Head/intake porting gains?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-23-2013, 10:08 AM
  #1  
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
mark21742's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 53
Received 20 Likes on 11 Posts
Head/intake porting gains?

I'm working on an 04 j32a3 engine and am getting ready to do some port work on the heads, upper and lower intakes. I've worked lots of GM ls1s, d16, and others, but never touched one of these especially an engine that has the exhaust manifold cast into the head.

What kind of gains can I expect and any parts that show higher gains than others when porting these?

Just to add this motor is going in front of a 5 speed auto in a car that should be a lot lighter than the stock TL in the end.

Thank you guys and tree I'll post up before and after pics!
Old 05-23-2013, 10:12 AM
  #2  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
justnspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Received 16,261 Likes on 11,972 Posts
mustang build!!!
awesome project!

you'll see decent gains from your port work!
Old 05-23-2013, 10:21 AM
  #3  
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
mark21742's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 53
Received 20 Likes on 11 Posts
Yup, lots of work ahead of me lol.

I have no exhaust at all, so I plan on making 2 4 bolt flanges to bolt to the head end see just what size pipe I can go with....right now the open is 2.25-2.5 primaries. If I can only go with 2.25s, then I think I'll merge into one 2.5" pipe and one Dynomax VT muffler, but if I can fit 2.5" primaries off the head I'll probably run dual 2.5"d to the back with an x pipe and two VT mufflers
Old 05-23-2013, 10:23 AM
  #4  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
justnspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Received 16,261 Likes on 11,972 Posts
^you'll want to become friends with Sonnick

https://acurazine.com/forums/3g-tl-performance-parts-modifications-112/j30a5-dyno-me-855798/
he's made great power and is running a similar setup as far as exhaust mods and porting and polishing
The following users liked this post:
mark21742 (05-23-2013)
Old 05-23-2013, 10:41 AM
  #5  
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
mark21742's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 53
Received 20 Likes on 11 Posts
Will do thank you! I thought my search skills were pretty decent, but I haven't been able to find much of anything on these a3 heads.
Old 05-23-2013, 10:54 AM
  #6  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
justnspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Received 16,261 Likes on 11,972 Posts
P.s. we replace the cats with 2.25 straight pipes called pre-cat deletes

http://rv6performance.gostorego.com/...v3pcd-223.html
Old 05-23-2013, 10:57 AM
  #7  
Burning Brakes
iTrader: (1)
 
i_love_cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Hartland, WI
Age: 41
Posts: 1,119
Received 571 Likes on 304 Posts
Originally Posted by mark21742
Will do thank you! I thought my search skills were pretty decent, but I haven't been able to find much of anything on these a3 heads.
you're talking head work, which is rare on that motor. Even Sonnick to my knowledge hasn't touched his heads yet - he only PnPed the IM/lower plenum and port matched them.

For NA, one of (if not the only) person here who has had heads done is Gerzand. I'm trying to acquire his j32a3 heads right now, actually. He went full tilt on them with 3 and 5 angle knife edge porting. The intake side of the heads isn't going to do much without reshaping - you'll get better results on the exhaust side.

I don't know if anyone has done heads by themselves, though, and measured any real gains. Typically you would include a cam regrind with head work like that, and also PnP the IM/runners to make use of the flowing heads.

on a 5at base TL and working on the stock heads, throwing out wildly assumed numbers, I'd say you could probably gain 40-50 whp on top of what it already makes if you include cams and PnP and some tuning.

definitely needs tuning though.
Old 05-23-2013, 11:07 AM
  #8  
Safety Car
iTrader: (7)
 
thisaznboi88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Jose, CA/ Charleston, WV
Posts: 4,045
Received 619 Likes on 459 Posts
atlas.46 has port and polished head, lower runner, and IM. He also bumped the compression on his accord from 10:1 to ~11:1. So that should give you an better idea how much the gains are to your TL.

