TSX Sportwagon - premium or regular fuel?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-27-2011 | 09:03 PM
  #1  
Aloha27's Avatar
Thread Starter
10th Gear
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
TSX Sportwagon - premium or regular fuel?

I'm thinking of buying the 2011 Sportwagon but am confused about whether it's premium required (like the brochure says) or recommended but not required (like the salesman said). Anyone have a definitive answer?

My current car is an 03 VW Passat Wagon which was premium recommended but not required. I've only used regular and never had a problem.

Thanks for any input.
Old 04-27-2011 | 09:09 PM
  #2  
Ken1997TL's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 45,641
Likes: 2,329
From: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
It is recommended. Besides, you may lose fuel economy running regular. With premium I've been getting 10% higher than EPA estimates. I haven't put regular in any of my cars in over 10 years so old habits die hard.
Old 04-27-2011 | 09:11 PM
  #3  
russel082581's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
91 octane or higher. unless you want probs..
Old 04-27-2011 | 10:02 PM
  #4  
mkeefe's Avatar
Developer & Car Fan
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 309
Likes: 28
From: Massachusetts
I was told by the dealer and Acura not to use anything but Premium, despite what others seem to think it actually does make a difference. No hard facts though, just got the car.

Matt
Old 04-27-2011 | 10:07 PM
  #5  
justnspace's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,294
Likes: 16,270
The compression ratio is 11:1.
that's pretty high.
the car will ping/knock with anything less than Premium.
Old 04-28-2011 | 12:27 AM
  #6  
cisobe's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 91
Likes: 2
My salesman recommended sticking with premium... though I've read here that other people mix grades...

I've only filled premium... but I've only filled once at half tank... had the car for almost a month now...

OP u from hawaii?
Old 04-28-2011 | 12:28 AM
  #7  
KillerG's Avatar
Op is too busy to care
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,257
Likes: 913
you use regular at your own risk, i premium it up
Old 04-28-2011 | 12:53 AM
  #8  
TSXKid2010's Avatar
SEEYOU2CREW
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 207
From: Houston | New Orleans
I think I read somewhere that the extra money you spend on premium and the extra mileage you get on premium pretty much cancels it out?

Premium is recommended, and I'm sure most people on here, including me, use premium as it's recommended.
Old 04-28-2011 | 01:06 AM
  #9  
Craig-D's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 380
Likes: 9
From: Hoboken, NJ
Originally Posted by Aloha27
I'm thinking of buying the 2011 Sportwagon but am confused about whether it's premium required (like the brochure says) or recommended but not required (like the salesman said). Anyone have a definitive answer?

My current car is an 03 VW Passat Wagon which was premium recommended but not required. I've only used regular and never had a problem.

Thanks for any input.
Page 215 of the owners manual states the 4 cyl TSX does not require premium (it is required for the 6), but it is recommended otherwise the engine may knock. If you run less than premium you will not damage the engine, but it will produce less power and fuel economy is likely to suffer as well.

The TSX doesn't produce a whole lot of power to being with, so I'm not about to reduce it even further by using lower octane gas. I want every single one of the 201 horsepower that I paid for.
Old 04-28-2011 | 07:38 AM
  #10  
VQPower37's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,386
Likes: 84
premium fo sho
Old 04-28-2011 | 07:48 AM
  #11  
hornyleprechaun's Avatar
Bent = #1
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,473
Likes: 25
From: Marietta, GA
Originally Posted by Craig-D
Page 215 of the owners manual states the 4 cyl TSX does not require premium (it is required for the 6), but it is recommended otherwise the engine may knock. If you run less than premium you will not damage the engine, but it will produce less power and fuel economy is likely to suffer as well.

The TSX doesn't produce a whole lot of power to being with, so I'm not about to reduce it even further by using lower octane gas. I want every single one of the 201 horsepower that I paid for.
I've run only regular (4-5 fillups) and been getting 26mpg on average. I'm going to run premium my next 4-5 fillups and see if I get an increase. I know Ken has been getting around 28-29mpg using just premium, so I want to really see if premium gets that extra MPG.

FWIW my dealer said it didn't matter if I used premium or not.
Old 04-28-2011 | 07:50 AM
  #12  
mattyloudness's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 37
Likes: 57
From: Olathe, KS
I have also been told that Premium will burn cleaner and is more environmently friendy, so not only should you get better gas mileage and performance you are being Green.
Old 04-28-2011 | 08:25 AM
  #13  
justnspace's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,294
Likes: 16,270
^lol lies.
Old 04-28-2011 | 10:01 AM
  #14  
Aloha27's Avatar
Thread Starter
10th Gear
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Thanks everyone.

cisobe, I used to live in Kealakekua, HI, but now I live in NJ. Not as exotic, right?

I might consider the Audi A4 Avant now because that requires premium also and has AWD.
Old 04-28-2011 | 10:36 PM
  #15  
cisobe's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 91
Likes: 2
Wow, big change in locals...

