View Poll Results: 1st gen owners, would a diesel option sell you on the 2009 TSX?
Yes, it's worth the wait-and-see, even if we're not sure they're even going to make one.
40
65.57%
Yes, but I'd rather upgrade now then wait for the diesel...
1
1.64%
No, I don't want a diesel, but I'm already sold on the '09 as it is.
2
3.28%
No, it's still not enough to make a upgrading worth it.
18
29.51%
Voters: 61. You may not vote on this poll

Diesel poll

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-23-2008, 09:34 PM
  #1  
9th Gear
Thread Starter
 
vonbuey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Age: 45
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Diesel poll

I like the new styling and upgrades, but I'm not blown away by the 2nd gen TSX.

I'm going to keep my '05 until they turn out a diesel version. If/when that happens, I'm upgrading. Anyone else feel the same way?
Old 03-23-2008, 10:24 PM
  #2  
Drifting
 
ostrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 2,540
Received 364 Likes on 190 Posts
I was previously very intrigued by the diesel option. Unfortunately, it's too little too late on Acura's part now. The 2009 TSX turns out to be less than attractive with that horrendous grille, and the fact that it only has the 4 cylinder option makes me so mad that I am losing interest rapidly with the new TSX. If I want a diesel vehicle in a couple of years' time, I am going to get the Audi A4 TDI, or the Maxima diesel.
Old 03-26-2008, 06:00 PM
  #3  
Instructor
 
Tmetcalf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: So Cal
Age: 47
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was at the stealership yesterday and whilst waiting for my car I got talking to a salesperson who told me he was going up to LA next week to test drive the new TSX and get breifed on it all. He then said that the diesel tsx should be out by August of this year. Will be interesting to see if its that soon, or if they wil wait longer.
Old 03-26-2008, 10:09 PM
  #4  
Team Owner
 
TS_eXpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 23,451
Received 54 Likes on 27 Posts
I will be sold on the new TSX if the Turbo Diesel comes out WITH that awesome body styling of the diesel seen at the Geneva Auto Show. If it still has the same styling as the '09 coming out...its a no-go for me.
Old 03-27-2008, 08:13 AM
  #5  
Senior Moderator
 
LuvMyTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NY
Age: 45
Posts: 14,667
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
I'm definitely interested, but vehicle price and efficiency will have to be weighed against cost of diesel fuel. Diesel fuel is getting really pricey now. This is really unfortunate, because diesel cars could make a huge comeback with so many new vehicles coming out in the next couple of years, but the price of the fuel is going to turn off a lot of people. As much as I think that using less fuel is more important than saving money, if the price difference is significant, it just won't be worth it to me.
Old 03-27-2008, 10:45 AM
  #6  
> 100K Mile Club Member
 
TSXinTN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Nashville, TN
Age: 51
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Is it feasible to think that a diesel TSX could get 50 MPG on the highway? If so, this would save me nearly $1000 per year in fuel. That is also considering diesel fuel is approximately $.50 more per gallon than premium fuel.
Old 03-27-2008, 10:53 AM
  #7  
Senior Moderator
 
LuvMyTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NY
Age: 45
Posts: 14,667
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by TSXinTN
Is it feasible to think that a diesel TSX could get 50 MPG on the highway? If so, this would save me nearly $1000 per year in fuel. That is also considering diesel fuel is approximately $.50 more per gallon than premium fuel.
I believe the Euro Accord Diesel achieved over 50 mpg.
Old 03-27-2008, 01:24 PM
  #8  
Instructor
 
spurfan15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Age: 37
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TSXinTN
Is it feasible to think that a diesel TSX could get 50 MPG on the highway? If so, this would save me nearly $1000 per year in fuel. That is also considering diesel fuel is approximately $.50 more per gallon than premium fuel.
Absolutely. I suspect we'll see a combined fuel economy in the 40's. With city in the 30s and highway in the 50s probably. Freeway could be really high under smooth driving conditions. The one thing that would be annoying to me, but affects every car, is heavy commute traffic.
Old 03-27-2008, 02:23 PM
  #9  
Banned
 
Iceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Age: 53
Posts: 620
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I am extremely interested in the diesel TSX. I am not sold on the new TSX's front end, but the rest of the car looks great! My next car will have a diesel or hybrid powertrain.
Old 04-06-2008, 01:24 AM
  #10  
Intermediate
 
nct1596's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Little Rock, AR
Age: 45
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to the honda.co.uk website, the new Accord (i.e. 2009 TSX) with the i-CTDI option gets upwards of 60 MPG on the highway...that's quite impressive. Given that diesel around here is $4/gallon, that's still cheaper than my 28MPG 2004 TSX and premium gas. It's about time for a diesel option.

