View Poll Results: Which MT fluid ?
GM Synchromesh transmission fluid
70
72.16%
Honda Manual transmission fluid
27
27.84%
Voters: 97. You may not vote on this poll
Trans fluid, GM Synchromesh or Honda MT fluid...your opinions
#42
Racer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Enfield, CT
Age: 67
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm glad I listened to you guys.....it's been about a month since I have had the GM Synchromesh put in and the feel of the stick is 100% better. It's almost unbelievable the difference it has made.
#43
GM Synchromesh is an MTF fluid and should not be used on an AT trans.
Also, I use the AmsOil MTF in my car and I feel the same way about it as you guys do about the GM stuff. The trans is much smoother and feels better.
Also, I use the AmsOil MTF in my car and I feel the same way about it as you guys do about the GM stuff. The trans is much smoother and feels better.
#44
Not a Blowhole
Guys - guys - I think the GMSFM is great or I would not have posted on it. If I am a BS'er, that is news to me. I have posted in detail on what is good about the GMSFM, and have also run extensive lab analyses on used HG MTF, GMSFM, and others.
The Specialty Formulations was around a long time until I decided to try it - note that my friend Michael Wan (we have never met, onbly email buds) has a lot of respect for Molakule, the man behind SF, but MW is also a sensible chapskate (I say that with respect) and did not like the price increases in the SF MTL-P. Me? I am well endowed financially, at least to cover the xtra cost of a few quarts of fluid - and yes, I pay for everything I use and recommend, so there is not corruption in this boy - I y'am what I y'am, a la Popeye.
Anyway, I tried the MTL-P, and found it to shift as well as GMSFM, and that it had a heartier (robust, stronger, longer lasting for those in Yorba Linda). I hated the color (purple) as I like stealth fluids. But the MTL-P has the best quality base stocks (GIV and GV) and should standup to both track and hard street use well.
So:
1) It shifts as well as GMSFM (which is to say, state of the art - SOTA)
2) Its formulary is 2nd to none, and is no one size fits all product: its viscosity and add pack are designed for trannies like Honda uses, and is safe with yellow metals, and even worked well with the carbon fiber synchros in the S2000)
3) It had no downsides, other than the color
4) It is pricey, but competitive with GMSFM (Michael would prefer Amsoil's new MT lube because it is a better deal for the money, but I do not care)
So all in all, why would I not endorse it? Does it mean I no longer think GMSFM is a fine product? Of course not! Would I immediately recommend you drain your GMSFM? Of course not? And note, GMSFM has been endorsed by me, and validated in use by many on these Forums - so it has the weight of experience and time. MTL-P does not.
I posted in detail originally in my MTL-P post, and my GMSFM analyses (which I believe have more fact and less opinion than any other reviews on the 'Net on that product). Hey, I could just be a BS'er, making all these facts up (that would make me a creative BS'er, no?).
You all are free to pick what you will. If it works for ya, I am happy - if it doesn't, post your opinions. But I just wanted to set the rec straight on my "motives", since some intimations of suspicion were starting to creep in here. (Oh yes, I think a blanket rejection of a lubricant because it has GM involvement is pretty silly - actually, GM has been a leader in that it has more fluid specs and products out there, tailored specifically for the product in which they are intended to be used. Most mfrs. just have 1 or 2 products, that seem somehow to be universally perfect in their add packs and lubricity - as someone with professional training in engineering (more IT these days than mechanical), I know that GM's spec for GMS, GMS FM, GM Syncromesh, are designed to get optimal results based on the specific needs of the DUT's (devices under test, for those in Yorba Linda).
Peace, guys. Enjoy your cars. Now cvan we go backl to more imnportant issues, like butt prints, which wipers to use, and the new Type-S?
The Specialty Formulations was around a long time until I decided to try it - note that my friend Michael Wan (we have never met, onbly email buds) has a lot of respect for Molakule, the man behind SF, but MW is also a sensible chapskate (I say that with respect) and did not like the price increases in the SF MTL-P. Me? I am well endowed financially, at least to cover the xtra cost of a few quarts of fluid - and yes, I pay for everything I use and recommend, so there is not corruption in this boy - I y'am what I y'am, a la Popeye.
