3G TL (2004-2008)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

in need of mpgees!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-18-2008, 10:27 AM
  #41  
I disagree with unanimity
iTrader: (2)
 
sho_nuff1997's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: WI
Age: 46
Posts: 14,035
Received 27 Likes on 20 Posts
i was using towing as an example to your comment "coasting uses more gas..."


Situation:

same road, distance, and vehicles.

one is being towed while idling in neutral, the other is being driven.
which uses more gas?
don't tell me towing it in gear is better.
Old 07-18-2008, 10:29 AM
  #42  
Suzuka Master
 
TzarChasm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Age: 52
Posts: 6,732
Received 233 Likes on 166 Posts
Originally Posted by sho_nuff1997
i was using towing as an example to your comment "coasting uses more gas..."


Situation:

same road, distance, and vehicles.

one is being towed while idling in neutral, the other is being driven.
which uses more gas?
don't tell me towing it in gear is better.
Why not compare what happens when you drive it off a cliff then? You can use even less gas and get there sooner.
Old 07-18-2008, 10:34 AM
  #43  
I disagree with unanimity
iTrader: (2)
 
sho_nuff1997's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: WI
Age: 46
Posts: 14,035
Received 27 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by TzarChasm
Why not compare what happens when you drive it off a cliff then? You can use even less gas and get there sooner.

is it in gear or in neutral?
Old 07-18-2008, 10:41 AM
  #44  
The Kinetics of Bleu
iTrader: (4)
 
TLAdvanced's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ocala, Fl
Age: 44
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by sho_nuff1997
is it in gear or in neutral?
It's in gear, but coasting so therefore is not using any fuel
Old 07-18-2008, 10:52 AM
  #45  
RAR
 
leedogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: DC Metro
Age: 47
Posts: 10,783
Received 1,286 Likes on 714 Posts
turn off the AC.
Put a nice wax on the car
making sure tires are inflated properly go a long way as well.
Finding the right tires with low rolling resistance helps as well.
Old 07-18-2008, 10:54 AM
  #46  
Safety Car
 
Tripnbeats's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: USA
Age: 42
Posts: 4,563
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
so since the fuel injectors are off when ur using the transmission brake then wouldnt the car shut off? how are ur rpms even staying up?
Old 07-18-2008, 10:57 AM
  #47  
Suzuka Master
 
TzarChasm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Age: 52
Posts: 6,732
Received 233 Likes on 166 Posts
Originally Posted by Tripnbeats
so since the fuel injectors are off when ur using the transmission brake then wouldnt the car shut off? how are ur rpms even staying up?
The transmission keeps the engine cycling. It's in the freaking owners manual if you don't believe me. Someone posted a copy of the page here in another thread.
Old 07-18-2008, 11:01 AM
  #48  
Suzuka Master
 
TzarChasm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Age: 52
Posts: 6,732
Received 233 Likes on 166 Posts
Originally Posted by sho_nuff1997
is it in gear or in neutral?
You got me, I guess the outcome would be the same.

I thought you were trying to make a real comparison, if I had known you were just looking for a fight I wouldn't have responded.

You win, you are correct, the OP could save all sorts of gas for his TL by towing it, in gear or not.
Old 07-18-2008, 11:55 AM
  #49  
I disagree with unanimity
iTrader: (2)
 
sho_nuff1997's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: WI
Age: 46
Posts: 14,035
Received 27 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by TzarChasm
You got me, I guess the outcome would be the same.

I thought you were trying to make a real comparison, if I had known you were just looking for a fight I wouldn't have responded.

You win, you are correct, the OP could save all sorts of gas for his TL by towing it, in gear or not.

I am trying to make a real comparison. Not trying to pick a fight, just trying to understand your logic. My original question still stands.

