Fuel octane rating.....
#1
Advanced
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fuel octane rating.....
......... what do u guys use? just recently filled up with 92 octane rating and the car feels less eager to pull and the engine rougher compared to when i picked up the car from the dealership....i doubt the dealership would put in an octane rating higher than 92 since it would be more costly...jus wondering what fuel octane rating u guys use
#2
Moderator Alumnus
Re: Fuel octane rating.....
I use 93 regularly, sometimes I will have 94, once a month. 93 is around $1.7-2.0 since the summer.
Heard from ppl in the north suggested lower octane might cause less vibration from the engine, I did try three full tanks of 87... no big difference for my case, and seemed to get less power...
So 93 again...
Heard from ppl in the north suggested lower octane might cause less vibration from the engine, I did try three full tanks of 87... no big difference for my case, and seemed to get less power...
So 93 again...
#3
Instructor
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Re: Fuel octane rating.....
Originally posted by rets
I use 93 regularly, sometimes I will have 94, once a month. 93 is around $1.7-2.0 since the summer.
Heard from ppl in the north suggested lower octane might cause less vibration from the engine, I did try three full tanks of 87... no big difference for my case, and seemed to get less power...
So 93 again...
I use 93 regularly, sometimes I will have 94, once a month. 93 is around $1.7-2.0 since the summer.
Heard from ppl in the north suggested lower octane might cause less vibration from the engine, I did try three full tanks of 87... no big difference for my case, and seemed to get less power...
So 93 again...
#4
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: New York City
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Re: Fuel octane rating.....
Originally posted by rets
I use 93 regularly, sometimes I will have 94, once a month. 93 is around $1.7-2.0 since the summer.
Heard from ppl in the north suggested lower octane might cause less vibration from the engine, I did try three full tanks of 87... no big difference for my case, and seemed to get less power...
So 93 again...
I use 93 regularly, sometimes I will have 94, once a month. 93 is around $1.7-2.0 since the summer.
Heard from ppl in the north suggested lower octane might cause less vibration from the engine, I did try three full tanks of 87... no big difference for my case, and seemed to get less power...
So 93 again...
#5
Instructor
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Aliso Viejo, CA
Age: 52
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In my opinion, lower octane would result in higher vibration engine from preliminary detonation of the gasoline in the cylinders from the 11:1 compression ratio.
I know that turbo and supercharged cars actually reduce the compression boost when they begin detecting these predetonations. I don't know what the TL does? It may affect the VTECH timings.
I know that turbo and supercharged cars actually reduce the compression boost when they begin detecting these predetonations. I don't know what the TL does? It may affect the VTECH timings.
#6
Moderator Alumnus
Originally posted by rkilian
In my opinion, lower octane would result in higher vibration engine from preliminary detonation of the gasoline in the cylinders from the 11:1 compression ratio.
I know that turbo and supercharged cars actually reduce the compression boost when they begin detecting these predetonations. I don't know what the TL does? It may affect the VTECH timings.
In my opinion, lower octane would result in higher vibration engine from preliminary detonation of the gasoline in the cylinders from the 11:1 compression ratio.
I know that turbo and supercharged cars actually reduce the compression boost when they begin detecting these predetonations. I don't know what the TL does? It may affect the VTECH timings.
Maybe I'm wrong, but I did think the same thing and this was the reason I try 87 for three consecutive tanks... this characteristic stuff could be really distinguishing feature for TL.
TO Nicki, I did get 94 in NJ while on the way home...
#7
The car will run fine with regular, but it will affect your performance since the computer will retard ignition timing to avoid preignition of the fuel. The engine is tuned to run on 92. More is not better, less is less than optimal.
Trending Topics
#8
Instructor
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Palmerton, Pa
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The engine has a knock sensor so if you use the lower octane fuel, the computer will detect the knock and retard the timing to stop it - result - less HP. Higher octane than recomended will buy you nothing.
#9
CEO, Team Anthracite
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Bear Territory
Posts: 2,899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by vtechbrain
The car will run fine with regular, but it will affect your performance since the computer will retard ignition timing to avoid preignition of the fuel. The engine is tuned to run on 92. More is not better, less is less than optimal.
The car will run fine with regular, but it will affect your performance since the computer will retard ignition timing to avoid preignition of the fuel. The engine is tuned to run on 92. More is not better, less is less than optimal.
#10
Instructor
Sunoco in NJ is the only place that I know of that has 94, some sunoco's have 107 race fuel, once again I've only seen it there, $3.00+ a gal. too. 94 about $1.70ish a gal.
#11
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: New York City
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Papaman677
Sunoco in NJ is the only place that I know of that has 94, some sunoco's have 107 race fuel, once again I've only seen it there, $3.00+ a gal. too. 94 about $1.70ish a gal.
Sunoco in NJ is the only place that I know of that has 94, some sunoco's have 107 race fuel, once again I've only seen it there, $3.00+ a gal. too. 94 about $1.70ish a gal.
#12
CEO, Team Anthracite
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Bear Territory
Posts: 2,899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Nicki
Yes, you are correct Jersey still has Sunoco 94. Sunoco dropped 94 in NYC last October 31, 2003. I contacted Sunoco for the reason why and got an email back I posted it back then in this forum. Sunoco stated that they are going to drop 94 in Jersey too eventually but did not know when. The reason for this is that in order to produce high octane they need a chemical called MTBE, which is a carcinogen. California was the first state to drop MTBE. It will eventually affect the whole country and there will be no 94 octanes anymore for automobiles. Maybe for racing is another story, but for commuter cars, it will stop.
Yes, you are correct Jersey still has Sunoco 94. Sunoco dropped 94 in NYC last October 31, 2003. I contacted Sunoco for the reason why and got an email back I posted it back then in this forum. Sunoco stated that they are going to drop 94 in Jersey too eventually but did not know when. The reason for this is that in order to produce high octane they need a chemical called MTBE, which is a carcinogen. California was the first state to drop MTBE. It will eventually affect the whole country and there will be no 94 octanes anymore for automobiles. Maybe for racing is another story, but for commuter cars, it will stop.
#13
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: New York City
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Its the level of MTBE not that it is completley not in there. 94 needs a higher level of MTBE so they stopped making 94. but with the small amount the govenrnemt allows "for now" they can still make 93. and lower
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
joflewbyu2
5G TLX (2015-2020)
105
08-18-2019 10:38 PM
ExcelerateRep
4G TL Performance Parts & Modifications
8
10-14-2015 08:20 AM
joflewbyu2
5G TLX (2015-2020)
139
10-08-2015 11:16 AM