Why you should get 255/40-17 tires for your OEM rims !!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-22-2016 | 08:08 AM
  #881  
Turbonut's Avatar
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 7,901
Likes: 832
From: NJ
Originally Posted by MarcoNorthPolo
Thread resurrection time! And what better thread than the granddaddy of tire threads. For anyone who is using 255/40/17 tires right now, do you have any current or recent pics from side on and/or 3/4 view? I am seriously considering this size for my next set of tires and a good percentage of the pic links from this thread are no longer valid. I am wondering about what the 255 looks like for wheel gap on a non-lowered TL.


*Edit* I was exhausted when I finished going through this thread. It took me quite a while!
You have a TLS? As the TLS spare (145/70-17) should be 25.0" in diameter, same as the 255/40-17, install the spare and you'll be able to see the gap.
Can't use a TL spare as they are only 24.5"
The following users liked this post:
MarcoNorthPolo (02-22-2016)
Old 02-28-2016 | 12:44 AM
  #882  
deepa1600's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 339
Likes: 96
From: Ontario
Has anyone tried 255-45-17. Thanks
Old 02-28-2016 | 08:38 AM
  #883  
VisualEchos's Avatar
Andrew
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 532
Originally Posted by deepa1600
Has anyone tried 255-45-17. Thanks
Probably not, that would be a huge sidewall. My 255/40/18 was 26" tall, and the 255/45/17 would be the same...on a 17! Cornering would be terrible, think Buick. But it'd probably ride pretty comfortable.
Old 02-28-2016 | 01:37 PM
  #884  
deepa1600's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 339
Likes: 96
From: Ontario
Originally Posted by VisualEchos
Probably not, that would be a huge sidewall. My 255/40/18 was 26" tall, and the 255/45/17 would be the same...on a 17! Cornering would be terrible, think Buick. But it'd probably ride pretty comfortable.
Yeah i think so as well. I think when stationary it will be okay (no rubbing) but when car is moving the suspension and body also moves so it would rub the tires. if compare aspect ratio on stock 17x8 rims:
oem tire: 45% of 235=105.75
tire#1: 45% of 255= 114.75 (now that's huge difference vs oem)
tire#2: 45% of 245= 110.25 (best in my opinion as it will fill the wheel wells good)
tire#3: 40% of 255= 102 (too small vs oem, tires look like donuts from sides)
Off course the width will depend on how wide the tread is.
I think i will go with 245-45-17 (comfortable ride and good looking).
Old 02-28-2016 | 02:01 PM
  #885  
NBP04TL4ME's Avatar
Stay Out Of the Left Lane
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 9,028
Likes: 1,251
From: SE Mass --- > Central VA --- > SE Mass
^^^^ Many Azine member have come to the same conclusion and put 245/45/17s on their cars......
Old 03-07-2016 | 10:40 AM
  #886  
MarcoNorthPolo's Avatar
KCCO
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,355
Likes: 192
From: Nova Scotia, Canada
I really want to go with the 255/40's, but after having bent two rims last year on separate occasions (and on stock 235/45 size tires) due to potholes, I would never hear the end of it if I got a smaller sidewall tire and bent another rim lol. It looks like I'm going to go with 245/45/17. A little more sidewall, more curb protection and a little more meat for the width.
Old 03-10-2016 | 08:46 PM
  #887  
deepa1600's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 339
Likes: 96
From: Ontario
So regarding my budget and after some research i got a deal on Yokohama Advan S4 255-40-17. So i decided to go bite the bullet. Will see how it goes. There is not much difference between oem and yoko's.





















Old 03-11-2016 | 11:36 AM
  #888  
MarcoNorthPolo's Avatar
KCCO
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,355
Likes: 192
From: Nova Scotia, Canada
Can't wait to see them on your car deepa. Be sure to get pics once they're installed! Your oem are 235/45 correct?
Old 03-11-2016 | 02:28 PM
  #889  
deepa1600's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 339
Likes: 96
From: Ontario
Originally Posted by MarcoNorthPolo
Can't wait to see them on your car deepa. Be sure to get pics once they're installed! Your oem are 235/45 correct?
Yes sure, i will put them on today and will post pictures. yes the oem size is 235-45-17.
Old 03-12-2016 | 05:31 PM
  #890  
deepa1600's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 339
Likes: 96
From: Ontario
So here are the photos. Today i washed and cleaned the car. Tires feel good, i have more road feel and car feels planted to the road. Ride is a bit stiff as expected becuase i am coming from Michelin X-ice2 225-50-17 which are soft. The rims are not in pristine shape but they are okay for their age. Right now i am running 35psi front and 34 in rear. Any recommendations for tire pressure? My TL is 5 spd auto.













































