CNET's number 1 failure the decade was.....
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
CNET's number 1 failure the decade was.....
DVD-A...
Here's the video.
http://cnettv.cnet.com/home-entertai...carouselMain.0
What do you think about this?
Here's the video.
http://cnettv.cnet.com/home-entertai...carouselMain.0
What do you think about this?
#2
DVD-A...
Here's the video.
http://cnettv.cnet.com/home-entertai...carouselMain.0
What do you think about this?
Here's the video.
http://cnettv.cnet.com/home-entertai...carouselMain.0
What do you think about this?
However, I think they misjudged. I think 3d TV will been the biggest flop of 00-10.
#3
Full of water...
The problem, no one knew it existed....and then everyone decided packing more music on a device was more important than the content itself. I love DVD-A's, love them. They sound SO awesome and make music listening so much better. Its like the first time i hooked up my surround sound to my 19" tv. Before, small picture and tiny sound...then, huge sound and who cares about the picture. I think the assessment was correct, no hype = failed product. I think my drive home from work today will consist of some Beatles Love on DVD-A...I cant wait!
#4
Senior Moderator
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,641
Received 2,329 Likes
on
1,309 Posts
I think most consumers are morons, wanting compressed 128 kbps MP3s instead of clear/crisp music.
#5
Keep Right Except to Pass
I think there were a number of problems that hamstrung DVD-A.
(a) Format war with SACD. Both were excellent formats for high-rez music, but the industry simply never seems to learn that customers don't appreciate it when they adopt competing formats.
(b) Incompatibility with most existing hardware, including DVD players, which surely confused people who saw "DVD" on there but who didn't realize that you need a separate player. Most people didn't want to buy a new player just to play music. (I already had an SACD player given to me one Christmas by my father, and then after I got the TL I upgraded my DVD player to a Marantz universal player that played both formats, but I know I'm an exception.)
(c) Lack of publicity outside the high-end audio press. (Stereophile and the Absolute Sound have provided ample coverage, but they're hardly mainstream.)
(d) Bad timing in releasing the format right as the download world heated up.
(e) The point Ken1997TL notes—the average customer is uneducated and cares only about convenience. Other customers who might be persuaded by the much higher-quality sound never got to hear it, or were put off by the inability to put the high-rez music on an iPod or similar device in high-rez (or multichannel) format.
(f) The media hype about what they erroneously call ".MP3 players." It leads the uneducated to think music should be formatted as .MP3s. An iPod is not an .MP3 player. It can play .MP3s, sure. But it's not restricted to that format. A more appropriate term would be "digital music player," although I suppose even that's not right because an iPod can handle other sorts of stuff as well. (Edited to add: I see Wikipedia uses the term "portable media player." That's a good generic term, I guess.)
(My disdain for .MP3 is not totally principled. If I have a choice between a concert recording available only as an .MP3 or no recording at all, then sure, the .MP3 is better than nothing. But anyone who has ears can readily tell the difference, especially when it comes to the bass.)
(a) Format war with SACD. Both were excellent formats for high-rez music, but the industry simply never seems to learn that customers don't appreciate it when they adopt competing formats.
(b) Incompatibility with most existing hardware, including DVD players, which surely confused people who saw "DVD" on there but who didn't realize that you need a separate player. Most people didn't want to buy a new player just to play music. (I already had an SACD player given to me one Christmas by my father, and then after I got the TL I upgraded my DVD player to a Marantz universal player that played both formats, but I know I'm an exception.)
(c) Lack of publicity outside the high-end audio press. (Stereophile and the Absolute Sound have provided ample coverage, but they're hardly mainstream.)
(d) Bad timing in releasing the format right as the download world heated up.
(e) The point Ken1997TL notes—the average customer is uneducated and cares only about convenience. Other customers who might be persuaded by the much higher-quality sound never got to hear it, or were put off by the inability to put the high-rez music on an iPod or similar device in high-rez (or multichannel) format.
(f) The media hype about what they erroneously call ".MP3 players." It leads the uneducated to think music should be formatted as .MP3s. An iPod is not an .MP3 player. It can play .MP3s, sure. But it's not restricted to that format. A more appropriate term would be "digital music player," although I suppose even that's not right because an iPod can handle other sorts of stuff as well. (Edited to add: I see Wikipedia uses the term "portable media player." That's a good generic term, I guess.)
(My disdain for .MP3 is not totally principled. If I have a choice between a concert recording available only as an .MP3 or no recording at all, then sure, the .MP3 is better than nothing. But anyone who has ears can readily tell the difference, especially when it comes to the bass.)
#6
2007 TL Type-S NBP
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Rexburg, Idaho
Age: 49
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
6 Posts
After dealing with road and wind noise it's tough for us blue collar types to justify the added cost of DVD-A. Can I tell the difference: Yes. Can I appreciate the difference: Yes, if I'm parked. Sort of if I'm doing 90mph on the Idaho/Utah/Montana interstates. Can I justify the cost of a DVD-A disc when I can get the same album on Amazon mp3 for half price and not have to monkey around with switching discs every time my mood changes: No. Just my opinion though. If I made six figures I'd go ahead and spend the money on DVD-A so I could use it in my home system as well but that's all just fantasy at this point.
#7
Team Owner
That's the truth. I'm amazed at how terrible the quality is on some store bought CDs. The better my system gets the worse the low quality recordings are and the better the good recordings sound. I wish we had the option to pay a few extra bucks for a good recording.
Trending Topics
#8
SHAWD 04TL is in
its turning into the old saying... GARBAGE IN-GARBAGE OUT
#9
Advanced
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Anchorage,AK
Age: 34
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok its very simple...Not too many people make DVD A's for one @. they are kinda expensive...HOWEVER if you have ever listened to a DVD A it is like Blu Ray versus VHS there isnt much of a comparison...it sounds amazing. The thing is that there arent many of them not that they suck. Cnet needs to look at worse things in life like 3D TV...Motorola BackFlip...Dodge Durango lol
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jamus22
2G TL Problems & Fixes
24
06-11-2023 10:08 AM
MrHeeltoe
1G TSX Tires, Wheels, & Suspension
20
02-23-2023 01:54 PM
MrHeeltoe
2G TSX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
3
09-29-2015 10:43 PM
MrHeeltoe
3G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
0
09-28-2015 05:43 PM