Blizzak LM-22 or LM-25 and other?
#1
Blizzak LM-22 or LM-25 and other?
I've been thinking about winter tires. since i only use stock 17" for winter, why suffer those EL-42 any longer? they suck in snow anyway (ok ok they suck everywhere).
looking at bridgeston Blizzak LM-22. i noticed it's only H rated. LM-25 is V rated but a bit more $$$. any experiences with these? 99% i'll not be driving my car over 130mph even on dry day. any noticeable differences like mushiness, handling, etc. also any other suggestions? how much would i suffer on gas mileage? Thanks.
looking at bridgeston Blizzak LM-22. i noticed it's only H rated. LM-25 is V rated but a bit more $$$. any experiences with these? 99% i'll not be driving my car over 130mph even on dry day. any noticeable differences like mushiness, handling, etc. also any other suggestions? how much would i suffer on gas mileage? Thanks.
#2
Burning Brakes
based from Gary@tirerack.com, he mentioned that they are about the same. like you said the main difference is the speed rating and the tread pattern. if you know you will be going that fast, then i think you have answered your question.
![2 Cents](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/2cents.gif)
![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
#3
The DVD-A Script Guy
Don't rule out the WS-50. It will not handle as good as the LM22/25 but if you live in an area prone to more icy storms than just snow it will grip much better. In my area we get a lot of storms that turn to freezing rain and the WS-50 will grip much better than the LM22/25. I noticed I big difference at first as the car isn't nearly as tight. A few weeks later, the streets are sandy, and I couldn't care less.
For the few months I need them on the car I will go for the best grip. Tire rack did recommend the LM22 originally but didn't have any problems with the WS-50 once I told them I was prone to more icy conditions. They then agreed the WS-50 was superior in icy conditions.
We have had WS-50s on my wife's van for about 4 winters. Dramatic difference is an understatement. She used to fear the snow. Now she complains about everyone else in the snow as in "what's their problem, it's not that slippery".
For the few months I need them on the car I will go for the best grip. Tire rack did recommend the LM22 originally but didn't have any problems with the WS-50 once I told them I was prone to more icy conditions. They then agreed the WS-50 was superior in icy conditions.
We have had WS-50s on my wife's van for about 4 winters. Dramatic difference is an understatement. She used to fear the snow. Now she complains about everyone else in the snow as in "what's their problem, it's not that slippery".
#4
Originally Posted by Adobeman
Don't rule out the WS-50. It will not handle as good as the LM22/25 but if you live in an area prone to more icy storms than just snow it will grip much better. In my area we get a lot of storms that turn to freezing rain and the WS-50 will grip much better than the LM22/25. I noticed I big difference at first as the car isn't nearly as tight. A few weeks later, the streets are sandy, and I couldn't care less.
For the few months I need them on the car I will go for the best grip. Tire rack did recommend the LM22 originally but didn't have any problems with the WS-50 once I told them I was prone to more icy conditions. They then agreed the WS-50 was superior in icy conditions.
We have had WS-50s on my wife's van for about 4 winters. Dramatic difference is an understatement. She used to fear the snow. Now she complains about everyone else in the snow as in "what's their problem, it's not that slippery".
For the few months I need them on the car I will go for the best grip. Tire rack did recommend the LM22 originally but didn't have any problems with the WS-50 once I told them I was prone to more icy conditions. They then agreed the WS-50 was superior in icy conditions.
We have had WS-50s on my wife's van for about 4 winters. Dramatic difference is an understatement. She used to fear the snow. Now she complains about everyone else in the snow as in "what's their problem, it's not that slippery".
#5
Overlord - Team Abyss
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Maplewood, Minnesota
Age: 43
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm looking for some winter rubber due to my recent mishap. I pray they last a hell of a lot longer than 10k. I'll some through a set of winter tread in one season with that kind of a lifetime!
#6
Originally Posted by TheNip73
I'm looking for some winter rubber due to my recent mishap. I pray they last a hell of a lot longer than 10k. I'll some through a set of winter tread in one season with that kind of a lifetime!
#7
The DVD-A Script Guy
I guess it depends on how you drive. My wife's WS-50s still have plenty of the Blizzak layer and this is the start of the 5th season on them. (there are two sets of indicators, one for the Blizzak layer and one for the overall tire) She does about 10Kmi a year total so I guess 3 to 4K in the winter. I guess that is 12-16K total on the WS-50s. I think the WS-50 has a higher tread wear rating than the 22/25's.
I don't think I will get as many miles on mine on the TL since the I probably accel and corner harder than she does. I have a friend who has 4 WS-50s on a Mustang and I expect he will chew them up much faster than me. Time will tell.
The LM22 is probably a good compromise for you. The WS-50 may be overkill since you say you get little ice. It is supposed to handle better than the 50 but I guess it will probably wear quicker.