Just waiting for him to install his clutch and break it in before the next dyno.
Old 05-23-2013, 12:02 PM
  #9  
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
mark21742's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 53
Received 20 Likes on 11 Posts
I doubt if the car will ever see a dyno, and I'm probably going to keep the stock cams in it since it will be only street driven and no mods to the auto tranny... The biggest gains will probably seat of the pants feel since the car will be about the same, or lighter than a stock Honda Civic.

I was looking at the heads last night and it looks like Honda did a pretty good job to start with so hopefully I can get in there and hog out the exhaust side near the flange, then just do some lighter port and bowl work to make them breath better.

My goals are a real strong daily driver that she can get in and drive in an weather year round, dead reliability, and great classic looks.
Old 05-23-2013, 12:15 PM
  #10  
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
mark21742's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 53
Received 20 Likes on 11 Posts
From what I've been reading deleting the intake runner butterflies might be a good option too. It looks like I might be able to gain some top end power without losing much of anything down low...that would let me open up, clean up and smooth out the inside of the upper intake to gain plentium volume.



Well, just for shits and giggles I might have to checkout one of the dyno days around here with it lol
Old 05-23-2013, 12:52 PM
  #11  
Pro
 
NvrDwn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Franklin County Virginia
Posts: 677
Received 132 Likes on 91 Posts
Atlas gained 20whp with just the head work HOWEVER his a/f was off AND he had a slipping clutch! So if you do all of this correctly and at one time I could believe a minimal 40whp gain.
Old 05-23-2013, 01:02 PM
  #12  
Safety Car
iTrader: (7)
 
thisaznboi88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Jose, CA/ Charleston, WV
Posts: 4,045
Received 619 Likes on 459 Posts
Originally Posted by mark21742
From what I've been reading deleting the intake runner butterflies might be a good option too. It looks like I might be able to gain some top end power without losing much of anything down low...that would let me open up, clean up and smooth out the inside of the upper intake to gain plentium volume.



Well, just for shits and giggles I might have to checkout one of the dyno days around here with it lol
Don't delete the butterflies. You will regret it. You lose low end all the way from idle until it goes into vtec
The following users liked this post:
Sonnick (05-24-2013)
Old 05-23-2013, 01:21 PM
  #13  
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
mark21742's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 53
Received 20 Likes on 11 Posts
So thisaznboi88 your saying pull them out, do all the grinding and polishing, then put the butterflies back in to keep more low end?
Old 05-23-2013, 01:25 PM
  #14  
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
mark21742's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 53
Received 20 Likes on 11 Posts
Also, just curious does anyone know exactly what the cam specs are as far as lift, duration and lsa, in and out of Vtec?
Old 05-23-2013, 01:29 PM
  #15  
Pro
iTrader: (1)
 
AccordFlex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Baltimore
Age: 35
Posts: 634
Received 213 Likes on 135 Posts
I swapped for the 3.7L manifold and delete my butterfly valve... Azn, what would you say is the big difference between the two?
Old 05-23-2013, 02:58 PM
  #16  
Pro
 
NvrDwn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Franklin County Virginia
Posts: 677
Received 132 Likes on 91 Posts
Originally Posted by AccordFlex
I swapped for the 3.7L manifold and delete my butterfly valve... Azn, what would you say is the big difference between the two?
Sonnick lost like 10-15 wtq from the removal of the butterfly.
Old 05-23-2013, 03:53 PM
  #17  
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
mark21742's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 53
Received 20 Likes on 11 Posts
I never had it dynoed, but I built a super short runner intake for my old D16 (about 2" runners) it worked great up higher in the rpms, but was a dog in the lower range, so it does make sense.
Old 05-23-2013, 09:45 PM
  #18  
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
mark21742's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 53
Received 20 Likes on 11 Posts
I got a little work done tonight on the upper intake, and lots done on the lower runners!
Kind of hard to see in some of the pics, but I was able to really open the lose runners up.
I also did a little grinding in the heads and upper intake, but you will need to wait on those pics




Old 05-24-2013, 09:30 AM
  #19  
Pro
iTrader: (1)
 
AccordFlex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Baltimore
Age: 35
Posts: 634
Received 213 Likes on 135 Posts
Originally Posted by NvrDwn
Sonnick lost like 10-15 wtq from the removal of the butterfly.
Hmmm, well guess that part is going back in haha.
Old 05-24-2013, 11:57 AM
  #20  
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
mark21742's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 53
Received 20 Likes on 11 Posts
I pulled the butterflies out of my intake to port it all out, but I think I'll bolt them back in after I get it all cleaned out, just to be safe.

