View Poll Results: Do u think Acura should make these changes??
yes
63
66.32%
no
32
33.68%
Voters: 95. You may not vote on this poll
Changes Acura Must Make in 06 TL
#41
I'd say add an mp3 player and AWD. Other than that I'm more than happy with the car. I'm besides myself really, I could buy a car with this much quality, luxury and performance for $33,000. Not everyone has $60,000 lying around for a Lexus or MB.
#43
Originally Posted by Juronimo
I'd say add an mp3 player and AWD. Other than that I'm more than happy with the car. I'm besides myself really, I could buy a car with this much quality, luxury and performance for $33,000. Not everyone has $60,000 lying around for a Lexus or MB.
Its such a gr8 car well almost, i still think that they always lack in something as basic and easy to do- DESIGN, (I own a 03 tl and its a average looking car ,and i know 04 TL owners love their car, but we all know its there but almost)why can't they just have a Awsome looking Car??, granted they have improved a lot in terms of design but yet they have a long way to go to become an Awesome looking car, but by the way they r going the 4th Gen might well be, if the new Accord and the coming Civic(06 Hybrid) are a indication of the things to come, the 4th Gen should be a CLEAR wiiner, I wish many changes would be done in the 06 TL but it in my heart of hearts I know thats wishful thinking, John Mendle has been around for a very shot time(the guy behind the Mazda change) to do any major Design change, lets hope 4th Gen come out as a clear winner and may in 07...please.
#44
Originally Posted by Juronimo
I'd say add an mp3 player and AWD. Other than that I'm more than happy with the car. I'm besides myself really, I could buy a car with this much quality, luxury and performance for $33,000. Not everyone has $60,000 lying around for a Lexus or MB.
in 06
aggressive grill
remaorte key
better paint & tires
less rattling
next year
AWD(but really probably will happen in 09)
optional DVD palyer & optional hybrid
#46
Originally Posted by crazymjb
In order to beat the 3 we just need to fix up the paint and have AWD as an option, the interior already kicks its ass. As for technological additions I would like TPMS, ventilated seats, and auto leveling headlights with cleaners. If you keep going you start to reach the RL, and break away from TL. Now the RL would be perfect if they stuck in a V8 and ventilated seats. As far as agression, I think the TL looks meaner then the new 3.
Both would look better with cleared headlights.
Both would look better with cleared headlights.
#47
Originally Posted by MR1
I think what some fail to consider is that Honda/Acura does not have the resources to go head-to-head with most other car makers. They create their own sub-set of the market instead. Of course some of your suggested changes will be made but I think they have found a sweet spot for the TL and are doing quite well.
The rattles will hopefully disappear, looks are subjective, I like it now. I am much more conserned that they get the 5AT to the bulletproof class than adding more gingerbread. We all have the opportunity to select the car that best serves our individual ideal. For me, the G3 TL has done that just fine for now.
The rattles will hopefully disappear, looks are subjective, I like it now. I am much more conserned that they get the 5AT to the bulletproof class than adding more gingerbread. We all have the opportunity to select the car that best serves our individual ideal. For me, the G3 TL has done that just fine for now.
#49
one thing and onyl 1 thing, AWD. so itll be heavier but the TL has soooo much to make up for it which is what all the reviews want too, does "the TL would have won if it had AWD" ring a bell. and it shouldnt make the price THAT bad. everything else is just good to have, but the TL NEEDS AWD.
P.S. the TL NEEDS AWD.
P.S. the TL NEEDS AWD.
#50
Originally Posted by gcjin2007
one thing and onyl 1 thing, AWD. so itll be heavier but the TL has soooo much to make up for it which is what all the reviews want too, does "the TL would have won if it had AWD" ring a bell. and it shouldnt make the price THAT bad. everything else is just good to have, but the TL NEEDS AWD.
P.S. the TL NEEDS AWD.
P.S. the TL NEEDS AWD.
#52
Sinca I traded a 330ci for the TL, I think it ia 3 beater already. One thing no has mentioned is the speed, the TL will smoke the 330i. The other is the ride. Yes, the 3 handling is amazing, but the ride sucks for a trip. You also mentioned leather quality. Have you sat in a 3? The pleather is a joke and hard as a rock. It also shows wear very quick.
#55
Yes, when you have the headlight all opened up, you put on spray or stick on tint, it is best to have a tint shop do this. If you use the search you can find in depth instructions on how to do this, I am sorry I do not have a link in front of me now.
#57
Thanks to all of you for depressing the hell out of me.
