HUGE uncald4 discount on 3rd Gen subwoofers!
#43
Team Owner
Maybe it's marketed toward the non audio crowd that just wants a little bump and doesn't know anything about audio or care what it sounds like.
Providing simple numbers without the attitude might help sales. You blame "us" for your lack of sales. Maybe it's your attitude and unwillingness to answer a simple question.
"But now everyone here is a professional. Everyone knows what I know and can do what I do." Maybe it's true, maybe several of us know more than you do. I'll give it to you, I know very little about fiberglassing, that's why I paid to have my kicks made but after saying that a small sub is quicker I seriously doubt your knowledge and I think that's why you instantly get defensive when anyone asks questions.
#45
Moderator
Chapter Leader (South Florida Region)
Chapter Leader (South Florida Region)
iTrader: (6)
Purely from a business standpoint, the getting defensive method definitely doesn't resound well with customers. If you know something you know it, if you don't it's always better to just listen and say that you weren't aware of that. I don't think everyone can make the enclosures uncald4 makes and I don't think everyone wants to. I'm guessing each one is a one off production which takes you a lot of labor which keeps the prices up...if you wanted to go next level I would have suggested coming up with a way to produce them in bulk and then price would have dropped and a lot more people would probably buy.
There's always someone that knows less and there's always someone that knows more...just the way it is.
Here are my subs...not to take it too far off topic, but just answering the question. Crutchfield says NOT recommended for free air so I assumed that meant IB.
These subs, I've had for 6 years now...they are tanks and have been able to handle plenty o power.
http://www.crutchfield.com/S-z3fPvdI...n-AW1206T.html
So, in closing, thanks to you audio buffs for the added info.
And thanks to Uncald4 for your addition to helping with the modding and customizing crowd for a car that doesn't have a big aftermarket (or didn't ) I would suggest you don't leave the forum altogether in case you need to come in and point people toward your online site. Make a new username like Uncald4 II or something.
There's always someone that knows less and there's always someone that knows more...just the way it is.
Here are my subs...not to take it too far off topic, but just answering the question. Crutchfield says NOT recommended for free air so I assumed that meant IB.
These subs, I've had for 6 years now...they are tanks and have been able to handle plenty o power.
http://www.crutchfield.com/S-z3fPvdI...n-AW1206T.html
So, in closing, thanks to you audio buffs for the added info.
And thanks to Uncald4 for your addition to helping with the modding and customizing crowd for a car that doesn't have a big aftermarket (or didn't ) I would suggest you don't leave the forum altogether in case you need to come in and point people toward your online site. Make a new username like Uncald4 II or something.
#48
Team Owner
Purely from a business standpoint, the getting defensive method definitely doesn't resound well with customers. If you know something you know it, if you don't it's always better to just listen and say that you weren't aware of that. I don't think everyone can make the enclosures uncald4 makes and I don't think everyone wants to. I'm guessing each one is a one off production which takes you a lot of labor which keeps the prices up...if you wanted to go next level I would have suggested coming up with a way to produce them in bulk and then price would have dropped and a lot more people would probably buy.
There's always someone that knows less and there's always someone that knows more...just the way it is.
Here are my subs...not to take it too far off topic, but just answering the question. Crutchfield says NOT recommended for free air so I assumed that meant IB.
These subs, I've had for 6 years now...they are tanks and have been able to handle plenty o power.
http://www.crutchfield.com/S-z3fPvdI...n-AW1206T.html
There's always someone that knows less and there's always someone that knows more...just the way it is.
Here are my subs...not to take it too far off topic, but just answering the question. Crutchfield says NOT recommended for free air so I assumed that meant IB.
These subs, I've had for 6 years now...they are tanks and have been able to handle plenty o power.
http://www.crutchfield.com/S-z3fPvdI...n-AW1206T.html
You can use any sub in IB but whether or not it would sound right is another story. I've found for the most part just about every sub people have tried sounds ok in IB. Manufacturers don't want people trying it because the warranty claims would pile up when people try and throw the same power on them that they did in a sealed setup. JL specifically told me not to use the W6 in IB but I did anyway and that's one of the best sounding sub setups I've ever heard.
With that said, these subs look best suited for a ported setup. If yours is ported now, you will probably be very disappointed with the output in IB. I still can't get over the efficiency. 96.4@1w 1m They're more than twice as efficient as my IB15s that I always brag about. I might keep an eye out for anyone selling one of these.