I briefly looked at a Audi a4 Avant too.. but they don't bring them in too often, and the damn thing was starting around $37k! But the 2.0T would be nice (a little more power and a lot more torque). I liked the styling too, but price was definitely the deal breaker... AWD to me, here in Hawaii only really useful when it rains...

So far, I'm really happy with my TSX wagon, for a sportyish car it has decent power... More would be great, but more would typically lower gas mileage...

My wife's CX-7 has a 2.3L turbo and it has ~244hp w/ 258ft/lb of torque and it has an enjoyable amount of power, but it does get only 21-22mpg with good driving... When I was playing with it, it dropped down to ~19 or less...

So far with a little spirited driving and traffic my TSX is still hovering in the high 25mpg range...
Old 04-29-2011 | 12:48 AM
  #16  
Daves1014's Avatar
10th Gear
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Just wondering what everyone's thoughts are about this article from Edmunds.com about using regular vs. premium fuel.

http://www.edmunds.com/fuel-economy/...g-premium.html
Old 04-29-2011 | 12:51 AM
  #17  
mkeefe's Avatar
Developer & Car Fan
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 309
Likes: 28
From: Massachusetts
According to that the 11 requires premium, which is what I found talking to a Honda tech a few months back. Personally trying to save $.20/gallon on your cars fuel is the wrong direction. Just buy one less coffee a week.

Matt
Old 04-29-2011 | 12:54 AM
  #18  
Daves1014's Avatar
10th Gear
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Only the V6 TSX is on the premium required list. The 4 cylinder TSX is on the recommended list.
Old 04-29-2011 | 12:56 AM
  #19  
mkeefe's Avatar
Developer & Car Fan
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 309
Likes: 28
From: Massachusetts
Whoops my mistake. Thanks for the clarification.
Old 04-29-2011 | 08:03 AM
  #20  
hornyleprechaun's Avatar
Bent = #1
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,473
Likes: 25
From: Marietta, GA
Originally Posted by mkeefe
According to that the 11 requires premium, which is what I found talking to a Honda tech a few months back. Personally trying to save $.20/gallon on your cars fuel is the wrong direction. Just buy one less coffee a week.

Matt
Yeah when you break it down the extra cost in negligible. I filled up on premium this morning before my drive to work and my MPG is already higher than what it was on regular. I'll wait until I get my full tank results, but the dash is displaying 31.5 MPG instead of 26.5 MPG
Old 04-29-2011 | 12:10 PM
  #21  
Craig-D's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 380
Likes: 9
From: Hoboken, NJ
The bottom line is the TSX will not run as efficiently or powerfully on regular fuel as opposed to premium. So whatever savings you get at the pump, will be lost on the road with inferior gas mileage. Spend the extra 20 cents a gallon and get the most out of the car you paid $30k for.
Old 04-29-2011 | 01:04 PM
  #22  
hornyleprechaun's Avatar
Bent = #1
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,473
Likes: 25
From: Marietta, GA
Where are you guys getting .20 cent difference? In GA it's .30 cents!
Old 04-29-2011 | 01:08 PM
  #23  
Ken1997TL's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 45,641
Likes: 2,329
From: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Originally Posted by hornyleprechaun
Where are you guys getting .20 cent difference? In GA it's .30 cents!
Its always been about 20 cents difference wherever I pay.

Are you filling up on 93 or 94 octane?
Old 04-29-2011 | 01:09 PM
  #24  
mkeefe's Avatar
Developer & Car Fan
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 309
Likes: 28
From: Massachusetts
$3.99 for Regular, $4.19 for Premium — At least here in Mass.
Old 04-29-2011 | 01:16 PM
  #25  
hornyleprechaun's Avatar
Bent = #1
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,473
Likes: 25
From: Marietta, GA
Originally Posted by Ken1997TL
Its always been about 20 cents difference wherever I pay.

Are you filling up on 93 or 94 octane?
Pretty sure it was 93.

Originally Posted by mkeefe
$3.99 for Regular, $4.19 for Premium — At least here in Mass.
3.71 for Regular
4.01 for Premium
Old 04-29-2011 | 01:20 PM
  #26  
Ken1997TL's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 45,641
Likes: 2,329
From: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
3.89 for regular
4.09 for premium
Old 04-29-2011 | 01:59 PM
  #27  
cisobe's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 91
Likes: 2
$4.48 regular
$4.68 premium

Oahu, Hi
Old 04-30-2011 | 11:24 AM
  #28  
FLYGUY31's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 431
Likes: 97
From: Valley Forge, PA
I've been running the mid grade..I think it's 89 or 90, not sure. But last week I got my best gas mileage every..about 29 mpg..I've seen no decrease in power, no pings, nothing to say I made a mistake moving down one grade, plus saving some $. My fill up yesterday cost $66...$3.99.9 per gallon. I fill up now about every 7 or 8 days. I'm glad I didn't go with the TL!
Old 05-04-2011 | 11:57 AM
  #29  
hornyleprechaun's Avatar
Bent = #1
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,473
Likes: 25
From: Marietta, GA
F'ing crazy.. This is near my office, which is why it's so high, but still ridiculous. I can get Premium for < $4.19 near home so I only put in 5 gallons.