Anyway, I tried the MTL-P, and found it to shift as well as GMSFM, and that it had a heartier (robust, stronger, longer lasting for those in Yorba Linda). I hated the color (purple) as I like stealth fluids. But the MTL-P has the best quality base stocks (GIV and GV) and should standup to both track and hard street use well.
So:
1) It shifts as well as GMSFM (which is to say, state of the art - SOTA)
2) Its formulary is 2nd to none, and is no one size fits all product: its viscosity and add pack are designed for trannies like Honda uses, and is safe with yellow metals, and even worked well with the carbon fiber synchros in the S2000)
3) It had no downsides, other than the color
4) It is pricey, but competitive with GMSFM (Michael would prefer Amsoil's new MT lube because it is a better deal for the money, but I do not care)
So all in all, why would I not endorse it? Does it mean I no longer think GMSFM is a fine product? Of course not! Would I immediately recommend you drain your GMSFM? Of course not? And note, GMSFM has been endorsed by me, and validated in use by many on these Forums - so it has the weight of experience and time. MTL-P does not.
I posted in detail originally in my MTL-P post, and my GMSFM analyses (which I believe have more fact and less opinion than any other reviews on the 'Net on that product). Hey, I could just be a BS'er, making all these facts up (that would make me a creative BS'er, no?).
You all are free to pick what you will. If it works for ya, I am happy - if it doesn't, post your opinions. But I just wanted to set the rec straight on my "motives", since some intimations of suspicion were starting to creep in here. (Oh yes, I think a blanket rejection of a lubricant because it has GM involvement is pretty silly - actually, GM has been a leader in that it has more fluid specs and products out there, tailored specifically for the product in which they are intended to be used. Most mfrs. just have 1 or 2 products, that seem somehow to be universally perfect in their add packs and lubricity - as someone with professional training in engineering (more IT these days than mechanical), I know that GM's spec for GMS, GMS FM, GM Syncromesh, are designed to get optimal results based on the specific needs of the DUT's (devices under test, for those in Yorba Linda).
Peace, guys. Enjoy your cars. Now cvan we go backl to more imnportant issues, like butt prints, which wipers to use, and the new Type-S?
#46
Senior Moderator
Regions Leader
Regions Leader
Was just at the dealer today. The head mechanic told me they have a new MTF coming in for the 07's. Hes going to try that and if that doesnt do it then he will go to GM and buy that syncro shit himself.
#47
Head a da Family
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New Friggin Jerzy
Age: 70
Posts: 5,505
Received 561 Likes
on
393 Posts
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=118339
10,000 miles later with the GM Syncromesh fluid, and it still shifts as smooth as the day after I did it!
10,000 miles later with the GM Syncromesh fluid, and it still shifts as smooth as the day after I did it!
#48
Racer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Enfield, CT
Age: 67
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DMZ
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=118339
10,000 miles later with the GM Syncromesh fluid, and it still shifts as smooth as the day after I did it!
10,000 miles later with the GM Syncromesh fluid, and it still shifts as smooth as the day after I did it!
#49
www.seattlewhips.com
I think its funny that everytime this topics comes up, some people think that the TL is the first application of GMSFM to honda/acura vehicles. as if this is something that is new and that we are somehow guineapigs or something. Please understand that GMSFM has been used by other honda/acura owners for years, i.e. S2000, ITR, etc. I changed out my MTF at 9K miles. have a little less than 20K on it now and 3rd gear is no longer a problem. tranny is still 'notchy' but smooth and feels solid. if you're thinking about it, then do it. its a proven solution to the our imperfect tranny.
By the way, please make sure that you are buying GM Synromesh FRICTION MODIFIED, as there is a regular GM Syncromesh Fluid.
By the way, please make sure that you are buying GM Synromesh FRICTION MODIFIED, as there is a regular GM Syncromesh Fluid.
