010, 10:33 AM
  #73  
Grandpa
 
George Knighton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia, Besieged
Age: 68
Posts: 7,596
Received 2,609 Likes on 1,475 Posts
Originally Posted by TJ Zooker
speaking of harsh my 03 rsx is pretty bad.
Lots of problems there compared to Honda's more recent McPherson designs.

In the DC5 and EP3 design, the front struts are straight up and down, with a very low hood and the tie rods connected to the strut.

This makes for very short strokes and harsh rides, and what most inexperienced drivers will believe is a kind of bump steer.

Beginning with 2006, the McPherson Honda designs are a lot better.
Old 06-12-2010, 04:46 PM
  #74  
Instructor
 
draph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 205
Received 25 Likes on 16 Posts
I've been driving my 2010 TL SH-AWD 6MT w/out HPT for about two weeks on the same roads I have driven a leased 07 335i 6MT with Sport Package including 18 in run flat tires for the last three years.

IMHO, the TL's ride is softer - compares more with the BMW when I was running 17 inch non-run flat winter tires. The TL definitely feels like it has more suspension travel (I believe the BMW sport pkg dropped the ride height about an inch). I suspect those that complain about the flinty ride of the TL are driving it with the factory HPT option or aftermarket 20s. If you have no sidewalls, you're going to feel every piece of gravel... IMHO, the optimum ride/handling balance in the TL SHAWD 6MT would be the 18" wheels with summer tires. This is what I plan on doing when the MXMs wear out.

The TL feels less composed on long, high speed turns with undulations. SH-AWD makes up for fwd nose-heavy balance when accelerating; and doesn't seem to help nearly as much when cruising through a corner, which I expected.

I'm only missing one thing about the 335: top gear acceleration. That car made me lazy. I could zip around slow cars at highway speeds without ever needing to shift down (unless I wanted to be really dramatic with how fast I could overtake them). I don't miss the open rear differential on wet mornings when needing to pull out into fast traffic...
Old 06-13-2010, 08:12 AM
  #75  
Burning Brakes
 
Kingmeow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 958
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by BLEXV6
The TSX is way harsher than the TL SH-AWD
That was not my experience when I had a TSX as a loaner a few months ago. It was an '09 and I felt it was more comfy than my '09 TL SH-AWD, ride wise.

Now my brother's M3, THAT'S harsh!
Old 06-13-2010, 08:27 AM
  #76  
Pro
 
graphicguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 583
Received 181 Likes on 73 Posts
Originally Posted by smarty666
Yeah, what is the deal with these run flat tires? Is that all BMW offers on all their models now or do you still have the option of getting regular tires? Because most of what I've read about them, people complain about how harsh and rough they have made the ride now so I don't see any advantage to going that route if they sacrifice ride quality that much?
smarty.....no option for anything but run flats on BMWs. If you want anything else, you have to go aftermarket (which is what I did). I was lucky that my favorite tire store at least gave me some cash the almost new run flats as a swap. Still, it cost me close to a grand to do it. I was willing to do the swap since those run flats really ruined the ride of my BMW.

I understand that BMW probably saved themselves $150-$200/car by not having to include a spare tire. But I thought that was taking cost cutting too far for what's supposed to be a lux brand.

This was a couple of years ago, but I did get a letter stating that there were some BMW owners who were filing a class action law suit against BMW for reimbursement to swap out the run flats. Don't know what the outcome was, however.
Old 06-13-2010, 09:51 AM
  #77  
Three Wheelin'
 
smarty666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,372
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by graphicguy
smarty.....no option for anything but run flats on BMWs. If you want anything else, you have to go aftermarket (which is what I did). I was lucky that my favorite tire store at least gave me some cash the almost new run flats as a swap. Still, it cost me close to a grand to do it. I was willing to do the swap since those run flats really ruined the ride of my BMW.

I understand that BMW probably saved themselves $150-$200/car by not having to include a spare tire. But I thought that was taking cost cutting too far for what's supposed to be a lux brand.

This was a couple of years ago, but I did get a letter stating that there were some BMW owners who were filing a class action law suit against BMW for reimbursement to swap out the run flats. Don't know what the outcome was, however.
That is always something that has really pissed me off with BMW! They make you pay an arm and a leg for every freakin luxury feature, etc that should come either standard or much more cheaper, but because they are BMW they think that is enough to warrant jacking the price of everything up ridiculously, and I'm sorry its not. I can't believe, they don't even give you a spare tire anymore, how ridiculous is that?
Old 06-13-2010, 12:48 PM
  #78  
Drifting
 
JM2010 SH-AWD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 2,384
Received 566 Likes on 365 Posts
Yes, but you can purchase the optional metallic paint and leather interior on your new Bimmer if you'd like.
Old 06-13-2010, 01:22 PM
  #79  
Three Wheelin'
 
smarty666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,372
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by JM2010 SH-AWD
Yes, but you can purchase the optional metallic paint and leather interior on your new Bimmer if you'd like.
Yeap, nothing like paying extra for paint and actual leather on a already 40, 50, or 60k some odd dollar luxury automobile
Old 06-14-2010, 07:29 PM
  #80  
Racer
 
cornelius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Age: 46
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
For me, my TL is WAY too soft. I always have to go super slow on small bumps and dips or else the front will crash into the ground. I always scratch the bottom when coming out of strip malls unless I drive extremely slow. How is the suspension in other large cars like Lexus GS, Mercedes Eclass, or BMW 7series?? M3 and s4 shouldnt be compared here. Those are tiny cars, and out of the tiny I cars I think Mitsubishi Evo has the best suspension.


Quick Reply: Does The 4G TL Ride Too Hard? (Try To Be Honest)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:18 AM.