#49
Team Owner
I just can't get over not answering the airspace and tuning frequency questions. That's like asking a car salesman which engine the car you're purchasing has and him getting defensive and saying trust me, it's the right one.
#50
Drifting
The specs look decent for IB. 18mm xmax isn't bad, the pair would be pretty loud. The efficiency is super high, I had no idea. In IB, 100w would probably be about right.
You can use any sub in IB but whether or not it would sound right is another story. I've found for the most part just about every sub people have tried sounds ok in IB. Manufacturers don't want people trying it because the warranty claims would pile up when people try and throw the same power on them that they did in a sealed setup. JL specifically told me not to use the W6 in IB but I did anyway and that's one of the best sounding sub setups I've ever heard.
With that said, these subs look best suited for a ported setup. If yours is ported now, you will probably be very disappointed with the output in IB. I still can't get over the efficiency. 96.4@1w 1m They're more than twice as efficient as my IB15s that I always brag about. I might keep an eye out for anyone selling one of these.
You can use any sub in IB but whether or not it would sound right is another story. I've found for the most part just about every sub people have tried sounds ok in IB. Manufacturers don't want people trying it because the warranty claims would pile up when people try and throw the same power on them that they did in a sealed setup. JL specifically told me not to use the W6 in IB but I did anyway and that's one of the best sounding sub setups I've ever heard.
With that said, these subs look best suited for a ported setup. If yours is ported now, you will probably be very disappointed with the output in IB. I still can't get over the efficiency. 96.4@1w 1m They're more than twice as efficient as my IB15s that I always brag about. I might keep an eye out for anyone selling one of these.
audiobling subs being 96db efficient? i don't believe it, lol.
#51
Moderator
Chapter Leader (South Florida Region)
Chapter Leader (South Florida Region)
iTrader: (6)
The specs look decent for IB. 18mm xmax isn't bad, the pair would be pretty loud. The efficiency is super high, I had no idea. In IB, 100w would probably be about right.
You can use any sub in IB but whether or not it would sound right is another story. I've found for the most part just about every sub people have tried sounds ok in IB. Manufacturers don't want people trying it because the warranty claims would pile up when people try and throw the same power on them that they did in a sealed setup. JL specifically told me not to use the W6 in IB but I did anyway and that's one of the best sounding sub setups I've ever heard.
With that said, these subs look best suited for a ported setup. If yours is ported now, you will probably be very disappointed with the output in IB. I still can't get over the efficiency. 96.4@1w 1m They're more than twice as efficient as my IB15s that I always brag about. I might keep an eye out for anyone selling one of these.
You can use any sub in IB but whether or not it would sound right is another story. I've found for the most part just about every sub people have tried sounds ok in IB. Manufacturers don't want people trying it because the warranty claims would pile up when people try and throw the same power on them that they did in a sealed setup. JL specifically told me not to use the W6 in IB but I did anyway and that's one of the best sounding sub setups I've ever heard.
With that said, these subs look best suited for a ported setup. If yours is ported now, you will probably be very disappointed with the output in IB. I still can't get over the efficiency. 96.4@1w 1m They're more than twice as efficient as my IB15s that I always brag about. I might keep an eye out for anyone selling one of these.
Funny story actually...I bought one of them, right...probably for about $89 IIRC...mind you, we're talking 6 years ago (at least!). So fedex delivery says it's on my doorstep. I get home and there's nothing. I call and say someone stole it. No problem, they send me another one. So new one comes and a week after that the original one shows up on my doorstep. I'm like WOW...so I go back to the store to give them the other one back. The girl at the customer service desk looks at me and says "ummm...if I put this in the back, one of our techs is just going to steal it...you should just keep it". I said OK!
In addition, they had given me a box for 2 12's (ironic?) and when I told them I had only ordered one they gave me 1 for 1 12. I ran just 1 12 for a bit since I was limited on space but once I amp'd the inside speakers...I tested out putting in both 12's and I was hooked.
They actually hit VERY nicely right now...can handle 1100 RMS each...and am feeding them 1ohm stable 1500 watts (at 5/8's gain) with my MB Quart Q amp. It runs to a knob up front that came with the amp that actually has a clip signal indicator ON the knob too. Pretty awesome since I can adjust bass on the fly.