#50
www.seattlewhips.com
For those of you who are so worried about your warranties, please have a little common sense. Just b/c it says GM on the bottle doesn't mean that its somehow chemically exclusive to GM vehicles. the bottom line is that its a chemical, made like every other chemical. Its not that unusual to believe that a GM fluid could be used on our trannies... its about chemical makeup, viscosity, etc...
secondly, if you really want to get technical, the dealer can deny a warranty based on ANYTHING. example... i have a K&N air filter which my dealership sells. truth be told, if that K&N was ever found to be the cause of an engine failure or any other failure, Acura could deny me warranty coverage. if I use a aftermarket brake pad that causes brake failure and they can prove it, i lose my warranty. Hell, if i use a leather cleaner, and it screws up my leather, i lose my warranty. get the point? don't have warranty phobia... be educated to what you are doing, why you are doing it, and know the outcome/results of what youre doing.
secondly, if you really want to get technical, the dealer can deny a warranty based on ANYTHING. example... i have a K&N air filter which my dealership sells. truth be told, if that K&N was ever found to be the cause of an engine failure or any other failure, Acura could deny me warranty coverage. if I use a aftermarket brake pad that causes brake failure and they can prove it, i lose my warranty. Hell, if i use a leather cleaner, and it screws up my leather, i lose my warranty. get the point? don't have warranty phobia... be educated to what you are doing, why you are doing it, and know the outcome/results of what youre doing.
#51
Head a da Family
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New Friggin Jerzy
Age: 70
Posts: 5,505
Received 561 Likes
on
393 Posts
I accompanied an Acura mechanic as he took my TL on a test drive today.
He swore mine was THE SMOOTHEST SHIFTING 2004/5/6 6 speed TL he's ever driven and wanted to know what I did. He was virtually shocked when I told him about the GM fluid.
He's also going to become an AcuraZine regular.
P.S. He was also surprised to see a DGP/Camel/6MT/Navi, a combo he's never seen.
.
.
.
He swore mine was THE SMOOTHEST SHIFTING 2004/5/6 6 speed TL he's ever driven and wanted to know what I did. He was virtually shocked when I told him about the GM fluid.
He's also going to become an AcuraZine regular.
P.S. He was also surprised to see a DGP/Camel/6MT/Navi, a combo he's never seen.
.
.
.
#53
Instructor
Put the GM FM in my 05 about 5,000 miles ago. Before then, my carefully driven TL would balk at shifting into 3rd gear once or twice a week. Since the switch ... Not Once. Great stuff.
#56
Originally Posted by sqzbox
Anyone tried RedLine low viscosity MTF???
Also, make sure you don't put an oil that has friction modfiers in it as many of these are corrosive to "yellow" parts which include synchros. Also, some oils are too slippery for the synchros and can cause damage. Lot's to understand before you shift off of the factory fill. Just make sure you do the research.
I use Redline in my track cars and change it very often. Basically, put a finger in the fill hole and if it smells burnt at all get rid of it.
#57
GM syncromesh fluid gets my vote
I purchased a new '05 TL. Had the occasional problem with engaging 3rd gear. drove me nuts. Brought it to three different dealers and non of them would confirm the problem, therefore, there is no problem with 3rd gear right?
Returned car to one of the dealers again with copies of forum posts describing the problem along with the GM fluid recommendation and testimonials. Brought it straight to the service manager. He called the regional service advisors and got approval to install the GM fluid. They put it in and it transformed the tranny instantly. I have not once failed to engage third and most obvious is how smooth shifting is in every gear. It's a smooth as my '90 integra after 150,000 miles.
I hate the fact that this is a bandaid solution but it works and until Acura confesses to the problem with this tranny and offers a new one as a drop in replacement under warranty I'll stick with it.
I could use some help with a related topic.
I have a 1983 ford ranger beater truck with 4sp manual. Ford specs ATF as the transmission fluid. Can I use GM syncromesh fluid or Redline MTF in this transmission? it's pretty notchy especially when not warmed up. Thanks for your input?
