Mileage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 6, 2004 | 08:41 AM
  #1  
berlinrl's Avatar
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 286
Likes: 1
From: pittsburgh, pa
Mileage

We took a road trip this weekend . . .

Pittsburgh to Philadelphia on Saturday, then back to Pittsburgh on Sunday,
all on the PA Turnpike. Travelling east, we got 31 MPG, but traveling west
this decreased to 29 MPG. This really tells how much the wind direction
effects mileage.

Rachel
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2004 | 08:50 AM
  #2  
Diver's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
From: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by berlinrl
We took a road trip this weekend . . .

Pittsburgh to Philadelphia on Saturday, then back to Pittsburgh on Sunday,
all on the PA Turnpike. Travelling east, we got 31 MPG, but traveling west
this decreased to 29 MPG. This really tells how much the wind direction
effects mileage.

Rachel
there could be a different explanation. elevation of Pittsburgh is 45 feet and elevation of Philadelphia is 1223 feet.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2004 | 08:57 AM
  #3  
ludachrisvt's Avatar
Wants an M3 in
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,779
Likes: 3
that means they were going downhill on the way back which doesnt explain the lower gas mileage :hehe:
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2004 | 10:04 AM
  #4  
hypertech's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
From: Mpls, MN
Originally Posted by berlinrl
We took a road trip this weekend . . .

Pittsburgh to Philadelphia on Saturday, then back to Pittsburgh on Sunday,
all on the PA Turnpike. Travelling east, we got 31 MPG, but traveling west
this decreased to 29 MPG. This really tells how much the wind direction
effects mileage.

Rachel
No, it just shows that something was different. I doubt there was a constant wind the entire trip there, while you were in Philadelphia and all the way back.

More likely it has to do with speed, temperature, humidity, etc. You can't pin it down on wind from that singel observation. By any chance did you buy gas in Philadelphia? Di you buy anything in Philadelphia that would have made the car heavier? That would throw a wrench in it too.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2004 | 10:26 AM
  #5  
Ron A's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 16,412
Likes: 1,043
Maybe too much knoshing on those Philly cheesesteak sandwiches.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2004 | 02:03 PM
  #6  
lakeman's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
From: Lake Hartwell, SC
The TL does get great mileage when driven for it. I just took a trip from upstate SC (elev 700 ft) to Daytona Beach (elev 50 ft). I got 31mpg running around 75 on the way down and got 29 on the way back running closer to 80 (average 77). I think elevation may have a little to do with the difference, but speed is likely the main difference. Once after filling up and resetting the TC, i got 35 mpg averaging 65 mph for about 30 miles. (This leg was also part of the trip down, so it may have helped boost that number.)

berlinrl, do you know your average speeds? Were they they same?
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2004 | 02:39 PM
  #7  
rets's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 12,177
Likes: 86
From: NYC/SF/Tokyo/HK
Imho...

Does anyone ever calculate by yourself?


I found out my TL's MID isn't that accurate while MPG > 27. MID seems to tell you "better MPG" than you actually have.

For example, if MID tells me the trip has 32 MPG, my own calculation will only show 29~30 MPG.


(I always try to fill up my tank by myself to "the same level"... in past 15 years...)
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2004 | 02:59 PM
  #8  
Ron A's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 16,412
Likes: 1,043
Slight variations in filling the tank will result in variances from the MID. Filling up one time on level ground, and then next time on an incline, might result in the amount of fuel in the tank being at a different level.

Other factors come into play here also. If your actual computed miles per gallon comes out to 29.6-30.4, the MID will show 30. Also, filling up on a hot day will give a different figure than filling up on a cool, damp day.

I have always manually computed miles per gallon figures after each fill-up, but since finding the MID is always, in my case at least, extremely accurate, I just note the MID MPG before holding down the reset button.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2004 | 03:15 PM
  #9  
rets's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 12,177
Likes: 86
From: NYC/SF/Tokyo/HK
I'm fully aware of those factors... and still experimenting on these issues... in my computer database, I have all my gas/gallon/price/mileage info since 1990, and always make sure myself to fill up the tank by the similar way and the uniform standard if possible.


So far, my issues/problems are only showing up in those high MPG trips. If I got 30 MPG, the MPG by my compute is usually around 27-28. In my amazing trip with 500+ miles, my MID display 34+, but I got 31~32 MPG after the calculation.


My car is around 20k, and there are 30+ fill-up with MPG > 25~28... 90% of them are showing up the similar result... hopefully this is only happening on my car...
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2004 | 07:53 PM
  #10  
batting_cleanup's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: Ashburn, Virginia
Originally Posted by Diver
there could be a different explanation. elevation of Pittsburgh is 45 feet and elevation of Philadelphia is 1223 feet.
I think you have this bass-akwards. I would bet you pink slips that pittsburgh sits at a higher elevation than Philly.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2004 | 07:54 PM
  #11  
vp911's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,682
Likes: 2
Interesting.... but it has to be more than just wind and elevation. How hard you accelerated things like that make a difference... how many times u passed people... etc etc
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 08:07 AM
  #12  
berlinrl's Avatar
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 286
Likes: 1
From: pittsburgh, pa
Average speed was higher on the return trip . . . about 72 rather than 69.

