What do you LIKE about the RLX?
#1
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
What do you LIKE about the RLX?
As your humble moderator, I see (and have been part of myself, shame on me) lots of criticism of the new RLX.
I would like to balance this trend with some positivity. This thread is meant to express positive thoughts about the RLX, since it does have some good points. A similar thread was very successful and continued for years in the 2G RL forum.
Those who own one, what little things have jumped out about the car that you like?
Ideally, we'd hear from some who have actually driven the PAWS version. (Actually, I'd love to hear from anyone who's driven the SH-SH-AWD version....though I doubt I can convince anyone to break NDA ). Also, I'd LOVE it if Colin made one of his famous videos about RLX features. *hinthinthint*
I think the styling is OK and would benefit from a nicer set of wheels. Were I to purchase one, whether PAWS or AWD, I would immediately swap out for a nice set of 5-spoke 19s.
The cockpit is nice and neat. The button cluster of the prior RL has been cleaned up somewhat.
I sat in the back seat of one at the Cleveland Auto Show, put the front seat all the way back, and was amazed at how much room there was. For reference, I am currently 5'10" and 160 pounds.
I would like to balance this trend with some positivity. This thread is meant to express positive thoughts about the RLX, since it does have some good points. A similar thread was very successful and continued for years in the 2G RL forum.
Those who own one, what little things have jumped out about the car that you like?
Ideally, we'd hear from some who have actually driven the PAWS version. (Actually, I'd love to hear from anyone who's driven the SH-SH-AWD version....though I doubt I can convince anyone to break NDA ). Also, I'd LOVE it if Colin made one of his famous videos about RLX features. *hinthinthint*
I think the styling is OK and would benefit from a nicer set of wheels. Were I to purchase one, whether PAWS or AWD, I would immediately swap out for a nice set of 5-spoke 19s.
The cockpit is nice and neat. The button cluster of the prior RL has been cleaned up somewhat.
I sat in the back seat of one at the Cleveland Auto Show, put the front seat all the way back, and was amazed at how much room there was. For reference, I am currently 5'10" and 160 pounds.
The following users liked this post:
neuronbob (04-12-2013)
#3
I'm a tech geek.... and I LOVE Lane Keep Assist and ACC with low speed follow. I have an 06 RL CMBS and one of my biggest wishes was for ACC to work UNDER 25mph! And I can't tell you how many times I have hit the rumble strips while driving long distances cause I was kinda dozing off. (I know I know... I should pull over and rest!)
The following users liked this post:
neuronbob (04-12-2013)
The following users liked this post:
neuronbob (04-12-2013)
#5
Three Wheelin'
I test drove the RLX in March. I like:
The way the RLX looks
The cruise control with low-speed follow
The rear seat room.
The way the RLX looks
The cruise control with low-speed follow
The rear seat room.
The following users liked this post:
neuronbob (04-12-2013)
#6
Three Wheelin'
I have yet to see the RLX in person, so I'll qualify my comments as "which attributes of the RLX I am most anxious to experience"...
- I'm a big fan of the interior, both layout and roominess. Most sedan buyers are anticipating times when they will be transporting multiple passengers and therefore wish there was a bit more room in the back seat...apparently, Acura has responded to that need.
- The Krell Audio system. I am hardly an audiophile, but I definitely enjoy listening to clean, crisp music, especially during highway driving.
- Related to above...the quietness of the RLX has been mentioned in many reviews and I certainly covet a smooth, quiet ride in my vehicles.
- I am most stoked about the SH SHAWD model that has yet to debut. I'll be honest here...I personally don't put a lot of emphasis on fuel economy when deciding on car purchases(I put less than 5000 miles a year on my cars), but I'm anxious to experience the performance benefit that the low-speed torque of the electric motors provides. I've driven a SHAWD vehicle since '05, so I don't expect to be overly wowed by the handling advantages of the new system over the current SHAWD system, but I'm still very eager to try it out on some quick corners.
