3G TL (2004-2008)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Gas has confuzzled me..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-29-2011, 11:05 PM
  #1  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
taker777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 32
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gas has confuzzled me..

Is it me or am i really noticing Chevron Techron 93 lasts alot longer in my TL compared to the other places i get it at like Shell, and Valero.

Anyone else notice something about getting gas from different companies?
Old 05-29-2011, 11:08 PM
  #2  
6-SPEED LOVER
iTrader: (2)
 
ABP_04TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NJ/NY
Age: 37
Posts: 4,170
Received 122 Likes on 90 Posts
Havent tried no other 93 but BP's
Old 05-29-2011, 11:17 PM
  #3  
Cruisin'
 
VieT916's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Age: 42
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by taker777
Is it me or am i really noticing Chevron Techron 93 lasts alot longer in my TL compared to the other places i get it at like Shell, and Valero.

Anyone else notice something about getting gas from different companies?
I only have 91 available and don't notice a difference regardless of brand.
Old 05-29-2011, 11:21 PM
  #4  
Burning Brakes
iTrader: (1)
 
snake134's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Motor City
Posts: 892
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 14 Posts
dunno. normally fill up with shell 93. always heard that was the best
Old 05-29-2011, 11:24 PM
  #5  
MechEng
iTrader: (9)
 
03tLsNBP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Long Island, NY
Age: 34
Posts: 5,910
Received 483 Likes on 400 Posts
i see no difference in 87, 89, 91, or 93

regardless, i always use 91.
Old 05-29-2011, 11:27 PM
  #6  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
taker777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 32
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I actually felt a difference in the cars pickup. Normally i always get Shell but it runs out ridiculously fast for me. And my day to day route + driving style is pretty much the same
Old 05-29-2011, 11:53 PM
  #7  
Safety Car
 
A SiQ TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sacramento area
Posts: 3,827
Received 340 Likes on 278 Posts
I noticed we don't have 93 available here. 91 is the highest. Since I've never used anything but Chevron 91, I couldn't say.
Old 05-30-2011, 04:11 AM
  #8  
Three Wheelin'
 
SpiderX1016's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Age: 32
Posts: 1,785
Received 96 Likes on 74 Posts
Only use Shell and Chevron. No difference.
Old 05-30-2011, 05:35 PM
  #9  
10th Gear
 
JohnG1920's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Massapequa Park, NY
Age: 63
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Around here Mobil gas is the best ( and a little bit pricier than the other brands).
I basically switch between Hess gas and Mobil gas week after week.
Always get premium which does seem to help the TL run better.
Old 05-30-2011, 05:40 PM
  #10  
Senior Moderator
 
Ken1997TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,640
Received 2,329 Likes on 1,309 Posts
Originally Posted by A SiQ TL
I noticed we don't have 93 available here. 91 is the highest. Since I've never used anything but Chevron 91, I couldn't say.
91 is the highest octane you'll find in California (unless you get racing gas)
Old 05-30-2011, 05:56 PM
  #11  
Racer
 
Chessie724's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 487
Received 52 Likes on 32 Posts
Just a thought, OP, but could it be that the Chevron pumps have a shut-off mechanism that simply puts more gas in the tank before cut-off? Or does your experience mean that you're getting more miles per gallon (MID and hand-calculated) with Chevron gas?
Old 05-30-2011, 08:54 PM
  #12  
Safety Car
iTrader: (4)
 
JTS97Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Plainfield, IL
Age: 43
Posts: 4,242
Received 946 Likes on 650 Posts
I average 25.7 mpg using Phillips 66 93 octane in my 08 Type S 6mt. I fill up at the exact same pump #11 each and every time and stop at the first click. That is with no highway miles all just far suburban driving. Gets me about 360ish miles to a tank right when range says 0 and about 13-14 gallons goes into it at fill up.
I can try a different brand for the heck of it and see what happens.

James
Old 05-31-2011, 12:20 AM
  #13  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
taker777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 32
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chessie724
Just a thought, OP, but could it be that the Chevron pumps have a shut-off mechanism that simply puts more gas in the tank before cut-off? Or does your experience mean that you're getting more miles per gallon (MID and hand-calculated) with Chevron gas?
more miles per gallons, i'm filling up the same price pretty much for wherever i get gas from it's always in the middle of the fuel line.

I really wanna go test it out
Old 05-31-2011, 09:24 AM
  #14  
Cruisin'
 
BitterAmerican's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I miss the days of gas without ethanol... and <$1.00/gal....

Either way though, I just look at whatever the highest octane rating is for whatever state I'm passing through. I stopped looking at the prices. It just depresses me.

If you can make a habit out of stopping at a toptiergas.com retailer, then good on you.
Old 05-31-2011, 09:37 AM
  #15  
Pro
iTrader: (1)
 
jsonkimz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Baltimore, MD
Age: 36
Posts: 634
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by bitteramerican
i miss the days of gas without ethanol... And <$1.00/gal....

Either way though, i just look at whatever the highest octane rating is for whatever state i'm passing through. I stopped looking at the prices. It just depresses me.

