View Poll Results: What should be my new TL color?
Voters: 60. You may not vote on this poll
Color?
#3
Well several reasons im leaving the RL
1. I just dont feel it while driving.
2. Not eye candy like the TL
3.def. the color
4. The TL just rocks....i mean im 19 so lol
5. Gas
6. To mod this RL right is going to be expensive as hell!!!!
I know if i get another SSM I am going to end up doing almost the same thing i did before. My second choice is def. WDP.
1. I just dont feel it while driving.
2. Not eye candy like the TL
3.def. the color
4. The TL just rocks....i mean im 19 so lol
5. Gas
6. To mod this RL right is going to be expensive as hell!!!!
I know if i get another SSM I am going to end up doing almost the same thing i did before. My second choice is def. WDP.
Trending Topics
#13
I completely agree with you. But he said "not a type-s". I think the chrome that the type-s has, and the tails/side makers, look hot as hell on a nbp.
#14
Go with the WDP. Black cars are great when clean, but are a nightmare to take care of. After a wash, it will be covered in dust within an hour, and if you aren't big on detailing, it will look like crap in 2 years.
#15
^ WDP is a pain, it get's dirty very fast, and there are constant marks left all over...I'm sick of coumponding it...
(I had NBP before, same amount of fun of hard work required to get the blue specs out)
SSM is the best I would say to clean less.
(I had NBP before, same amount of fun of hard work required to get the blue specs out)
SSM is the best I would say to clean less.
#16
That is why I got alabaster silver.
#19
I have NBP and it looks fabulous when it's clean, but it's a nightmare to keep it clean and it will show every swirl mark or minute scratch more than many other colors. I currently have two black cars and my prior car was also black, and I've pretty much determined that my next one will not be. Just takes too much effort to keep them looking good.
Of the three you listed, I'd go with SSM. I had two silver cars in the 1990s (a 1982 Accord and a 1986 Legend) and both were far easier to keep looking good. They don't show swirl marks and such nearly as much, either (and I knew a heck of a lot less about proper car-washing techniques then than I do now, too).
Of the three you listed, I'd go with SSM. I had two silver cars in the 1990s (a 1982 Accord and a 1986 Legend) and both were far easier to keep looking good. They don't show swirl marks and such nearly as much, either (and I knew a heck of a lot less about proper car-washing techniques then than I do now, too).
#24
I'd keep the RL unless your bank is full of $$$$$$$$$$$$
Your reasons aren't enough to take that big a loss... if you think about it, you've spent 8,000 in taxes... way to help the government.'
Oh HEY!!! 500 posts.
Your reasons aren't enough to take that big a loss... if you think about it, you've spent 8,000 in taxes... way to help the government.'
Oh HEY!!! 500 posts.
#26
#28
I miss the TL ..........being on this website is not making it much easier. Should I say farewell acurazine?
Also it is a hit, but damn man to mod this RL my bank account is.......
Also it is a hit, but damn man to mod this RL my bank account is.......
#29
you should have never left TL in the first place, now you're coming back to the right place. like you said, you're only 19 man....what were you thinking driving a RL~
#31
Why don't you do little mods? Well... not necessarily little, but do a little suspension MOD so it drives 'like' a TL. You SHOULD be feeling better driving the RL since its top of the line Acura. Try getting used to it, I was reading on the RL forums, and some guy said all the little things made him regret buying an RL, but he eventually got used to it. Give it a few months.
#32
#40
Nothing better looking than a WDP/Ebony except a NBP/Ebony TL. If you can deal with the upkeep of a black car there is no better choice. We have 2 NBP's in the family and when it comes time to purchase my s2000 it may be black as well.