One day, I'll probably give IB a try...guess the 2 and a 1/2" rubber surround should have been a clue that they'd be able to pound pretty well.
#52
UA7 6MT
iTrader: (1)
I was looking into one of these to install a single 10" JL 10W3v3-4 which would receive about 250-300W RMS to just add some bass to my setup.
Is the general consensus that these enclosures would not be ideal in terms of SQ perspective?
I am looking to get some good SQ without taking up too much trunk space and not to mention the added weight.
Is the general consensus that these enclosures would not be ideal in terms of SQ perspective?
I am looking to get some good SQ without taking up too much trunk space and not to mention the added weight.
#53
Coolest A-zine Member
iTrader: (1)
I was looking into one of these to install a single 10" JL 10W3v3-4 which would receive about 250-300W RMS to just add some bass to my setup.
Is the general consensus that these enclosures would not be ideal in terms of SQ perspective?
I am looking to get some good SQ without taking up too much trunk space and not to mention the added weight.
Is the general consensus that these enclosures would not be ideal in terms of SQ perspective?
I am looking to get some good SQ without taking up too much trunk space and not to mention the added weight.
I will say that if you dont have the sub yet, step up to the 12.
#54
Drifting
Sealed is much easier to get right than ported first of all. When dealing with ported you have to worry about port velocity, length, frequency, etc etc. With that being said...these enclosures seem to hold up for the people that have them so if you're looking for a small, side loaded enclosure then go for it.
I will say that if you dont have the sub yet, step up to the 12.
I will say that if you dont have the sub yet, step up to the 12.
skip the w3 and get a image dynamics id or idq
They do much better in small sealed
#55
Drifting
iTrader: (9)
I just picked up a 10W6v2 for one of these enclosures, and will install in next week. My install guy was saying that a sealed enclosure built to JL specs for the sub is too small to sound good. I can't imagine the official JL specs being wildly off, and I know I've seen people here run this exact set up and be happy. Any idea if I will have any issues with this?
#56
Coolest A-zine Member
iTrader: (1)
I just picked up a 10W6v2 for one of these enclosures, and will install in next week. My install guy was saying that a sealed enclosure built to JL specs for the sub is too small to sound good. I can't imagine the official JL specs being wildly off, and I know I've seen people here run this exact set up and be happy. Any idea if I will have any issues with this?
An installer that is competent. None of those in this state lol. But yeah, JL's specs (and most actually) are on the small side. My 12w6's say around 1.25 but they sound much better in 1.5/sub. The 10" calls for 0.625 so 1cuft or slightly more should be fine.
#57
The following users liked this post:
KJ TL-S (02-03-2012)
#61
Drifting
iTrader: (9)
Perfect, I think I'll do just that. I'm not looking to make every single detail as perfect as possible, I'm more looking for a good quality setup, SQ over SPL all day, and minimal trunk space occupied. Hopefully this all works nicely, the new stuff is going in a week from today and the amp is moving to the ceiling, should make for a nice, clean looking install.
#63
Team Owner
Good advice in here. The W7 is JL's best SQ sub and it happens to get loud as well. Put it in a larger box and the power requirements go down, the response flattens out, and it sounds better on every type of music.
#65
Team Owner
#66
Drifting
iTrader: (9)
Ah, gotcha. Yea, that w7 is nice for sure, but out of my price range. The w6 was more than I was looking to spend too, but I decided the quality would be worth it over my second choice, the alpine type r. If I keep going, I'll probably get either a 300/2 or 300/4. Is there a good reason to get one over the other? I'm wondering if it's worth it to amp the rears or just leave them be.
And I will definitely post up some pics when it's done, can't wait.
And I will definitely post up some pics when it's done, can't wait.
#68
Drifting
iTrader: (9)
I already have the sub powered just fine with a Polk MOMO C500.1 . The next step would be amping the fronts or the fronts and rears. Thats why I'm trying to figure out if I should just get a 300/2 for the fronts and leave the rears as they are, or if I would go with a 300/4 and do all 4 speakers. Is a 300.2 overkill for most component sets? 150W x 2 @ 4 ohms if I went with the matching amp to my C500.1, which I have access to purchasing, or I would imagine the same or similar specs with the JL 300.2.
It seems like its more difficult to get to the rears, taking the seat out and all. Is it an easier install to just power the front speakers? I have mine faded towards the front already, and if I got some decent components and amped them up front, I would probably just move it even more to the front.