I was able to take a LOT of material out of the inside of the upper intake. I'll take and post pics here late tonight after I get it all cleaned up.
Old 05-24-2013, 12:10 PM
  #21  
Pro
 
NvrDwn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Franklin County Virginia
Posts: 677
Received 132 Likes on 91 Posts
Originally Posted by mark21742
I pulled the butterflies out of my intake to port it all out, but I think I'll bolt them back in after I get it all cleaned out, just to be safe.

I was able to take a LOT of material out of the inside of the upper intake. I'll take and post pics here late tonight after I get it all cleaned up.
Be sure to put them in tight! maybe use some high temp glue to help keep them there. Someone put theres in and the screw backed out and the engine ate it.
Old 05-24-2013, 12:41 PM
  #22  
All motor
 
Sonnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 3,530
Received 532 Likes on 395 Posts
Originally Posted by NvrDwn
Atlas gained 20whp with just the head work HOWEVER his a/f was off AND he had a slipping clutch! So if you do all of this correctly and at one time I could believe a minimal 40whp gain.
With supporting mods I would agree. I wouldn't be surprised to see 30-40whp from the intake manifold porting/larger TB (ZDX), and ported heads/runners. The J32a3 is already 11:1, so that will help as well.
Originally Posted by NvrDwn
Sonnick lost like 10-15 wtq from the removal of the butterfly.
This. Under 4K I lost 10-15whp and wtq. Car felt completely different in the lower RPMs after the 3.7 manifold. I can understand the argument that I am comparing a ported stock manifold/stock TB/stock runners to a bored 3.7 TB/IM/ported runners, but the actual gradient of the graph(s) are almost identical before/after 4K, just more or less HP/TQ.
Old 05-24-2013, 01:07 PM
  #23  
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
mark21742's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 53
Received 20 Likes on 11 Posts
I guess throwing Vtec in with the butterflies does make sense....it honestly really is like having to completely different engines, one for low rpms and a completely different on for high rpms.
Old 05-24-2013, 01:15 PM
  #24  
Pro
 
NvrDwn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Franklin County Virginia
Posts: 677
Received 132 Likes on 91 Posts
What did you use to port those?
Old 05-24-2013, 02:03 PM
  #25  
All motor
 
Sonnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 3,530
Received 532 Likes on 395 Posts
FYI, this is my before/after 3.7 manifold/TB dyno. Note the huge loss between 2800-4000 RPM. The only other difference is the 'dip' around 4200 RPM when the butterflies open up is gone once they're deleted (obviously). Not worth it to delete them IMO on a daily driver.

Old 05-24-2013, 03:00 PM
  #26  
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
mark21742's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 53
Received 20 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by NvrDwn
What did you use to port those?
1 aluminum round nose cylinder
2 steel round nose cylinder (keep it well coated with grinders grease)
3 round white stone
4 round 80 grit sanding drum
Then finish off with
5 round 120 grit sanding drum

I can post pics of the bits and drums here later
Old 05-24-2013, 03:03 PM
  #27  
Pro
 
NvrDwn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Franklin County Virginia
Posts: 677
Received 132 Likes on 91 Posts
Originally Posted by mark21742
1 aluminum round nose cylinder
2 steel round nose cylinder (keep it well coated with grinders grease)
3 round white stone
4 round 80 grit sanding drum
Then finish off with
5 round 120 grit sanding drum

I can post pics of the bits and drums here later
That would be great.
Old 05-25-2013, 10:21 AM
  #28  
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
mark21742's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 53
Received 20 Likes on 11 Posts
I still have a little more work to do on them, but here are some before and after pics












Old 05-25-2013, 11:01 AM
  #29  
All motor
 
Sonnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 3,530
Received 532 Likes on 395 Posts
Wow, you took a lot of material off the head where the precats are.
Old 05-25-2013, 03:17 PM
  #30  
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
mark21742's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 53
Received 20 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Sonnick
Wow, you took a lot of material off the head where the precats are.
It's going in a 66 Mustang, so no cats, or pre cats
Old 05-25-2013, 04:44 PM
  #31  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
I would be very careful of the short side radius. It's hard to see how much material you took off but I usually just clean it up without taking any serious material off.