- I'm a big fan of the interior, both layout and roominess. Most sedan buyers are anticipating times when they will be transporting multiple passengers and therefore wish there was a bit more room in the back seat...apparently, Acura has responded to that need.
- The Krell Audio system. I am hardly an audiophile, but I definitely enjoy listening to clean, crisp music, especially during highway driving.
- Related to above...the quietness of the RLX has been mentioned in many reviews and I certainly covet a smooth, quiet ride in my vehicles.
- I am most stoked about the SH SHAWD model that has yet to debut. I'll be honest here...I personally don't put a lot of emphasis on fuel economy when deciding on car purchases(I put less than 5000 miles a year on my cars), but I'm anxious to experience the performance benefit that the low-speed torque of the electric motors provides. I've driven a SHAWD vehicle since '05, so I don't expect to be overly wowed by the handling advantages of the new system over the current SHAWD system, but I'm still very eager to try it out on some quick corners.
The following users liked this post:
neuronbob (04-12-2013)
#7
Three Wheelin'
I drove the Base RLX. Being an audiophile, I'm in love with Krell. I was always wondering when Krell would work with a car manufacture, and happy it was Acura. This was one of the reason I considered the RLX. The light interior in the RLX is not bad and I could live with it. The acceleration is very smooth. That's it for my positive -
The following users liked this post:
neuronbob (04-12-2013)
Trending Topics
#8
Three Wheelin'
I wonder how Krell compares to high-end audio systems in the Lexus GS or Infiniti M.
#9
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,511
Received 841 Likes
on
524 Posts
I love the interior design, feel, and quality. Rear seat has tons of room, not that I will be sitting there if I buy one...lol. I like the exterior design too, especially the rear end.
The following users liked this post:
neuronbob (04-12-2013)
#10
3G TL/2G MDX Owner
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The west side of the Potomac River
Posts: 5,375
Received 978 Likes
on
803 Posts
-I loved the interior layout, the gauges, steering controls, and all of the goodies that come with it (of course very honda/acura typical in terms of ergonomics).
-The seating is comfortable and body hugging which I like considering i'm leaner than the average consumer.
-The night time exterior lighting is HOT! Loving the new LEDs on the tails and the jewel eyes are unique (though busy for my tastes during the day)
-The leather was supple and was much nicer than any TL I've driven or even the MDX.
-The drive: it was nice, drove like a smaller car than it was.
-The features in the Advance model, while on paper sound really cool and neat, i find myself too much of a "driver" to let the car kind of "drive" for you. (personal preference). the brake assist feature is neat though. it would be great to have around here.
-i find the exterior, despite my initial, "eh" response when i saw the pics, seeing the car in person, my response elevated to "it's a handsome mature car." I wouldn't own one, because of the sporty nature in my personal tastes, but given the options of choosing the "executive sedan" across brands, the RLX would be on the list of choices.
-The seating is comfortable and body hugging which I like considering i'm leaner than the average consumer.
-The night time exterior lighting is HOT! Loving the new LEDs on the tails and the jewel eyes are unique (though busy for my tastes during the day)
-The leather was supple and was much nicer than any TL I've driven or even the MDX.
-The drive: it was nice, drove like a smaller car than it was.
-The features in the Advance model, while on paper sound really cool and neat, i find myself too much of a "driver" to let the car kind of "drive" for you. (personal preference). the brake assist feature is neat though. it would be great to have around here.
-i find the exterior, despite my initial, "eh" response when i saw the pics, seeing the car in person, my response elevated to "it's a handsome mature car." I wouldn't own one, because of the sporty nature in my personal tastes, but given the options of choosing the "executive sedan" across brands, the RLX would be on the list of choices.
The following users liked this post:
neuronbob (04-12-2013)
#11
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
That's the spirit! Keep it up (if only in this thread). We need to hear from the actual owners, who've spent more miles than a test drive in this car.
