Short Ram For Type S
#1
3rd Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rockville, MD
Age: 34
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Short Ram For Type S
Where can i get a short ram for the type s ? everywhere i go it says not for type S. Does it really matter theres some that dont say not for type S. What do you guys suggest!?
#2
why do you want a short ram? Short ram does practically nothing for performance gains, except for the noise. It makes sense if you only want noise, but why not get horsepower and noise combined with a CAI?
if you're dead set on a short ram, then get a K&N cone filter and make it yourself
if you're dead set on a short ram, then get a K&N cone filter and make it yourself
#4
Volks FTW!!!
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: TheWildWest
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
please do me a favor and do not get the short ram. it does nothing for your car and just reuses the hot air under the hood. pay a little more for a cai and you will be glad you did. trust me my friend, this is one thing you won't regret doing.
#7
3rd Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rockville, MD
Age: 34
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yea i was 100% set on the cold air injen but my buddy works at a shop and has had 4 locked up engines this month from the cai.and 3 of the 4 were done. nd its been raining alot lately.
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by DPGT03
yea i was 100% set on the cold air injen but my buddy works at a shop and has had 4 locked up engines this month from the cai.and 3 of the 4 were done. nd its been raining alot lately.
#9
Senior Moderator
Oh and if your that concerned about it, get the Comptech Icebox.
#10
-Arsenic-
Originally Posted by DPGT03
yea i was 100% set on the cold air injen but my buddy works at a shop and has had 4 locked up engines this month from the cai.and 3 of the 4 were done. nd its been raining alot lately.
#11
Originally Posted by 02type-s
The non-Type-S uses smaller tubing than the Type-S, so no. Use what is made for the Type-S. And a short ram is useless, go with cold air.
I don't think so on the tube sizing Many on this forum are using the old 3.2 CAI's on their TL-S's 3.5, since almost no one builds a CAI for the 3.5. I've been on Fujita, AEM, K&N's website, and no one has one. They don't bother with the shortram, since as everyone has says, they produce no hp gain.
As to hydrolocking, there must be some risk, or else K&N wouldn't provide a "raincoat" with theirs. Not saying it's common, but a risk.
#12
I just installed my new P2R thermoblock from excelerate.com today. Pretty impressed with "seat of the pants" diff. I would recommend it for cheap and easily installed hp gains if you have doubts about the CAI.
#14
-Arsenic-
Originally Posted by S PAW 1
`
I don't think so on the tube sizing Many on this forum are using the old 3.2 CAI's on their TL-S's 3.5, since almost no one builds a CAI for the 3.5. I've been on Fujita, AEM, K&N's website, and no one has one. They don't bother with the shortram, since as everyone has says, they produce no hp gain.
As to hydrolocking, there must be some risk, or else K&N wouldn't provide a "raincoat" with theirs. Not saying it's common, but a risk.
I don't think so on the tube sizing Many on this forum are using the old 3.2 CAI's on their TL-S's 3.5, since almost no one builds a CAI for the 3.5. I've been on Fujita, AEM, K&N's website, and no one has one. They don't bother with the shortram, since as everyone has says, they produce no hp gain.
As to hydrolocking, there must be some risk, or else K&N wouldn't provide a "raincoat" with theirs. Not saying it's common, but a risk.
#15
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by S PAW 1
`
I don't think so on the tube sizing Many on this forum are using the old 3.2 CAI's on their TL-S's 3.5, since almost no one builds a CAI for the 3.5. I've been on Fujita, AEM, K&N's website, and no one has one. They don't bother with the shortram, since as everyone has says, they produce no hp gain.
As to hydrolocking, there must be some risk, or else K&N wouldn't provide a "raincoat" with theirs. Not saying it's common, but a risk.
I don't think so on the tube sizing Many on this forum are using the old 3.2 CAI's on their TL-S's 3.5, since almost no one builds a CAI for the 3.5. I've been on Fujita, AEM, K&N's website, and no one has one. They don't bother with the shortram, since as everyone has says, they produce no hp gain.
As to hydrolocking, there must be some risk, or else K&N wouldn't provide a "raincoat" with theirs. Not saying it's common, but a risk.
As to the 3.5 part of it, the TB isnt ANY bigger since you are using the Type-s IM and TB
#16
Thanks for the information. I thought I was pretty knowledgeable on CAI's, but the newer TL-S has me confused. I must have missed some serious information .
What is the IM? The TL-S appears to have a pretty efficient "CAI" built in from the factory. Until a CAI mfr. builds a better "mousetrap" specifically for the TL-S, it appears as though the only thing an aftermarket CAI adds is noise(although one man's noise is another mans music). All information is fully appreciated!
What is the IM? The TL-S appears to have a pretty efficient "CAI" built in from the factory. Until a CAI mfr. builds a better "mousetrap" specifically for the TL-S, it appears as though the only thing an aftermarket CAI adds is noise(although one man's noise is another mans music). All information is fully appreciated!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BoricuaTL
Car Parts for Sale
138
04-08-2016 01:08 PM
BlkTxAcuraTypeS
Member Cars for Sale
3
10-18-2015 08:05 PM
Mugen TSX
Eastern Canada
0
09-01-2015 11:11 PM