Old 05-04-2011 | 02:20 PM
  #30  
Puppetmaster's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 937
Likes: 247
From: Fairfax, VA
And I still remember only several years ago, GA had some of the lowest gas prices in the nation...
Old 05-04-2011 | 02:32 PM
  #31  
hornyleprechaun's Avatar
Bent = #1
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,473
Likes: 25
From: Marietta, GA
Originally Posted by Puppetmaster
And I still remember only several years ago, GA had some of the lowest gas prices in the nation...
We do just not in Buckhead (little north of Atlanta). It's a rich area, and full of office buildings. I always try to fill up by my house, but just didn't have time, so I put a couple gallons in during lunch.

Buckhead is always $.25 higher than the stations around where I live. I just thought it was crazy how it increased $.30 between each fuel grade.
Old 05-04-2011 | 04:36 PM
  #32  
Craig-D's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 380
Likes: 9
From: Hoboken, NJ
In Northern NJ the best gas price is:

$3.859 regular
$4.079 premium

As a plus, at least we don't have to pump our own gas for the money. Self-serve fueling is illegal in NJ and stations can't charge extra for full serve.
Old 05-05-2011 | 08:25 AM
  #33  
Puppetmaster's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 937
Likes: 247
From: Fairfax, VA
Originally Posted by hornyleprechaun
We do just not in Buckhead (little north of Atlanta). It's a rich area, and full of office buildings. I always try to fill up by my house, but just didn't have time, so I put a couple gallons in during lunch.

Buckhead is always $.25 higher than the stations around where I live. I just thought it was crazy how it increased $.30 between each fuel grade.
Ah, okay. I've been down to Atlanta a few times and I remember Buckhead. Was down there some years back for a wedding. Stayed at a hotel next to the Lenox (?) mall, across the street from a Maggiano's. I remember that because I went there to get dinner, haha. Nice area.
Old 05-05-2011 | 08:41 AM
  #34  
hornyleprechaun's Avatar
Bent = #1
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,473
Likes: 25
From: Marietta, GA
Originally Posted by Puppetmaster
Ah, okay. I've been down to Atlanta a few times and I remember Buckhead. Was down there some years back for a wedding. Stayed at a hotel next to the Lenox (?) mall, across the street from a Maggiano's. I remember that because I went there to get dinner, haha. Nice area.
Yeah I work right around the corner from Maggiano's. The BP in the picture is right down the street. It's a very upscale area so everything is priced higher than the other areas around Atlanta.
Old 05-05-2011 | 11:17 PM
  #35  
GrigioTSX10's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 127
Likes: 6
From: Baltimore, MD
I only have 1100 miles, I've only used premium since I got the car. The dealer told me I could use regular when I bought the car. I've been averaging 25mpg or so, 80% highway driving but I speed lol

Fuel here is $4.07 for premium and $3.90 for regular @ Sam's Club.
Old 05-17-2011 | 10:25 AM
  #36  
hornyleprechaun's Avatar
Bent = #1
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,473
Likes: 25
From: Marietta, GA
From Atlanta, GA to St. George Island, Florida

Old 05-17-2011 | 10:31 AM
  #37  
Ken1997TL's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 45,641
Likes: 2,329
From: Better Neighborhood, Arizona


And I bet you aren't doing 65 mph the whole time either..
Old 05-17-2011 | 11:26 AM
  #38  
tsxuser's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 193
Likes: 2
From: Maryland
I don't think TSX can tolerate anything less than 93 without pinging issue. For me, even with 93, mine still ping. I heard Citgo has higher 93 rating. I already put one tank of Citgo 93. so far so good. at least it is better than Exxon 93 ( used for more than 5 tanks, but still heard the pinging, especially temperature is high and AC is On).
Old 05-17-2011 | 11:26 AM
  #39  
hornyleprechaun's Avatar
Bent = #1
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,473
Likes: 25
From: Marietta, GA
I probably averaged it but I noticed going 80mph was less efficient than 70mph. Most of it was two lane roads so wasn't going above 70 much.
Old 05-21-2011 | 10:11 AM
  #40  
hornyleprechaun's Avatar
Bent = #1
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,473
Likes: 25
From: Marietta, GA
Originally Posted by hornyleprechaun
From Atlanta, GA to St. George Island, Florida

Had it around 33mpg+ on the way back home, but had to make more stops than I wanted, so didn't get a true test on the way back. I think if you can cruise @ 70mph on a freeway the TSX Wagon will get 600+ miles per tank, which is really awesome.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:06 AM.