TL-S vs GS300

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-19-2005, 04:22 PM
  #1  
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
01blkv6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Age: 50
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TL-S vs GS300

Had a run in with the current Lexus GS300 on Georgia Ave on my way to DC. We both pull up to light and I KNEW this guy was gonna try something, so light goes green I go a lil stronger than normail, not WOT. and he is right with me, then he is GONE. I was like ok, whatever. So next light I said I am gonna show him whats up. Light goes green, he gets me off the line ONLY because I was not paying attn. I nailed it and it seemed like he sat still, I FLEW by him. I let up and he come back weaving in and out of traffic and he gets back in the middle lane, I am in the third lane and we are side by side, he hits it AGAIN, I hit it, and again, his car seemed as if it sat still as I passed. So they are no match, but I know the GS 400/430 is a differwnt story. Just thought I would share!
Old 01-19-2005, 04:26 PM
  #2  
NiGhT rIdEr
 
bkzjimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: brooklyn, ny
Age: 45
Posts: 3,269
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
good kill!
Old 01-19-2005, 04:33 PM
  #3  
Drifting
 
aaronnn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Jersey City
Age: 38
Posts: 3,197
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
lexus' are slow. at least the camry engine 3.0L's. i doubt that GS300 woulda kept up, theyre just wayy too heavy and their suspensions are just way too soft to even be handling that well. the only thing the GS's have going for them are the rear wheel drives. but even the new FF ES330 cant keep up with the TL. its just not gonna happen.

and another thing, you have a TL-S. you got 260hp if it was stock. and the sports suspension. the lexus' 300 engines only have 210.. it just wouldnt compete. even a TLP can pass it, not easily, but still up there. the new 330 engines have 220 or 230 hp i think. even those cant beat the TL-S.
Old 01-19-2005, 04:33 PM
  #4  
Banned
 
1fasttl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Santa Clarita, Ca
Age: 48
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Nice kill. The GS400 isn't that fast. I've mopped up plenty of those.
Old 01-19-2005, 04:34 PM
  #5  
Dragging knees in
iTrader: (2)
 
Pure Adrenaline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Seattle Area
Age: 42
Posts: 12,434
Received 32 Likes on 21 Posts
Nice kill.
Old 01-19-2005, 04:37 PM
  #6  
Resident Troll.
 
ndawood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Richmond Hill, Ontario
Age: 41
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
the gs 300/400/430 are not really cars to worry about... just watchout when you run into a turbo gs300...... then you are in trouble!
Old 01-19-2005, 04:38 PM
  #7  
'99 Acura 3.2TL
 
@cUr@-TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Quebec
Age: 37
Posts: 4,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ndawood
the gs 300/400/430 are not really cars to worry about... just watchout when you run into a turbo gs300...... then you are in trouble!

dood a GS430 is faster than a stock Type-S... 300hp and more torque than a Type-S... the GS400 and TL-S are pretty close tho... but i think the GS400 could win...
Old 01-19-2005, 04:39 PM
  #8  
Resident Troll.
 
ndawood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Richmond Hill, Ontario
Age: 41
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by @cUr@-TL
dood a GS400/430 is faster than a stock Type-S... 300hp and more torque than a Type-S...
and heavier... I have gone against both of them stock and it wasnt that hard.
Old 01-19-2005, 04:40 PM
  #9  
Drifting
 
aaronnn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Jersey City
Age: 38
Posts: 3,197
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by @cUr@-TL
dood a GS400/430 is faster than a stock Type-S... 300hp and more torque than a Type-S...
uhhhh.. those V-8 TANKS are HEAVY as F***. before you compare hp stats, compare weight and the 0-60 speed. the TL's weight to power ratio is still better.
Old 01-19-2005, 04:41 PM
  #10  
'99 Acura 3.2TL
 
@cUr@-TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Quebec
Age: 37
Posts: 4,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ndawood
and heavier... I have gone against both of them stock and it wasnt that hard.
oh well they didnt know how to drive or their car was messed up... for real..
Old 01-19-2005, 04:42 PM
  #11  
'99 Acura 3.2TL
 
@cUr@-TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Quebec
Age: 37
Posts: 4,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by aaronnn
uhhhh.. those V-8 TANKS are HEAVY as F***. before you compare hp stats, compare weight and the 0-60 speed. the TL's weight to power ratio is still better.

i know they're heavy but they're still faster...