It seems like its more difficult to get to the rears, taking the seat out and all. Is it an easier install to just power the front speakers? I have mine faded towards the front already, and if I got some decent components and amped them up front, I would probably just move it even more to the front.
#69
UA7 6MT
iTrader: (1)
Sealed is much easier to get right than ported first of all. When dealing with ported you have to worry about port velocity, length, frequency, etc etc. With that being said...these enclosures seem to hold up for the people that have them so if you're looking for a small, side loaded enclosure then go for it.
I will say that if you dont have the sub yet, step up to the 12.
I will say that if you dont have the sub yet, step up to the 12.
Its not that I cant afford a 12 but I have always been impartial towards a hard hitting 10 vs a 12.
I am not looking for a lot off bass either just enough to compliment my current system.
I have read some good things about them but I still got lots of time to do some research before I pull the trigger.
#70
Team Owner
The size of a sub has no effect on how hard it hits. The enclosure determines this. You can have a 15 that hits as hard or much harder than a 10. It's always better to go with the largest speaker or multiples as you can fit whether your goal is SQ, SPL, or both. That's why I run a pair of 15s... but the sound is determined by the enclosure.
The following users liked this post:
TmaX (02-04-2012)
#71
UA7 6MT
iTrader: (1)
The size of a sub has no effect on how hard it hits. The enclosure determines this. You can have a 15 that hits as hard or much harder than a 10. It's always better to go with the largest speaker or multiples as you can fit whether your goal is SQ, SPL, or both. That's why I run a pair of 15s... but the sound is determined by the enclosure.
I'm going to keep a look out for any good deals on a 12 locally then.
The reason I was looking at this enclosure b/c it allows me to retain the most amount of trunk space.
From the above posts having the enclosure build a bit larger than the JL Specs would also aid in giving me better bass.
#72
Coolest A-zine Member
iTrader: (1)
Most enclosure specs are on the small side because it will protect the sub & give what 90% of car audio users want...boomy and loud-sounding. Anyways, go for the 12.
KJ- I'd run fronts only. That 300/2 will be fine if your running through the passives. Actually..I'd personally like a bit more power but for 90% of people that'll be fine.
KJ- I'd run fronts only. That 300/2 will be fine if your running through the passives. Actually..I'd personally like a bit more power but for 90% of people that'll be fine.
#73
You're right.... you guys are the AZ car audio nazi's. I'm just a peon.
I'm not here to win discussions. I will always steer clear of car audio discussions with forum members because it's a complete waste of time. My customers will always stand behind me because of my experience, honesty and integrity. You clowns are not my customers and can fuck off.
You guys need to call the winningest car ever in competitive sound and tell him that he should be running 15's instead of 6" and 8" subwoofers.
I'm not here to win discussions. I will always steer clear of car audio discussions with forum members because it's a complete waste of time. My customers will always stand behind me because of my experience, honesty and integrity. You clowns are not my customers and can fuck off.
You guys need to call the winningest car ever in competitive sound and tell him that he should be running 15's instead of 6" and 8" subwoofers.
Last edited by uncald4; 02-04-2012 at 11:57 AM.
#74
Drifting
arguably the best and most dymanic sounding car in the world(richard clark's grand national) ran 15's...
The SpeakerWorks Buick
In 1988, another superstar car was introduced to the car audio world. The 1986 Buick Grand National (Installations April '89 and August '92) built by SpeakerWorks in Orange, California (and later sold to Richard Clark), is believed to be the only vehicle ever to retire undefeated from the pro division of the national sound-off circuit.
The bad black Buick won the Alpine Car Audio Nationals II Pro Unlimited (751 watts and up) division in '88, and IASCA's Pro unlimited title in '89, '90, and '91 before being retired by Clark.
"It's the winningest car of all time in the Pro category," said Clark, who keeps the car in storage in North Carolina. "It was totally undefeated, and its design had a big impact on the way things are done today."
The SpeakerWorks Buick was "the winningest car" in IASCA's Pro division, according to Richard Clark. The system featured two 15-inch subwoofers behind the rear seat, and a 12-inch sub in each rear side panel.
According to Eric Holdaway, whose family owns SpeakerWorks and designed the original system, the speaker locations in the Buick were a pioneering concept.
"People thought we were nuts to put speakers in the kick panels," said Holdaway. "Our goal was to maximize the pathlengths for better imaging and staging. It was a groundbreaking approach that most top installers are following today."
