TL for S2000..........?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-29-2001, 08:26 AM
  #1  
Original Member #81
Thread Starter
 
NSX4dr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Age: 51
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question TL for S2000..........?

I've been thinking about getting rid of the TL. I know I know.......but I want something faster and the 6speed TL won't be out for some time......Help me out guys what do you think?
I'm thinking about getting a new yellow S2000 w/black leather..........any comments?

------------------
Comptech exhaust
Ground Control coilovers
custom 3" air intake
Wings West front air dam
18x7.5 Alstadts w/ 53mm offset
225/40/18 Kumho Ecsta Supras
Plastic on grill color matched
Razo shift knob
153mph Top Speed

194.8hp @ the wheels
NSX4dr is offline  
Old 05-29-2001, 08:42 AM
  #2  
Three Wheelin'
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Age: 46
Posts: 1,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

The S2K is definately an awesome car. A friend of mine has the exact same car that you are considering. All I can say is that if you want a good handling car and fun to drive, the S2k would suit you nicely. Anyhow, I have some pictures of his car at Summit Point raceway that might wet your taste buds. Dont mind the mud, for that he a little incident.

http://albums.photopoint.com/j/Album...a=12757367&f=0

------------------
'00 White Diamond Pearl w/Nav & VoN Kit
20% tint, WW Spoiler, Comptech Exaust, Rear Comptech Sway bar, H&R OE Sport Springs, AEM CAI, Inspire Tails, Inspire Interior footwell lighting
PhiTL is offline  
Old 05-29-2001, 08:44 AM
  #3  
Instructor
 
Inspire32V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

My family would kill me if I got rid of the four doors and 5 passenger seating but if I had the choice like you, I'd do it in a heartbeat! S2K is my dream machine! BADASS Roadster!

------------------


<FONT COLOR="#800080" SIZE="1" FACE="Verdana, Arial">[This message has been edited by Inspire32V on May 29, 2001 @ ]</font>
Inspire32V is offline  
Old 05-29-2001, 10:58 AM
  #4  
Pro
 
socal28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Post

They are two very different cars! Everything is opposite! From one being rear-wheel drive and the other front-wheel drive to digital to analog gauges! Everything you're use to on the TL is opposite on the S2000.
It took me awhile to get use to the S2000. Now I love it!
Personally, I'd wait for the 2002 models. They are going to a have blue color option and rumors of glass back!

------------------
1999 Dark Emerald Pearl TL w/ nav
Factory underbody kit and rear spoiler.
Comptech springs, sways, headers and exhaust.
18x7.5 +48 5Zigen Heidfeld wheels with 225/40ZR18 Nitto NT-555 tires.
Inspire Tail-lights with Polarg M-23 P8711R signal bulbs.
DEI Viper 550ESP Alarm
Pics of my TL
Pics of my S2000
socal28 is offline  
Old 05-29-2001, 12:29 PM
  #5  
Sticky Rice OwnZ joO
 
Edub-TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Bay Area & Sacramento, Cali
Age: 47
Posts: 4,246
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

Originally posted by NSX4DR:

I'm thinking about getting a new yellow S2000 w/black leather..........any comments?

YES YES YES!!!! GET IT!!

------------------
June 10, 11AM - N. Cali / Bay Area Meet - Click Here!
<A HREF="http://www.geocities.com/phanthavong/mytl.html" TARGET=_blank>
</A>2001 SSM. 02 tails, 02 vent trim, burlwood knob.

Mods? What mods? I can't afford mods, I'm getting married!!
Vin says 2001, but it's really a 2000 with an upgraded cupholder!!
Edub-TL is offline  
Old 05-29-2001, 04:09 PM
  #6  
Drifting
 
SL1200MK4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Toronto Ont Canada
Posts: 3,277
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Post

Depends on the way you drive. S2000 is a very unique car. You need to keep the VETC active or else the car is gonna feel like a Civic. If you want to do fast 1/4 or 0-60. You have to dump the clutch HARD!!!

A friend on mine have the S2000. I have to say that the car is AMAZING on the track. But not so exciting for normal city driving. Because you don't feel the torque, unlike the Vette that push you back everytime you floor it. I am not saying that the S2000 is slow, it's just that it's fast in a different way!