I answered your cliff argument with a joke, because the cliff statement was a joke.
Old 07-18-2008, 12:29 PM
  #50  
Suzuka Master
 
TzarChasm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Age: 52
Posts: 6,732
Received 233 Likes on 166 Posts
Originally Posted by sho_nuff1997
I am trying to make a real comparison. Not trying to pick a fight, just trying to understand your logic. My original question still stands.

I answered your cliff argument with a joke, because the cliff statement was a joke.
Then I don't understand your question. It looks to me like you are trying to compare the gas mileage you get when being towed to the gas mileage you get while driving, which I assumed could not be a serious question.

one is being towed while idling in neutral, the other is being driven.
which uses more gas?
If you are serious then; yes, getting towed ALWAYS provides better gas mileage than driving. I just thought that was rather obvious, so assumed you were just trying to make a rediculous argument to try to pick a fight.
Old 07-18-2008, 02:27 PM
  #51  
I disagree with unanimity
iTrader: (2)
 
sho_nuff1997's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: WI
Age: 46
Posts: 14,035
Received 27 Likes on 20 Posts
This whole debate stemmed from this comment:

Originally Posted by TzarChasm
Coasting in neutral uses more gas than leaving it in gear.

The towing, again, was just an example. Since this has nothing to do with towing, let me put it this way.
Two indentical cars traveling down an infinitely long hill (both are running), one is in neutral, the other in gear.
You are saying the one in gear will use less gas?
Old 07-18-2008, 02:33 PM
  #52  
Suzuka Master
 
TzarChasm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Age: 52
Posts: 6,732
Received 233 Likes on 166 Posts
Originally Posted by sho_nuff1997
This whole debate stemmed from this comment:




The towing, again, was just an example. Since this has nothing to do with towing, let me put it this way.
Two indentical cars traveling down an infinitely long hill (both are running), one is in neutral, the other in gear.
You are saying the one in gear will use less gas?
Absolutely.
Old 07-18-2008, 02:39 PM
  #53  
I disagree with unanimity
iTrader: (2)
 
sho_nuff1997's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: WI
Age: 46
Posts: 14,035
Received 27 Likes on 20 Posts
Since I already mucked the thread enough, I agree to disagree.

Back on topic

Here are some fuel economy test done by Edmunds a few months ago.
http://www.edmunds.com/advice/fuelec...8/article.html
Old 07-18-2008, 03:19 PM
  #54  
Keep Right Except to Pass
 
1995hoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Kingstowne, VA
Age: 51
Posts: 2,408
Received 44 Likes on 35 Posts
I tried setting the cruise control at 65 mph as much as possible on Wednesday driving from Virginia to Maine. Had to go faster a few times due to traffic; also had a 20-minute slowdown at 5 mph or so in Connecticut and a briefer slowdown in Massachusetts. Averaged 58 mph for the trip and 31 mpg. I believe I got 430 miles out of the first tank (stopped at the MA-9 exit off I-495 in Massachusetts).

Going 65 seems SOOOOO slow, but on the other hand, it's nice not being concerned about seeing cops!
Old 07-18-2008, 03:39 PM
  #55  
I disagree with unanimity
iTrader: (2)
 
sho_nuff1997's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: WI
Age: 46
Posts: 14,035
Received 27 Likes on 20 Posts
If have the cruise on 65 on a long trip, I get 34mpg. If the cruise is on 75mph, I get 30 or 31mpg. The time difference, between 65mph and 75mph, on trips < 100 miles, is minimal at best.
Old 07-18-2008, 04:02 PM
  #56  
Instructor
 
say when's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Age: 52
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
some just can't understand that idle uses fuel. You explained it well. Let it be.
Old 07-18-2008, 04:18 PM
  #57  
Advanced
 
Lileasy123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Iowa
Age: 37
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I understand what your saying TzarChasm, makes perfect sense to me!!
Old 07-18-2008, 05:00 PM
  #58  
Drifting
 
LukeaTron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 2,548
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by sho_nuff1997
Since I already mucked the thread enough, I agree to disagree.

