Hi Flow 3rd Cat - good or bad for a supercharger application???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 13, 2010 | 08:05 AM
  #1  
siularbar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Advanced
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 64
Likes: 1
Hi Flow 3rd Cat - good or bad for a supercharger application???

Hi all. I am seeking for opinions for an exhaust setup. I sat in my buddy's 3G the other day, and he has the following exhaust setup:

1) Pre-cat deletes
2) ATLP J-Pipe
3) 3rd cat delete, not sure whether he has the RV6 or ATLP straight pipe
4) ATLP base exhaust

In general, the car sounded pretty good. But the noise level gets pretty harsh at higher RPM and the smell wasn't too plesant. I am working on purchasing a used supercharger for a decent price, and wanted to go down a similar path as far as the exhaust goes.

I have learned that no cats will be the optimum setup for the supercharger. Like I said above, I am not liking the smell and the noise, so the following is what I have in mind:

PCD -> ATLP or RV6 JPIPE -> ATLP or RV6 HiFlow 3rd cat -> ATLP or XLR8 exhaust (with some sort of resonator in between to cut down the noise).

Now here is the question for the gurus: With the setup above, will a Hi-Flow 3rd cat deteriorate performance/exhaust flow for supercharger??? ATLP's site talked about their hi-flow 3rd cat consists of 200 cells vs. 900 stock (I think), and I can't get any info on RV6's 3rd cat.

Inputs/options/comments please!!
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2010 | 09:42 AM
  #2  
Hi speed's Avatar
runnin a little boost
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,227
Likes: 256
No a hi flow 3rd cat will be fine. It may take a hp or two of power but you will never notice. If you don't like the smell and raspyness get hi flow primary cats, they will get rid of both.

Originally Posted by siularbar
Hi all. I am seeking for opinions for an exhaust setup. I sat in my buddy's 3G the other day, and he has the following exhaust setup:

1) Pre-cat deletes
2) ATLP J-Pipe
3) 3rd cat delete, not sure whether he has the RV6 or ATLP straight pipe
4) ATLP base exhaust

In general, the car sounded pretty good. But the noise level gets pretty harsh at higher RPM and the smell wasn't too plesant. I am working on purchasing a used supercharger for a decent price, and wanted to go down a similar path as far as the exhaust goes.

I have learned that no cats will be the optimum setup for the supercharger. Like I said above, I am not liking the smell and the noise, so the following is what I have in mind:

PCD -> ATLP or RV6 JPIPE -> ATLP or RV6 HiFlow 3rd cat -> ATLP or XLR8 exhaust (with some sort of resonator in between to cut down the noise).

Now here is the question for the gurus: With the setup above, will a Hi-Flow 3rd cat deteriorate performance/exhaust flow for supercharger??? ATLP's site talked about their hi-flow 3rd cat consists of 200 cells vs. 900 stock (I think), and I can't get any info on RV6's 3rd cat.

Inputs/options/comments please!!
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2010 | 10:13 AM
  #3  
c2pid's Avatar
Instructor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 176
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by Hi speed
No a hi flow 3rd cat will be fine. It may take a hp or two of power but you will never notice. If you don't like the smell and raspyness get hi flow primary cats, they will get rid of both.
there are hi-flow primary cats? who makes those?
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2010 | 10:16 AM
  #4  
blkaspec's Avatar
Full of water...
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,284
Likes: 11
From: Michigan
i thought i remember reading that adding boost to a completely free flowing exhaust isnt good...i will look for proof. something about needing that added back pressure that the cats provide...
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2010 | 10:25 AM
  #5  
c2pid's Avatar
Instructor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 176
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by blkaspec
i thought i remember reading that adding boost to a completely free flowing exhaust isnt good...i will look for proof. something about needing that added back pressure that the cats provide...
and i always thought boost with a free flowing exhaust is good.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2010 | 02:16 PM
  #6  
I hate cars's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,172
Likes: 1,818
From: Bakersfield
You want the best flowing exhaust for FI applications. Turbos moreso that superchargers because a restriction downstream can hurt spool.