Of course, off the line acceleration is a bit slower - but has wicked torque. Can't wait!
Old 04-06-2008, 01:42 AM
  #11  
Safety Car
 
SSFTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,581
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
Previous Euro diesel got 52mpg vs 30mpg for 2.4 litre on combined Euro cycle.
here TSX is rated for 23mpg in EPA but practically people are achieving 27 to 28 mpg.
so i have no reason to believe TSX diesel will be less than 50mpg. with 60 mpg highway possibility in 65 to 75 mph range. All with V6 like passing power and refinment. 131 mph top speed and 0-60 miles in 9.4 second was achieved with only 138bhp. I havent seen any other 1500KG car with only138hp achieving it.
if they bump diesel slightly to 150 to 180 bhp range it will practically kill V6s on highway speeds because torque for diesel is on very low rpm. practically you can launch vehicle in any gear.
Old 04-07-2008, 11:26 AM
  #12  
Intermediate
 
ILTomK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
60 Mpg

Originally Posted by nct1596
According to the honda.co.uk website, the new Accord (i.e. 2009 TSX) with the i-CTDI option gets upwards of 60 MPG on the highway...that's quite impressive. Given that diesel around here is $4/gallon, that's still cheaper than my 28MPG 2004 TSX and premium gas. It's about time for a diesel option.
Was the G in 60 MPG an Imperial gallon? If the UK (and the Web site) is still using the Imperial Gallon, then the mileage would be 50 miles per US gallon because the Imperial gallon volume is about 1.2 times the US gallon volume. But even 50 MPG sounds pretty good.
Old 04-07-2008, 12:48 PM
  #13  
Banned
 
Iceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Age: 53
Posts: 620
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I agree, 50 Mpg is more realistic for a 3400-lb car.
Old 04-09-2008, 02:55 PM
  #14  
Instructor
 
xanctus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Auckland, NZ
Age: 49
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I would def. go get the diesel if it is coming out for the market.
Old 04-09-2008, 08:28 PM
  #15  
Old Man Yelling at Clouds
 
1Louder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Age: 57
Posts: 16,973
Received 7,362 Likes on 3,906 Posts
Originally Posted by TSXinTN
Is it feasible to think that a diesel TSX could get 50 MPG on the highway? If so, this would save me nearly $1000 per year in fuel. That is also considering diesel fuel is approximately $.50 more per gallon than premium fuel.
The 09 Accord should also be available in diesel, and I've read similar MPG marks for it. Bet its the same base engine.
Old 04-11-2008, 08:28 PM
  #16  
Intermediate
 
nct1596's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Little Rock, AR
Age: 45
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ILTomK
Was the G in 60 MPG an Imperial gallon? If the UK (and the Web site) is still using the Imperial Gallon, then the mileage would be 50 miles per US gallon because the Imperial gallon volume is about 1.2 times the US gallon volume. But even 50 MPG sounds pretty good.
You're right, the G is imperial G...but as listed in l/km = 4.5 l/km in extra urban driving (highway) and that equates to 52.5 MPG(US). Of course, if they rate their cars like the US, it most likely will be a tad bit higher...so maybe 55 MPG(US)? That's still pretty good! Almost 1000 miles/tank!
Old 04-14-2008, 02:57 AM
  #17  
Intermediate
 
nickp85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Age: 39
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone see the price of diesel these days... premium gas is about 3.29 a gallon here in NJ and diesel is going for around 4.00 already... I don't think the added MPG will make up for that price difference since when you fill it will take 60 bucks instead of 45.
Old 04-14-2008, 01:05 PM
  #18  
Banned
 
Iceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Age: 53
Posts: 620
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yeah but you will only have to fill it twice a month.
Old 04-14-2008, 08:05 PM
  #19  
Old Man Yelling at Clouds
 
1Louder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Age: 57
Posts: 16,973
Received 7,362 Likes on 3,906 Posts
Originally Posted by nickp85
Anyone see the price of diesel these days... premium gas is about 3.29 a gallon here in NJ and diesel is going for around 4.00 already... I don't think the added MPG will make up for that price difference since when you fill it will take 60 bucks instead of 45.
I just noticed when I filed up yesterday - diesel at $4.25. Premium was around $3.70.