Returned car to one of the dealers again with copies of forum posts describing the problem along with the GM fluid recommendation and testimonials. Brought it straight to the service manager. He called the regional service advisors and got approval to install the GM fluid. They put it in and it transformed the tranny instantly. I have not once failed to engage third and most obvious is how smooth shifting is in every gear. It's a smooth as my '90 integra after 150,000 miles.
I hate the fact that this is a bandaid solution but it works and until Acura confesses to the problem with this tranny and offers a new one as a drop in replacement under warranty I'll stick with it.
I could use some help with a related topic.
I have a 1983 ford ranger beater truck with 4sp manual. Ford specs ATF as the transmission fluid. Can I use GM syncromesh fluid or Redline MTF in this transmission? it's pretty notchy especially when not warmed up. Thanks for your input?
#58
Head a da Family
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New Friggin Jerzy
Age: 70
Posts: 5,505
Received 561 Likes
on
393 Posts
Originally Posted by bowton
Returned car to one of the dealers again with copies of forum posts describing the problem along with the GM fluid recommendation and testimonials. Brought it straight to the service manager. He called the regional service advisors and got approval to install the GM fluid.
We should keep a list of dealers who are using the GM fluid in case someone here ever has a problem and gets refused warranty work on their 6 speed tranny because they had the GM stuff in it.
#59
Something I'd like to add is that AmsOil MTF is specifically designed to be compatible with Honda. The GM stuff isn't specifcally meant for that (not to say its not good - its just not specified). I put it in my car and am enjoying it. I put full synth AmsOil 10w30 in the engine as well. Been running that stuff for years - works great at extended change intervals (10k). My accord has 210k miles on it w/ no smoking and still passes emissions checks.
#60
Moderator
Originally Posted by bowton
I have a 1983 ford ranger beater truck with 4sp manual. Ford specs ATF as the transmission fluid. Can I use GM syncromesh fluid or Redline MTF in this transmission? it's pretty notchy especially when not warmed up. Thanks for your input?
#61
- Doc
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii USA
Age: 60
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Greetings,
I'm about to go from GM SM F-M to the new
and improved Honda MT oil. Nothing
against the GM product al all - it's
fabuluos, it's just that I'm currently
running a mixture of the old Honda
MT oil w/ one qt. GM SM. The reason
for the switch is that I can get 3 qts.
of Honda oil for 15 bucks. I'll try it out
and if I don't think it's as good,
I'll switch to the GM product in a
blink of my eye.
Cheers
I'm about to go from GM SM F-M to the new
and improved Honda MT oil. Nothing
against the GM product al all - it's
fabuluos, it's just that I'm currently
running a mixture of the old Honda
MT oil w/ one qt. GM SM. The reason
for the switch is that I can get 3 qts.
of Honda oil for 15 bucks. I'll try it out
and if I don't think it's as good,
I'll switch to the GM product in a
blink of my eye.
Cheers
#62
2005TL(6MT)
Since people are still having shifting problems with the MT I thought it would be nice to bump this thread. May be we will get some new poll takers and opinions.
I'm still very happy with the GMSFM fluid after 10,000 miles.
I'm still very happy with the GMSFM fluid after 10,000 miles.
#63
FYI - I went in to my dealer for an oil change and MTF fluid change 2 weeks ago ('06 - 13K miles). I had been having the "sticky" 3rd gear problem since I got the car. (By the way, I drove an '04 MT TL for 2 years and it had no 3rd gear issue to speak of - shifted very smoothly in all gears). I immediately knew the problem when i felt it in the new TL, since i had read about it on the forums for a couple of years.
When I set up the appointment I asked the service tech about the GM synchromesh FM (like everyone suggested) and he said I could bring it in and they would replace the factory. I bought it and took it in. Once I arrived the tech I was working with gave me the run-around saying he never heard of the problem and that they would have to drive the car and determine if there was an issue and then determine if I could have a loaner car.
