2006 Acura TL with 57K miles and no Nav

or 2006 with 73K miles and NAV.

The 57K car is in a little better shape on the exterior. The 73K has a crack in the bumper easily fixable. I really like the NAV.

Can get the 73K one for about 15000
and the 57 K for 15700.

What do you guys think.

http://washingtondc.craigslist.org/m...283624050.html
73K


http://washingtondc.craigslist.org/m...288086725.html
57K

 

hmm this is a hard one....but im going to say go with the one with 73k just because your going to get it around the same price as the other one and the one with 73k already has a navi (which i love). 73k really isn't terrible either and i also like the black more then the silver (even though i have a silver!) :0 lol

 

definitely the one with nav. wouldn't even be a question for me unless there was a huge disparity in condition.

 

even witht he 73,000 miles.

 

I'd get the one with the NAV as well, just remember you have major service coming up in ~20K miles, maybe try to get another $500 or so off the price.

 

I agree w/ ^. I got the navi, but only because it came with the TL-S.

If I got another TL, I'd DEMAND the navi- not just for the Navi features, but because the entire interior, and almost all of the features, are built into and around that LCD.