TL Vs. SX 2.0 (High output, 150 hp)
08-03-2004, 05:46 PM
#1
Scorching Hot
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Tor, Ontario
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
TL Vs. SX 2.0 (High output, 150 hp)
Hey...
Just out of curiosity, which one do you guys think would win in a drag... a 2004 Dodge SX 2.0 (with the high output 150 engine) or a AT TL?
Just out of curiosity, which one do you guys think would win in a drag... a 2004 Dodge SX 2.0 (with the high output 150 engine) or a AT TL?
08-03-2004, 05:58 PM
#2
'99 Acura 3.2TL
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Quebec
Age: 37
Posts: 4,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TheGreatNS
Hey...
Just out of curiosity, which one do you guys think would win in a drag... a 2004 Dodge SX 2.0 (with the high output 150 engine) or a AT TL?
Just out of curiosity, which one do you guys think would win in a drag... a 2004 Dodge SX 2.0 (with the high output 150 engine) or a AT TL?
are you joking?
i'll answer your question so you cant say i didnt help.. the TL will win.
@cUr@-TL
Trending Topics
08-04-2004, 10:13 AM
#8
SOLD
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lakehood, CO
Age: 40
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Possible, I have not seen these cars but......
99-?? Civic Si with 160HP/111 torque and 1.6L 5MT runs 6.8-7.0s 0-60 stock. It also is a coupe and I belive only weighs 2200 pound, very light. If a car is very light it doesn't need a big engine.
99-?? Civic Si with 160HP/111 torque and 1.6L 5MT runs 6.8-7.0s 0-60 stock. It also is a coupe and I belive only weighs 2200 pound, very light. If a car is very light it doesn't need a big engine.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pham Alvan
2G TL (1999-2003)
38
03-16-2016 09:17 AM
InFaMouSLink
Car Parts for Sale
3
10-30-2015 09:43 AM
