Car and Driver slams RDX Aspec

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 28, 2018 | 06:53 PM
  #41  
HotRodW's Avatar
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 849
Likes: 341
Originally Posted by durt
I wonder if putting the transmission in S mode makes much difference to 0-60 / 1/4 mile times. Maybe C/D left it in D?
C/D shifted manually according to the test sheet (attached), likely because previous runs indicated it was the fastest method.

Attached Files
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2018 | 07:24 PM
  #42  
MI-RDX's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 993
Likes: 257
From: Michigan
Test sheet shows the shift point as 6600RPM. Peak torque range for this engine is 1600-4600RPM and falls off after that. They may have achieved better times shifting around 5000RPM or so to take advantage of the better torque at the lower RPM and making better use of the gearing. It would at a minimum be an interesting comparison.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2018 | 11:37 PM
  #43  
supafamous's Avatar
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 839
Likes: 345
From: Vancouver, BC
Originally Posted by HotRodW
C/D shifted manually according to the test sheet (attached), likely because previous runs indicated it was the fastest method.
Here's the Accord test sheet from C/D : https://hmg-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/fi...1530111461.pdf

From this we can see the traction limited Accord (FWD) actually launches harder than RDX which shouldn't be happening and it ends up consistently behind the rest of the way. A BMW X3 does 0-60 in 6.2s and is 250 lbs heavier so I'm going to suggest it was a soft motor this time around and not testing methodology.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2018 | 12:38 PM
  #44  
durt's Avatar
4th Gear
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Just test drove a ‘19 RDX AWD and it does feel a bit sluggish right off the line if you just stomp on the throttle pedal with no brake torquing. I imagine it needs brake torque to build boost to get the quicker acceleration test times we’ve seen from other tests. Perhaps the reviewer in this article didn’t do this. Quite a bit different feel off the line without brake torquing than the 2nd gen with AWD which would squeal the front tires off the line.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2018 | 02:39 PM
  #45  
Tom2's Avatar
Unregistered Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,472
Likes: 45
From: New York
Originally Posted by chickdr
It shouldn't with an FI engine. NA motors are adversely affected, but turbos should not be.
Turbo engines are indeed affected by altitude, but they are less affected than naturally aspirated engines. It's really just simple math.

Reply
Old Aug 31, 2018 | 03:37 PM
  #46  
CheeseyPoofs McNut's Avatar
Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,993
Likes: 1,405
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by HONDAFIXER
This guy does not know how to launch a turbo car. Hold brake,build boost and then launch
I thought the same thing while watching his review a few days ago. That said - nothing wrong with his method (or lack thereof) if he tests every car the same way. Actually this is a more real-world representation of how most people drive the car and provides a good apples to apples comparison with his other reviews. All that said - I find the reviewer a bit annoying personally
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2018 | 06:18 PM
  #47  
RDX10's Avatar
Suzuka Master
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,533
Likes: 959
Originally Posted by CheeseyPoofs McNut
I thought the same thing while watching his review a few days ago. That said - nothing wrong with his method (or lack thereof) if he tests every car the same way. Actually this is a more real-world representation of how most people drive the car and provides a good apples to apples comparison with his other reviews. All that said - I find the reviewer a bit annoying personally
He's so damn obnoxious.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2018 | 10:19 AM
  #48  
107main's Avatar
10th Gear
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Not enough difference between them.

After I studied them, I would just probably get a base with Tech package in FWD. This setup has a lot of features, you pay a bunch more to get a few more bells and whistles, but spent thousands more. My favorite wheels are: 1. a spec wheels(but they say they drop MPG a bit. 2. the base model spoke wheels. 3. I dont even like the advance wheels. Other than this, if you look at options, there are not that many to justify the higher prices, unlike other vehicles I have studied. The a spec is just window dressing, that I do like, but do not like the limited interior colors at two. My wife said NO RED and she means it, and that only leaves the ebony or whatever you call it. I do not like the difference color piping around the seats, it should be the same color and I dont want a dark color, gray would be nicer for the a-spec for me. I may just opt for a new Pilot as it is less money, no new engine to worry about. No it aint as pretty as the RDX, but I can live with it and it has more room.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2018 | 10:27 AM
  #49  
TacoBello's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 30,487
Likes: 4,417
From: In an igloo
It seems to me that Acura simply didn’t pay C/D enough money for them to give the RDX a great review.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bender13
2G RL (2005-2012)
24
Aug 27, 2018 07:52 PM
Shadzilla
2G CL Transmission Recall Q & A
5
Jan 6, 2005 11:09 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:45 PM.