my best 0-60 was 6.6
#1
my best 0-60 was 6.6
i have a bone stock 04 auto tl with 102k miles. i borrowed a friends g-tech pro, input all the info as best i could. total wieght was about 3950. it was about 65 degrees outside and the road was flat
i tried a few different launches and the best time was achieved by turning off the vsa and stomping on the gas. holding the brake and reving to about 2k rpms and releasing the brake gave me a slower time. ss didnt help since the auto shifts from 1st to 2nd on its own. i didnt try "L"
anyway to improve this time without any mods and without lowering the weight? is there a better way to launch?
i tried a few different launches and the best time was achieved by turning off the vsa and stomping on the gas. holding the brake and reving to about 2k rpms and releasing the brake gave me a slower time. ss didnt help since the auto shifts from 1st to 2nd on its own. i didnt try "L"
anyway to improve this time without any mods and without lowering the weight? is there a better way to launch?
#3
Drifting
^ ditto 6.6 seems pretty good for an auto. The SS should hold 1st as long as you don't let off on the gas- it will auto-shift the moment you let off. I agree that the auto shifts pretty good on it's own so it may yield the best time even if SS holds 1st longer with full WOT runs.
I have the dynolicious application on my IPod Touch, but have yet to get a good run in. I can't find a great place in Northern San Diego to go for a run with my car that's safe.( I wish the Palomar Road drag strip was still open.) The best place I have now is the on ramp onto 5 North from Canon road but it's hard to get a good run with all the traffic (during the day anyway). For anyone with an IPhone or Ipod touch- the dynolicious application seems pretty good- just a 12 buck download.
I'll be going out to the desert in a couple of weeks and hope to get a run in there. I hear the GTech gives more optimistic times than a drag strip clock would perhaps off by a couple 1/10's of a second. Supposedly the dynolicious is pretty close to a real time slip posting. I'll post my results when I have them.
I have the dynolicious application on my IPod Touch, but have yet to get a good run in. I can't find a great place in Northern San Diego to go for a run with my car that's safe.( I wish the Palomar Road drag strip was still open.) The best place I have now is the on ramp onto 5 North from Canon road but it's hard to get a good run with all the traffic (during the day anyway). For anyone with an IPhone or Ipod touch- the dynolicious application seems pretty good- just a 12 buck download.
I'll be going out to the desert in a couple of weeks and hope to get a run in there. I hear the GTech gives more optimistic times than a drag strip clock would perhaps off by a couple 1/10's of a second. Supposedly the dynolicious is pretty close to a real time slip posting. I'll post my results when I have them.
#6
Under construction
iTrader: (3)
i have a bone stock 04 auto tl with 102k miles. i borrowed a friends g-tech pro, input all the info as best i could. total wieght was about 3950. it was about 65 degrees outside and the road was flat
i tried a few different launches and the best time was achieved by turning off the vsa and stomping on the gas. holding the brake and reving to about 2k rpms and releasing the brake gave me a slower time. ss didnt help since the auto shifts from 1st to 2nd on its own. i didnt try "L"
anyway to improve this time without any mods and without lowering the weight? is there a better way to launch?
i tried a few different launches and the best time was achieved by turning off the vsa and stomping on the gas. holding the brake and reving to about 2k rpms and releasing the brake gave me a slower time. ss didnt help since the auto shifts from 1st to 2nd on its own. i didnt try "L"
anyway to improve this time without any mods and without lowering the weight? is there a better way to launch?
6.6 sec 0-60mph is pretty good considering you were almost 4000 pounds!
Trending Topics
#10
Safety Car
i think, THINK, my best 0-60 was under 6 seconds...? i wanna say 5.6? (fully bolted on)
used dynolicious though...which i've heard is just as accurate as the g-tech
used dynolicious though...which i've heard is just as accurate as the g-tech
#11
Racer
If I remember correctly,gas is about 7 lbs a gallon. I just did 0-60 in 6.3 sec in my auto not even trying. I had 3/4 tank of gas. I weigh about 200. Ofcourse I have 82k miles, and I'm slightly modded. Your posted numbers are good. I'll break the 5 second range on another day.
#13
Chapter Leader (Southern Region)
#15
Chapter Leader (Southern Region)
#19
Safety Car
i'm confused...the bmw (was looking around) website says that the 335i does 0-60 in 5.6 seconds... there's no way i'd be able to keep up with a 335...