Back on topic

Here are some fuel economy test done by Edmunds a few months ago.
http://www.edmunds.com/advice/fuelec...8/article.html
TzarChasm is correct. When your engine is idling, it using combustion to keep the motor turning. When coasting down a hill and your RPMs are above a certain cutoff (I think it's like 1,600 for the TSX, it'll be somewhere close for the TL) the ECU recognizes the wheels will keep the engine turning and shuts off the injectors. The engine is now simply and air pump being driven by the wheels via the transmission. As soon as you touch the gas pedal, the injectors start injecting and away you go.
Old 07-18-2008, 07:09 PM
  #59  
Advanced
 
jtkoo7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Age: 41
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's like when you downshift and the rpms go up. They go up because of the rate at which the wheels are turning. As long as the wheels are spinning and the car is not in neutral the transmission, the crankshaft and the pistons continue to move because the wheels force them to. All of this causes the drive belt to still spin which allows your alternator and ac compressor and whatever else, is on the belt, to work as it normally would.
Old 07-18-2008, 07:16 PM
  #60  
black on black 04 TL 6MT
 
sol_da_man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Northwest
Age: 39
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LukeaTron
the ECU recognizes the wheels will keep the engine turning and shuts off the injectors. The engine is now simply and air pump being driven by the wheels via the transmission. As soon as you touch the gas pedal, the injectors start injecting and away you go.
well put.
Old 07-19-2008, 06:39 AM
  #61  
Safety Car
 
Tripnbeats's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: USA
Age: 42
Posts: 4,563
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
i still say go get a hybrid...lol
Old 07-19-2008, 02:39 PM
  #62  
Pro
 
ChicagoBurbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Batavia, IL
Age: 69
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I've been able to get an extra 2-4 MPG out of my 07 TLS 6MT by skip-shifting all the time. (of course this ONLY works with a clutch).

* Accelerate gently from a dead stop and take it up to around 2K RPM
* At 2K, shift up from 1st to 3rd gear and once again accelerate gently to 2K
* At 2k, shift up from 3rd to 5th gear accelerate to 2k and drop it into 6th to cruise.

A few notes...at these RPM's you won't be lugging the engine, but you're running at the bottom of each gear's power band so don't expect the car to jump if you need to move in a hurry; you'll have to down shift at least one gear to get any 'oomph' when you hit the gas.
You may be pissing a few of the jackrabbits off who are behind you when you take off at a light, but not really as many as I expected. I was surprised how most folks seem to be adjusting their driving habits to save some gas.

I also do the coasting to a light thing, and combined with proper tire inflation I'm getting 27-29 MPG around town. Unfortunately that's where I do %95 of my driving in the TLS.

One final footnote...driving this way is absolutely the least fun you can have in a TLS. But it really does matter when you can get an extra 60-70 miles out of a tank when you're paying over $65.00 for a fillup. Boy do I miss the days when mashing the pedal wasn't a big cost consideration.
Old 07-19-2008, 02:56 PM
  #63  
Three Wheelin'
 
HQTL6SPD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Spring TX
Age: 38
Posts: 1,329
Received 27 Likes on 21 Posts
has anyone made any upgrades to their fuel system? (bigger injectors/ fuel rails)
how did it affect gas milage?
Old 07-19-2008, 02:57 PM
  #64  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
This should not be a debate as it's based in fact. Like it has been said, with your foot off the gas, rpms above idle, your injectors are off. So here it it is:

Coasting in gear= No fuel used
Coasting in neutral= Idle amount of fuel being used, sometimes higher.

Driving style is #1 on the list. When you see a redlight, let off the gas, don't stay on the gas until it's time to hit the brakes. In an auto, accelerate gently but not too gently. The torque convertor gets more efficient as more power is applied and if you accelerate too easy a lot of your mpg goes up in heat in the auto.

Tire pressure to the max recommended by the manufacturer which varies from 32psi to 55psi. I don't believe in going over and giving up traction to save .001mpg.

