Top Speed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 31, 2001 | 07:45 AM
  #1  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post Top Speed

What is the top speed for the type S? Isn't it electronically limited?
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2001 | 08:40 AM
  #2  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

top speed is 145
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2001 | 09:24 AM
  #3  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

I that 145 electronically limited? Has anybody here reached that top speed?
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2001 | 02:45 PM
  #4  
Mr.T's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
From: California, OC
Post

Originally posted by prokell:
I that 145 electronically limited? Has anybody here reached that top speed?
Dude at least break the 1000 mile mark before you try the top speed lol
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2001 | 07:59 PM
  #5  
Gomez's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
Post

If it's really only 145 then it's governed. TL-P will do almost 150; lots of people on the TL board have gone from 145-149 or so, and one guy even posted 152.

------------------
'01 White Diamond Pearl 3.2TL
-Wing, tint, wood and Whistler
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2001 | 08:06 PM
  #6  
2K2SilverTL-S's Avatar
AZ O.G NoOldManVetteOwner
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,074
Likes: 204
From: NJ/NYC
Post

You got to remember that the spedometers are "off" at that kind of speed. 152 on the spedometer is probably more 1ike 145 mph.

------------------
2002 Satin Silver TL-S With Navi
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2001 | 10:07 PM
  #7  
Gomez's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
Post

Originally posted by 2k2SilverTL-S:
You got to remember that the spedometers are "off" at that kind of speed. 152 on the spedometer is probably more 1ike 145 mph.
If they're off, then how can you assume that they're over-reporting vehicle speed? How do you even know that they are off?

I can come up with an explaination showing that the opposite is true, that at high speeds the speedo actually shows lower than true speed.

Consider centrifugal force - when something spins, it wants to spread out. In fact, the earth actually bulges at the equator due to this effect. If your car was going 140mph+, then wouldn't the tires bulge a little, too? And when they do, they'll have a larger circumference, and therefore rotate fewer times for each unit of distance covered. Hence, speed shown on the speedometer would be lower than actual speed.

Comments/suggestions?


------------------
'01 White Diamond Pearl 3.2TL
-Wing, tint, wood and Whistler
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2001 | 10:34 PM
  #8  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

x
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2001 | 11:27 PM
  #9  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

x
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2001 | 11:30 PM
  #10  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Smile

X
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2001 | 08:59 AM
  #11  
RAdams's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
Post

Honestly, this was a totally legitimate thread until HondaBTR saw fit to inject her inane comments. I think her words (and how creatively she spells them) speak volumes for her intellect.

Gomez:

You're right in that the circumference of the tire does increase as speed increases, but the change is very slight. So slight, in fact, that its effect on the actual road speed is almost negligible, especially at
"only" ~145mph. With that being said, it's pretty common for speedometers to be "off" at higher speeds, but again we don't know if it's reading too high or too low (without the use of radar), like you said, so we just go by what the speedo says.

------------------
2000 WDP 3.2TL non-NAV
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2001 | 09:09 AM
  #12  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

I'm sure that Acura does have a set top end for the TL-S. Almost would have to

If you doubt the Speedometer, which can be off at that speed, simply use a handheld gps (preferably held by a passenger). GPS units give a very acurate speed. And its easy to point them thru the sunroof or windshield glass.

Done this on in a couple vehicles. Interesting how far off a factory speedo can be.

------------------
1989 Acura Integra LS
1993 Honda Lawn Tractor
2000 Honda Rancher ES 4x4
2002 Acura TL-S (This Year)
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2001 | 09:17 AM
  #13  
RAdams's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
Post

The 1999 and 2000 TL Service Manual doesn't show any kind of artificial speed limiting device. I think the TL/TL-S top speed, along with that of other Acuras, is drag limited.

------------------
2000 WDP 3.2TL non-NAV
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2001 | 09:37 PM
  #14  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

2002 TL-S top spped should be close to 120mph or so.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2001 | 11:10 PM
  #15  
ZodiakTL's Avatar
Acura TL-S
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Post

Originally posted by pjonkheer:
2002 TL-S top spped should be close to 120mph or so.
heh... i've done 125 so far, but keep running out of room, cuz damn cars keep popping into the left lane... this car will go 148 according to the drag limited specs, and about 152 with headers(thats on the speedo, like other people said actual speed might be a little off)... at that point it just doesnt have enough ponies to push it further... also, it takes about 20 seconds to get to 120, then it can take a couple of minutes to get to top speed... i've done this with my 00TL and it took about a minute to get from 120 to 130... then i ran out of highway again


------------------
'02 Nighthawk TL-S
------------------
Comptech Springs / Comptech Headers
------------------
Alpine CVA-1005 Head Unit / Alpine G320 EQ / Alpine DVA-5205 DVD / Alpine NVE-N851A Navi / JL Audio XR653-CS 3-Way comps for the front powered by a bridged Alpine MRV-F407 amp / Boston Acoustics 5.5 ProSeries 2-Way comps for the rear powered by Alpine MRV-1002 amp / Dual 10" JL Audio W-6 sub powered by Alpine MRV-1005 amp / Two Alpine CHA-1214 CD Changers

__________________
'00 Nighthawk TL
------------------
Aem Short Ram / Comptech Sway Bars / Comptech Springs / Cross-Drilled Rotors / Pirelli SP7000 Tires
-------------
Pics of my TL and Fun/Crazy Pics
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2001 | 11:36 PM
  #16  
Closer's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,695
Likes: 1
From: Seattle
Post

Originally posted by Gomez:
Consider centrifugal force - when something spins, it wants to spread out. In fact, the earth actually bulges at the equator due to this effect. If your car was going 140mph+, then wouldn't the tires bulge a little, too? And when they do, they'll have a larger circumference, and therefore rotate fewer times for each unit of distance covered. Hence, speed shown on the speedometer would be lower than actual speed.

Comments/suggestions?


[/B]
True. But, legally... the automobile manufacturer is liable if their car is going faster than what their instrumentation says. That's why the margin of error leans to the slower than posted side. Imagine all the lawsuits from people getting in accidents and getting speeding tickets when their car is going faster than it says it is. As a manufacturer, I'd rather go on the safe side and avoid that risk.

Backyard mechanic testing: for the most part, cars are slower than their speedo (at the strip we noticed that). No proof, just taken a few runs and thought I had a certain speed only to find out it was a couple mph lower when I got my read out.

Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Yumcha
Automotive News
70
Dec 7, 2020 05:39 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
4
Aug 15, 2019 12:58 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
1
Sep 17, 2015 09:01 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
2
Sep 17, 2015 08:57 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
2
Sep 17, 2015 10:16 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:46 AM.