The following users liked this post:
nist7 (09-10-2020)
Old 03-14-2016 | 10:41 AM
  #891  
MarcoNorthPolo's Avatar
KCCO
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,355
Likes: 192
From: Nova Scotia, Canada
They look great! I'm sure you'll love them. Seeing those has me almost convinced to get the same size. How do you find the gap in the wheel well compared to the stock size?
Old 03-14-2016 | 01:15 PM
  #892  
deepa1600's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 339
Likes: 96
From: Ontario
Originally Posted by MarcoNorthPolo
They look great! I'm sure you'll love them. Seeing those has me almost convinced to get the same size. How do you find the gap in the wheel well compared to the stock size?
I don't think there is a significant difference in filling of wheel wells. They may be a bit smaller than oem but the thing is only you know that they are not oem everyone else will think they are oem. As far as the rubbing when car is moving i have had no problems so far i have put around 300km on them. With this size You will feel every inch of the road where the tires are touching. See the photos of inside i took after installation mind you the car was dirty at the time with all the salt and sh*t. Too much salt in Ontario.






Old 03-30-2016 | 04:48 PM
  #893  
MarcoNorthPolo's Avatar
KCCO
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,355
Likes: 192
From: Nova Scotia, Canada
Can anyone that is using 255/40/17 tires comment on what the tires look like after 25,000 or more miles? I like the look of them when new, but after wearing down a bit I can imagine the wheel gap is even larger.
Old 04-03-2016 | 04:31 PM
  #894  
Taquila1's Avatar
Taquila 1
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 65
Likes: 4
From: las vegas,nv
Been running the 255 40 17 for 6 mo IMO the way 2 go
Old 04-03-2016 | 04:32 PM
  #895  
Taquila1's Avatar
Taquila 1
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 65
Likes: 4
From: las vegas,nv
Know ur tire sizes and what the #s mean
Old 04-12-2016 | 09:54 PM
  #896  
dochereford's Avatar
Cruisin'
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 24
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Frank S
I had the F-1's installed yesterday!! I have to say the car feels much more stable and as Inaccurate says feels like it is riding on rails. It makes the car feel like a much greater quality car. Well I'm off to visit the family.

Thanks again Inaccurate and everyone else for sharing all of the information in this post.
I've been running 255/40/17 for over a year now on toyos. No issues man. They look great.



Old 04-12-2016 | 10:08 PM
  #897  
Minihogg's Avatar
9th Gear
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Is the oem rim for the 2004-2006 the same width as the 2007-2008 oem rim
Old 04-12-2016 | 10:17 PM
  #898  
deepa1600's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 339
Likes: 96
From: Ontario
Originally Posted by Minihogg
Is the oem rim for the 2004-2006 the same width as the 2007-2008 oem rim
I think in 2007-2008 had 2 rim sizes one was 17"(8Jx17 ET45, same as 2004-2006) and other 18" (TypeS) which was 8.5Jx18 ET42 i guess.
The following users liked this post:
Minihogg (04-13-2016)
Old 04-13-2016 | 10:44 AM
  #899  
Minihogg's Avatar
9th Gear
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Originally Posted by deepa1600
I think in 2007-2008 had 2 rim sizes one was 17"(8Jx17 ET45, same as 2004-2006) and other 18" (TypeS) which was 8.5Jx18 ET42 i guess.
I was referring to the 17" - I can get a good deal on some tires and wanted to know if they would fit. Thank you
Old 04-18-2016 | 08:51 PM
  #900  
MarcoNorthPolo's Avatar
KCCO
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,355
Likes: 192
From: Nova Scotia, Canada
Originally Posted by Minihogg
I was referring to the 17" - I can get a good deal on some tires and wanted to know if they would fit. Thank you

Yes they will. They are the same size in 17".
Old 04-25-2016 | 09:05 PM
  #901  
CB900Fer's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 63
Likes: 9
From: Pensacola, FL
My first set of tires on my TL were Yokohama YK580 245/40-17. I didn't do any calculations at the time, but they ended up being a little too low profile, and they looked a little odd (especially when the tread wore down a bit). I had little complaint with the tires themselves, but for a little bit of extra road noise. They were very responsive and had excellent grip. I got 31,000 miles out of them, which was under the warranty, so I got a good pro-rate deal on my next set of tires.

