Being a previous 2G owner and currnet 3G owner
#1
Racer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Philly, PA
Age: 47
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Being a previous 2G owner and currnet 3G owner
I would say I like the 2G better. Its refinement is far better. 3G is designed to intrigue people with facy looks and gadgets. But after a while you will realize those aren't important stuff for a car.
2G has definitely engine noise and vibration. Car is more stable on highway speed, but 3G feel busy and very bumpy.
3G people wouldn't allow me to miss my 2G on their forum, so hope you can accept me back.
2G has definitely engine noise and vibration. Car is more stable on highway speed, but 3G feel busy and very bumpy.
3G people wouldn't allow me to miss my 2G on their forum, so hope you can accept me back.
#3
Originally Posted by gainful
I would say I like the 2G better. Its refinement is far better. 3G is designed to intrigue people with facy looks and gadgets. But after a while you will realize those aren't important stuff for a car.
2G has definitely engine noise and vibration. Car is more stable on highway speed, but 3G feel busy and very bumpy.
3G people wouldn't allow me to miss my 2G on their forum, so hope you can accept me back.
2G has definitely engine noise and vibration. Car is more stable on highway speed, but 3G feel busy and very bumpy.
3G people wouldn't allow me to miss my 2G on their forum, so hope you can accept me back.
#4
Senior Moderator
being a 2g owner and having driven a 3g a few times i much rather have the 3g
#5
Racer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Philly, PA
Age: 47
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by fsttyms1
being a 2g owner and having driven a 3g a few times i much rather have the 3g
#6
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by gainful
Felt the same way until I got a 3G. Big disappointment....When the showing-offs to your friends are over, you will start missing the tranquility and smoothness of 2G
![Dunno](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/dunno.gif)
Trending Topics
#8
Dragging knees in
iTrader: (2)
![](http://teamrevolution.net/gallery/data/500/185both_TLs.jpg)
I like the 3G's features and gadgets. It is more advanced, but then again, that's pretty obvious given the fact that the technology behind the 3G is 5 years newer.
But that doesn't mean the 2G falls behind. Oh, no. I love my 2G. The design is not exactly breathtaking, but it has very classy lines and it exudes upscale ambience with a bit of a hot and wild side with the current modifications.
Driving characteristics-wise, I like the 3G, speaking stock versus stock. The chassis is more rigid, and the suspension can handles the corners very well. 2G falls behind in that department, but it's not quite a Geo Metro, either. Both cars inspire confidence and handles well for family sedans.
Bottom line... I'll never trade my 2G for a 3G. But even if I wasn't a biased owner of my modified 2G, then I would have to say that, after much consideration, I would have to give the nod to the 3G. But once again, the 3G's technology is 5 years newer, which is a lifetime in the automotive industry. Therefore, it's not really a legitimate, objective comparison. Then again, what is objective when it comes to cars? It's all about the gut feelings and the emotions when you look at the car, and when you're behind the wheel.
![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
#9
Racer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Philly, PA
Age: 47
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pure Adrenaline
[img]Driving characteristics-wise, I like the 3G, speaking stock versus stock. The chassis is more rigid, and the suspension can handles the corners very well.
Comon guys! The roads are not only made of corners, there are potholes too! 3G sacrifice too much of ride comfort and only gained a little in handling. Thats all a FWD car can do!
A BMW540, having the same handling (if not better), has a more supple suspension, and soak up bumps really well. In contrast, 3G TL is teeth cracking.
#10
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by gainful
Comon guys! The roads are not only made of corners, there are potholes too! 3G sacrifice too much of ride comfort and only gained a little in handling. Thats all a FWD car can do!
A BMW540, having the same handling (if not better), has a more supple suspension, and soak up bumps really well. In contrast, 3G TL is teeth cracking.
A BMW540, having the same handling (if not better), has a more supple suspension, and soak up bumps really well. In contrast, 3G TL is teeth cracking.
1 more reason teh 3g is better is because its offerend in a manual
#11
Dragging knees in
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by gainful
Comon guys! The roads are not only made of corners, there are potholes too! 3G sacrifice too much of ride comfort and only gained a little in handling. Thats all a FWD car can do!
A BMW540, having the same handling (if not better), has a more supple suspension, and soak up bumps really well. In contrast, 3G TL is teeth cracking.
