What's up with TL-S gear ratios?
#1
Thread Starter
Advanced
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
What's up with TL-S gear ratios?
Some people have been posting that 4th and 5th gears are overdrives and that we need to keep it in 3rd for pulling away from bimmers. Is this true?
Here are the gearing info I pull off the web. I can't quite make sense out of these numbers... How are they calculated? Can someone please explain?
Our TL (type S same as TL???)
Ratios (:1)
1st - 2.563
2nd - 1.551
3rd - 1.021
4th - 0.653
5th - 0.470
Reverse - 1.846
Final Drive - 4.428
BMW 325
Manual gear ratios
1 - 4.23, 2 - 2.52, 3 - 1.66, 4- 1.22, 5 - 1.00, R - 4.04
Final drive ratio (:1)
3.15
Automatic gear ratios
1 - 3.67, 2- 2.00, 3- 1.41, 4- 1.00, 5 - 0.74, R - 4.10, Final (:1) 3.46
BMW 330
Standard gear ratios (:1)
1- 4.21, 2- 2.49, 3 - 1.66, 4- 1.24, 5 - 1.00, R - 3.85
Final drive ratio :1
2.93
Automatic gear ratios (:1)
1 - 3.67, 2 - 2.00, 3 - 1.41, 4 - 1.00, 5 - .74, R - 4.10
Final drive ratio :1
3.38
Here are the gearing info I pull off the web. I can't quite make sense out of these numbers... How are they calculated? Can someone please explain?
Our TL (type S same as TL???)
Ratios (:1)
1st - 2.563
2nd - 1.551
3rd - 1.021
4th - 0.653
5th - 0.470
Reverse - 1.846
Final Drive - 4.428
BMW 325
Manual gear ratios
1 - 4.23, 2 - 2.52, 3 - 1.66, 4- 1.22, 5 - 1.00, R - 4.04
Final drive ratio (:1)
3.15
Automatic gear ratios
1 - 3.67, 2- 2.00, 3- 1.41, 4- 1.00, 5 - 0.74, R - 4.10, Final (:1) 3.46
BMW 330
Standard gear ratios (:1)
1- 4.21, 2- 2.49, 3 - 1.66, 4- 1.24, 5 - 1.00, R - 3.85
Final drive ratio :1
2.93
Automatic gear ratios (:1)
1 - 3.67, 2 - 2.00, 3 - 1.41, 4 - 1.00, 5 - .74, R - 4.10
Final drive ratio :1
3.38
#2
http://www.acura-tl.com/ubb/Forum14/HTML/001272.html
Check out this link, a bunch of us discussed the ramifications of different gearing in automatic vs. manual cars.
Overdrive = gear ratio < 1.0 .. where 1.0 is direct drive, engine and wheels spin at same speed .. overdrive, engine spins slower than wheels. Note the BMW's only have 1 overdrive gear, whereas the TL-S has two.
Check out this link, a bunch of us discussed the ramifications of different gearing in automatic vs. manual cars.
Overdrive = gear ratio < 1.0 .. where 1.0 is direct drive, engine and wheels spin at same speed .. overdrive, engine spins slower than wheels. Note the BMW's only have 1 overdrive gear, whereas the TL-S has two.
#3
Acura is looking for good real world mpg as well as performance with a heavier car than the pipsqueak 3-series (heck, I am 6-2 and 215! Me needum space!).
If the TL's came with a closer ratio 5-speed and traded off say 1 mpg, they would absolutely howl.
If the TL's came with a closer ratio 5-speed and traded off say 1 mpg, they would absolutely howl.
#4
The 2nd gen CL owners have been griping about this from day one. The car is a bit of a dog in 4th gear, but you don't get there til 110mph!!!!! Is that really that bad??? With headers and intake, my gas mileage is absolutely amazing when I keep my foot out of it on the highway. I actually got over 34mpg in my CL-S once. Last trip I made I got 31.8mpg and I was still averaging over 75mph!!
Every once in awhile some more aggressive gearing would be nice but it's gonna be more than a 1mpg trade-off. Look at the IS300.... with it's gearing, it can't even hit 60mph in 2nd gear (we hit.... what... 72mph) and it's only rated at 23mpg on the highway. That's pretty pathetic, IMHO.
