Is it necessary to "break in" the engine for max fuel economy?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 20, 2004 | 08:13 AM
  #1  
bullish's Avatar
Thread Starter
3rd Gear
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Jupiter, FL
Is it necessary to "break in" the engine for max fuel economy?

The dealership told me it was not necessary to "break in" the new TL engine for fuel economy. Is this true? I want to maximize the fuel efficiency and I thought I should stay under 65 for the first 600-1000 miles. Any informed opinions appreciated.
Reply
Old May 20, 2004 | 08:19 AM
  #2  
ahemp's Avatar
1st Gear
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Laurel, MD
I think that it rally does not matter if you stay under or go over 65 during that time. I found that the mileage will fluctuate according to the daily stop and go whether its city driving or traffic jam. Highwat truly get 500+ miles in a full tank. Tested and testing again this weekend.
Reply
Old May 20, 2004 | 09:56 AM
  #3  
Advanced
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Islip, NY
Question

Originally Posted by bullish
The dealership told me it was not necessary to "break in" the new TL engine for fuel economy. Is this true? I want to maximize the fuel efficiency and I thought I should stay under 65 for the first 600-1000 miles. Any informed opinions appreciated.

Everyone I speak with regarding this (including the salesman, service dept.) say that the engine has already been broken in prior to assembly. I was told they fire it up to test it and let it run. If this is untrue someone correct me and everyone else that has told me.
Reply
Old May 20, 2004 | 10:50 AM
  #4  
rets's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 12,177
Likes: 86
From: NYC/SF/Tokyo/HK
IMHO, please just follow what your owner manual says, and do the proper break-in for the certain mileage. It's good for your MPG and performance in the future. Is it 600-1k miles so hard to execute?

(Otherwise, two of my friends never break-in their 04TLs, and they will have new lease cars 3 years after...)





BTW, ahemp, although my 04TL could run 32-33 MPG at 50-55 MPH purly in the highway, I doubt it can run 500 miles per tank by maintaining such low MPH... Maybe I have to ignore "low fuel warning" light and "Miles to Empty" these two indicators.
Reply
Old May 20, 2004 | 11:17 AM
  #5  
kilrb's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City
Originally Posted by bullish
The dealership told me it was not necessary to "break in" the new TL engine for fuel economy. Is this true? I want to maximize the fuel efficiency and I thought I should stay under 65 for the first 600-1000 miles. Any informed opinions appreciated.
I always trust the people who made the car, as opposed to sell the car. I know in this case they are agreeing with Acura. If there were an rpm issue for break-in, it would be in the manual. I wish I had a dollar for every time someone (including dealerships) have advised break-in limitations above and beyond what the factory says.

Oh, here's an interesting take on break-in. It claims the best fuel mileage comes from a good, hard break-in. Take it or leave it, but I think what he argues makes a lot of sense.
http://www.mototuneusa.com/break_in_secrets.htm
Reply
Old May 20, 2004 | 11:29 AM
  #6  
gto2050's Avatar
Someday pigs WILL fly!
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,320
Likes: 0
From: Pequannock, NJ USA
With today's manufacturing tolerances, I doubt it's necessary but use common sense. Redlining and hard driving might be put aside for awhile. It's hard not to speed etc when a car is new. Manuals are full of legaleze to make the attorneys happy. Just like the warning with the nav unit.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
01CLOwner
2G CL (2001-2003)
21
Oct 9, 2015 01:07 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
2
Sep 17, 2015 10:16 AM
Yumcha
Automotive News
3
Sep 14, 2015 10:09 PM
MyBlackBeauty
Canada
0
Sep 14, 2015 05:28 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:51 PM.