J32A2 Engine + J35A3 Crank & rods > J35A3 Engine + J32A2 Cams?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-10-2018 | 08:28 PM
  #1  
ksu90's Avatar
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 60
Likes: 1
From: Seattle, WA
J32A2 Engine + J35A3 Crank & rods > J35A3 Engine + J32A2 Cams?

Is J32A2 Engine + J35A3 Crank & rods better than J35A3 Engine + J32A2 Cams?

Or would they be the same??
Old 04-10-2018 | 08:33 PM
  #2  
teh CL's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 14,217
Likes: 999
From: Kelowna
Essentially the same thing. J35A3 swap with J32A2 cams is the simple route unless you really want to build a motor.
The following users liked this post:
zeta (04-10-2018)
Old 04-10-2018 | 08:39 PM
  #3  
zeta's Avatar
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,945
Likes: 1,866
From: S. Florida
The post below is a source of good information that I always refer to when I 'get a hair' and think about going the J35A3 route.

Maybe it will help you, cuz you know you want to do it!

Difference between J32A2 and J35A3:
Originally Posted by 03 tls nc
Both blocks are the same. The only difference in the oil pumps is the pressure valve and spring, the J32A2 parts can be purchased for around $20. The coolant crossover manifold is different but can be made to work. The EGR valves are different and must correspond to the appropriate ECU. Of course the crank, rods and pistons are different. J35A3 has forged crank and rods but they are not comparable to after market forged rods but still better than cast (J32A2 has forged crank only). The heads are the same castings and use the same valve seats even thought the J32 uses a 1mm larger intake vale (with a valve job the smaller valve will flow more, due to less shrouding). Lost motion assemblies were updated for the 03 J32. The cams and springs are different (J32 springs are considerably stronger). The intake of the J35 utilizes are 1" spacer between the upper and lower runners and the upper intake is the same between the two with the exception of the longer trumpets used on the J35 (produces more torque below peak). The TBs are the same with the exception of the MAP sensors and the corresponding MAP sensor must be used with the correct TB (both use the same plug).

If forced induction is in your future use the J35A3. Clean up the casting marks in the intake tract but do not increase the size and enjoy the lower static compression and cams with less over lap. (upgrade the oil pressure spring and valve for good measure)

For some NA fun on the cheap start with J35A3 use J32A2 cams and springs, port from the J35A3 IM to the valves, valve job and mill the head. (.010" is approximately equal to 0.25:1 static compression with J35 rotating assembly). I milled mine to 0.030" with no valve clearance issues and an estimated 10.75:1 static compression (no issues achieving correct mechanical timing with 0.030" milled). I also upgraded the oil pressure spring and valve in the bottom of the oil pump.

Assuming that even if you don't separate the heads and run the long block as is replacing all exterior seals and gaskets only makes good since. Since you have to pull the pan to replace the the gaskets behind the oil pump and pickup, removing one allen plug and dropping the J32A2 oil pressure spring and valve in place is some really cheap insurance.
The following users liked this post:
teh CL (04-11-2018)
Old 04-10-2018 | 10:21 PM
  #4  
thisaznboi88's Avatar
Safety Car
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,045
Likes: 619
From: San Jose, CA/ Charleston, WV
put some J35a8 camshaft using p2r camshaft spacer.. someone on the fb group about his build
Old 03-16-2021 | 05:16 PM
  #5  
InspireJ32A's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 307
Likes: 41
Greetings comrades. Instead of creating a new thread, I hope nobody minds if I ask a question right here. I'm about to build a 3.5/3.2 hybrid (J32A2 block, pistons, heads, cams, J35A1 crankshaft and rods). It'll be run by my stock J32A2, and the question is - how does this affect gas mileage? I'm aware of someone running a J35A3 on a J32A2 ECU whose fuel consumption went up 25%. I'm assuming that it's due to the ECU and the cams being incompatible, but if anybody has some real experience - please share. Thank you.
Old 03-16-2021 | 06:37 PM
  #6  
justnspace's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Likes: 16,270
I think your assumption is correct. the ECU or the tune...
if you have the ability to tune this engine build, then you can get the air/fuel ratios stoich.


if its running super rich, then it's just dumping fuel.
Old 03-16-2021 | 06:55 PM
  #7  
zeta's Avatar
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,945
Likes: 1,866
From: S. Florida
InspireJ32A, what is the part # for the ECU in your car?
TL-S=37820-PGE-A62
TL-P=37820-PJE-L65
From what I understand the TL-S ECU has the more aggressive (higher performance) programing; therefore, it would compliment the better J32A2 Type-S cams and would not drastically influence MPG.

Last edited by zeta; 03-16-2021 at 06:58 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dragstang86
2G TSX (2009-2014)
5
03-21-2021 10:07 AM
tenzingsherpa
3G TL Photograph Gallery
74
11-03-2009 01:16 PM
96teeluxury
1G TL (1996-1998)
13
12-16-2006 06:31 AM
jermz123
1G CL (1997-1999)
2
08-13-2004 03:45 AM
princegn
1G CL (1997-1999)
1
08-09-2003 08:38 PM



Quick Reply: J32A2 Engine + J35A3 Crank & rods > J35A3 Engine + J32A2 Cams?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:23 AM.