TL vs. RX8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-23-2010 | 02:06 PM
  #1  
Schweinsteiger11's Avatar
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 274
Likes: 10
From: MD/ NOVA
TL vs. RX8

Ok so I understand that these are two different types of cars, but what I want to know is if the TL is capable of running with a RX8. What mods outside of a Turbo and SC would make it more competitive or even push the TL out ahead of the RX8. Right now I have the ATLP Base, J-Pipe and Race Pipe as well as an Injen CAI.

I was thinking a UR Crank Pulley to increase quickness off the line as well as some weight reduction. Is anyone running Nitrous?

Any feedback from the awesome Acurazine community would be great. Thanks.
Old 09-23-2010 | 02:43 PM
  #2  
pohljm's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,070
Likes: 595
From: San Diego, CA
The rx8 is far superior in the twisties, but the TL will destroy it in acceleration so it just depends on the amount of corners and how much straight you have between them. So depending on the course a stock TL will compete with the rx8. very tight course goes to the rx, open course goes to the TL
Old 09-23-2010 | 02:49 PM
  #3  
LostSol's Avatar
Chapter Leader (Central Florida)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 599
Likes: 15
From: Near mickeyland...
Your engine will last past 20,000 miles. WIN.
Old 09-23-2010 | 03:04 PM
  #4  
tenzingsherpa's Avatar
J36Twingt28r's,nextgt30r
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 408
Likes: 2
From: lebanon, pa
^^ lol that is tooo funny.

tl>rx8, power doesn't mean squat if it isn't reliable.

Last edited by tenzingsherpa; 09-23-2010 at 03:07 PM.
Old 09-23-2010 | 03:27 PM
  #5  
Rick_TL-S's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,259
Likes: 1,239
Wouldn't even be close unless the Mazda has some serious mods of its own.
Old 09-23-2010 | 03:28 PM
  #6  
swoosh's Avatar
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 30,994
Likes: 4,732
From: Kansas City, MO
LOL....

but in reality the rx-8 rotary engine is wicked quick....i took her for a test drive and had some fun with it....

luckily it didnt break on me LOL
Old 09-23-2010 | 03:32 PM
  #7  
tenzingsherpa's Avatar
J36Twingt28r's,nextgt30r
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 408
Likes: 2
From: lebanon, pa
^^ yeah i bet the high reving rotary engine is amazing to drive don't get me wrong, just don't expect to push it too hard without spend some REAL dough on it.
Old 09-23-2010 | 03:35 PM
  #8  
mbagnal's Avatar
10th Gear
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Well an RX8 might outrun you for a few laps. But then you gotta pull it off and rebuild the wankle engine...

But in all seriousness it all depends on what kind of race. A TL should outrun it in a straight line. or atleast be close. With your mods I think you could handle one. On a super twisty course or road the RX8 might win because its light and quick. So you might rather invest in good suspension upgrades if you want to run with one on some twists.
Old 09-23-2010 | 03:35 PM
  #9  
D's Up's Avatar
9 mpg.
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,628
Likes: 306
From: Sometimes here, sometimes there.
With those mods, you should rip an RX-8 in a straight line. Don't bother with corners. haha. The 8's aren't built for straight lines. They're like S2000's; high revving motor, nimble car = amazing track car.
Old 09-23-2010 | 03:38 PM
  #10  
swoosh's Avatar
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 30,994
Likes: 4,732
From: Kansas City, MO
thats true....what i meant to say is....if the OP is racing an RX-8....he might get his butt kicked (on a track).....but again he has quite a few supporting mods....but still i think he will get owned by a car length on the streets...
Old 09-23-2010 | 03:48 PM
  #11  
D's Up's Avatar
9 mpg.
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,628
Likes: 306
From: Sometimes here, sometimes there.
Originally Posted by swoosh
thats true....what i meant to say is....if the OP is racing an RX-8....he might get his butt kicked (on a track).....but again he has quite a few supporting mods....but still i think he will get owned by a car length on the streets...
Really? I didn't think RX-8's were capable of beating a TL in a straight line. I mean, I know the base 5at is a high 14/low 15 second car but I always and heard and believed that RX-8's were slow as well. Hmm..my bad.
Old 09-23-2010 | 04:15 PM
  #12  
SatinSilverAV6's Avatar
2003 Accord Coupe V6
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 74
From: Oceanside, Ca
Originally Posted by Type-DM 2004 TL
Really? I didn't think RX-8's were capable of beating a TL in a straight line. I mean, I know the base 5at is a high 14/low 15 second car but I always and heard and believed that RX-8's were slow as well. Hmm..my bad.
A properly driven stock 6MT RX-8 should be able to run a high 14 with a perfect high RPM launch. From a roll though the TL will pull due to its low end torque that the RX-8 lacks.
Old 09-23-2010 | 04:44 PM
  #13  
myron's Avatar
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,205
Likes: 269
From: Edmonton, Canada
I drove a RX8 and I found that car to be much slower to my TL. Both cars 2005 and both cars manual. I like the way they look, but I don't think I would ever buy one
Old 09-23-2010 | 04:53 PM
  #14  
swoosh's Avatar
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 30,994
Likes: 4,732
From: Kansas City, MO
i think the Rx-8's comes in 2 variants....the regular one and the 30th anniversary rotary engine.....the regular one is tad bit slower than the TL....but the rotary one sure does have a lot more ooomph factor.....