At 50 mpg and $4.25, that's 8.5 cents per mile.

At 30 mpg and $3.75, its about 12.5 cents per mile.

But still, that price takes the edge off the benefit...
Old 04-14-2008, 08:10 PM
  #20  
Suzuka Master
 
Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,802
Received 1,012 Likes on 567 Posts
Makes me wonder if as more mfgs introduce diesels in the coming years, and demand increases, will production capacity increase enough to start bringing costs down? Will the economics of scale be negated by the ever rising costs of crude?
Old 04-14-2008, 08:32 PM
  #21  
Moderator Alumnus
 
sauceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Windsor-Quebec corridor
Age: 47
Posts: 7,709
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Colin
Makes me wonder if as more mfgs introduce diesels in the coming years, and demand increases, will production capacity increase enough to start bringing costs down? Will the economics of scale be negated by the ever rising costs of crude?
I'd be surprised it would cause a significant increase in demand. Compared to what trucks use in fuel, as well as home fuel furnaces, car diesel is very insignificant.

Hopefully it would help reduce demand on gas, but even then, don't hold your breath.
Old 04-15-2008, 08:08 AM
  #22  
Senior Moderator
 
LuvMyTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NY
Age: 45
Posts: 14,667
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Colin
Makes me wonder if as more mfgs introduce diesels in the coming years, and demand increases, will production capacity increase enough to start bringing costs down? Will the economics of scale be negated by the ever rising costs of crude?
What would cause a large increase in demand is if the government forces freight ships to use the low sulfur diesel on the market now. That's what they're trying to implement, and if that happens, diesel supply will most definitely go down.
Old 04-15-2008, 03:01 PM
  #23  
Suzuka Master
 
Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,802
Received 1,012 Likes on 567 Posts
Originally Posted by LuvMyTSX
What would cause a large increase in demand is if the government forces freight ships to use the low sulfur diesel on the market now. That's what they're trying to implement, and if that happens, diesel supply will most definitely go down.
Interesting. I would hope that in a free market economy, someone would recognize the increased demand and step up production (or build more infrastructure) to fill the market and reap the benefits of increased sales.

Isn't this kinda like oil? US and Canada aren't out of oil, we're just out the the 'easy to get' oil. If the price of imported oil gets more expensive than domestic oil, (environmentalists permitting) we start drilling again. (this is probably over simplifying it a bit, but thats the gist of it as I hear)
Old 04-16-2008, 09:18 AM
  #24  
Safety Car
 
SSFTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,581
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
http://www.topgear.com/blogs/drives/...accord-saloon/
It's a serious business, this launching cars game. Take this new Honda Accord - budgets the size of national GDPs must be getting spent making sure that the right message gets out to everyone.

Which is all well and good. But it doesn't hide the basic fact that people aren't really buying these sorts of cars any more. Mondeos, Vectras, Lagunas, you name it; customers just aren't as interested. They want niches, even when niches get so niche that you wonder where you started in the first place. BMW X6, I'm looking at you.

And yet Honda doesn't really have any niche. It's still relying on good old-fashioned engineering integrity, valiantly trying to push its cars into the premium sector. Which is a polite way of saying it's ploughing on with the same old formula.

Not that it doesn't work in the Accord. It's a lovely car and in diesel guise makes a huge amount of sense. It feels expensive inside (dare I bow to the marketing pressure and say 'premium'?), there's plenty of technology available - crucially it's fully iPod-compatible - and it's really comfortable.

The new diesel engine is still the highlight. Smooth, quiet at speed, plenty of torque, economical, low emissions - it's hard to fault. OK, so it's not a sporty number like BMW's twin-turbo diesel, but then it's much less expensive than a 335d.

And it's also where you'll find Honda's niche. Because the diesel won't get an automatic until early 2009, which is extremely rare in the premium class into which Honda is pushing. Apart from anything else, this is quite a lazy diesel, so an auto would be ideal.

The last diesel Accord never got an auto, which is reasonably understandable because the whole engine was so new. Honda has been developing this new version for a while now, so to launch it without that crucial gearbox is staggering.

Staggering and crazy. When the auto comes, the Accord will be a really competent bit of kit. Until then, it's simply not playing with a full deck of cards against the premium boys.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scooter
Automotive News
1
03-21-2004 09:47 AM
gavriil
Automotive News
2
02-24-2003 04:17 PM



Quick Reply: Diesel poll



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:05 PM.