Oh, and I doubt the safety of the S2000 as few fatal accidents happened in HK & Japan...etc.
SL1200MK4 is offline  
Old 05-29-2001, 06:50 PM
  #7  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Cool

Originally posted by SL1200MK4:
Depends on the way you drive. S2000 is a very unique car. You need to keep the VETC active or else the car is gonna feel like a Civic. If you want to do fast 1/4 or 0-60. You have to dump the clutch HARD!!!

A friend on mine have the S2000. I have to say that the car is AMAZING on the track. But not so exciting for normal city driving. Because you don't feel the torque, unlike the Vette that push you back everytime you floor it. I am not saying that the S2000 is slow, it's just that it's fast in a different way!

Oh, and I doubt the safety of the S2000 as few fatal accidents happened in HK & Japan...etc.
This is valid if you are comparing the car against a vette, etc. But what if you don't care to have detroit iron, or care about who you have to race? I believe, compared to a Civic any other street cars out there, that the torque to weight ratio is plenty spirited for everyday driving, and you can do a jekyl/hide by just letting the revvs go up into the right side.

I see plenty of bald old men who drive their Vettes, etc. below the speed limit just to be in your way and get noticed. Not me, give me clear road or track and let me have my own fun! Sure if they want, they can punch it, melt tires, and be pushed back in the seat. But I can drive with a grin on my face all day and not worry about working off testosterone like that.

------------------
------------------
Had 2000 3.2TL... Realized I like smaller cars.

Now I have:
2001 Civic EX Coupe, Black, Auto... wife uses mostly. Getting 36 MPG overall.
Pictures
1999 CR-V EX 4WD Auto White... bad weather car, hauls stuff including bicycle.
1992 MR-2 5-Speed T-Tops 2.2L, Greddy SP S/S Exhaust... sunny-day car.


Next up: MR2 gets sacrificed to make garage
space for a Yellow S2000!!!!

<FONT COLOR="#800080" SIZE="1" FACE="Verdana, Arial">[This message has been edited by Einstein on May 29, 2001 @ ]</font>
 
Old 05-29-2001, 10:19 PM
  #8  
Senior Moderator
 
Shoofin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Brooklyn, NY USA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,085
Received 740 Likes on 309 Posts
Post

I wouldn't trade the TL to get an S2000, i'd get the S2000 in addition.... two different cars, IMO..
Ed

------------------
Acura-TL.com - Forum Moderator
'66 Mustang Fastback
'99 Mazda Miata
'99 Acura TL Satin Silver/Ebony, Non/Nav, Comptech Springs and Sways, CL Type S wheels wrapped with 225/45/17 Dunlop SP9000's, Comptech Air Filter Element, Inspire Tails, AEM Brake Pads all around, Comptech Axle Back Exhaust, Gutter Guard Grille, "Guy Smiley" doll on the dash as my Co-driver...

Pics of my TL
Pics of my Miata! Wadya think?
Shoofin is offline  
Old 05-29-2001, 10:32 PM
  #9  
Burning Brakes
 
Gomez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

You should drive the S2000 before you get set on it - lots less torque than the TL.

Sure, it'll do 0-60 in about 5 1/2 seconds. However, in a recent road test I read the drivers did a second comparison run shifting not at redline but at 7,000 RPM instead. The result? 0-60 time of over 10 seconds. So, to get the power and performance out of it, "you gotta drive it like you just stole it."

I say get a Z3 3.0 or perhaps a used M Roadster!

------------------
'01 White Diamond Pearl 3.2TL
-Wing, tint, wood and Whistler
Gomez is offline  
Old 05-29-2001, 11:46 PM
  #10  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Lightbulb

I would highly recommend it if it fits your lifestyle (zip luggage space, no room to wiggle, etc.) Do like I plan, keep it in the garage for sunny days, something else for typical duty.

------------------
------------------
Had 2000 3.2TL... Realized I like smaller cars.

