0-60 time for an AT?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 18, 2004 | 07:48 AM
  #1  
dorikin_86's Avatar
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
0-60 time for an AT?

I looked all over the internet and all I found was times for 6 sp manuals....does anybody know what the 0-60 for an AT with Navi is?

Thanks

John
Reply
Old May 18, 2004 | 08:04 AM
  #2  
DopeTL04's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
From: Edison, NJ
Originally Posted by dorikin_86
I looked all over the internet and all I found was times for 6 sp manuals....does anybody know what the 0-60 for an AT with Navi is?

Thanks

John

Dont know for with Navi, but do know for non-Navi...sorry

:lol1:
Reply
Old May 18, 2004 | 08:05 AM
  #3  
PetesTL's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 3
From: Chicago suburb, IL
Motor Trend says 6.3 sec for AT.
Reply
Old May 18, 2004 | 08:11 AM
  #4  
Ron A's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 16,412
Likes: 1,043
Originally Posted by DopeTL04
Dont know for with Navi, but do know for non-Navi...sorry

:lol1:
So tell us what the non-navi 0-60 is. Do you think the extra weight of the navi (maybe a couple of pounds or so) would appreciably alter the 0-60 time?
6.3 seconds sounds about right, depending who says it it varies a little, but in the real world, that's close enough.
Reply
Old May 18, 2004 | 08:19 AM
  #5  
DopeTL04's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
From: Edison, NJ
Originally Posted by Ron A
So tell us what the non-navi 0-60 is. Do you think the extra weight of the navi (maybe a couple of pounds or so) would appreciably alter the 0-60 time?
6.3 seconds sounds about right, depending who says it it varies a little, but in the real world, that's close enough.

Non navi is 6.258765498
Reply
Old May 18, 2004 | 08:58 AM
  #6  
Ron A's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 16,412
Likes: 1,043
I guess the weight of the navi accounts for the .041234502 difference in elapsed time from 0-60.
Reply
Old May 18, 2004 | 09:20 AM
  #7  
Pro
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
From: Somerset, NJ
Can Bluetooth be tuned to lower 0-60 times on the TL??
Reply
Old May 18, 2004 | 11:04 AM
  #8  
Teh Jatt's Avatar
The Oracle of Acurazine!
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,706
Likes: 44
From: Fresno, CA
Originally Posted by VQ35DE
Can Bluetooth be tuned to lower 0-60 times on the TL??
:lol1:
Reply
Old May 18, 2004 | 11:14 AM
  #9  
ensley696's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
This site says 6.3, but does not distinguish navigation or not.
http://www.modernracer.com/acuratl.html
Reply
Old May 18, 2004 | 11:53 AM
  #10  
AzNxJ32Aspec's Avatar
AzNxJ32-Aspec
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Roslyn Heights, New York
you guys are dorks....the times posted in the ads...are done by pros....you'll NEVER get that time unless you've figure out some wackass way of driving..or mebbe if ur on a really steep hill.....mebbe you can get your friends to push before you launch....gosh we drive AT for a reason...we're lazy...stop talking about our 0-60 times....unless you've moded your AT screw this thread...i mean i dont mean to be rude..but there are ppl wit REAL problems...and you take up server space with these meaningless questions
Reply
Old May 18, 2004 | 12:06 PM
  #11  
DaveyCrockett's Avatar
10th Gear
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by AzNxJ32Aspec
you guys are dorks....the times posted in the ads...are done by pros....you'll NEVER get that time unless you've figure out some wackass way of driving..or mebbe if ur on a really steep hill.....mebbe you can get your friends to push before you launch....gosh we drive AT for a reason...we're lazy...stop talking about our 0-60 times....unless you've moded your AT screw this thread...i mean i dont mean to be rude..but there are ppl wit REAL problems...and you take up server space with these meaningless questions
Whats wrong with wanting to know your cars 0-60 time? Should AT drivers be forbidden from opening their hood or turning VSA off?
Reply
Old May 18, 2004 | 01:24 PM
  #12  
lindros2's Avatar
Black
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 18
From: Atlanta, GA
10 seconds
Reply
Old May 18, 2004 | 01:39 PM
  #13  
caball88's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,631
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Originally Posted by DaveyCrockett
Whats wrong with wanting to know your cars 0-60 time? Should AT drivers be forbidden from opening their hood or turning VSA off?
yes AT owners are not allowed to drive their cars hard or their tranny's might break like the 2nd gen TL's. hehehehe. i think the auto tranny's times are around mid 6's. no one has actually posted a time slip for the 0-60, but someone has posted recently the quarter mile time for an AT. it was consistently in the low 15's with about 1 run that was at 14.9. the 6MT runs 5.8ish and quarter mile is low 14's.
Reply
Old May 18, 2004 | 03:00 PM
  #14  
DopeTL04's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
From: Edison, NJ
Originally Posted by caball88
yes AT owners are not allowed to drive their cars hard or their tranny's might break like the 2nd gen TL's. hehehehe. i think the auto tranny's times are around mid 6's. no one has actually posted a time slip for the 0-60, but someone has posted recently the quarter mile time for an AT. it was consistently in the low 15's with about 1 run that was at 14.9. the 6MT runs 5.8ish and quarter mile is low 14's.


5.8 with or without Navi??
Reply
Old May 18, 2004 | 03:03 PM
  #15  
PoochaKannInc's Avatar
Shift_faster
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,965
Likes: 0
From: Queens, NY
5.8 MUST be w/ navi. We ALL know that the 6MT w/o navi is .00024987 seconds faster.
Reply
Old May 18, 2004 | 03:34 PM
  #16  
Ron A's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 16,412
Likes: 1,043
Originally Posted by DopeTL04
5.8 with or without Navi??
Navi is not a turbocharger or power booster, and has nothing to do with engine power output. What makes you think the times will be different with or without navi? Detailed explanation, please.
Reply
Old May 18, 2004 | 03:41 PM
  #17  
DopeTL04's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
From: Edison, NJ
Originally Posted by Ron A
Navi is not a turbocharger or power booster, and has nothing to do with engine power output. What makes you think the times will be different with or without navi? Detailed explanation, please.

Guess you didnt catch the point in this whole thread, is that its A JOKE! This thread was started by someone asking for a 0-60 time on his/her 5AT with NAVI.....
Reply
Old May 18, 2004 | 04:35 PM
  #18  
Ron A's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 16,412
Likes: 1,043
I didn't take it as a joke. If you look, most people describe their car as a 5AT with navi or w/o navi or 6MT with navi or w/o navi, and that is the way I read it. Now that you mention it, it could have been a joke, but only dorikin 86 can tell us.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mossman77
1/2G MDX (2001-2013)
18
Sep 16, 2015 12:21 PM
Skirmich
2G TL (1999-2003)
37
Sep 15, 2015 06:41 PM
forrie
2G RDX (2013-2018)
12
Sep 15, 2015 09:57 AM
PortlandRL
Car Talk
2
Sep 14, 2015 12:01 PM
BC01191980
5G TLX (2015-2020)
8
Sep 7, 2015 08:14 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:30 PM.