0-60 times range from like 5.7 to 6 sec.. quarter mile in around 14sec @ over 100mph...
Old 01-19-2005, 04:42 PM
  #12  
Resident Troll.
 
ndawood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Richmond Hill, Ontario
Age: 41
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by @cUr@-TL
oh well they didnt know how to drive or their car was messed up... for real..
just because someone has more hp and looses a race does not necessarily mean that they cant drive or messed up.... a car can be heavy and slow them down as well.....
Old 01-19-2005, 04:44 PM
  #13  
'99 Acura 3.2TL
 
@cUr@-TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Quebec
Age: 37
Posts: 4,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ndawood
just because someone has more hp and looses a race does not necessarily mean that they cant drive or messed up.... a car can be heavy and slow them down as well.....

that's not what i said, i said the GS430 is faster and that if it'S running like it should it 's gonna be in front of the type-s.

anyways... let's stop hi-jacking the thread, you know im right man

btw, congrats on ur 1000th post
Old 01-19-2005, 04:47 PM
  #14  
Resident Troll.
 
ndawood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Richmond Hill, Ontario
Age: 41
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by @cUr@-TL
that's not what i said, i said the GS430 is faster and that if it'S running like it should it 's gonna be in front of the type-s.

anyways... let's stop hi-jacking the thread, you know im right man
dont hate cause you cant run with the big boys and the type s


thanx man i didnt even notice that im already at 1000!!
Old 01-19-2005, 05:32 PM
  #15  
Banned
 
55M2G7L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 9,984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ive beaten stock type S'
Old 01-19-2005, 05:48 PM
  #16  
Banned
 
Jput's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Springfield, Mo
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nice kill i hate those GS300's they are ugly
Old 01-19-2005, 05:50 PM
  #17  
Banned
 
55M2G7L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 9,984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
imo, i like the way th gs400s look, with the hids and yellow fogs, especially in black, looks nice
Old 01-20-2005, 02:22 AM
  #18  
Skills: nunchuku skills
 
jaroque's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 42
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by aaronnn
lexus' are slow. at least the camry engine 3.0L's. i doubt that GS300 woulda kept up, theyre just wayy too heavy and their suspensions are just way too soft to even be handling that well. the only thing the GS's have going for them are the rear wheel drives. but even the new FF ES330 cant keep up with the TL. its just not gonna happen.

and another thing, you have a TL-S. you got 260hp if it was stock. and the sports suspension. the lexus' 300 engines only have 210.. it just wouldnt compete. even a TLP can pass it, not easily, but still up there. the new 330 engines have 220 or 230 hp i think. even those cant beat the TL-S.

gs300's and is300's use the inline-6 from the supra - 2jz-ge's, and not the 3.0L camry engines.
Old 01-20-2005, 02:46 AM
  #19  
Senior Moderator
 
Ken1997TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,641
Received 2,329 Likes on 1,309 Posts
Originally Posted by jaroque
gs300's and is300's use the inline-6 from the supra - 2jz-ge's, and not the 3.0L camry engines.


Beat me to it.
Old 01-20-2005, 08:25 PM
  #20  
極品インスパイア32V
 
InspireUA5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hm....what about TL-P compare with 03/04 Accord EXV6 Coupe Auto?
Old 01-20-2005, 08:36 PM
  #21  
Senior Moderator
 
Ken1997TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,641
Received 2,329 Likes on 1,309 Posts
Originally Posted by InspireUA5
hm....what about TL-P compare with 03/04 Accord EXV6 Coupe Auto?
If the Accord is running premium gas, it has about 250 hp at the crank vs 225 for a TL-P.

Also it weighs less than a TL.
Old 01-21-2005, 12:23 AM
  #22  
極品インスパイア32V
 
InspireUA5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I used to use Octane 94 gas....and the accord uses Octane 91 gas
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MetalGearTypeS
3G TL Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
6
08-29-2016 08:28 PM
LogicWavelength
3G TL Photograph Gallery
33
11-01-2015 09:38 AM
Timmy18
5G TLX (2015-2020)
78
10-17-2015 03:58 PM
Acura604
3G TL (2004-2008)
10
09-28-2015 12:24 PM
UA7_Ando
3G TL (2004-2008)
10
09-28-2015 07:53 AM



Quick Reply: TL-S vs GS300



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:11 PM.