If you can make a habit out of stopping at a toptiergas.com retailer, then good on you.
+1
Old 05-31-2011, 10:25 AM
  #16  
Keep Right Except to Pass
 
1995hoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Kingstowne, VA
Age: 51
Posts: 2,406
Received 44 Likes on 35 Posts
I have found no difference. I can get both 91 and 93 because Sunoco stations here carry four grades of gas (87, 89, 91, and 93); there is also a Wawa station down in Dale City that carries 92 (which was the standard grade of super around here until the early 1990s). I tend to use the Sunoco 91 most often because the Sunoco about a mile from our house has the best price, because the 91 is 2¢ a gallon cheaper than the 93, and because I have noticed absolutely no difference in how the car runs on the two grades. But I wouldn't go out of my way to get the 91 octane if it weren't so convenient.

Lately I've been using Shell 93 more often because the Shell stations in the DC area have a deal with a local supermarket chain (Giant) where you get points when you use your Giant Bonuscard (supermarket loyalty card) and for every 100 points you get 10¢ a gallon off at the pump. I'm not a big fan of Giant as a grocery store, especially the one here in Kingstowne because it doesn't have cart-return corrals in the car park, but the gas discount is too valuable over time to resist, especially with two cars that require super (my TL and my wife's RSX Type-S). I have noticed no difference at all in how the car runs on the Shell versus the Sunoco.

The only real difference for me is, as usual, city driving versus highway driving.
Old 06-08-2011, 11:23 AM
  #17  
Advanced
 
BlueAquarian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 86
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
I tested my car when they changed the gas to summer fuel this past April and I noticed I getter better miles with Chevron, than Kroger,Costco, and especially Quik Trip..Maybe because Kroger,Costco, and Quik Trip uses the same gas, but it is a big difference.
Old 06-08-2011, 12:26 PM
  #18  
Q('.')=O
iTrader: (1)
 
imj0257's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: DFW, TX
Age: 40
Posts: 23,516
Received 720 Likes on 520 Posts
I take mine to Kroger and use premium (mid) grade. I get same mileage if not better than if I use super premium (highest) grade . I think in Texas it is 87, 91, 93...
Old 06-08-2011, 12:28 PM
  #19  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
justnspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Received 16,263 Likes on 11,973 Posts
In houston, its 87, 89, 93.
Old 06-08-2011, 12:30 PM
  #20  
Racer
iTrader: (1)
 
av2600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Atlanta
Age: 45
Posts: 458
Received 28 Likes on 25 Posts
dang, now i feel like i've been feeding my acura garbage.... i only put in 89 from shell

never tried anything less, but my fwiw my dad used to have an 04TL and once i "borrowed" it and got caught bc i put 87 in it.... The engine made a whole lot of noise, and my dad busted me. Now, i have my own
Old 06-08-2011, 12:31 PM
  #21  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
justnspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Received 16,263 Likes on 11,973 Posts
^put premium, sir.
your wallet will thank you.
Old 06-08-2011, 01:06 PM
  #22  
Racer
iTrader: (1)
 
av2600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Atlanta
Age: 45
Posts: 458
Received 28 Likes on 25 Posts
Originally Posted by justnspace
^put premium, sir.
your wallet will thank you.

Do you mean that its better for the engine over time, or did I just make that up?

After reading this thread, it looks like i'm the only cheap-skate that puts in less than 90 octane!

Going to try 93 shell V-power for the rest of the month, I'll report back
Old 06-08-2011, 01:11 PM
  #23  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
justnspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Received 16,263 Likes on 11,973 Posts
the engine has a high compression ratio of 11:1. it needs 91octane or better. if anything less, the fuel will detonate early, causing the ECU to pull timing, thus your fuel economy and performance will suffer.
The following users liked this post:
av2600 (06-08-2011)
Old 06-08-2011, 01:13 PM
  #24  
Racer
iTrader: (1)
 
av2600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Atlanta
Age: 45
Posts: 458
Received 28 Likes on 25 Posts
Originally Posted by justnspace
the engine has a high compression ratio of 11:1. it needs 91octane or better. if anything less, the fuel will detonate early, causing the ECU to pull timing, thus your fuel economy and performance will suffer.

So you're telling me "you're doing it wrong?"

Thanks for the explanation man, I really appreciate it. V-power here I come!
The following users liked this post:
justnspace (06-08-2011)
Old 06-08-2011, 01:34 PM
  #25  
Enthusiast
 
RealSteiner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lafayette, IN
Age: 32
Posts: 142
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I have put 87 in for 8 years with no problems.
Old 06-08-2011, 01:35 PM
  #26  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
justnspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Received 16,263 Likes on 11,973 Posts
^thats what you think.
the fact is that 2004-2008 TL's have an engine compression ratio of 11:1.
a lower octane will knock.