I then proceeded to pull out 50 pages of printouts from this forum and read him the riot act HA HA! (actually i was very calm and respectful but demanded the "proper service"). I told him that he was not going to "feel" the problem upon inspection since I just drove the car for 15 miles to get it to the dealer and the fluid was warm now.
after I sat around for 1 hour awaiting a response they finally sent out a tech who showed me the Acura bulletin for the 3rd gear problem and said they would fix it ASAP and give me a rental car. However, they called Acura home service in California and they said that if I wanted the GM MTF fluid put in, it would void the warranty.
I had them put in the Honda MTF instead - with the mindset that if it solves the problem the way they say it should, then I will not have voided the warranty and the problem would be fixed. If not, then I would take the car back and have them put in the GM stuff.
All in all (and to answer the question originally asked) the Honda MTF fluid was a noticeable improvement over the factory MTF fluid. Although it isn’t quite as smooth as I wanted it to be, it is good enough, especially since I have not voided the warranty. The car shifts pretty smoothly into 3rd always now. However, I have yet to drive the car in cold weather. When I do, I will repost (will be a few months though, as I live in PA.
of course, i have not felt the GM MTF fluid, so i can;t compare apples to apples - i can only tell you that for me, the Honda fluid did improve/fix the 3rd geaer issue.
When I set up the appointment I asked the service tech about the GM synchromesh FM (like everyone suggested) and he said I could bring it in and they would replace the factory. I bought it and took it in. Once I arrived the tech I was working with gave me the run-around saying he never heard of the problem and that they would have to drive the car and determine if there was an issue and then determine if I could have a loaner car.
I then proceeded to pull out 50 pages of printouts from this forum and read him the riot act HA HA! (actually i was very calm and respectful but demanded the "proper service"). I told him that he was not going to "feel" the problem upon inspection since I just drove the car for 15 miles to get it to the dealer and the fluid was warm now.
after I sat around for 1 hour awaiting a response they finally sent out a tech who showed me the Acura bulletin for the 3rd gear problem and said they would fix it ASAP and give me a rental car. However, they called Acura home service in California and they said that if I wanted the GM MTF fluid put in, it would void the warranty.
I had them put in the Honda MTF instead - with the mindset that if it solves the problem the way they say it should, then I will not have voided the warranty and the problem would be fixed. If not, then I would take the car back and have them put in the GM stuff.
All in all (and to answer the question originally asked) the Honda MTF fluid was a noticeable improvement over the factory MTF fluid. Although it isn’t quite as smooth as I wanted it to be, it is good enough, especially since I have not voided the warranty. The car shifts pretty smoothly into 3rd always now. However, I have yet to drive the car in cold weather. When I do, I will repost (will be a few months though, as I live in PA.
of course, i have not felt the GM MTF fluid, so i can;t compare apples to apples - i can only tell you that for me, the Honda fluid did improve/fix the 3rd geaer issue.
#64
- Doc
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii USA
Age: 60
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rocket Man
I'm going to have to disagree that bringing it back would be a big mistake....even if the problem does not get fixed, if they keep repairing it, it'll either qualify it as a lemon (not too sure what the lemon laws are like in your area and I'm sure they differ a bit from the canadian laws) or they'll eventually give you the newer model of it that is problem-free. Case-in-point, I have a few close friends who had '02 RSX-S's and they had numerous problems with the tranny (1st gear grind, popping out of 2nd, etc etc) and they kept going back and getting warranty work done. Eventually, they were just given new '04 trannies that did not have the same issues. Another close friend had a early model '04 TSX that was going through oil at a rate about 1L/800-1000kms. He kept going back for warranty repairs and when they couldn't solve the problem, he eventually got a '06 TSX block put into his '04 TSX that did not have the oil burning issue.