#12
Three Wheelin'
Without using same source and music it would be difficult to say. However, I doubt very much either would be as good or truer to the music. The Meridian in the Jag, would be up there, if not better sounding then the Krell. Usually, it all comes down to your taste in music and what you think accurate is. While the ELS system in my TL is not the absolute best, its very pleasing to my ears. Believe it or not, one of the best stock system I ever heard was in a older Audio 8. It had a Bose system with bass that made my pants bottom flutter. Anyway back to the joys of the RLX!
#13
I've seen the RLX in person and personnaly I like the style both in/out.
Back seat room is impressive.
Need to drive it to say any mroe, but the tech stuff looks well done.
Back seat room is impressive.
Need to drive it to say any mroe, but the tech stuff looks well done.
#15
I have been harsh on the Acura family as of late myself so I could use a spanking of my own. That being said, despite my criticism, I still feel that the overall exterior design looks clean and elegant and that equipped with better wheels, the RLX would look good. I like the quality of the material, and that is usually one advantage Acura has over cheaper brand. I am happy that Acura is giving its owners a great audio system, being the ELS or Krell system.
#16
Instructor
I love the tech that Acura endows their cars with, both the in-cabin and under the sheet-metal tech is world-class.
I like the grey leather interior and all the features found in the Advance package. Overall interior design and materials is what I expect in a vehicle of this class, and I like it a lot.
The Krell audio system is very competent. Glad to see this option in a car I'm planning to get.
The exterior is nice enough, with interesting surface changes and a stronger dimensional look than my '07 RL. The overall shape is OK, and front end looks good with the new lights.
Driving experience likes will need to wait until I get my hands on the Sports Hybrid, and expect I that one to be awesome.
I like the grey leather interior and all the features found in the Advance package. Overall interior design and materials is what I expect in a vehicle of this class, and I like it a lot.
The Krell audio system is very competent. Glad to see this option in a car I'm planning to get.
The exterior is nice enough, with interesting surface changes and a stronger dimensional look than my '07 RL. The overall shape is OK, and front end looks good with the new lights.
Driving experience likes will need to wait until I get my hands on the Sports Hybrid, and expect I that one to be awesome.
#17
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
This is what I am waiting for. I have been spoiled by SH-AWD. My RL was a great driving experience because of that and it only improved with lowered suspension and sticky tires. It was a truly unique driving experience that alas, too few people got to share. My hope is that the new Sport Hybrid does SH-AWD one better.
#18
Instructor
I sat in the Advance (manager had already claimed it) and drove the Tech. I like:
1) The Krell system. Auditioned it with a DTS CD. Far superior to the ELS in my 2009 TL SH-AWD Tech.
2) The exterior and interior appearance and quality.
3) The very quiet cabin.
4) The automatic brake hold.
5) Smooth transmission.
6) Interior space.
My father-in-law was here from the UK and is a diehard BMW owner and fan. He was very impressed with the RLX and dealership experience.
I'm waiting for the SH-SH-AWD hybrid.
1) The Krell system. Auditioned it with a DTS CD. Far superior to the ELS in my 2009 TL SH-AWD Tech.
2) The exterior and interior appearance and quality.
3) The very quiet cabin.
4) The automatic brake hold.
5) Smooth transmission.
6) Interior space.
My father-in-law was here from the UK and is a diehard BMW owner and fan. He was very impressed with the RLX and dealership experience.
I'm waiting for the SH-SH-AWD hybrid.
The following users liked this post:
jhr3uva90 (04-14-2013)
#19
I test drove an Advance model when it first arrived in mid February. I was most impressed with the build quality, quietness, and expected Acura ergonomics. This is a fine vehicle which I feel has been unfairly maligned. I am waiting to drive the SH SH AWD when it is introduced and look forward to that. I hope they offer an exclusive color or two when it debuts but knowing Acura like we do I don't have my hopes set too high !!!