now only if they were reliable
Old 09-23-2010 | 05:10 PM
  #15  
Opel's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 47
From: NYC
Originally Posted by Type-DM 2004 TL
Really? I didn't think RX-8's were capable of beating a TL in a straight line. I mean, I know the base 5at is a high 14/low 15 second car but I always and heard and believed that RX-8's were slow as well. Hmm..my bad.
you guys need to stop comparing FWD vs. RWD on 1/4 mile runs....a 6mt TL is capable of running neck to neck with a mid 13 sec car off a low speed roll (2nd gear).... just because a FWD car like our TL doesnt do so great in 1/4 mile, doesn't mean it ain't quick. The front wheel drive platform limits its launch capabilities...you can't get off the line at high rpm because of excessive wheel spin, and you can't get off the line at low rpm because there isn't enough power. On a rwd, you can launch them high, there will be wheel spin, but you'll take off.

Roll a FWD and everything changes. I speak from experience, after having raced countless G35s, 350Zs, E46 M3s etc.

Nothing ticks me off about cars more than when I hear "but it runs so so so 1/4 mile"...really, who cares...1/4 isn't the only type of race, and in fact it isn't the right race to compare 2 completely different platforms when one has the edge BY FAR. 2 equally powered cars, with identical gear ratios, identical weight, identical tires, identical WHP, (though the rwd should have a bigger loss, but for arguments sake, lets say they both put down same WHP)
#1-FWD, #2-RWD...RWD is going to win every single time off the line...
Start them from a 20-30 mph roll, and they're going to be dead even (assuming same drivers)

Last edited by Opel; 09-23-2010 at 05:16 PM.
Old 09-23-2010 | 05:15 PM
  #16  
AMUA6's Avatar
ScoobyZINE
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,986
Likes: 41
From: Ocoee, TN
Uhm, what Opel said
Old 09-23-2010 | 05:44 PM
  #17  
phee's Avatar
I got the Shifts
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 14,203
Likes: 230
the RX8 requires a quart of oil every tank. thats too mch for me
Old 09-23-2010 | 06:01 PM
  #18  
Dave_B's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 950
Likes: 45
From: Shawnee, KS
Old 09-23-2010 | 06:08 PM
  #19  
TL Luver's Avatar
2006 6spd
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 653
Likes: 83
From: San Antonio; Texas
Originally Posted by phee
the RX8 requires a quart of oil every tank. thats too mch for me

i knew someone that had one; and couldn't ever really drive it too much cuz he was broke and didn't have money to buy oil...
Old 09-23-2010 | 06:09 PM
  #20  
Rick_TL-S's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,259
Likes: 1,239
Originally Posted by swoosh
thats true....what i meant to say is....if the OP is racing an RX-8....he might get his butt kicked (on a track).....but again he has quite a few supporting mods....but still i think he will get owned by a car length on the streets...
The torqueless wonder is not going to run next to even a decently modded 5AT TL.