A BMW540, having the same handling (if not better), has a more supple suspension, and soak up bumps really well. In contrast, 3G TL is teeth cracking.
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
As for the suspension, yeah, Acura still has some ways to go in terms of chassis and suspension tuning. But you're talking about BMW, the benchmark in the automotive industry. Otherwise, I think it's pretty high up there among its competition.
![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
#13
Sippy Cup (x2)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Age: 42
Posts: 1,961
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
3 Posts
Originally Posted by fsttyms1
being a 2g owner and having driven a 3g a few times i much rather have the 3g
![Why Me](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/whyme.gif)
#14
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by RickRoush03
tell ya what, anyone that wants to trade my 2G for their 3G, holla!!
![Werd](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/werd.gif)
#15
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Orleans, MA
Age: 57
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree with what everyone has said thus far. Personally, I prefer the classic styling of the 2nd Gen but find the 3rd Gen to be superior in many performance oriented categories - but not all. I agree with gainful that the ride of the 3rd Gen is somehow "busier". I guess, for me, if there is a disappointment in the 3rd Gen it's that you hope in the evolution of a car that it will perform better across the board than it's predecessors. For me, the 3rd Gen is a reminder that compromise is the nature of automotive design. Or, to put it in baseball terms, I see the 3rd Gen as a triple, not a home run...
#16
05 C230K & 09 135i 6MT
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: GA
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Some of you need to step over to 3G forum and look at his other posts. Every single one of them are the same "I liked my 2G better than this 3G". Quite annoying.
I like both cars, but I'd take a 3G anyday. The 2G is not without faults. And I'm still wondering how anyone would find the 3G's ride teeth jarring? It's firm but compliant.
I like both cars, but I'd take a 3G anyday. The 2G is not without faults. And I'm still wondering how anyone would find the 3G's ride teeth jarring? It's firm but compliant.
#17
Instructor
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Monterey, California
Age: 47
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I test drove the 3G just a week ago and I'm sorry to say that I was dissapointed. Ok well,.. maybe disapointed is too harsh, but my initial impressions are that the 3G was considerabaly heavier and much less nimble than the 2G. And while that gave the 3G a more 'european' luxury feel, I can't say I enjoyed it as much as the 2G. I guess it would just take getting used to. But I have to admit, I like the styling (exterior & interior) of the 3G. The only thing on the 3G that I was disgusted with was the cupholder cover. I know,.. it's a lame thing to be annoyed by, but the 'dual-door' on the 2G is much nicer than the 'slider' on the 3G. That said,.. It's still probably going to be my next car. (unless I can afford the RL)
#19
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,270
Received 2,793 Likes
on
1,988 Posts
1G TL owns all
![Naa Naa](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/naanaa.gif)
#20
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by FuzzyNutz
I test drove the 3G just a week ago and I'm sorry to say that I was dissapointed. Ok well,.. maybe disapointed is too harsh, but my initial impressions are that the 3G was considerabaly heavier and much less nimble than the 2G. And while that gave the 3G a more 'european' luxury feel, I can't say I enjoyed it as much as the 2G. I guess it would just take getting used to. But I have to admit, I like the styling (exterior & interior) of the 3G. The only thing on the 3G that I was disgusted with was the cupholder cover. I know,.. it's a lame thing to be annoyed by, but the 'dual-door' on the 2G is much nicer than the 'slider' on the 3G. That said,.. It's still probably going to be my next car. (unless I can afford the RL)
#22
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by 03CoupeV6
handles like a cow ice skating.
![Spit](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/spit.gif)
![rofl](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
#23
White 2000 TL
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Boston, MaSS
Age: 39
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I like the way they Both drive, i like the interior of the 3G it's sick with the Blue gauges clean look for interior, but as far as the 3g Go's for exterior it dont do it for me i think it looks like a BMw not an Acura but then again i think all the 05 cars look the same
But i really like the Body of the 2G i think it's insane
By the way i have an 00 TL, No one hate just my Opinon I love All acuras
But i really like the Body of the 2G i think it's insane
By the way i have an 00 TL, No one hate just my Opinon I love All acuras
#24
Racer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Philly, PA
Age: 47
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 03CoupeV6
And I'm still wondering how anyone would find the 3G's ride teeth jarring? It's firm but compliant.
WHat u talking about? FIRM and COMPLIANT? Sounds like you are saying your car is WDP and NBP,......
