View Poll Results: Bridgestone Potenza RE960 AS Pole Position or Michelin Pilot Sport A/S?
Bridgestone Potenza RE960 AS Pole Position
21
67.74%
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S
10
32.26%
Voters: 31. You may not vote on this poll

Bridgestone Potenza RE960 AS Pole Position vs. Michelin Pilot Sport A/S

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-24-2009, 06:41 PM
  #1  
2016 E350 Sport
Thread Starter
 
SweetJazz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: East Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,953
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts
Bridgestone Potenza RE960 AS Pole Position vs. Michelin Pilot Sport A/S

I was thinking about replacing the 235/40-18 Yokohama ES100’s that came with the A-Spec wheels on my TL-S. After doing some research, the Bridgestone Potenza RE960 AS Pole Position and Michelin Pilot Sport A/S are two top notch tires. I love the tread design of the Michelins but I have read slightly better tire wear/noise reviews with the Bridgestones. Which would you choose in size 245/40-18 and give some feedback if you already have either one?
Old 01-24-2009, 08:15 PM
  #2  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Turbonut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NJ
Age: 60
Posts: 7,901
Received 832 Likes on 679 Posts
Anything is better than Bridgestones IMHO. Check the tread width on the BS, only 8.2"
Go with Yokohama W4s at 9.2" and with a cost of $149 can't go wrong, or even the S.4 8.7", and they are fantastic tires.
Old 01-24-2009, 11:53 PM
  #3  
Racer
 
D R E W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Tacoma, WA
Age: 44
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
I currently have the Bridgestone RE960AS with 245/35R19 (front) and 275/30R19 (rear) tires.

It is true that the Bridgestones run narrow compared to other brands. The Michelins are wider and will look really beefy (as far as looks).

The Bridgestones actually take some time to warm up and will develop flat spots if the car sits over night in cold temps. I may return my Bridgestones.
Plus, the Bridgestones are more expensive. Go with the Michelins.
Old 01-25-2009, 04:34 AM
  #4  
Racer
 
darksky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 380
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
+1 for Michelin (mine are the 'Plus' version which was introduced in Aug of '08 btw).

I had a bad experience with the BS tires:

https://acurazine.com/forums/showpos...1&postcount=23
https://acurazine.com/forums/3g-tl-tires-wheels-suspension-97/michlen-pilot-sport-s-plus-first-500-miles-704011/
Old 01-25-2009, 12:53 PM
  #5  
Racer
 
wps007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Fresno
Age: 54
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Tired all types of tire for the money Kumho the best
Old 01-25-2009, 02:58 PM
  #6  
Drifting
 
avs007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 2,192
Received 26 Likes on 23 Posts
Both tires are great, I've run both... If you go for the michelin, get the "Plus" version, becuase that one has a treadwear warranty.

Ignoring a tire, because it's treadwidth is narrower is retarded. I've ran Avon M550s before, and despite it having a wider tread-width, it has less lateral grip from what I can tell. Same with the Continental ContiExtremeContact. Those have a wider treadwidth as well, but when I switched them to the RE960AS, I noticed significantly better lateral grip.

Some will say they have bad experiences with this tire, but really, any tire will have someone that had bad experiences with them. For example, when I ran the Pilot Sport A/S on my other car, it went bald after 20,000 miles, whereas the RE960AS on that car now currently has 20,000 miles on it, and the treads still look to have more than half left. Our TL, also has 960AS on it now, and it has a shade over 25k miles on it, and again, the treads are still looking great. When I originally bought these tires, people were praising the Goodyear Eagle F1/AS, but lately everyone I know with those tires are complaining about them.

I don't know about flatspots either. One of my cars sits outside, and I never noticed flat spots. Even when it sat out in the snow for two weeks. I also don't know about RE960AS being more than Michelins. My Pilot Sport A/S were definitely more expensive than the RE960AS. Edit: Nevermind, looks like the Plus versions are cheaper than the non plus versions I got previously.