As said numerous times, the RX-8 is an amazing handling car, there's no doubt. But it doesn't have the "oomph" from the factory to handle anything on highway roll.
Old 09-23-2010 | 08:56 PM
  #21  
Schweinsteiger11's Avatar
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 274
Likes: 10
From: MD/ NOVA
It would be a straight line. I agree with the oomph factor but I wasn't sure how much the different weights would effect the race. To me my TL feels like it has more oomph than my dads Mercedes C300, but that could just be me loving my TL
Old 09-23-2010 | 10:47 PM
  #22  
alexSU's Avatar
Under construction
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 5,007
Likes: 96
From: Charlotte NC
Originally Posted by Schweinsteiger11
It would be a straight line. I agree with the oomph factor but I wasn't sure how much the different weights would effect the race. To me my TL feels like it has more oomph than my dads Mercedes C300, but that could just be me loving my TL
Again, you'll smoke the RX8 and your dads C300 for that matter.
Old 09-24-2010 | 02:35 AM
  #23  
D's Up's Avatar
9 mpg.
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,628
Likes: 306
From: Sometimes here, sometimes there.
Originally Posted by alexSU
Again, you'll smoke the RX8 and your dads C300 for that matter.
Amen. Trust us when we say you got this. C300's are nice cars but they're not that fast. I remember one guy still had his dealer plates on and he was running fly-by's on me. Long story short, we lined up at 55. 3 honks and the moment I pulled a car length I shut down.

Might be different from a dig, who knows.
Old 09-24-2010 | 09:52 AM
  #24  
swoosh's Avatar
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 30,994
Likes: 4,732
From: Kansas City, MO
you can walk over C300 and E350 because of the sheer weight they carry....c350 would be close and e550 would take the TL (i think)....lets not talk about AMG's....
Old 09-24-2010 | 09:57 AM
  #25  
SatinSilverAV6's Avatar
2003 Accord Coupe V6
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 74
From: Oceanside, Ca
Originally Posted by swoosh
you can walk over C300 and E350 because of the sheer weight they carry....c350 would be close and e550 would take the TL (i think)....lets not talk about AMG's....
My money would be on a E350 taking out a TL 5AT. They run mid-high 14's stock. That 7AT really helps!
Old 09-24-2010 | 10:10 AM
  #26  
swoosh's Avatar
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 30,994
Likes: 4,732
From: Kansas City, MO
v6 engine and that car weighs a lot more than the TL....my money would be on the TL....

e500/e550 on the other hand has a more powerful v8....

again quit talking about 1/4 mile times....dude that is not the only type of race....have you raced an e350 on the streets ? have you driven one ?

i had to floor the gas pedal for that thing to move....
Old 09-24-2010 | 11:03 AM
  #27  
SatinSilverAV6's Avatar
2003 Accord Coupe V6
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 74
From: Oceanside, Ca
Originally Posted by swoosh
v6 engine and that car weighs a lot more than the TL....my money would be on the TL....

e500/e550 on the other hand has a more powerful v8....

again quit talking about 1/4 mile times....dude that is not the only type of race....have you raced an e350 on the streets ? have you driven one ?

i had to floor the gas pedal for that thing to move....
Why would I quit talking 1/4 mile times? The E350 is faster in the 1/4 mile than a TL 5AT stock for stock. The curb weight of a E350 is 3740lbs vs the TL at 3575lbs. Not much of a difference. The Benz has a 7AT vs the 5AT in the TL. The Benz has A LOT more torque at 258ft lbs vs the TL at 232ft lbs. 268HP vs 258HP. The 2 extra gears and more torque makes up for the neglagable weight difference.
Old 09-24-2010 | 11:08 AM
  #28  
Ken1997TL's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 45,641
Likes: 2,329
From: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
I love RX-8's and I've given some serious thought to buying one. They are reliable if maintained properly.
Old 09-24-2010 | 11:32 AM
  #29  
swoosh's Avatar
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 30,994
Likes: 4,732
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by SatinSilverAV6
Why would I quit talking 1/4 mile times? The E350 is faster in the 1/4 mile than a TL 5AT stock for stock. The curb weight of a E350 is 3740lbs vs the TL at 3575lbs. Not much of a difference. The Benz has a 7AT vs the 5AT in the TL. The Benz has A LOT more torque at 258ft lbs vs the TL at 232ft lbs. 268HP vs 258HP. The 2 extra gears and more torque makes up for the neglagable weight difference.
well then i guess am a good driver....i did race and win against an e350....:rooleyes:
Old 09-24-2010 | 12:02 PM
  #30  
Rick_TL-S's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,259
Likes: 1,239
Originally Posted by SatinSilverAV6
Why would I quit talking 1/4 mile times? The E350 is faster in the 1/4 mile than a TL 5AT stock for stock. The curb weight of a E350 is 3740lbs vs the TL at 3575lbs. Not much of a difference. The Benz has a 7AT vs the 5AT in the TL. The Benz has A LOT more torque at 258ft lbs vs the TL at 232ft lbs. 268HP vs 258HP. The 2 extra gears and more torque makes up for the neglagable weight difference.
B/c as IHC & Opel have numerously pointed out, QTR mile times are pointless when 80% of this forum are doing their runs from a roll, where the TL runs a lot better than from a dig.
Old 09-24-2010 | 12:45 PM
  #31  
anx1300c's Avatar
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,020
Likes: 930
From: 633 Stag Trail Rd
Cry me a river. You guys act like a 14 second snail of a car is so impossible to launch with FWD. Suck it up and learn how to drive, or buy some D/R's. You guys think RWD cars don't have traction issues? All it takes is an extra 75 or so whp in a comparable weight RWD to create similar traction problems. And that's not even bringing torque into the mix.