The all-stealth Buick, equipped with only six speakers and nearly 5,000 watts of power, won four national titles and consistently hit 140+ dB. "I won $60,000 in prize money in one year with that car," said Clark.
In 1988, another superstar car was introduced to the car audio world. The 1986 Buick Grand National (Installations April '89 and August '92) built by SpeakerWorks in Orange, California (and later sold to Richard Clark), is believed to be the only vehicle ever to retire undefeated from the pro division of the national sound-off circuit.
The bad black Buick won the Alpine Car Audio Nationals II Pro Unlimited (751 watts and up) division in '88, and IASCA's Pro unlimited title in '89, '90, and '91 before being retired by Clark.
"It's the winningest car of all time in the Pro category," said Clark, who keeps the car in storage in North Carolina. "It was totally undefeated, and its design had a big impact on the way things are done today."
The SpeakerWorks Buick was "the winningest car" in IASCA's Pro division, according to Richard Clark. The system featured two 15-inch subwoofers behind the rear seat, and a 12-inch sub in each rear side panel.
According to Eric Holdaway, whose family owns SpeakerWorks and designed the original system, the speaker locations in the Buick were a pioneering concept.
"People thought we were nuts to put speakers in the kick panels," said Holdaway. "Our goal was to maximize the pathlengths for better imaging and staging. It was a groundbreaking approach that most top installers are following today."
The all-stealth Buick, equipped with only six speakers and nearly 5,000 watts of power, won four national titles and consistently hit 140+ dB. "I won $60,000 in prize money in one year with that car," said Clark.
yeah...myth busted.
#75
Drifting
iTrader: (9)
[QUOTE=Trunk Monkey;13530683
KJ- I'd run fronts only. That 300/2 will be fine if your running through the passives. Actually..I'd personally like a bit more power but for 90% of people that'll be fine.[/QUOTE]
That seems like it would work out pretty well then. The amp actually tests out at about 175 x 2 as opposed to the 150 x 2, so there would be a little extra power anyway. Thanks for the input. Don't know if I'll do this anytime soon or not, but its nice to have the info.
KJ- I'd run fronts only. That 300/2 will be fine if your running through the passives. Actually..I'd personally like a bit more power but for 90% of people that'll be fine.[/QUOTE]
That seems like it would work out pretty well then. The amp actually tests out at about 175 x 2 as opposed to the 150 x 2, so there would be a little extra power anyway. Thanks for the input. Don't know if I'll do this anytime soon or not, but its nice to have the info.
#76
HUGE Discount until 02/22/2012......
$256.98 plus shipping for a sealed 10" enclosure
$262.34 plus shipping for a sealed 12" enclosure
$290 plus shipping for a ported 8" enclosure
$366 plus shipping for a ported 10" enclosure
PM or email me for package deals including JL Audio, Kicker, Rockford Fosgate and Boston Acoustics amps and subs.
Prices above include a custom built fiberglass subwoofer enclosure with trunk matched carpet. Custom variants are available at additional cost. Contact me for details.
$256.98 plus shipping for a sealed 10" enclosure
$262.34 plus shipping for a sealed 12" enclosure
$290 plus shipping for a ported 8" enclosure
$366 plus shipping for a ported 10" enclosure
PM or email me for package deals including JL Audio, Kicker, Rockford Fosgate and Boston Acoustics amps and subs.
Prices above include a custom built fiberglass subwoofer enclosure with trunk matched carpet. Custom variants are available at additional cost. Contact me for details.
#77
Team Owner
You're right.... you guys are the AZ car audio nazi's. I'm just a peon.
I'm not here to win discussions. I will always steer clear of car audio discussions with forum members because it's a complete waste of time. My customers will always stand behind me because of my experience, honesty and integrity. You clowns are not my customers and can fuck off.
You guys need to call the winningest car ever in competitive sound and tell him that he should be running 15's instead of 6" and 8" subwoofers.
I'm not here to win discussions. I will always steer clear of car audio discussions with forum members because it's a complete waste of time. My customers will always stand behind me because of my experience, honesty and integrity. You clowns are not my customers and can fuck off.
You guys need to call the winningest car ever in competitive sound and tell him that he should be running 15's instead of 6" and 8" subwoofers.