The first 60,000 miles in my TL were commute miles and I paid very close attention to mpg and speeds. I found that if I got in the truck lane and did 55mph I got optimal mpg. A little slower and I didn't see a difference. Take it down to 40mph and the mileage got worse.

Contrary to overwhelming popular belief, a K&N will do absolutely nothing for your mileage, not even .0000000000000000001mpg. This is impossibe and I wish people would stop repeating it.

Exhaust will give both power and mpg.
Old 07-19-2008, 08:10 PM
  #65  
Racer
 
scv76_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: So.Cal SCV
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by I hate cars
This should not be a debate as it's based in fact. Like it has been said, with your foot off the gas, rpms above idle, your injectors are off. So here it it is:
So the injectors shut off with foot off the gas at any rpm above idle......nice.....

That answers a question I was going to ask based on the concept from what other people have said that the rpm's had to be over something like 1500 before the injectors would shut off.
If that were true, you would have to engine brake while approaching a red light in order to keep the rpms up.

But wait, if at idle (700 rpm?) gas is needed, but coming to a stop at 800 rpms gas is not needed, they must use something like a throttle positioner device to tell the difference if you are in neutral or just low rpms due to slowing down?
Old 07-19-2008, 08:22 PM
  #66  
Suzuka Master
 
FiveLiterCheater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,030
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Keep it under or around 2k RPM, keep up with tire pressure, don't burn through gears from a dead stop.

As far as the A/C debate goes...i'm pretty sure you would get better MPG with all the windows up and A/C on low vs. windows down (more drag)....atleast on the highway.
Old 07-19-2008, 09:33 PM
  #67  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
Originally Posted by scv76_
So the injectors shut off with foot off the gas at any rpm above idle......nice.....

That answers a question I was going to ask based on the concept from what other people have said that the rpm's had to be over something like 1500 before the injectors would shut off.
If that were true, you would have to engine brake while approaching a red light in order to keep the rpms up.

But wait, if at idle (700 rpm?) gas is needed, but coming to a stop at 800 rpms gas is not needed, they must use something like a throttle positioner device to tell the difference if you are in neutral or just low rpms due to slowing down?
Each car is different but when I had the TL on the scanner I saw it go into fuel cut as low as 1,400rpm but didn't check any lower than that. When I said above idle, that was a little exaggerated but it's not much above idle.
Old 07-20-2008, 08:31 AM
  #68  
Safety Car
 
Tripnbeats's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: USA
Age: 42
Posts: 4,563
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
i hear people upgrading to the rsx type s injectors. thats about it though. i dont see where the benefit stands with that tho.... more power? i dunno.
Old 07-20-2008, 05:56 PM
  #69  
Three Wheelin'
 
HQTL6SPD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Spring TX
Age: 38
Posts: 1,329
Received 27 Likes on 21 Posts
^ yea i wonder if there are any benefits.. anyone care to fill us in??
Old 07-20-2008, 06:37 PM
  #70  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
Originally Posted by HQTL6SPD
^ yea i wonder if there are any benefits.. anyone care to fill us in??
Only if the car needs more fuel than the stock injectors can put out which it doesn't. No advantage whatsoever.
Old 07-26-2009, 07:41 PM
  #71  
10th Gear
 
shub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Portland, ME
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When I am approaching a red light or stop sign, I've gotten into the habit of putting into neutral and coasting up to it. Now after reading this thread and seeing I am wasting more gas, I believe I won't be doing that anymore. However, I can still see some occasions where I still want use neutral, like rolling into a parking slot. I feel bad for my throwout bearing using my clutch every time I put the car into neutral. I noticed that the gear shift can pop into neutral without it, would it be damaging to do that regularly?
Old 07-26-2009, 11:38 PM
  #72  
Racer
 
piggydog's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 491
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by TzarChasm
Sorry but you are wrong. Shifting into neutral, besides being dangerous, causes the computer to have to inject fuel into the engine in order to keep the car running. If you just get off the gas, the transmission will keep the engine running and you will use NO gas.
true but you travel way less distance in gear vs in neutral. And every manual I've had I'll put it in neutral to coast to a light, much less strain on the car and can't coast in a given gear too long, you'll have to downshift (more wear on the tranny, clutch, engine etc)
Old 07-27-2009, 11:25 AM
  #73  
Instructor
 