I just bought a TL and now I find out it will rattle, the paint sucks, the tire sucks.
Great. I guess I did some shitty research
Here's mine for what's it worth. The biggest thing Acura does wrong/leaves out etc.
Is the handling. For a car of this power it's it's way understated. I was going to get a
9-3 Areo which handles better and the it's AT shifting is smoother. But Saabs have
a shitty track record. And hands down you can't beat BMWs on handling.
But if you look at what comes standard on a TL and compare that to a 330 the 330
would be around $42,750. That 10k more! That's huge! I just priced it out on
BMW's site before this.
And actually the TL in the 325 class according to some of the car rags and if you price out all the options the 325 is still around 6500 more.
My bro is a big Bmer guy 330, 540, z4 and now x5 he had the M suspension
on the 30 & 540 (SICK!) but the leather and the over all comfort I feel is
just as good in the TL if not better.
As style goes (which is subjective) the TL has a aggressive front, rear and 3/4
but loses it on a straight profile and the wheels are could use better styling.
Also the TL is tailered toward a little more middle of the road.
Bottom line over all the TL rocks and you can't beat the bang for the buck.
Peace.
I just bought a TL and now I find out it will rattle, the paint sucks, the tire sucks.
Great. I guess I did some shitty research
Here's mine for what's it worth. The biggest thing Acura does wrong/leaves out etc.
Is the handling. For a car of this power it's it's way understated. I was going to get a
9-3 Areo which handles better and the it's AT shifting is smoother. But Saabs have
a shitty track record. And hands down you can't beat BMWs on handling.
But if you look at what comes standard on a TL and compare that to a 330 the 330
would be around $42,750. That 10k more! That's huge! I just priced it out on
BMW's site before this.
And actually the TL in the 325 class according to some of the car rags and if you price out all the options the 325 is still around 6500 more.
My bro is a big Bmer guy 330, 540, z4 and now x5 he had the M suspension
on the 30 & 540 (SICK!) but the leather and the over all comfort I feel is
just as good in the TL if not better.
As style goes (which is subjective) the TL has a aggressive front, rear and 3/4
but loses it on a straight profile and the wheels are could use better styling.
Also the TL is tailered toward a little more middle of the road.
Bottom line over all the TL rocks and you can't beat the bang for the buck.
Peace.
#60
Originally Posted by studog
Thanks to all of you for depressing the hell out of me.
I just bought a TL and now I find out it will rattle, the paint sucks, the tire sucks.
Great. I guess I did some shitty research
Here's mine for what's it worth. The biggest thing Acura does wrong/leaves out etc.
Is the handling. For a car of this power it's it's way understated. I was going to get a
9-3 Areo which handles better and the it's AT shifting is smoother. But Saabs have
a shitty track record. And hands down you can't beat BMWs on handling.
But if you look at what comes standard on a TL and compare that to a 330 the 330
would be around $42,750. That 10k more! That's huge! I just priced it out on
BMW's site before this.
And actually the TL in the 325 class according to some of the car rags and if you price out all the options the 325 is still around 6500 more.
My bro is a big Bmer guy 330, 540, z4 and now x5 he had the M suspension
on the 30 & 540 (SICK!) but the leather and the over all comfort I feel is
just as good in the TL if not better.
As style goes (which is subjective) the TL has a aggressive front, rear and 3/4
but loses it on a straight profile and the wheels are could use better styling.
Also the TL is tailered toward a little more middle of the road.
Bottom line over all the TL rocks and you can't beat the bang for the buck.
Peace.
I just bought a TL and now I find out it will rattle, the paint sucks, the tire sucks.
Great. I guess I did some shitty research
Here's mine for what's it worth. The biggest thing Acura does wrong/leaves out etc.
Is the handling. For a car of this power it's it's way understated. I was going to get a
9-3 Areo which handles better and the it's AT shifting is smoother. But Saabs have
a shitty track record. And hands down you can't beat BMWs on handling.
But if you look at what comes standard on a TL and compare that to a 330 the 330
would be around $42,750. That 10k more! That's huge! I just priced it out on
BMW's site before this.
And actually the TL in the 325 class according to some of the car rags and if you price out all the options the 325 is still around 6500 more.
My bro is a big Bmer guy 330, 540, z4 and now x5 he had the M suspension
on the 30 & 540 (SICK!) but the leather and the over all comfort I feel is
just as good in the TL if not better.
As style goes (which is subjective) the TL has a aggressive front, rear and 3/4
but loses it on a straight profile and the wheels are could use better styling.
Also the TL is tailered toward a little more middle of the road.
