Pulley...problems?
Pulley...problems?
I searched apparently search is down or something. I was considering a UR crank pulley I'm not sure. I know the motor is internally balanced and the pulley isn't harmonically balanced but what about the vibrational aspect.....
any insight....These motors were designed with a certain weight pulley on the end for balance. How would this not shorten the life of bearings??
any insight....These motors were designed with a certain weight pulley on the end for balance. How would this not shorten the life of bearings??
Last edited by JS08TLS; Feb 23, 2009 at 02:35 PM.
The motor is internally balanced and the pulley does not act as a hrmonic balancer. This shouldn't shorten the life of the engine or have any effect on anything. There are plenty of users out there that have done this modification over long periods of time without incident.
The motor is internally balanced and the pulley does not act as a hrmonic balancer. This shouldn't shorten the life of the engine or have any effect on anything. There are plenty of users out there that have done this modification over long periods of time without incident.
Last edited by JS08TLS; Feb 23, 2009 at 03:31 PM.
I think beacause it's so much lighter, any ammount of vibration in the pulley wouldn't transfer nearly as much felt vibration as would the super heavy steel pulley. Also, the machining of this pulley is probably alot more precise than the stock one.
I'm passing on the UR pulley. I'll sacrifice 5hp and save the longevity of the motor.
I highly doubt the UR is made more precisely than a stock honda part.
Trending Topics
You need to hold the UR pulley in you hand and you will change your mind. Lucky me being a sales rep I have about 230,000 miles on two different J32 motors over eight years and NO problems with this pulley. It is a great and safe mod.
Yeah, JD, when your search starts working again this has been touched on in almost every UR thread.
Short answer is no one can explain the elastomeric bearing in the stock pulley but 2G TL owners have hundreds of thousands of miles with no ill effects. It is a beautifully crafted part.
Short answer is no one can explain the elastomeric bearing in the stock pulley but 2G TL owners have hundreds of thousands of miles with no ill effects. It is a beautifully crafted part.
Yeah, JD, when your search starts working again this has been touched on in almost every UR thread.
Short answer is no one can explain the elastomeric bearing in the stock pulley but 2G TL owners have hundreds of thousands of miles with no ill effects. It is a beautifully crafted part.
Short answer is no one can explain the elastomeric bearing in the stock pulley but 2G TL owners have hundreds of thousands of miles with no ill effects. It is a beautifully crafted part.
A 1/10 ounce rubber ring has no effect on your engine's internals.
I already got an email back about the search. The mod said the server broke and they would have someone looking at it today. Should be working any day now.
I just got the pulley done and it is really a night and day change. All for the better. In my opinion I think that the engine runs better with it.
I just got the pulley done and it is really a night and day change. All for the better. In my opinion I think that the engine runs better with it.
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,877
Likes: 624
From: www.ExceleratePerformance.com
And yes the UR pulleys are CNC and 0 gram balanced which is better than the factory pulley.
The rubber ring (elastomer) used in Honda's crank pulleys is there to reduce engine noise.
Would you be talking about the noise the pulley itself makes? Cause it doesn't look like one solid piece. Kinda put together at the rubber ring. If this is the case then there is no big deal going to the UR pulley cause it is one solid part.
Last edited by NCTL05; Feb 24, 2009 at 02:07 PM.
The rubber ring (elastomer) used in Honda's crank pulleys is there to reduce engine noise. That rubber ring does not absorb vibration like you are thinking of. You are thinking of older domestic V8's. There are 2nd gen CL/TL customers with over 200k with the crank pulley with no issues. If you were running 3 times the factory hp or revving past the factory redline then you want an aftermarket damper like ATI or Fluidampr.
And yes the UR pulleys are CNC and 0 gram balanced which is better than the factory pulley.
And yes the UR pulleys are CNC and 0 gram balanced which is better than the factory pulley.
I just did the pulley this past weekend and it really does make a difference. The car idles much smoother and quieter at highway speeds. No vibration at all. The weight savings is crazy!! Very happy with the way it turned out. I had the whole set on my previous car. I am thinking about getting one to go on the wifes MDX to help with fuel.
I just did the pulley this past weekend and it really does make a difference. The car idles much smoother and quieter at highway speeds. No vibration at all. The weight savings is crazy!! Very happy with the way it turned out. I had the whole set on my previous car. I am thinking about getting one to go on the wifes MDX to help with fuel. 
Last edited by JS08TLS; Feb 25, 2009 at 09:45 AM.
....
Typical solutions
There are three principal means of improving NVH:
Deciding which of these to use in solving a particular problem is the challenge facing the NVH engineer.
....
Typical solutions
There are three principal means of improving NVH:
- reducing the source strength, as in making a noise source quieter with a muffler, or improving the balance of a rotating mechanism;
- interrupting the noise or vibration path, with barriers (for noise) or isolators (for vibration); or
- absorption of the noise or vibration energy, as for example with foam noise absorbers, or tuned vibration dampers.
Deciding which of these to use in solving a particular problem is the challenge facing the NVH engineer.
....
In a way it acts similar to the rubber part of the engine mounts.
It's obvious that the amount of noise/vibration reduction provided by the OE partsis minimal. After removal no one ever complains (or as far as I know) even notices increased noise or vibration.
There was a good article posted here sometime back on the difference between hamonic vibration (resonance) dampning and noise/vibration dampning. They are not the same thing.
.
The rubber insert interupts and/or absors noise and/or normal engine vibartion. Not tuned/resonant internal/crankshaft vibration as has been mentioned above, since the engine is internally balanced.
In a way it acts similar to the rubber part of the engine mounts.
It's obvious that the amount of noise/vibration reduction provided by the OE partsis minimal. After removal no one ever complains (or as far as I know) even notices increased noise or vibration.
There was a good article posted here sometime back on the difference between hamonic vibration (resonance) dampning and noise/vibration dampning. They are not the same thing.
.
In a way it acts similar to the rubber part of the engine mounts.
It's obvious that the amount of noise/vibration reduction provided by the OE partsis minimal. After removal no one ever complains (or as far as I know) even notices increased noise or vibration.
There was a good article posted here sometime back on the difference between hamonic vibration (resonance) dampning and noise/vibration dampning. They are not the same thing.
.


