U.S. News is the worst...
#1
U.S. News is the worst...
14 Fastest New SUVs Under $50,000
https://cars.usnews.com/cars-trucks/...vs-under-50000
No mention of the 2019 Acura RDX. However, once I saw that they included the 2019 Ford Flex, the article immediately lost all credibility.
https://cars.usnews.com/cars-trucks/...vs-under-50000
No mention of the 2019 Acura RDX. However, once I saw that they included the 2019 Ford Flex, the article immediately lost all credibility.
Last edited by rfbarry19; 01-24-2019 at 01:41 PM.
#2
https://cars.usnews.com/cars-trucks/...vs-under-50000
No mention of the 2019 Acura RDX. However, once I saw that they included the 2019 Ford Flex, the article immediately lost all credibility.
No mention of the 2019 Acura RDX. However, once I saw that they included the 2019 Ford Flex, the article immediately lost all credibility.
#3
14 Fastest New SUVs Under $50,000
https://cars.usnews.com/cars-trucks/...vs-under-50000
No mention of the 2019 Acura RDX. However, once I saw that they included the 2019 Ford Flex, the article immediately lost all credibility.
https://cars.usnews.com/cars-trucks/...vs-under-50000
No mention of the 2019 Acura RDX. However, once I saw that they included the 2019 Ford Flex, the article immediately lost all credibility.
The following users liked this post:
rfbarry19 (01-24-2019)
#6
Motor Trend:
MKC
and the RDX
So how does the MKC make a list of fastest SUVs?
MKC
Go for the latter option, and your $45,100 MKC 2.3 AWD's respectable 6.5-second 0-60 time keeps up with the Infiniti QX50 and Acura RDX. Still, that comes at the cost of 18/25 mpg fuel economy and a relatively short overall driving range
From a stop, our all-wheel-drive Acura reached 60 mph in 6.4 seconds, about as quick as a few all-wheel-drive 2019 Infiniti QX50s we've tested and our long-term 2019 Volvo XC60 T5 AWD (6.5 seconds).
Trending Topics
#8
And I doubt many people pay less than 50k for most of those cars. The RDX starts at 37k but nobody buys that car, even if there is on on the lot, which is unlikely.
#9
You know what they say ... beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Personally, I think the Flex is a cool spin on the traditional wagon. It's unique without resorting to massive grille work or overly-creased sheet metal (Lexus and Lexus). If I needed a people-hauler, I'd take one over a minivan or a cramped 3-row crossover in a heartbeat.
Personally, I think the Flex is a cool spin on the traditional wagon. It's unique without resorting to massive grille work or overly-creased sheet metal (Lexus and Lexus). If I needed a people-hauler, I'd take one over a minivan or a cramped 3-row crossover in a heartbeat.
#10
You know what they say ... beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Personally, I think the Flex is a cool spin on the traditional wagon. It's unique without resorting to massive grille work or overly-creased sheet metal (Lexus and Lexus). If I needed a people-hauler, I'd take one over a minivan or a cramped 3-row crossover in a heartbeat.
Personally, I think the Flex is a cool spin on the traditional wagon. It's unique without resorting to massive grille work or overly-creased sheet metal (Lexus and Lexus). If I needed a people-hauler, I'd take one over a minivan or a cramped 3-row crossover in a heartbeat.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post