If you are looking for 245/40-18, I still have two Michelin Pilot Sport A/S in that size sitting on a shelf in my garage. (They have 7/32" tread left). You can have them for free if you want, if you pay for shipping. Nothings wrong with these two tires, I just swapped em out when I decided to try a different make/model tire on the car.

Last edited by avs007; 01-25-2009 at 03:02 PM.
Old 01-25-2009, 03:05 PM
  #7  
Drifting
 
avs007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 2,192
Received 26 Likes on 23 Posts
I double checked the pricing... Looks like in the 245 size, the Pilots are cheaper. It's only the size I needed for my other car, the Pilots were more.
Old 01-25-2009, 05:30 PM
  #8  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Turbonut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NJ
Age: 60
Posts: 7,901
Received 832 Likes on 679 Posts
Originally Posted by avs007
Ignoring a tire, because it's treadwidth is narrower is retarded. I've ran Avon M550s before, and despite it having a wider tread-width, it has less lateral grip from what I can tell. Same with the Continental ContiExtremeContact. Those have a wider treadwidth as well, but when I switched them to the RE960AS, I noticed significantly better lateral grip.
Retarded? It's proven that a wider tire will contribute to a better handling vehicle. Never tried the Avon M55, but as it's an XL (97W) rated tire with a sidewall stiffener, I would think it wouldn't distort under a load as long as the correct pressue is maintained.
The 245 BS is the same as a 225 Sumitomo and is 1/4" smaller than the 225 W4s.

Your decision as to which tire to purchase, but tread width does make a difference, at least to me, especially in a quality tire.
Old 01-25-2009, 10:11 PM
  #9  
2016 E350 Sport
Thread Starter
 
SweetJazz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: East Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,953
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by avs007
Both tires are great, I've run both... If you go for the michelin, get the "Plus" version, becuase that one has a treadwear warranty.

Ignoring a tire, because it's treadwidth is narrower is retarded. I've ran Avon M550s before, and despite it having a wider tread-width, it has less lateral grip from what I can tell. Same with the Continental ContiExtremeContact. Those have a wider treadwidth as well, but when I switched them to the RE960AS, I noticed significantly better lateral grip.

Some will say they have bad experiences with this tire, but really, any tire will have someone that had bad experiences with them. For example, when I ran the Pilot Sport A/S on my other car, it went bald after 20,000 miles, whereas the RE960AS on that car now currently has 20,000 miles on it, and the treads still look to have more than half left. Our TL, also has 960AS on it now, and it has a shade over 25k miles on it, and again, the treads are still looking great. When I originally bought these tires, people were praising the Goodyear Eagle F1/AS, but lately everyone I know with those tires are complaining about them.

I don't know about flatspots either. One of my cars sits outside, and I never noticed flat spots. Even when it sat out in the snow for two weeks. I also don't know about RE960AS being more than Michelins. My Pilot Sport A/S were definitely more expensive than the RE960AS. Edit: Nevermind, looks like the Plus versions are cheaper than the non plus versions I got previously.

If you are looking for 245/40-18, I still have two Michelin Pilot Sport A/S in that size sitting on a shelf in my garage. (They have 7/32" tread left). You can have them for free if you want, if you pay for shipping. Nothings wrong with these two tires, I just swapped em out when I decided to try a different make/model tire on the car.
Thanks for the writeup avs007. However, I'm planning on only buying new tires.
Old 01-25-2009, 10:53 PM
  #10  
Safety Car
 
erick3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle, Washington
Age: 36
Posts: 4,163
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
do the 960s even come in the size for our aspecs? i don't think they do - although i voted for them. i have a set of aspecs, gunmetal 8.5 - i did research and ended with 760 sports...
Old 01-25-2009, 10:54 PM
  #11  
Safety Car
 
erick3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle, Washington
Age: 36
Posts: 4,163
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
...you must be 18 by 8, huh? my fault...
Old 01-25-2009, 11:08 PM
  #12  
Vroooom!!!
 