I was looking to move to a 255/40-17 this time so they would fill the fenders a little better. But the Yokohama's aren't available in that size, so I went with the Continental DWS06 that everyone here raves about. I have to be honest, I can't stand the tires. I've put about 2,000 miles on them, and they feel like they're all over the road compared to my Yokohamas. They have a lot of sidewall give, and are not very responsive.

I knew when they were new they would be a little extra squishy in the sidewall, but they haven't stiffened up much. I would honestly return them right now if I could. They ride better than the Yokohamas, but are nowhere near in the sport department. They grip well, but they feel horrible.

Can anyone give any feedback on their experience with the DWS06?
Old 04-25-2016 | 09:13 PM
  #902  
deepa1600's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 339
Likes: 96
From: Ontario
Originally Posted by CB900Fer
My first set of tires on my TL were Yokohama YK580 245/40-17. I didn't do any calculations at the time, but they ended up being a little too low profile, and they looked a little odd (especially when the tread wore down a bit). I had little complaint with the tires themselves, but for a little bit of extra road noise. They were very responsive and had excellent grip. I got 31,000 miles out of them, which was under the warranty, so I got a good pro-rate deal on my next set of tires.

I was looking to move to a 255/40-17 this time so they would fill the fenders a little better. But the Yokohama's aren't available in that size, so I went with the Continental DWS06 that everyone here raves about. I have to be honest, I can't stand the tires. I've put about 2,000 miles on them, and they feel like they're all over the road compared to my Yokohamas. They have a lot of sidewall give, and are not very responsive.

I knew when they were new they would be a little extra squishy in the sidewall, but they haven't stiffened up much. I would honestly return them right now if I could. They ride better than the Yokohamas, but are nowhere near in the sport department. They grip well, but they feel horrible.

Can anyone give any feedback on their experience with the DWS06?
YoKo's come in 255-40-17. That's what i have in pictures above. And so far they have been excellent i have driven them for 3000km through rain, ice, snow, freezing rain and they have held very well.
Old 04-29-2016 | 03:29 PM
  #903  
CB900Fer's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 63
Likes: 9
From: Pensacola, FL
Originally Posted by deepa1600
YoKo's come in 255-40-17. That's what i have in pictures above. And so far they have been excellent i have driven them for 3000km through rain, ice, snow, freezing rain and they have held very well.
Oh, well that makes me sad now. Discount Tire didn't have an option for it on their site. I guess I should have asked when I went into the store.
Old 04-29-2016 | 07:38 PM
  #904  
nfnsquared's Avatar
Race Director
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 12,474
Likes: 1,795
From: MAGA country
Originally Posted by CB900Fer
... so I went with the Continental DWS06 that everyone here raves about. I have to be honest, I can't stand the tires. I've put about 2,000 miles on them, and they feel like they're all over the road compared to my Yokohamas. They have a lot of sidewall give, and are not very responsive.

I knew when they were new they would be a little extra squishy in the sidewall, but they haven't stiffened up much. I would honestly return them right now if I could. They ride better than the Yokohamas, but are nowhere near in the sport department. They grip well, but they feel horrible.

Can anyone give any feedback on their experience with the DWS06?
You would certainly appear to be in the minority:

https://acurazine.com/forums/3g-tl-t...-dws06-937765/

Originally Posted by sockr1
Get the dws06. They stiffened the sidewall a lot and this is the best tire I've ever had. They made huge improvements to it!!

On another note, the DWS06 has now moved into the #1 spot on the TireRack UHPAS survey, knocking the Comp2 A/S down to #2, although not by much...
Old 06-08-2016 | 02:58 PM
  #905  
EngineeredTL's Avatar
5th Gear
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Thanks to this thread, I ended up getting 255/35-19 Continental DWS 06 tires on a 19x8 wheel.