Of course you steer clear of discussions, you don't even know the displacement or tuning frequency of the enclosures you sell. It's your job to provide basic specs of your product and you can't/won't. Any vendor with this attitude tells me to run, not walk away. For the price you demand, you can't supply specs, really? Instead you give off this I'm better than you attitude. I hope no one buys another one of your products, you're busted.
JL spec enclosures don't give the best SQ, they're there to give a good compromise and most importantly to protect the sub and make sure it hits the thermal limits before the mechanical limits. Make the enclosure larger and you lower power requirements and increase SQ. This is coming from someone with a brain that has used these subs in 3 different sealed enclosures, ported, bandpass, and IB. How much experience do YOU have in these setups?
We are not your customers because we have a brain. You literally lost all respect when you said sub size makes a difference in the way it sounds.
You're good at marketing a product, that doesn't mean you know anything about it.
If you're talking about the HAT car with a 6" in a t-line, that's not doable for people that don't want their entire trunk taken up by a little sub and that particular one might have one win. The entire team has a ton of wins but not with the 6".
You'll also realize that competition and daily drivers are not tuned the same way and should not be tuned the same way. I've had some very big, very winning names in the industry admit that if the same x over points are used with any sort of power as you do in daily driving you're going to blow something. Almost all have a daily driving tune and a comp tune. If you've ever been to judging, they're judged at a low level, something like 90db. Depending on efficiency, 90db requires 1-2w of power. So fine, run a 6" or 8". Comp cars sound boring to me. I've tuned my car that way and I can't get used to it. I like bass. I like the bass integrated but I like a lot of it and no 8" or 10" is going to give me the SPL along with SQ that I need. Some of best sounding cars I've ever heard, even at competitions were not the winners but that's a whole different (and sore) subject.
If you're talking about certain SPL cars that have hit crazy numbers, keep in mind they're one note wonders that sound awful on music. They're usually tuned very high and are super efficient at one note. A pair of 15s will have great SPL on real music from 20hz-100hz.
So I ask one last time, what are your enclosure specs, and what are the ported ones tuned to? If I have to, I'll buy one off of someone and post the results myself. All you had to do is give out common information that EVERY other manufacturer supplies without being asked.
Last edited by I hate cars; 02-04-2012 at 02:22 PM.
#78
Coolest A-zine Member
iTrader: (1)
That seems like it would work out pretty well then. The amp actually tests out at about 175 x 2 as opposed to the 150 x 2, so there would be a little extra power anyway. Thanks for the input. Don't know if I'll do this anytime soon or not, but its nice to have the info.
You're right.... you guys are the AZ car audio nazi's. I'm just a peon.
I'm not here to win discussions. I will always steer clear of car audio discussions with forum members because it's a complete waste of time. My customers will always stand behind me because of my experience, honesty and integrity. You clowns are not my customers and can fuck off.
You guys need to call the winningest car ever in competitive sound and tell him that he should be running 15's instead of 6" and 8" subwoofers.
I'm not here to win discussions. I will always steer clear of car audio discussions with forum members because it's a complete waste of time. My customers will always stand behind me because of my experience, honesty and integrity. You clowns are not my customers and can fuck off.
You guys need to call the winningest car ever in competitive sound and tell him that he should be running 15's instead of 6" and 8" subwoofers.
Last edited by Trunk Monkey; 02-04-2012 at 02:38 PM.
#79
Team Owner
BEAUTIFUL! I have seen many pics of your enclosures and it's honestly sincere craftsmanship and it's a real bummer to see many ppl disregard your experience. Your work has been a real inspiration for me to dust off my subs and revive my old passion for car audio! Best of luck for you and your crew!
I know at first glance he seems to know his stuff but if I were guessing he does not build this product, he sells it. Nothing wrong with that.
Making statements that have been busted a long time ago like an 8" sub hits harder or tighter than a larger sub is a very bad thing to say when you're supposed to know more than all of us little peons. Just about everyone has made that statement at one time including myself but when you claim to be above everyone with a condescending attitude, that statement is unacceptable.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MrHeeltoe
1G TSX Tires, Wheels, & Suspension
20
02-23-2023 01:54 PM
emailnatec
5G TLX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
29
09-28-2018 04:27 PM
kb1rl
2G RL Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
5
09-30-2015 10:17 AM
MrHeeltoe
2G TSX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
3
09-29-2015 10:43 PM
MrHeeltoe
3G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
0
09-28-2015 05:43 PM