#20
Drifting
I sat in the Advance (manager had already claimed it) and drove the Tech. I like:
1) The Krell system. Auditioned it with a DTS CD. Far superior to the ELS in my 2009 TL SH-AWD Tech.
2) The exterior and interior appearance and quality.
3) The very quiet cabin.
4) The automatic brake hold.
5) Smooth transmission.
6) Interior space.
My father-in-law was here from the UK and is a diehard BMW owner and fan. He was very impressed with the RLX and dealership experience.
I'm waiting for the SH-SH-AWD hybrid.
1) The Krell system. Auditioned it with a DTS CD. Far superior to the ELS in my 2009 TL SH-AWD Tech.
2) The exterior and interior appearance and quality.
3) The very quiet cabin.
4) The automatic brake hold.
5) Smooth transmission.
6) Interior space.
My father-in-law was here from the UK and is a diehard BMW owner and fan. He was very impressed with the RLX and dealership experience.
I'm waiting for the SH-SH-AWD hybrid.
#21
Instructor
^ ^
Frankly, I wasn't expecting much for the Krell package add-on at "only" $2k. It was a pleasant surprise. I left the dealership trying not to justify spending $60k-$75k for an auto sound system!
Frankly, I wasn't expecting much for the Krell package add-on at "only" $2k. It was a pleasant surprise. I left the dealership trying not to justify spending $60k-$75k for an auto sound system!
#23
Three Wheelin'
You know what else I like about the RLX? Power folding mirrors! The old RL didn't have them, and neither does the new Lexus GS. WTF?
#24
Three Wheelin'
Oh, and another thing I like about Acura RLX is the new AcuraLink:
#25
^^^The old RL was the only Acura with power folding mirrors (though, like the new one, only on higher trims). I think it was the only Acura with a power rear sunshade, as well.
That being said, in the US, power folding mirrors are a dying option for most cars. Strange, though, since the cheaper Lexus RX has them as an option, though that's a different type of car.
I know a couple of lessor hyundais (not the Genesis or Eqqus) can be optioned with power folding mirrors, though I suspect as the Korean Won goes up, that "extra" will meet the chopping block.
That being said, in the US, power folding mirrors are a dying option for most cars. Strange, though, since the cheaper Lexus RX has them as an option, though that's a different type of car.
I know a couple of lessor hyundais (not the Genesis or Eqqus) can be optioned with power folding mirrors, though I suspect as the Korean Won goes up, that "extra" will meet the chopping block.
#26
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
The power folding mirrors were 2009 and up. Jhr and I had pre-MMC RLs so no power mirrors.
They were available on the JDM model from the start (2005 model year), along with other tech that never made it here, like night vision, smart cards in dash, and front bumper side view cameras.
They were available on the JDM model from the start (2005 model year), along with other tech that never made it here, like night vision, smart cards in dash, and front bumper side view cameras.
Last edited by neuronbob; 04-15-2013 at 05:15 AM.
#27
I've sat in a couple, and seen one out on the highway. I'm very impressed with the interior, which has a cleaner, more fuss-free design than most these days. I also think the exterior styling will help make it more successful than previous generations. It isn't exactly gorgeous, but it has gravitas, which TLtrigirl aptly called handsome and mature. The last RL looked weak, which I suspect contributed to its poor sales.
#29
The first time I saw the RLX concept, I actually really liked it and put it on my mental list to check out. As it released and more details came out, I liked it less and less. However, I do like the LED lights and the technology and controls.
I find the controls on our MDX a bit fussy with all those small buttons and the two screens seems to work.
Funny thing is I had the exact opposite reaction to the new MDX. Hated it when it was launched and now warming a bit to it. When both are in the dealers, I will check them out more thoroughly.
So two things I like about the RLX:
1. LED lights
2. Technology (nav, voice commands, controls)
I will add, I do like the styling more than the old RL
I find the controls on our MDX a bit fussy with all those small buttons and the two screens seems to work.