Bottom line over all the TL rocks and you can't beat the bang for the buck.
Peace.
#61
Originally Posted by Bitium
1. opinion of course
5. coming
6. That would just be stupid. If anything, it would have keyless like the RL
7. yeah ok
Big Money Waste oh please germans don't even buy BMW's all the BMW's I see here are stupid americans driving them. On the autobahn I only see MB's and Audi's passing me and maybe a 7 series sometimes. I work with germans and none drive BMW's neither would they want one. Most europeans drive little cars and they people that can afford nice cars drive MB's or Audi's.
BTW: Acura already sells more TL's than 3 series, so acura don't have to do anything to be more competative nor they will at least not beacuse of BMW's
5. coming
6. That would just be stupid. If anything, it would have keyless like the RL
7. yeah ok
Big Money Waste oh please germans don't even buy BMW's all the BMW's I see here are stupid americans driving them. On the autobahn I only see MB's and Audi's passing me and maybe a 7 series sometimes. I work with germans and none drive BMW's neither would they want one. Most europeans drive little cars and they people that can afford nice cars drive MB's or Audi's.
BTW: Acura already sells more TL's than 3 series, so acura don't have to do anything to be more competative nor they will at least not beacuse of BMW's
#62
AWD in the TL is NOT coming in the 06 model. It will probably be here in the 4th gen, but do not expect it at all in this 3rd gen. There are many reasons acura will not do this:
1. That is one of the best things they have going for the RL, the DO NOT want to ruin competition by having a 15k difference for a few gizmos
2. Putting in AWD would require they re design the entire undercarraige, suspension, and engine, it would be a different car with the same cabin, a whole new set of first year quirks
3. It would drive the price up initially 4-5k for the bigger engine and SH-AWD(if they used that), again putting it to close to the RL which one can get at about 43k if they know how to talk to the dealer.
1. That is one of the best things they have going for the RL, the DO NOT want to ruin competition by having a 15k difference for a few gizmos
2. Putting in AWD would require they re design the entire undercarraige, suspension, and engine, it would be a different car with the same cabin, a whole new set of first year quirks
3. It would drive the price up initially 4-5k for the bigger engine and SH-AWD(if they used that), again putting it to close to the RL which one can get at about 43k if they know how to talk to the dealer.
#63
Originally Posted by crazymjb
AWD in the TL is NOT coming in the 06 model. It will probably be here in the 4th gen, but do not expect it at all in this 3rd gen. There are many reasons acura will not do this:
1. That is one of the best things they have going for the RL, the DO NOT want to ruin competition by having a 15k difference for a few gizmos
2. Putting in AWD would require they re design the entire undercarraige, suspension, and engine, it would be a different car with the same cabin, a whole new set of first year quirks
3. It would drive the price up initially 4-5k for the bigger engine and SH-AWD(if they used that), again putting it to close to the RL which one can get at about 43k if they know how to talk to the dealer.
1. That is one of the best things they have going for the RL, the DO NOT want to ruin competition by having a 15k difference for a few gizmos
2. Putting in AWD would require they re design the entire undercarraige, suspension, and engine, it would be a different car with the same cabin, a whole new set of first year quirks
3. It would drive the price up initially 4-5k for the bigger engine and SH-AWD(if they used that), again putting it to close to the RL which one can get at about 43k if they know how to talk to the dealer.
#64
Originally Posted by prashants17
it makes sense, how about an optional type s with awd option at 3k more??, may be they'll do that in 06-07. RL by the way was never hot and will never may, it competes in a class were snob appeal is paramount, they r already selling it at invoice, sad but true, plus the exterior is flat too.
#65
Originally Posted by crazymjb
The new 5 looks very agressive, moreso than the TL, it has those tilted in eyebrow things over the headlights.An old 5 to a New TL, that doesnt make them the same Class. A new 5 to an RL, that is more like it.
#66
Originally Posted by prashants17
TL is about 300 pounds heavier,6" longer and 4"wider,1" taller and 1" more ground clearence.
Now if they lower the ground clearence and lower the center of gravity and add a AWD i think the though the Beamer will still have a "marginal" handling edge, it would be largely offset by its overall BRAINS, and it will be almost impossible for the beamer to saty ahead. As for the snob appeal, acura has ground to cover.
Now if they lower the ground clearence and lower the center of gravity and add a AWD i think the though the Beamer will still have a "marginal" handling edge, it would be largely offset by its overall BRAINS, and it will be almost impossible for the beamer to saty ahead. As for the snob appeal, acura has ground to cover.