I know it's not on OEM wheels, but it's still a 255 wide tire on an 8 inch width wheel. I've driven 300 miles on them so far and love the way they look and the way the car feels on the road (compared to stock base wheels with cheapo 235/45-27 tires).
Old 06-08-2016 | 03:34 PM
  #906  
EngineeredTL's Avatar
5th Gear
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Here's a pic of my setup (I hope it works, still new to this forum):



Stock base suspension, Akata 20mm front wheel spacers, Akata 25mm rear wheel spacers, 19"x8" +55mm offset 2013-2016 Accord Coupe HFP 19" Diamond Cut Wheels, and 255/35-19 Continental DWS 06 tires.

After 300 miles of driving, I have observed a slight decrease in acceleration --- probably due to the higher wheel+tire weight and the increase in overall diameter/circumference. But, comparing this setup to the stock base 07-08 wheel + cheapo 235/45-17 tires that I received with the car when I bought it a month ago, the car feels much more planted/steady at low speeds, high speeds, and corners/curves (not really a fair comparison, I know, just stating my observations).
Old 06-08-2016 | 03:43 PM
  #907  
EngineeredTL's Avatar
5th Gear
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Oh yeah! I forgot to mention that the ride is slightly more rough than the stock wheel+tire setup (sorta a given when upsizing 2" in wheel diameter). But, it's still completely acceptable, to me, for most roads in Cali.
Old 04-17-2018 | 06:56 AM
  #908  
fraiolim07's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 116
Likes: 7
From: Montana
Reviving a long-dead thread here, sorry...

Has anyone running 255/40s seen any feathering? I understand that feathering should be caused by a bad alignment (toe) rather than by wider tires, but trying to run down every possibility before I spend money.

Back story: I have the car in Italy right now, and drive significantly faster here than I did in the states. I've noticed that the car shakes above 80 mph. Nothing ridiculous, but I can definitely feel it in the seats and steering wheel. After some research on the shaking, and after having the tires balanced, I took it to the local mechanic for an alignment, and he didn't even bother; said he drove it and the tires are dangerous; only new tires will stop the shaking. I'm not a tire expert, but I believe they're "feathered", and I don't see how that can be dangerous (I understand there's less surface area on the road as a result of the wear, etc.). I assume a bad alignment caused the tires to wear that way, and I figured the alignment was the source of the shaking since I've had the tires balanced not long ago, so my theory makes sense to me.

The mechanic also said these are cheap tires, which is why they wore like they did, and I should buy higher quality ones next time to ensure this doesn't happen again. I have General G-MAX AS-03s, and while they were definitely conservatively priced, I don't think they're low quality or cheap. This is the second set of these I've had, but like I said above, I drove much slower in the states than I do here. The speed is relevant because if these tires are the culprit (cheap/poor quality), I might have never noticed on the last set because I drove much slower on those ones.

Thanks for any feedback.
Old 06-24-2018 | 07:06 PM
  #909  
Slayer-33's Avatar
Racer
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 258
Likes: 25
From: NYC
Originally Posted by Gregerst
I'm running 255's with 20mm rear and 15mm front spacers. Car is also dropped about 2" or so with Tein SA coils. With this setup there will be some minor rubbing on speed bumps and big dips. The fenders will need to be rolled but it's an easy job with a fender roller tool.

The car is a lot more aggressive and sporty looking. It also corners and handles like a beast which is a lot of fun . I have the dampers set at medium so it's still very comfortable to drive and it's not slammed so low that I have to worry about every little bump and dip in the road.

Attachment 84039
Wouldn't I be able to have this setup an inch higher with no fender roll or rubbing with 15MM-F and 20MM-R spacers? With 255/40/17's of course..

Last edited by Slayer-33; 06-24-2018 at 07:09 PM.
Old 09-05-2018 | 06:09 AM
  #910  
VeNoMiZeD's Avatar
Cruisin'
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, CA
80k miles and still going with the Continental DWS 255/40/17!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rseb4agze
Car Parts for Sale
10
05-03-2016 08:41 AM
booma1218
Car Parts for Sale
11
05-03-2016 08:39 AM
bailey24
5G TLX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
8
11-21-2015 09:43 PM
merc009
3G TL (2004-2008)
21
10-03-2015 01:59 AM
MyKids&Cars
Car Parts for Sale
6
09-01-2015 01:53 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:13 PM.