There are no worries about loss of low end torque. The turbo or blower more than make up for it.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2010 | 04:23 PM
  #7  
Etohprn247's Avatar
KoolKatz..
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 416
Likes: 2
From: Fort Worth, Tx
Would it be BAD to drill extra bigger holes in the stock catalytic converter on both ends hence more flow? There's NO O2 sensor plugged in so no check engine lights etc.?
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2010 | 05:26 PM
  #8  
I hate cars's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,172
Likes: 1,818
From: Bakersfield
Originally Posted by Etohprn247
Would it be BAD to drill extra bigger holes in the stock catalytic converter on both ends hence more flow? There's NO O2 sensor plugged in so no check engine lights etc.?
If you're going that far, might as well gut it completely like I did. No worries about check engine light.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2010 | 05:33 PM
  #9  
siularbar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Advanced
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 64
Likes: 1
Thanks guys for your replies!!

I hate cars: So, would adding a hi-flow 3rd cat and a resonator hurt performance of the S/C? If so, how much will I lose?

Originally Posted by I hate cars
If you're going that far, might as well gut it completely like I did. No worries about check engine light.
Originally Posted by I hate cars
You want the best flowing exhaust for FI applications. Turbos moreso that superchargers because a restriction downstream can hurt spool.

There are no worries about loss of low end torque. The turbo or blower more than make up for it.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 07:29 AM
  #10  
blkaspec's Avatar
Full of water...
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,284
Likes: 11
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by I hate cars
You want the best flowing exhaust for FI applications. Turbos moreso that superchargers because a restriction downstream can hurt spool.

There are no worries about loss of low end torque. The turbo or blower more than make up for it.
i was waiting for your reply ok, i guess i was wrong. i just remember reading somewhere that there was a mod(s) that worked better if you didnt "free flow" the entire exhaust. thanks!
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 08:11 AM
  #11  
Inaccurate's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,442
Likes: 482
From: Houston, Texas
SC performs much better with as little back pressure as possible.

NA (normal aspiration) performs better (subjective drivability) with some back pressure.

Most TL's with a SC will destroy the primary cats eventually. The primary cats will disintegrate (crumble). The broken pieces will create obstacles in the cat and also in the third cat further downstream. For this reason, it is highly recommend that no primary cats (not even aftermarket primary cats) be used with the SC. Also, a supercharged TL engine (J32) will produce much more power if no primary cats are used.

The third cat is ok. The third oem cat flows fairly well. There have been no reports from other TL owners of the SC ever destroying or hurting an oem third cat. But of course for the ultimate power possible, no third cat is advised.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 09:21 AM
  #12  
siularbar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Advanced
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 64
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Inaccurate
SC performs much better with as little back pressure as possible.

NA (normal aspiration) performs better (subjective drivability) with some back pressure.

Most TL's with a SC will destroy the primary cats eventually. The primary cats will disintegrate (crumble). The broken pieces will create obstacles in the cat and also in the third cat further downstream. For this reason, it is highly recommend that no primary cats (not even aftermarket primary cats) be used with the SC. Also, a supercharged TL engine (J32) will produce much more power if no primary cats are used.

The third cat is ok. The third oem cat flows fairly well. There have been no reports from other TL owners of the SC ever destroying or hurting an oem third cat. But of course for the ultimate power possible, no third cat is advised.
Thank you! ATLP's website mentioned about their hi-flow 3rd cat contains 200 cells (not sure about RV6's tho), which is much more free flow than the 900 cells oem cat. What about a resonator(s)? Those guys are pretty much free flow as well right?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ExcelerateRep
4G TL Performance Parts & Modifications
8
Dec 11, 2015 12:58 PM
NJALLDAY57
3G TL Problems & Fixes
21
Oct 13, 2015 08:25 AM
DDTsx06
1G RDX Performance Parts & Modifications
8
Sep 8, 2015 06:56 PM
NSolace
2G TL Problems & Fixes
15
Sep 3, 2015 08:02 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:53 PM.