Imagine if all the guys in the 60's-70's, driving LS6 Chevelles and Hemi Cudas were a bunch of pansy ricers and never put real tires on their cars.

OH MY GAWD, DUDE.....MY CAR IS INCINERATING MY BIAS PLY TIRES AND I'M GETTING SIDEWAYS AT 75 MPH. WE NEED TO RUN FROM 90-120!


YO, DUDE.....SOUNDS GOOD! WE'LL GO ON THE THIRD HONK!
Old 09-24-2010 | 02:34 PM
  #32  
Opel's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 47
From: NYC
FWD vs. RWD, just compare their 1/4 mile Trap speeds...that should give you some conclusions. If RWD is trapping at 103 mph in 13.8 sec, and a FWD is trapping at 102 in 14.0 secs, what is that telling you?
Seriously, this debate can go on forever, since everyone has different views and opinions, but there's only one way to look at it.

Whoever said, TIRES TIRES TIRES...yes sure, like i mentioned before, equip both FWD and RWD cars with identical tires (drags for all i care), same power and weight and everything, and the RWD is going to bounce every time, no matter if they have 300 hp, or 1000 hp. It's just how physics work.
Old 09-24-2010 | 02:48 PM
  #33  
Opel's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 47
From: NYC
Originally Posted by SatinSilverAV6
Why would I quit talking 1/4 mile times? The E350 is faster in the 1/4 mile than a TL 5AT stock for stock. The curb weight of a E350 is 3740lbs vs the TL at 3575lbs. Not much of a difference. The Benz has a 7AT vs the 5AT in the TL. The Benz has A LOT more torque at 258ft lbs vs the TL at 232ft lbs. 268HP vs 258HP. The 2 extra gears and more torque makes up for the neglagable weight difference.
200 lbs is not much of a difference to you? its actually a big enough difference. We're talking in 10th of seconds here, not minutes.
The torque difference isn't much, just about 20 lbs..and the HP is only 10.
The 7 speed tranny (MB has much better AT's anyway) is somewhat of an advantage. I find the AT in the TL weak after 2nd gear.

Originally Posted by anx1300c
Cry me a river. You guys act like a 14 second snail of a car is so impossible to launch with FWD. Suck it up and learn how to drive, or buy some D/R's. You guys think RWD cars don't have traction issues? All it takes is an extra 75 or so whp in a comparable weight RWD to create similar traction problems. And that's not even bringing torque into the mix.
I don't think anyone is saying that it's hard or impossible to launch the TL and get 14s. I can do that all day...what's being said is that, another car with the same power as the TL, on street tires but RWD platform, would break 13's.

RWD cars would have issues as well with added power or whatever the case you speak of may be, but in a FWD world, that issue will always be much worse. And let's not bring comparable weight into it, bcs if that played such a critical role, then FWD would take off every time, being that they're mainly front heavy, and the RWD have less weight on their drive wheels...it ain't the case, its the physics, the platform that plays the crucial role.