CdTriX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
when i first got the car, my driving habits were really bad... i was getting 450km per tank.. after awhile, i got use to the pedals and the breaking and now i'm avging 600km per tank.

It's all in pedal finesse. The smoother you are, the less gas you use.
Old 07-27-2009, 12:05 PM
  #74  
Ryan Christopher
 
Black_05_TL_6SP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Alabama
Age: 47
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by piggydog
true but you travel way less distance in gear vs in neutral. And every manual I've had I'll put it in neutral to coast to a light, much less strain on the car and can't coast in a given gear too long, you'll have to downshift (more wear on the tranny, clutch, engine etc)
My thoughts on this as well.
If coasting down a hill in gear -
1) your speed will remain pretty much the same
2) no fuel used, but if you hit a flat spot you must accelerate to maintain speed.
3) As soon as you get to the base of the hill, you must put your foot back on the pedal to maintain current speed

If coasting down a hill in neutral -
1) Your speed will accelerate due to gravity
2) Not need to hit pedal during a flat spot as there is nothing to slow the wheels except ground friction and air friction
3) You can let the car coast longer at the base of the hill only consuming the .5gal/hr rate vs having to accelerate.

I personally take advantage of downhill slopes and try to coast. Using some of the hypermileing tricks, I was able to get 34 MPG for an entire tank of gas with 545 miles on that tank. Given it was boring as hell, it was still good to find out what it could do.

Old 07-27-2009, 02:47 PM
  #75  
Advanced
 
MDXin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My trip computer says I'm getting 27 mpg ave. I drive 1/3 highway, 1/3 city, 1/3 country roads. (06 TL) How much more do you want?
Old 07-27-2009, 03:18 PM
  #76  
Chapter Leader (San Antonio)
iTrader: (3)
 
TheChamp531's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 6,022
Received 433 Likes on 319 Posts
You didn't buy a TL to save gas! Vroom! Vroom!

Anyways just read what I hate cars wrote it is 100% correct, most of you that care so much about gas are so light onthe gas that you're actually losing mileage due to torque converter. Just drive normal not too fast not too slow. If you worry about it so much than the TL is not for you. Get a hybrid or a 4 banger
Old 07-27-2009, 03:21 PM
  #77  
Chapter Leader (San Antonio)
iTrader: (3)
 
TheChamp531's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 6,022
Received 433 Likes on 319 Posts
I get 14 MPG commuting from work and home. And 8-11 MPG when finding a parking spot for college. But when I'm on the highway I get 30+ MPG so I'm happy especially whe you see the numbers on our counterparts aka the G series, Z series, and the Nissans. Only the Accord 6 CYL are slightly better.
Old 07-27-2009, 03:59 PM
  #78  
Full of water...
 
blkaspec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
Age: 44
Posts: 2,284
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by sho_nuff1997


so if I was getting pulled in neutral while my car is running for 60 miles, it would use more gas than somebody driving the same distance?

i think the issue is with this statement. its not just when your car is in neutral, its when it is in neutral and the car is running. if the car is being pulled and it is off then no fuel is used. if you are driving the car and you coast you are also using little/no fuel, its if you are driving your car and you shift it in to neutral while coasting then you will use more gas than just taking your foot off the gas.
Old 07-28-2009, 06:48 AM
  #79  
Advanced
 
MDXin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My last car was an 06 v6 accord, I think my 06 TL gets better mpg. at least 1.0 mpg avg. For my commute that has been the same for 17 yrs.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:10 PM.