Interestingly, the previous week we went to Williamsburg for Thanksgiving and
had similar results.

Pittsburgh to Williamsburg 29 mpg
Williamsburg to Pittsburgh
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 08:09 AM
  #13  
berlinrl's Avatar
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 286
Likes: 1
From: pittsburgh, pa
Average speed was higher on the return trip . . . about 72 rather than 69.

Interestingly, the previous week we went to Williamsburg for Thanksgiving and
had similar results.

Pittsburgh to Williamsburg 29 mpg
Williamsburg to Pittsburgh 27 mpg

(We had a lot more traffic on this trip, given that it was a holiday
weekend)

On this return trip to Pittsburgh (Saturday, 11/28) I could feel myself
driving into the wind. Gusts were about 30 mph.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 03:08 PM
  #14  
edavies's Avatar
Cruisin'
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Just returned from round trip Ottawa to Destin Florida, 3 day drive, 1500 miles each way, average speed 65mph, and average of 29.6 mpg.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 03:21 PM
  #15  
GRich4u's Avatar
Weapon X
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Keep in mind it also depends on the gas. Different gas stations put different additives in their gas. My #1 choice is 76. I Use it on my motorcyle and gets good miles. My least choice is Cheveron. The techron is good for cleaning your engine but horsepower is reduced. So if you are testing MPG, be sure to use same type of gas from the same station. Not a lot of people know that.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 04:46 PM
  #16  
TLGen3's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
my guess is that you're riding in the Jet stream, and back you were against it Just kidding
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 04:56 PM
  #17  
moeronn's Avatar
is learning to moonwalk i
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 15,520
Likes: 3
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by TLGen3
my guess is that you're riding in the Jet stream, and back you were against it Just kidding
That might be it, but my guess is it has more to do with the rotation of the earth
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 06:00 PM
  #18  
Acuraluvr's Avatar
Spinnin them beats
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,767
Likes: 47
From: Delaware
we liv in a small town and use the tl daily to got 2 miles back and forth each day (ben a yrs, only 3200 miles lol) the ave. mileage is 18mpg???!!! seems ok in comparison wit our suburban...
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 09:02 PM
  #19  
lakeman's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
From: Lake Hartwell, SC
Originally Posted by berlinrl
Average speed was higher on the return trip . . . about 72 rather than 69.

Interestingly, the previous week we went to Williamsburg for Thanksgiving and
had similar results.

Pittsburgh to Williamsburg 29 mpg
Williamsburg to Pittsburgh 27 mpg

(We had a lot more traffic on this trip, given that it was a holiday
weekend)

On this return trip to Pittsburgh (Saturday, 11/28) I could feel myself
driving into the wind. Gusts were about 30 mph.
Sounds like wind could be the big difference. I would expect that air drag has the biggest impact on gas mileage on the highway. ( At city speeds mechanical drag - tires, gears etc - is likely a bigger factor.) If you were driving 70 with an average 20 mph wind going the same way, the wind drag would be more like 50 mph. In the return direction the effective speed would be more like 90 mph. With that difference, I would not have been surprised at an even larger difference in your mileage.


Also, rets, for the first 3 or 4K miles, I calculated each tank and compared to the TC. I rarely found it only off by 1 mpg. I did a long average and it was maybe 1/2 a MPG high. I suspect that each car is slightly different.

Lakeman
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 09:09 PM
  #20  
TL Driver's Avatar
7th Gear
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, OH
Originally Posted by Diver
there could be a different explanation. elevation of Pittsburgh is 45 feet and elevation of Philadelphia is 1223 feet.
I think you have that backwards. Philly is on the coast and the 'burgh in the hills of Western PA. That would lend some cred to your theory.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 09:59 PM
  #21  
rets's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 12,177
Likes: 86
From: NYC/SF/Tokyo/HK
Originally Posted by lakeman
.. for the first 3 or 4K miles, I calculated each tank and compared to the TC. I rarely found it only off by 1 mpg. I did a long average and it was maybe 1/2 a MPG high. I suspect that each car is slightly different.

Lakeman

Thanks for your input. I'll keep paying attention to this issue on my TL.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
08KBP_VA
2G RL (2005-2012)
44
Oct 22, 2019 01:55 PM
08_UA7_Gr33k
Member Cars for Sale
13
Feb 11, 2016 02:17 PM
lanechanger
Member Cars for Sale
4
Oct 13, 2015 10:56 AM
Froid
2G RDX (2013-2018)
3
Sep 27, 2015 06:16 PM
jmaxima03
Member Cars for Sale
1
Sep 27, 2015 10:22 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:14 PM.