This confuses me "9-3 Aero which handles better"? TL skidpad .087, Aero .083,
TL Slalom 65.8MPH, Aero 63.3, TL braking from 80MPH 210 Ft, Aero 224 FT. Add in price as tested TL $35,395 vs Aero $40,112, mind you with the GM discount, things change allot, they give Aero's away. I looked and test drove the Aero, not even close to the TL in value, performance or handling. This is not a beat up session at all
#68
Originally Posted by Hugh9269
New issue of Road and Track lists the New 2006 3 series sedan only 20 # less than the TL. Also take in account the as test price of $42,000+ for the 3! Imagine if Acura threw $3-5000 of upgrades on the TL? Mind you i love the New 3, but I lack $10000 in additional funds...
This confuses me "9-3 Aero which handles better"? TL skidpad .087, Aero .083,
TL Slalom 65.8MPH, Aero 63.3, TL braking from 80MPH 210 Ft, Aero 224 FT. Add in price as tested TL $35,395 vs Aero $40,112, mind you with the GM discount, things change allot, they give Aero's away. I looked and test drove the Aero, not even close to the TL in value, performance or handling. This is not a beat up session at all
This confuses me "9-3 Aero which handles better"? TL skidpad .087, Aero .083,
TL Slalom 65.8MPH, Aero 63.3, TL braking from 80MPH 210 Ft, Aero 224 FT. Add in price as tested TL $35,395 vs Aero $40,112, mind you with the GM discount, things change allot, they give Aero's away. I looked and test drove the Aero, not even close to the TL in value, performance or handling. This is not a beat up session at all
#70
Originally Posted by vupac1
i didnt know leather quality was an issue...i actually prefer the soft, smooth leather of the TL as compared to the hard, tough leather in my friends 330
#71
Originally Posted by SFOX
I total agree what you guys . One more thing to improve is dealer service. Acura need to treat their customer better. Send them to Luxus and that is what a good service suppose be.
My next car would be Luxus.
My next car would be Luxus.
#72
Originally Posted by prashants17
Which lexus??.
#73
Originally Posted by EZZ
Probably the upcoming IS350. That will be a SERIOUS competitor to the TL. 310hp, Lexus (GS like) interior, 6-speed manumatic, and Lexus dealership network. It will definitely steal many many sales from the 3 series, G35, and the TL.
#74
It looks as though the IS will be a much more serious contender than before!
http://www.lexus.com/2006is_preview/index.html
http://www.lexus.com/2006is_preview/index.html
#75
Originally Posted by prashants17
had no idea lexus has such grand plans for IS, are u sure it will be as loaded as TL??, if yes at what price, IS has been so small more like TSX??. Iam not sure it will compete with Lexus, but if your info is reliable that will make things interesting, and u know what may be my wish list for TL upgrades will become true then.
#76
Originally Posted by california-usa
Key-fob integrated into the key...that is not too much to ask for.
Forget that! I would rather have Keyless Access. Just walk up, pull the handle, get in and turn a switch all with the remote/key in my pocket.
#77
Originally Posted by Spazz
Hay, Precision Crafted who is John Mendle?
John's role at Mazda is what we see today in their great looking and smart handling products. John has walked into designs that were already in the cards (ie new Civic, Ridgeline, RL) and may influence new designs (RDX and next gen Accord).
Seeing what John did for Mazda gives me good feelings that Acura will continue on the trend of great looking cars and SUVs. Maybe he can influence the JDM side of the company to make Acuras AWD (RWD would be nice but I'm not holding my breath on that one).
#78
Even if it is a good idea, acura won't be putting AWD on the 3rd gen. I also believe Aspec is replacement for type S, this is pretty much the Max power you can put down on a FWD car. At the rate car manufacturers(sp?) are putting in AWD systems, expect it on the 4th Gen though. The TL is reaching its halfway mark in production, they don't do major changes at this point. TPMS is mandated to start in 08, so at the end of the 3rd gen one may expect to see it.(I hope it can be added onto an existing acura and plugged into the MID).
#79
Originally Posted by crazymjb
Even if it is a good idea, acura won't be putting AWD on the 3rd gen. I also believe Aspec is replacement for type S, this is pretty much the Max power you can put down on a FWD car. At the rate car manufacturers(sp?) are putting in AWD systems, expect it on the 4th Gen though. The TL is reaching its halfway mark in production, they don't do major changes at this point. TPMS is mandated to start in 08, so at the end of the 3rd gen one may expect to see it.(I hope it can be added onto an existing acura and plugged into the MID).