dumb question
On the same tranny, I think it was Car and Driver or R/T mag that posted faster times for the TL-S. Numbers would be different with a CL-S 6 tho.
The only stupid question is the one that was never asked. (My DI's words)
Vicman
________________
03 TL- Type-S SSM
The only stupid question is the one that was never asked. (My DI's words)
Vicman
________________
03 TL- Type-S SSM
There aren't stupid questions, just stupid people...
The cars are the same with the same engine, but the CL-S would be lighter and theoretically quicker. The manual CL-S would indeed be quicker by appx .5 seconds to 60 and about the same for the 1/4...
With such minimal differences, it really comes down to the driver and road, tires, etc if anything, but again, the CL-S "should" be quicker in any form...
The cars are the same with the same engine, but the CL-S would be lighter and theoretically quicker. The manual CL-S would indeed be quicker by appx .5 seconds to 60 and about the same for the 1/4...
With such minimal differences, it really comes down to the driver and road, tires, etc if anything, but again, the CL-S "should" be quicker in any form...
I have to give credit where credit's due...My ex was a teacher and that was the running joke among her and all her teacher friends...
And yes, it may be hard to believe but even some of you might have a stupid child (or be stupid yourselves). I won't point any fingers, though. I promise...Maybe...
And yes, it may be hard to believe but even some of you might have a stupid child (or be stupid yourselves). I won't point any fingers, though. I promise...Maybe...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
navtool.com
5G TLX Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
31
Nov 16, 2015 08:30 PM
DerrickW
3G TL Performance Parts & Modifications
9
Nov 15, 2015 05:52 PM
navtool.com
1G RDX Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
1
Sep 25, 2015 05:15 PM


why didn't I think of that (member of enough forums to have given that one out a few times myself 