RC51Ryder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 641
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
I like the Bridgestones. I've have good experiences with them in the past on my other rides.
Old 01-26-2009, 12:22 AM
  #13  
Safety Car
iTrader: (1)
 
JD TL-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Northern ILLINOIS
Age: 62
Posts: 4,848
Received 134 Likes on 130 Posts
I have the Pilot Sport A/S on now and I like them, but I can spin them like no tomorrow. In 2nd gear(TL 6-speed) I can be going 30-40 MPH and when I punch it without using the clutch I spin them like mad. Heck I can spin the shit out of them, but its been very cold in Northern IL this year.
Old 01-26-2009, 11:52 AM
  #14  
Drifting
 
avs007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 2,192
Received 26 Likes on 23 Posts
Originally Posted by Turbonut
Retarded? It's proven that a wider tire will contribute to a better handling vehicle.
That's true if you are comparing like tires. However, when you start comparing across different brands/models of tires, that claim does not necessarily hold true anymore. That's why I was just saying that you have to evaluate all aspects of a tire. Just because it's wider does NOT automagically make it better handling. Using your logic, a K-Mart brand 255 width Z-rated tire will have superior handling than a 235 width Michelin Pilot Sport Z-rated tire? Just based on the treadwidth?

That's the part I was saying was retarded. Because if all you cared about was price and contact-patch width, you can get some pretty cheap chinese made Nankang tires, or Korean made Hankook tires
Old 01-26-2009, 12:53 PM
  #15  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Turbonut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NJ
Age: 60
Posts: 7,901
Received 832 Likes on 679 Posts
Originally Posted by avs007
That's true if you are comparing like tires. However, when you start comparing across different brands/models of tires, that claim does not necessarily hold true anymore. That's why I was just saying that you have to evaluate all aspects of a tire. Just because it's wider does NOT automagically make it better handling. Using your logic, a K-Mart brand 255 width Z-rated tire will have superior handling than a 235 width Michelin Pilot Sport Z-rated tire? Just based on the treadwidth?

That's the part I was saying was retarded. Because if all you cared about was price and contact-patch width, you can get some pretty cheap chinese made Nankang tires, or Korean made Hankook tires
How do you know a K-Mart tire in 255, providing it's not made like a Bridgestone with narrow tread, wouldn't handle better than a 235 Michelin? They are both Z rated and will retain tread contact in excess of 149 mph. Many guys get great performance out of an inexpensive tire.
If you recall, the original analogy was between a BS and Michelin and I suggested the Yoko W4s because of its wider tread contact patch, all UHP tires.
Old 01-26-2009, 05:21 PM
  #16  
Drifting
 
avs007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 2,192
Received 26 Likes on 23 Posts
Originally Posted by Turbonut
How do you know a K-Mart tire in 255, providing it's not made like a Bridgestone with narrow tread, wouldn't handle better than a 235 Michelin? They are both Z rated and will retain tread contact in excess of 149 mph. Many guys get great performance out of an inexpensive tire.
If you recall, the original analogy was between a BS and Michelin and I suggested the Yoko W4s because of its wider tread contact patch, all UHP tires.
That's why I mentioned the Continental ContiExtreme Contact and the Avon M550 A/S. They are both Z-rated, and they both have a bigger contact patch than the Potenza RE960AS, but they both handled worse than the Potenza RE960AS, from what I can tell when I drove on them. (As tested on same car, in the same sized tire)

I was just being sarcastic with the K-Mart thing. My point was that you shouldn't dismiss a tire soley on it's contact patch being a little smaller.
Old 01-27-2009, 01:59 PM
  #17  
Racer
 
D R E W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Tacoma, WA
Age: 44
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
I'm just giving the OP my experiences with these tires. He is trying to decide between the Bridgestones and Michelins and no other tires.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MrHeeltoe
1G TSX Tires, Wheels, & Suspension
20
02-23-2023 01:54 PM
neuronbob
3G RLX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
23
07-16-2019 10:48 AM
navtool.com
Sponsored Sales & Group Buys
87
01-23-2016 01:25 PM
MrHeeltoe
2G TSX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
3
09-29-2015 10:43 PM
MrHeeltoe
3G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
0
09-28-2015 05:43 PM



Quick Reply: Bridgestone Potenza RE960 AS Pole Position vs. Michelin Pilot Sport A/S



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:40 AM.