Now I have:
2001 Civic EX Coupe, Black, Auto... wife uses mostly. Getting 36 MPG overall.
Pictures
1999 CR-V EX 4WD Auto White... bad weather car, hauls stuff including bicycle.
1992 MR-2 5-Speed T-Tops 2.2L, Greddy SP S/S Exhaust... sunny-day car.


Next up: MR2 gets sacrificed to make garage
space for a Yellow S2000!!!!
 
Old 05-30-2001, 12:22 AM
  #11  
Safety Car
 
TommyBoiSxty9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Age: 42
Posts: 4,026
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

JUST NO YELLOW!!
TommyBoiSxty9 is offline  
Old 05-30-2001, 12:48 AM
  #12  
Pro
 
Rice1304's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Originally posted by Gomez:
You should drive the S2000 before you get set on it - lots less torque than the TL.

Sure, it'll do 0-60 in about 5 1/2 seconds. However, in a recent road test I read the drivers did a second comparison run shifting not at redline but at 7,000 RPM instead. The result? 0-60 time of over 10 seconds. So, to get the power and performance out of it, "you gotta drive it like you just stole it."

I say get a Z3 3.0 or perhaps a used M Roadster!

Yeah but why would you want to shift at 7k instead of 8.9k? That's like testing a 360 and saying that it's crappy because it does 0-60 quite slower when you shift at 5k.
Rice1304 is offline  
Old 05-30-2001, 01:20 AM
  #13  
Pro
 
Pimpin_TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: houston
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Z3 or M ROADSTER???


NSXnext: man, you missed out be a couple weeks. Some guy was selling his supercharged S2k on ebay... that would be one FAST car... It depends tho, if you don't mind cramped area, don't need the space, luxury, etc, get the S2k if thats what you want.. But I'm positive of one thing, you'll miss the luxury, comfort of the TL day to day driving. I think the S2k makes a very fine second or weekend car, but i don't see many ppl using it as a daily driver, although i'm sure you could, its still a honda, reliable, good gas mileage, etc. if you want to go for pure sport, get it and supercharge it!Looking at your sig, you seem to be a speed freak.. if so, the TL is not a solution, Type S or not (Sorry guys), its not a race car, and its quite heavy. If you really wanna go crazy, may i suggest getting a used Supra Turbo, and upgrading it with blitz turbo ?
Originally posted by Gomez:
You should drive the S2000 before you get set on it - lots less torque than the TL.

Sure, it'll do 0-60 in about 5 1/2 seconds. However, in a recent road test I read the drivers did a second comparison run shifting not at redline but at 7,000 RPM instead. The result? 0-60 time of over 10 seconds. So, to get the power and performance out of it, "you gotta drive it like you just stole it."

I say get a Z3 3.0 or perhaps a used M Roadster!

Pimpin_TL is offline  
Old 05-30-2001, 07:23 AM
  #14  
Burning Brakes
 
bobatimez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Age: 43
Posts: 918
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

no trade, just add on or nothing. and wait for 2002.

------------------


Some Said, "TL Type S," Soon They Will Say, "Wannabe TL-S." Laguna METALLIC, Navi, Side Cuts, Tint All Around, Interior Footwell Lighting, Eibach ProKit, PIAA 1700x Fogs custom cut into side holes, Akimoto Intake, Inspire Tails, 17" Type-S Rims with 215/45/17 Bridgestone Potenza RE730's, Visor, Wood Shifter, Comptech Sways making me ride on rails...

http://albums.photopoint.com/j/Album...026&Auth=false
bobatimez is offline  
Old 05-30-2001, 07:52 AM
  #15  
Pro
 
hunter001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

IF the S2000 came as an S2800 (with a 2.8L V6/I6), and in Sedan form, I would trade-up my beloved TL in and purchase it....assuming that it comes equipped with the NAV system as an option, which is a must for me.



------------------
2000 Naples Gold 3.2TL/Navi - Factory Stock but with up-graded tires
hunter001 is offline  
Old 05-30-2001, 08:16 AM
  #16  
Advanced
 
quick5hift's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

boba thats one nice ride...very clean look
quick5hift is offline  
Old 05-30-2001, 08:35 AM
  #17  
Burning Brakes
 
Gomez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Originally posted by Rice1304:
Yeah but why would you want to shift at 7k instead of 8.9k? That's like testing a 360 and saying that it's crappy because it does 0-60 quite slower when you shift at 5k.
How ignorant... I suppose you always drive your TL full-throttle and run it up to the redline? No, because it has ample torque and good power anywhere on the RPM band. Not the S2000, though - you gotta ream it out to get any sort of performance.