Last edited by justnspace; 06-08-2011 at 01:37 PM.
Old 06-08-2011, 02:43 PM
  #27  
Enthusiast
 
RealSteiner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lafayette, IN
Age: 32
Posts: 142
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by justnspace
the fuel will detonate early, causing the ECU to pull timing, thus your fuel economy and performance will suffer.
I average around 26 mpg, with no knock. It was also what the dealer recommended. I see people averaging around the same as I. If the fuel would happen to detonate early, wouldn't that substantially inhibit my fuel economy? I don't believe if it really matters unless it is the 3.5 Type S
Old 06-08-2011, 02:45 PM
  #28  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
justnspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Received 16,263 Likes on 11,973 Posts
keep putting in 87


the 3.2 has the same compression ratio as the 3.5


I hate cars has monitored knock on a 3.2, he found a mixture of 100 and 93 octane to make 96 completely stopped knock.
Old 06-08-2011, 02:55 PM
  #29  
Enthusiast
 
RealSteiner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lafayette, IN
Age: 32
Posts: 142
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by justnspace
I hate cars has monitored knock on a 3.2, he found a mixture of 100 and 93 octane to make 96 completely stopped knock.
That's absurd..
Old 06-08-2011, 03:02 PM
  #30  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
justnspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Received 16,263 Likes on 11,973 Posts
keep putting in that 87
The following users liked this post:
stvtec (06-08-2011)
Old 06-08-2011, 03:15 PM
  #31  
'06 WDP TL 6MT
iTrader: (2)
 
stvtec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Central NJ
Age: 45
Posts: 1,130
Received 58 Likes on 50 Posts
Its even worse than that justnspace. Our engines are actually 11.5:1 I do believe.
Old 06-08-2011, 03:24 PM
  #32  
Enthusiast
 
RealSteiner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lafayette, IN
Age: 32
Posts: 142
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by justnspace
keep putting in that 87
Oh, I will continue to. Rest assured. j32 ftw
Old 06-08-2011, 04:28 PM
  #33  
Intermediate
 
blktl04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: minnesota
Age: 35
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i only fill up with bp 93. here in Minnesota we have a few to choose from, 87,89,91,92,93. has anybody ran non-oxy premium? Just kinda curious because its also 93 octane.
Old 06-08-2011, 04:29 PM
  #34  
Why me??
iTrader: (1)
 
mikedog4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Bloomington
Age: 43
Posts: 120
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by RealSteiner
I have put 87 in for 8 years with no problems.
you've been driving since you were 10?
Old 06-08-2011, 04:38 PM
  #35  
Enthusiast
 
RealSteiner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lafayette, IN
Age: 32
Posts: 142
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by mikedog4
you've been driving since you were 10?
Ha yes... But it was my parents car before mine to clarify.

I researched and with 87 the ecu combats the pre-detonation/any problems by changing up the air-fuel mixture. This will not affect the mpg but might have a slight performance loss. As with any higher octane fuel, it would be expected.
Old 06-08-2011, 06:07 PM
  #36  
Chapter Leader (San Antonio)
iTrader: (3)
 
TheChamp531's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 6,022
Received 433 Likes on 319 Posts
^oh god. 18 year old messing up a nice car. Do some research, search on AZ.

Put 91/93.
The following users liked this post:
RainSupreme (07-03-2011)
Old 06-08-2011, 07:04 PM
  #37  
[x] FWCC [x]
 
tones160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Connecticut
Age: 37
Posts: 743
Received 21 Likes on 20 Posts
i always put BP's or Shell's 89. It's got the same octane.
Old 06-08-2011, 07:36 PM
  #38  
VGT
Advanced
 
VGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Age: 38
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
LOL at people thinking they get significantly different gas mileage from one brand to another.

Think its true? Next time you're empty, let your spouse, friend, girlfriend, whatever go and fill your car up, and not tell you where its from. Try it a couple times and see if you can spot a statistically significant difference.
Old 06-08-2011, 07:54 PM
  #39  
Team Owner
iTrader: (4)
 
RaviNJCLs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Landisville, PA
Age: 49
Posts: 37,112
Received 599 Likes on 417 Posts
Originally Posted by RealSteiner
Ha yes... But it was my parents car before mine to clarify.

I researched and with 87 the ecu combats the pre-detonation/any problems by changing up the air-fuel mixture. This will not affect the mpg but might have a slight performance loss. As with any higher octane fuel, it would be expected.
How much do you/your parents drive a year?

If you drive 20K miles a year which may be high then with 87 you are spending about $2800 a year on gas at $3.60 a gallon.

I have gotten gotten nothing less than 27 mpg and 31 on highway. Granted it is just 3000 miles. Let's call it a 28 mpg average. That means for the same amount of miles you are saving $16 a year with 87 octane vs. 93 but you are losing what you call just performance.

(20000/26) x 3.60 = $2769
(20000/28) x 3.90 = $2785

Sounds smart.
Old 06-08-2011, 08:03 PM
  #40  
Three Wheelin'
 
SpiderX1016's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Age: 32
Posts: 1,785
Received 96 Likes on 74 Posts
Originally Posted by RealSteiner
Ha yes... But it was my parents car before mine to clarify.

I researched and with 87 the ecu combats the pre-detonation/any problems by changing up the air-fuel mixture. This will not affect the mpg but might have a slight performance loss. As with any higher octane fuel, it would be expected.
lol


Quick Reply: Gas has confuzzled me..



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:55 AM.