Every once in awhile some more aggressive gearing would be nice but it's gonna be more than a 1mpg trade-off. Look at the IS300.... with it's gearing, it can't even hit 60mph in 2nd gear (we hit.... what... 72mph) and it's only rated at 23mpg on the highway. That's pretty pathetic, IMHO.
#5
Well unfortunetly it is true, no pick up after 110mph. My good bud has a brand new CL type S and we raced (my GS 4) I mean he lost but after about 90 mph it was not even close. I then drove it to try and engine gives up at like u said 110 mph, but who really needs to go that fast anyway!??!
Gears are not sporty at all like u said kept it in 3rd when it dropped to 4th it was a BIG MISTAKE let alone 5th.
But Cl is a cruiser (a Japanese Ford T-bird) not a sports car.
Gears are not sporty at all like u said kept it in 3rd when it dropped to 4th it was a BIG MISTAKE let alone 5th.
But Cl is a cruiser (a Japanese Ford T-bird) not a sports car.
#6
Originally posted by GoldTypeS:
but you don't get there til 110mph!!!!!
but you don't get there til 110mph!!!!!
5th gear is so tall that down shifting to 4th is like staying in 5th in any other car.
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by Road Rage:
Acura is looking for good real world mpg as well as performance with a heavier car than the pipsqueak 3-series (heck, I am 6-2 and 215! Me needum space!).
If the TL's came with a closer ratio 5-speed and traded off say 1 mpg, they would absolutely howl.
Acura is looking for good real world mpg as well as performance with a heavier car than the pipsqueak 3-series (heck, I am 6-2 and 215! Me needum space!).
If the TL's came with a closer ratio 5-speed and traded off say 1 mpg, they would absolutely howl.
How ridiculous is that?
------------------
2001 TL Silver w/ Black Leather
CL-S Wheels w/Pilots
Alpine CD Changer
Burlwood Shift Knob
25% Tint, 35% In Front
Trending Topics
#8
Originally posted by Closer:
If WOT from a start. The problem is when you're in 5th gear at normal freeway speeds and you need to pass someone. Gas it and the tranny drops a gear to get power. But, you're not actually getting power, because you're no where near your peak power band. Instead you slowly accelerate while you wait for your rpms to climb into vtec. Why? The gears are too long and have too much of an rpm difference between gears.
5th gear is so tall that down shifting to 4th is like staying in 5th in any other car.
If WOT from a start. The problem is when you're in 5th gear at normal freeway speeds and you need to pass someone. Gas it and the tranny drops a gear to get power. But, you're not actually getting power, because you're no where near your peak power band. Instead you slowly accelerate while you wait for your rpms to climb into vtec. Why? The gears are too long and have too much of an rpm difference between gears.
5th gear is so tall that down shifting to 4th is like staying in 5th in any other car.
Why not kick it over to sportshift, and drop it down to third manually?
------------------
2002 Acura TL Type-S Dark Emerald Pearl
1986 Pontiac Fiero SE V6
1994 Ford Explorer 4x4
#9
Originally posted by Closer:
If WOT from a start. The problem is when you're in 5th gear at normal freeway speeds and you need to pass someone. Gas it and the tranny drops a gear to get power. But, you're not actually getting power, because you're no where near your peak power band. Instead you slowly accelerate while you wait for your rpms to climb into vtec. Why? The gears are too long and have too much of an rpm difference between gears.
5th gear is so tall that down shifting to 4th is like staying in 5th in any other car.
If WOT from a start. The problem is when you're in 5th gear at normal freeway speeds and you need to pass someone. Gas it and the tranny drops a gear to get power. But, you're not actually getting power, because you're no where near your peak power band. Instead you slowly accelerate while you wait for your rpms to climb into vtec. Why? The gears are too long and have too much of an rpm difference between gears.
5th gear is so tall that down shifting to 4th is like staying in 5th in any other car.
#10
Banned
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
Originally posted by bbjones:
Why not kick it over to sportshift, and drop it down to third manually?
Why not kick it over to sportshift, and drop it down to third manually?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SidhuSaaB
3G TL Problems & Fixes
18
05-30-2020 12:40 AM
MetalGearTypeS
3G TL Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
6
08-29-2016 08:28 PM
joflewbyu2
5G TLX (2015-2020)
139
10-08-2015 11:16 AM
guyvelella
2G TL (1999-2003)
8
09-30-2015 11:02 PM
AcuraKidd
Non-Automotive & Motorcycle Sales
1
09-26-2015 04:10 PM