Personally, I don't want to have to hear an engine scream and wait to get to over 8000 RPM just to get on the freeway every time.

Maybe you should just drive a motorcycle, Rice?

And by the way, a 360 Ferrari has a large engine with plenty of torque down low unlike an S2000. Road and Track wouldn't have even brought up the 7000 RPM 0-60 time of the S2000 if it wasn't so noteworthy and slow.

Now go hop on the subway and smell the magic...

------------------
'01 White Diamond Pearl 3.2TL
-Wing, tint, wood and Whistler
Gomez is offline  
Old 05-30-2001, 01:08 PM
  #18  
Pro
 
Rice1304's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Originally posted by Gomez:
How ignorant... I suppose you always drive your TL full-throttle and run it up to the redline? No, because it has ample torque and good power anywhere on the RPM band. Not the S2000, though - you gotta ream it out to get any sort of performance.

Personally, I don't want to have to hear an engine scream and wait to get to over 8000 RPM just to get on the freeway every time.

Maybe you should just drive a motorcycle, Rice?

And by the way, a 360 Ferrari has a large engine with plenty of torque down low unlike an S2000. Road and Track wouldn't have even brought up the 7000 RPM 0-60 time of the S2000 if it wasn't so noteworthy and slow.

Now go hop on the subway and smell the magic...

my point is, who cares if you "have to hear the engine scream" (you're making it sound as if it were a bad thing!!!). People who talk about "usable power" are stupid. The bottom line is that the s2k can and will still get you to 60 mph about the same time as an e36 m3. You just have to rev it higher. There is no law that says you can't rev over 7k rpm!!!! Besides, on the torque curve above, after 5.5 torque significantly increases.

<FONT COLOR="#800080" SIZE="1" FACE="Verdana, Arial">[This message has been edited by Rice1304 on May 30, 2001 @ ]</font>
Rice1304 is offline  
Old 05-30-2001, 01:57 PM
  #19  
Senior Moderator
 
Shoofin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Brooklyn, NY USA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,085
Received 740 Likes on 309 Posts
Post

No no no no, you've got it all wrong! Drive it like you HATE it, not stole it..
Ed
Shoofin is offline  
Old 05-30-2001, 08:06 PM
  #20  
Burning Brakes
 
bobatimez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Age: 43
Posts: 918
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

this is going a long way towards showing how lost TL people are in terms of s2000s. Just drive one than talk and not a second before because the numbers don't do it justice. driving it is like a direct extension of ur body going 99 mph on the ridge road. never felt anything like it.

------------------


Some Said, "TL Type S," Soon They Will Say, "Wannabe TL-S." Laguna METALLIC, Navi, Side Cuts, Tint All Around, Interior Footwell Lighting, Eibach ProKit, PIAA 1700x Fogs custom cut into side holes, Akimoto Intake, Inspire Tails, 17" Type-S Rims with 215/45/17 Bridgestone Potenza RE730's, Visor, Wood Shifter, Comptech Sways making me ride on rails...

http://albums.photopoint.com/j/Album...026&Auth=false
bobatimez is offline  
Old 05-30-2001, 08:13 PM
  #21  
Racer
 
Don's TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Originally posted by Pimpin_TL:
Z3 or M ROADSTER???

If you really wanna go crazy, may i suggest getting a used Supra Turbo, and upgrading it with blitz turbo ?
Yeah man, what he said. Go all out and get a Supra turbo, BPU it and go single! That's what I'm thinking about too, just have to find one in good condition!



