Umm this dosnt look good (engine mount).
11-17-2005, 01:05 PM
#3
Boomer SOONER
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: McKinney, TX
Age: 41
Posts: 3,729
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes
on
14 Posts
ya looks like you need to replace that one - do all the mounts look like that inside? I know the front one has a rubber cover on it, so I havent looked at the actual mount
11-17-2005, 01:24 PM
#5
Originally Posted by ou sig
ya looks like you need to replace that one - do all the mounts look like that inside? I know the front one has a rubber cover on it, so I havent looked at the actual mount
No the other mounts look fine. They actually look new. ACura replaced those for free last time they changed the tranny
11-17-2005, 01:57 PM
#6
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Plantation
Age: 59
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dnd2984
No the other mounts look fine. They actually look new. ACura replaced those for free last time they changed the tranny
If that is the case when the tranny is replaced shouldn't it cover the replacement of the mounts also? I am such a noob when it comes to cars... sheesh.
Trending Topics
11-17-2005, 02:53 PM
#9
Originally Posted by stiletto
The first time the tranny was replaced in the car (under warranty) they replaced 2 mounts (rear-I belive close to 33K miles). 20K+ miles later (second tranny replacement) since it is out of warranty, they would not replace another cracked mount (rear). What gives with these mounts? I was told a while back that sometimes to get to the tranny components the engine mounts must be removed or replaced...
If that is the case when the tranny is replaced shouldn't it cover the replacement of the mounts also? I am such a noob when it comes to cars... sheesh.
If that is the case when the tranny is replaced shouldn't it cover the replacement of the mounts also? I am such a noob when it comes to cars... sheesh.
I really dont know man, I know I been taken both our acurars to the same dealer and the same service guy for the last 4 years. He is really cool about it. My 3rd tranny was replaced at 56k and he went ahead told them to replace the mounts to.
11-17-2005, 03:28 PM
#10
Boomer SOONER
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: McKinney, TX
Age: 41
Posts: 3,729
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes
on
14 Posts
actually mine looks like your 2nd pic (new one) and doesnt have anything that could be loose - only the rubber part, but that doesnt go all the way around - are you sure your mount is really bad? I just assumed from all that crap in there, but I can tell there is no way my mount could look like that (unless dirt got in there).
11-17-2005, 03:33 PM
#11
Originally Posted by dnd2984
Actually theres nothing worng with it according to acura and my friends at sears. But I am gonna replace it anyways.
heres a pic of the new one.
heres a pic of the new one.
11-17-2005, 03:35 PM
#12
Boomer SOONER
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: McKinney, TX
Age: 41
Posts: 3,729
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes
on
14 Posts
Originally Posted by Pure Adrenaline
Hmm, I thought the rubber was supposed to go all around. In the second picture of the first group, the top looked like it was definitely missing a chunk. But I guess that's the way it's designed. I never looked at the engine mounts up close.
11-17-2005, 03:55 PM
#16
NiGhT rIdEr
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: brooklyn, ny
Age: 45
Posts: 3,269
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally Posted by optomos
I see the rubber seperating just a little, but its not to bad. Its not the most important mount, but at 50-60 dollars its not the most expensive one either.
my front was even worse....that was $115
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sockr1
Car Parts for Sale
22
10-01-2015 01:31 AM