Bottom line is, if a 6MT TL was RWD, and everything else remaining the same, it would easily be into 13s all day, every day
Old 09-24-2010 | 03:14 PM
  #34  
fpgreenwrx's Avatar
Cruisin'
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
you mean 6mt tl-s? Btw from every track test ive seen The tl-s is pretty nuts in the corners.
Old 09-24-2010 | 04:36 PM
  #35  
SatinSilverAV6's Avatar
2003 Accord Coupe V6
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 74
From: Oceanside, Ca
Originally Posted by Opel
200 lbs is not much of a difference to you? its actually a big enough difference. We're talking in 10th of seconds here, not minutes.
The torque difference isn't much, just about 20 lbs..and the HP is only 10.
The 7 speed tranny (MB has much better AT's anyway) is somewhat of an advantage. I find the AT in the TL weak after 2nd gear.
Its actually 165lbs. What I was trying to say is that with 2 more gears and 20+ lbs ft of torque more with a much fatter powerband due to the bigger displacement the benz more than compensates for the 165lb difference.
Old 09-24-2010 | 04:39 PM
  #36  
SatinSilverAV6's Avatar
2003 Accord Coupe V6
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 74
From: Oceanside, Ca
Originally Posted by Rick_TL-S
B/c as IHC & Opel have numerously pointed out, QTR mile times are pointless when 80% of this forum are doing their runs from a roll, where the TL runs a lot better than from a dig.
Most people do 1/4 mile drag races, not roll races. Even on this forum. The TL 5AT does do better from a roll. The TL 6MT, TL-S auto and 6MT all do well from a dig.
Old 09-24-2010 | 06:34 PM
  #37  
Rick_TL-S's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,259
Likes: 1,239
Originally Posted by SatinSilverAV6
Most people do 1/4 mile drag races, not roll races. Even on this forum. The TL 5AT does do better from a roll. The TL 6MT, TL-S auto and 6MT all do well from a dig.
I highly doubt that considering that a large number of these threads are made based on street encounters & what if's, rather than how they ran at the strip.
Old 09-24-2010 | 06:48 PM
  #38  
SatinSilverAV6's Avatar
2003 Accord Coupe V6
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 74
From: Oceanside, Ca
Originally Posted by Rick_TL-S
I highly doubt that considering that a large number of these threads are made based on street encounters & what if's, rather than how they ran at the strip.
I can refrase it for you if you like. Most people do DIG races as opposed to roll races. I wasn't necessarily referring to the strip. Just a 1/4 mile in general since most races that I have read on here stop around 80-100mph.
Old 09-24-2010 | 07:04 PM
  #39  
Opel's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 47
From: NYC
Originally Posted by SatinSilverAV6
I can refrase it for you if you like. Most people do DIG races as opposed to roll races. I wasn't necessarily referring to the strip. Just a 1/4 mile in general since most races that I have read on here stop around 80-100mph.
Ive never launched the TL against another car! ever...
at the track yes, few times, but against time. As far as street races, never.
And your statement, is just a very broad statement, bcs I can say that 100% of the people that I've seen race, and been involved in, have been roll races, mainly on the highway. That includes every platform. Even RWD vs. RWD, and not simply to favor FWD platform

Either way, this is a pointless argument.
Old 09-26-2010 | 10:30 AM
  #40  
AtlM5's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 525
Likes: 11
From: Atlanta, Ga
Thank you Opel...someone finally agrees with me...
Originally Posted by Opel
you guys need to stop comparing FWD vs. RWD on 1/4 mile runs....a 6mt TL is capable of running neck to neck with a mid 13 sec car off a low speed roll (2nd gear).... just because a FWD car like our TL doesnt do so great in 1/4 mile, doesn't mean it ain't quick. The front wheel drive platform limits its launch capabilities...you can't get off the line at high rpm because of excessive wheel spin, and you can't get off the line at low rpm because there isn't enough power. On a rwd, you can launch them high, there will be wheel spin, but you'll take off.

Roll a FWD and everything changes. I speak from experience, after having raced countless G35s, 350Zs, E46 M3s etc.

Nothing ticks me off about cars more than when I hear "but it runs so so so 1/4 mile"...really, who cares...1/4 isn't the only type of race, and in fact it isn't the right race to compare 2 completely different platforms when one has the edge BY FAR. 2 equally powered cars, with identical gear ratios, identical weight, identical tires, identical WHP, (though the rwd should have a bigger loss, but for arguments sake, lets say they both put down same WHP)
#1-FWD, #2-RWD...RWD is going to win every single time off the line...
Start them from a 20-30 mph roll, and they're going to be dead even (assuming same drivers)


Quick Reply: TL vs. RX8



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:42 AM.