------------------
'00 Taffeta White TL w/NAV
-Weapon-R intake
-Piaa 1700x and Polarg M-14 bulbs
-white acura emblems and custom clear headlights
-NEX Coilovers ( For sale $800 + shipping)
-Tanabe Hyper Medallion Dual Exhaust
-18" Racing Hart C-5 3-piece +50 offset with P7000SS 225-40-18 (sold, ridding on stocks!
-A'pexi V-AFC
-Inspire Tails

My Ride
Don's TL is offline  
Old 05-30-2001, 08:45 PM
  #22  
Drifting
 
SL1200MK4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Toronto Ont Canada
Posts: 3,277
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Post

Well, I think the Supra is gonna go CRAZY on the straight highway or drag strip.

The S2000 will feel like a kart on the track.

Like I said the S2000 is unique. It's loud when you want to drive it fast, because you have to rev it. Sure the thing moves but you'll miss torque eventually...
SL1200MK4 is offline  
Old 05-30-2001, 11:11 PM
  #23  
Pro
 
socal28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Post

[quote]Originally posted by Gomez:
[b]
Originally posted by Rice1304:
Yeah but why would you want to shift at 7k instead of 8.9k? That's like testing a 360 and saying that it's crappy because it does 0-60 quite slower when you shift at 5k.
How ignorant... I suppose you always drive your TL full-throttle and run it up to the redline? No, because it has ample torque and good power anywhere on the RPM band. Not the S2000, though - you gotta ream it out to get any sort of performance.

Personally, I don't want to have to hear an engine scream and wait to get to over 8000 RPM just to get on the freeway every time.

Maybe you should just drive a motorcycle, Rice?

And by the way, a 360 Ferrari has a large engine with plenty of torque down low unlike an S2000. Road and Track wouldn't have even brought up the 7000 RPM 0-60 time of the S2000 if it wasn't so noteworthy and slow.

Now go hop on the subway and smell the magic...

In defense of the S2000....since I do have one!
The low torque isn't that bad. And the torque is pretty flat from 3k to 9k RPMS with a little jump at VTEC. ~130 torque max isn't bad for a 2700lb car. I'm pretty confident I can keep up with a stock Civic Si without going to VTEC (pass 6k RPM) and keep up with a Boxster S going to 9k RPM.
But it is true that you do have to drive it like you stole it to really get the performance out of it!


Just my .02 cents.


------------------
1999 Dark Emerald Pearl TL w/ nav
Factory underbody kit and rear spoiler.
Comptech springs, sways, headers and exhaust.
18x7.5 +48 5Zigen Heidfeld wheels with 225/40ZR18 Nitto NT-555 tires.
Inspire Tail-lights with Polarg M-23 P8711R signal bulbs.
DEI Viper 550ESP Alarm
Pics of my TL
Pics of my S2000

<FONT COLOR="#800080" SIZE="1" FACE="Verdana, Arial">[This message has been edited by socal28 on May 30, 2001 @ ]</font>
socal28 is offline  
Old 05-16-2005, 05:20 PM
  #24  
Scru U guyz, Im Goin Home
iTrader: (1)
 
boku's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: EsEfCee
Age: 46
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Get an Insight

....Hella fast!
boku is offline  
Old 05-16-2005, 05:23 PM
  #25  
Three Wheelin'
 
big mike 13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NYC
Age: 38
Posts: 1,711
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
,lol... the thread is over 4 years old.....
big mike 13 is offline  
Old 05-16-2005, 05:28 PM
  #26  
Scru U guyz, Im Goin Home
iTrader: (1)
 
boku's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: EsEfCee
Age: 46
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hey, it's never too late.
boku is offline  
Old 05-16-2005, 05:55 PM
  #27  
Intermediate
 
Bushwah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Parker, CO
Age: 47
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[QUOTE=Shoofin]I wouldn't trade the TL to get an S2000, i'd get the S2000 in addition.... two different cars, IMO..
Ed


if you can afford it.
Bushwah is offline  
Old 05-16-2005, 11:12 PM
  #28  
Ganji, Want some?
 
VITEK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Da HELL A WHERE?
Age: 40
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OMG!!! THAT WAS SOME OL CYBER BUMP SHIT! HE BUMPED THIS THREAD BACK FROM THE FUTURE. I WAS THINKING THE SAME THING "damn... this thread is old as hell, damn, its four years old. who didn't either have a life or who was REALLY bored!!!!!!"
VITEK is offline  




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:44 PM.