Also, on the exhaust pictures it's hard to see but what is the material blocking the left cylinder from line of sight? Is it EGR or something?

Looking at the intake bowl area with the carbon deposits you can literally picture the flow and how swirl is introduced assuming the carbon is the low pressure area where the fuel has no chance to clean.

I saw flow numbers on these heads before, years ago. I don't remember the numbers but I remember the intake side flows more than my aftermarket and ported heads on my GN. I want to say they bested the LS1 heads too.

It's too bad no one has done much work on these before, it's always nice to know where the water jackets are when porting. At least you don't have to worry about pushrod holes.

Looking forward to the end result and possible dyno. If this is going in a Mustang, what transmission is going behind it?

I also wonder if changing the exhaust side of the cam would be beneficial. We know the vtec intake lobe is pretty aggressive considering it doesn't fall off at all to redline. I wonder if there's any power in a slightly more aggressive exhaust side especially considering they were chosen with a 1200 cell catalytic converter hanging off each head in mind.
Old 05-25-2013, 06:05 PM
  #32  
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
mark21742's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 53
Received 20 Likes on 11 Posts
I've worked on a number of Ls heads, I have an lq4 based built 408 stroker in my 04 GTO.

It was really nice when I started working on them because one of my friends dropped a valve on one of his motors and gave me a cut out head section so I could exactly where all the oil, water and bolt holes went.

I did exactly like you said, I just cleaned up the short side radius....I've never really seen much gain from cutting more of them out. Most of the material I took out was on the long side and around the valve guide...then of course the whole end of the exhaust port and shaped it into more of a collector.



The egr port is on the outside edge of the end runner and you can't see it in the pics, it is just the angle that I took that shot at I think.
Old 05-25-2013, 08:54 PM
  #33  
3.7L Nitrous Breathing CL
iTrader: (7)
 
richardparker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,658
Received 160 Likes on 140 Posts
You should show before and after pics from the same angles.
That way people can see your work a little easier.
Old 05-25-2013, 08:55 PM
  #34  
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
mark21742's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 53
Received 20 Likes on 11 Posts
Top left corner is one of the standard sanding bit from a porting kit
The next few across the top are aluminum cutting bits,
Across the bottom are steel cutting bits that have finer teeth (you need to use "grinders grease" with these on aluminum so they don't clog)
The last one on the far right is a homemade modded shaft for the sander drum kit in the second pic (I took two of the bit shafts and a peice of brake line, then welded them together)
Third pic is my strait and 90 air tools





Old 05-26-2013, 06:57 PM
  #35  
Pro
 
NvrDwn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Franklin County Virginia
Posts: 677
Received 132 Likes on 91 Posts
Thanks. I don't have any extensions to get that deep.
Old 05-26-2013, 07:14 PM
  #36  
All motor
 
Sonnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 3,530
Received 532 Likes on 395 Posts
Originally Posted by NvrDwn
Thanks. I don't have any extensions to get that deep.
That's what she said
The following users liked this post:
AccordFlex (05-27-2013)
Old 05-27-2013, 07:56 PM
  #37  
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
mark21742's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 53
Received 20 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Sonnick
That's what she said
Ok that literally made me lol...and drool a little too lol
The following users liked this post:
Sonnick (05-28-2013)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rp_guy
Member Cars for Sale
9
07-16-2017 07:33 AM
InFaMouSLink
Car Parts for Sale
3
10-30-2015 09:43 AM
blacktsxwagon
5G TLX (2015-2020)
42
10-27-2015 10:12 PM
JarrettLauderdale
2G CL Dynograph Gallery
5
09-21-2015 07:51 PM



Quick Reply: Head/intake porting gains?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:40 AM.