Funny thing is I had the exact opposite reaction to the new MDX. Hated it when it was launched and now warming a bit to it. When both are in the dealers, I will check them out more thoroughly.
So two things I like about the RLX:
1. LED lights
2. Technology (nav, voice commands, controls)
I will add, I do like the styling more than the old RL
Last edited by noobie; 04-15-2013 at 07:27 PM.
#30
I have automatic ones mow that fold on door lock and unfold on open as well as with a button. I don't really care about them as much as I thought I would.
#31
Suzuka Master
My M has them manually activated, I guess in a tight space or tight garage opening it would help, as with the big mirrors on the M I can see how little clearance there is on both sides if you had issues judging the width. I used them once to check them out, never since.
#32
Three Wheelin'
I seem to be in tight spaces pretty often. Power folding mirrors would help. So would a small turning radius.
#33
2012 Cadillac CTS-V Coupe
Why is there so much love for folding mirrors. My old GS had them, but they were manual, power (meaning button activated to fold and open). I never really used them.
I have automatic ones mow that fold on door lock and unfold on open as well as with a button. I don't really care about them as much as I thought I would.
I have automatic ones mow that fold on door lock and unfold on open as well as with a button. I don't really care about them as much as I thought I would.
#35
I think this is one of these features that sounds great and useful and the when you have it, it not so useful after all. At least that's how I feel about them. Do use them at car washes though. It save the attendant folding them in.
#36
Three Wheelin'
If you live in the suburbs where you rarely parallel park or rarely park in tight public parking garages, then folding mirrors might be unnecessary. However, those of us in urban areas might find them useful.
#37
I see your point, but I'd probably be looking for a smaller car if it were so tight that I needed to fold the mirrors in. I find the auto mirrors that lower on reverse more useful for parallel parking as you can see the curb while backing up.
Have you ever had a car with them? I'm only asking since I thought they would be really useful until I actually got them.
Have you ever had a car with them? I'm only asking since I thought they would be really useful until I actually got them.
#38
[QUOTE=noobie;14428591]I think this is one of these features that sounds great and useful and the when you have it, it not so useful after all. QUOTE]
After you have driven through a tight space against oncoming traffic in the city and you smash your mirror against the opposing cars mirror then you will be glad you can fold them prior to experiencing the tight squeeze. Replacing fixed mirrors in big cities is big business especially as each mirror can be over $300.
After you have driven through a tight space against oncoming traffic in the city and you smash your mirror against the opposing cars mirror then you will be glad you can fold them prior to experiencing the tight squeeze. Replacing fixed mirrors in big cities is big business especially as each mirror can be over $300.
#39
^^ I could never imagine living in such a city. I guess I take for granted how well we have it here in rural Canada where traffic, crimes and damaged mirrors from oncoming traffic is something you hear about on the internet only
#40
[QUOTE=db22;14430251]
I can see that they would be useful in that situation, but I would imagine that a small fraction of RLX owners would encounter that. If you have ever been driven around in places like Mumbai, Bangkok, Manila you'll know that the crazy drivers over there take every inch of paved or unpaved surface and drive way closer than we would ever. Even then they get a few mirror knocks, but it's not that common.
But it you routinely drive in tight quarters, I could see how you might find them valuable.
I think this is one of these features that sounds great and useful and the when you have it, it not so useful after all. QUOTE]
After you have driven through a tight space against oncoming traffic in the city and you smash your mirror against the opposing cars mirror then you will be glad you can fold them prior to experiencing the tight squeeze. Replacing fixed mirrors in big cities is big business especially as each mirror can be over $300.
After you have driven through a tight space against oncoming traffic in the city and you smash your mirror against the opposing cars mirror then you will be glad you can fold them prior to experiencing the tight squeeze. Replacing fixed mirrors in big cities is big business especially as each mirror can be over $300.
But it you routinely drive in tight quarters, I could see how you might find them valuable.