I don't think I will get as many miles on mine on the TL since the I probably accel and corner harder than she does. I have a friend who has 4 WS-50s on a Mustang and I expect he will chew them up much faster than me. Time will tell.
The LM22 is probably a good compromise for you. The WS-50 may be overkill since you say you get little ice. It is supposed to handle better than the 50 but I guess it will probably wear quicker.
Trending Topics
#9
The DVD-A Script Guy
Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
Adobe, so the LM25 is the one you would reccomend?
The thing is, I see the term "high performance snow tire" as a bit of an oxymoron. I expect snow tires to grip well in the snow at the expense of dry weather performance. Some will argue that you need the performance for "emergency" situations but I don't think the WS-50s are by any means "dangerous" since they give up some dry performance.
The other argument is cost of ownership of the Blizzaks since they only have "Blizzak" layer for about 1/2 the tire. To my understanding, the WS-50 is a still a "snow tire" compound after the "Blizzak" layer is worn off but the 22/25 doesn't use as "grippy" a "Blizzak" layer and revert to an "all season" compound when worn through. Not sure if that is still true. Either way, if they do wear faster, it is only a few hundred dollars over the life of the car. I can live with that risk.
#11
Overlord - Team Abyss
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Maplewood, Minnesota
Age: 43
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am correct in assuming the LM-22 is inbetween the WS-50 and the LM-25? I think the LM-25 (V rated) is overkill, but I think the WS-50 is going to be too far to the opposite extreme. I am looking for a snow tire that has good snow AND ice performance but won't be too sheepish in handling either. I am more than willing to have it be somewhat sheepish. Something that is 1 step below the WS-50 is what I'm looking for. Suggestions?
#13
Drifting
I just bought a winter wheel/tire package from the TireRack. Their recommendation to me me was 16" Blizzak Revo's. So far, so good.
#15
I have the ws-50 on my TL and would much rather drive it than my Wifes MDX with stock tires in crappy weather. They are the best snow tires I have ever had.
If I keep it under 95 Mph for three months a year - so can you.
If I keep it under 95 Mph for three months a year - so can you.
#16
Overlord - Team Abyss
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Maplewood, Minnesota
Age: 43
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I opted for the LM-22 today. I will follow-up with a report once I have some miles on them. I get them put on late in the week or next week - depending on when I get my car back.
#18
The DVD-A Script Guy
Originally Posted by kilroy
I have the ws-50 on my TL and would much rather drive it than my Wifes MDX with stock tires in crappy weather. They are the best snow tires I have ever had.
If I keep it under 95 Mph for three months a year - so can you.
If I keep it under 95 Mph for three months a year - so can you.
#19
i am thinking more like 4+ mo. from late nov. to early april. still drive carefully tho. don't be like that canadian lady crashed her TL doing 100kmh remember? i believe she had LM-22 on the car.
#20
6th Gear
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Age: 48
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LM-22's!!!
Originally Posted by ttliang
I've been thinking about winter tires. since i only use stock 17" for winter, why suffer those EL-42 any longer? they suck in snow anyway (ok ok they suck everywhere).
looking at bridgeston Blizzak LM-22. i noticed it's only H rated. LM-25 is V rated but a bit more $$$. any experiences with these? 99% i'll not be driving my car over 130mph even on dry day. any noticeable differences like mushiness, handling, etc. also any other suggestions? how much would i suffer on gas mileage? Thanks.
looking at bridgeston Blizzak LM-22. i noticed it's only H rated. LM-25 is V rated but a bit more $$$. any experiences with these? 99% i'll not be driving my car over 130mph even on dry day. any noticeable differences like mushiness, handling, etc. also any other suggestions? how much would i suffer on gas mileage? Thanks.
![2 Cents](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/2cents.gif)
#21
Originally Posted by TheNip73
Blizzak WS-50 for you my man.
I just got these recently and they are a serious winter tire. You can completely forget about driving in a spirited fashion with these things!!, But in terms of getting the best "SNOW+ICE" tire, this is it.
#22
Overlord - Team Abyss
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Maplewood, Minnesota
Age: 43
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So far I'm glad I got the Blizzak LM-22. I can tell it is a snow tire and kinda "bouncy". However, I only have about 150 miles on em and I haven't had em in the snow yet. I can only imagine how those WS-50's are handling...
#23
The DVD-A Script Guy
Originally Posted by TheNip73
So far I'm glad I got the Blizzak LM-22. I can tell it is a snow tire and kinda "bouncy". However, I only have about 150 miles on em and I haven't had em in the snow yet. I can only imagine how those WS-50's are handling...
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Remember, the "gloves come off" when the snow is on the road.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hobbes235
Car Parts for Sale
14
12-24-2006 12:45 AM
thnworld
Car Parts for Sale
1
09-18-2006 04:42 PM