My point is that if you get it repaired and the problem persists, keep pushing and eventually you'll get it resolved, the proper way. That's why we have warranties. I'm not sure if the 3rd gear problems are for the 04-05 models or for the 04-06 models but since you say that there is a TSB out, chances are, the issue will be resolved very soon (if not already). So instead of hiding their design flaw with a different lubricant, you could be getting the properly designed tranny. That's just the way I like to have things done. I'll follow the book (Honda MTF) and that way, there can be absolutely no issue with it be covered under warranty and they'll keep seeing my car until it is resolved. I'm not going to let them off the hook with their design flaw.
p.s. what's skip shift? never heard of that term before.
My point is that if you get it repaired and the problem persists, keep pushing and eventually you'll get it resolved, the proper way. That's why we have warranties. I'm not sure if the 3rd gear problems are for the 04-05 models or for the 04-06 models but since you say that there is a TSB out, chances are, the issue will be resolved very soon (if not already). So instead of hiding their design flaw with a different lubricant, you could be getting the properly designed tranny. That's just the way I like to have things done. I'll follow the book (Honda MTF) and that way, there can be absolutely no issue with it be covered under warranty and they'll keep seeing my car until it is resolved. I'm not going to let them off the hook with their design flaw.
p.s. what's skip shift? never heard of that term before.
I switched to GMS F/M, realized it was the bomb (got rid of the 3rd gear issue, etc.) switched back to the 'new' formula Honda MTF because I figured the manufacturer knows best, you know. After about 1000k miles I switched back.
Nuespeed STS, _orsport solid metal shift cable end bushings, GMS F/M oil =
buttery smooth, precise shifts. Just do it.
#65
2006 TL MT RJ BodyKit
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Canada
Age: 45
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brettg
Then you would be making a big mistake.
People have gone that route, getting the transmission 'fixed' and the problem came right back.
Rather than have some bozo take my trans all apart, I would just change the fluid...
The fluid fixes 100% of the issues people report, and the trans 'fix/replacement has fixed no ones issue for longer than 1000 miles.
I think people here have had their trans 'fixed', got the problem back, then changed the fluid and that fixed the problem.
In some cases, the dealer actualy put the GM stuff in....
By the way, Acura knows about the issue, and put a tsb out about it warning people not to skip shift!
Brett
People have gone that route, getting the transmission 'fixed' and the problem came right back.
Rather than have some bozo take my trans all apart, I would just change the fluid...
The fluid fixes 100% of the issues people report, and the trans 'fix/replacement has fixed no ones issue for longer than 1000 miles.
I think people here have had their trans 'fixed', got the problem back, then changed the fluid and that fixed the problem.
In some cases, the dealer actualy put the GM stuff in....
By the way, Acura knows about the issue, and put a tsb out about it warning people not to skip shift!
Brett
I totally agree with Brett...just change it...everyone says it fixes all problems. I'm definitely puting the GM fluid in soon...my third gear has been showing some attitude.
#67
'06 6MT WDP
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Age: 48
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The problem with the new improved Honda/Acura fluid is that it will feel better initially but your problems are likely to come back soon. If you read some of the other posts on this subject you'll find several people who have reported this.
Like others, I had the 3rd gear problem about 3-5 times per week for the first 12K miles on the car. Switched to the GM fluid and have not had the 3rd gear grind for THE LAST 20K miles. Proof enough for me.
Easy fix and no need to have the grease monkeys at the dealer tear into the box.
The GM fluid and the compech short shifter make this car an absolute joy to drive.
Like others, I had the 3rd gear problem about 3-5 times per week for the first 12K miles on the car. Switched to the GM fluid and have not had the 3rd gear grind for THE LAST 20K miles. Proof enough for me.
Easy fix and no need to have the grease monkeys at the dealer tear into the box.
The GM fluid and the compech short shifter make this car an absolute joy to drive.
#69
Gm
When i 1st got my TL i had 3rd pop out a few times in the first couple months of owning it and i was really concerned that i made a mistake purchasing the car. Thanks to this sight i learned about the GM fluid changed it out and havent had it happen again and its been over 2 years now. Stuff works wonders!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
3rd, fixed, fluid, gear, gm, grinding, honda, mt, problems, rsx, snycromesh, synchromesh, tranny, transmission, volkswagen, vw