#23
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BMW advertised it like that intentionally. When they first introduced the 335i, it was adv as 0-60 at 5.4 sec car because of the previous m3 model. If people knew the car was just as fast as the previous m3, who would want to purchase the m3 over the 335i. BMW is always under-rated. Even the 330ci was under rated. It had less hp than 2G TL-s and was still able to beat it.
#24
Chapter Leader (Southern Region)
#25
Team Owner
One thing the mags do is just stomp the gas to the floor. Most of them state this in the small print. In a turbo car you will see great benefits by powerbraking and getting a few psi before you release the brakes. That's why cars like my GN were rated for high 4-low 5 second 0-60 times and high 13s yet the owners could typically knock half a second off of those times with a correct launch. I guarantee a stock 335 would do 0-60 in 5.0 with a good driver.
As for the TL's 0-60, don't stress too much over what a g-tech tells you. I've run them in the car down the 1/4 and the g-tech usually shows a quicker ET and the mph is very optimistic.
As for the TL's 0-60, don't stress too much over what a g-tech tells you. I've run them in the car down the 1/4 and the g-tech usually shows a quicker ET and the mph is very optimistic.
#27
Team Owner
#28
Chapter Leader (Southern Region)
#30
Advanced
Exactly right. The strength of our cars, at least 6mt version, is 3rd & 4th gears; and our cars are tough to launch too. And, so what if our cars are just 6.4 vehicles, that is still plenty fast.
#31
Chapter Leader (Southern Region)
.. 1st & 2nd have a greater gear ratio.. so how could 3rd & 4th be the 'strength of our cars'? speed vs. time is almost linear in 1st & 2nd.. every gear after it tapers off.. the weak link for a fwd vehicle is traction.
#32
Instructor
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Age: 41
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ya and when do you have the least traction, 1st and 2nd. Although I really can't see too many TLs with enough torque to spin its tires in 2nd.
Last edited by <{Kris}>; 09-23-2009 at 01:26 PM.
#33
Safety Car
lol i do that all the time when it rains! i have terrible summer tires on...hahaha works even better when i'm going up a hilllllllll lame...
#34
Advanced
From my perspective, especially first gear, my car feels sluggish almost as if the gear has an rev limiter around 3.5-4 rpm; 3 & 4th gear feels fairly fluid. I can get past 6 rpm in first gear but the car never feels real balanced. For comparison sake, a 3 series bmw revs freely without that limiter feel; perhaps it is just the inline six because when I test drove a s2000, first gear had the same feeling as my TL.
#35
Team Owner
From my perspective, especially first gear, my car feels sluggish almost as if the gear has an rev limiter around 3.5-4 rpm; 3 & 4th gear feels fairly fluid. I can get past 6 rpm in first gear but the car never feels real balanced. For comparison sake, a 3 series bmw revs freely without that limiter feel; perhaps it is just the inline six because when I test drove a s2000, first gear had the same feeling as my TL.
#36
Under construction
iTrader: (3)
Unless you have way too much power and can't put the pedal down until 3rd, like your GN.
#37
Team Owner
Definately. Acceleration always falls off unless the car has big power and traction issues. On some sort of street tire I think mine pulls harder in third than first or at least it feels like it's planting me in the seat harder. It seems to have more traction once it's moving. I've noticed that when it tries to spin in third it takes chunks out of the tires instead of smoothly removing rubber so something changes at speed but I'm not sure what it is.
#38
Chapter Leader (Southern Region)
From my perspective, especially first gear, my car feels sluggish almost as if the gear has an rev limiter around 3.5-4 rpm; 3 & 4th gear feels fairly fluid. I can get past 6 rpm in first gear but the car never feels real balanced. For comparison sake, a 3 series bmw revs freely without that limiter feel; perhaps it is just the inline six because when I test drove a s2000, first gear had the same feeling as my TL.
Like Chuck Norris, Matt gets every gear down, and if the transmission / shafts gives him any lip he kicks through the floorboard and Fred Flinstone's the rest of the way FTW!
#40
Under construction
iTrader: (3)
Definately. Acceleration always falls off unless the car has big power and traction issues. On some sort of street tire I think mine pulls harder in third than first or at least it feels like it's planting me in the seat harder. It seems to have more traction once it's moving. I've noticed that when it tries to spin in third it takes chunks out of the tires instead of smoothly removing rubber so something changes at speed but I'm not sure what it is.