Some things can't be "and "ed together.
#27
2016 TLX
Given some thought, this thread isn't as goofy as I first believed. I prefer the exterior and interior styling of my 3G, the wheels and the instrument lights are much nicer, and the audio is a little better, plus the seat memory and dual-zone heat/air pay off for my wife and me. However, my 2G was a great car: it rode more smoothly; it felt just as powerful; yes, it had a better cup-holder cover; there was less vibration in that 1500-2000 rpm range; and it cost less. I miss the fern-green interior color. It also ran 60,000 miles without any service problem.
The 3G isn't perfect. There's that ride thing, the vibration is within spec, but still out of place on a $35,000 car, and DVD-A is a disappointment - not enough music available and it doesn't simulate surround from two-channel sources as it should. (In addition, some things are wasted on us: we don't use a cell phone, we've never had the sunroof open, we haven't telescoped the steering wheel, or put in more than one CD at a time, the navi is aggravating and hasn't taken us anywhere we didn't get in the past with a map, and I wish the back seat would fold down. Too bad Acura wouldn't build one just for us and charge a little less.)
Having said all that though - the TL is more car than I ever hoped to own, and in comparison with other brands on looks, performance, amenities, and price, I would still make the same choice. Both cars have been money well spent.
The 3G isn't perfect. There's that ride thing, the vibration is within spec, but still out of place on a $35,000 car, and DVD-A is a disappointment - not enough music available and it doesn't simulate surround from two-channel sources as it should. (In addition, some things are wasted on us: we don't use a cell phone, we've never had the sunroof open, we haven't telescoped the steering wheel, or put in more than one CD at a time, the navi is aggravating and hasn't taken us anywhere we didn't get in the past with a map, and I wish the back seat would fold down. Too bad Acura wouldn't build one just for us and charge a little less.)
Having said all that though - the TL is more car than I ever hoped to own, and in comparison with other brands on looks, performance, amenities, and price, I would still make the same choice. Both cars have been money well spent.
#29
Originally Posted by Pure Adrenaline
I like the 3G's features and gadgets. It is more advanced, but then again, that's pretty obvious given the fact that the technology behind the 3G is 5 years newer.
But that doesn't mean the 2G falls behind. Oh, no. I love my 2G. The design is not exactly breathtaking, but it has very classy lines and it exudes upscale ambience with a bit of a hot and wild side with the current modifications.
Driving characteristics-wise, I like the 3G, speaking stock versus stock. The chassis is more rigid, and the suspension can handles the corners very well. 2G falls behind in that department, but it's not quite a Geo Metro, either. Both cars inspire confidence and handles well for family sedans.
Bottom line... I'll never trade my 2G for a 3G. But even if I wasn't a biased owner of my modified 2G, then I would have to say that, after much consideration, I would have to give the nod to the 3G. But once again, the 3G's technology is 5 years newer, which is a lifetime in the automotive industry. Therefore, it's not really a legitimate, objective comparison. Then again, what is objective when it comes to cars? It's all about the gut feelings and the emotions when you look at the car, and when you're behind the wheel.![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
But that doesn't mean the 2G falls behind. Oh, no. I love my 2G. The design is not exactly breathtaking, but it has very classy lines and it exudes upscale ambience with a bit of a hot and wild side with the current modifications.
Driving characteristics-wise, I like the 3G, speaking stock versus stock. The chassis is more rigid, and the suspension can handles the corners very well. 2G falls behind in that department, but it's not quite a Geo Metro, either. Both cars inspire confidence and handles well for family sedans.
Bottom line... I'll never trade my 2G for a 3G. But even if I wasn't a biased owner of my modified 2G, then I would have to say that, after much consideration, I would have to give the nod to the 3G. But once again, the 3G's technology is 5 years newer, which is a lifetime in the automotive industry. Therefore, it's not really a legitimate, objective comparison. Then again, what is objective when it comes to cars? It's all about the gut feelings and the emotions when you look at the car, and when you're behind the wheel.
![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
#30
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by gainful
WHat u talking about? FIRM and COMPLIANT? Sounds like you are saying your car is WDP and NBP,......
Some things can't be "and "ed together.
Some things can't be "and "ed together.
![Huh](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/huh.gif)
Originally Posted by 03CoupeV6
I believe that was "firm BUT compliant" not "firm AND compliant"
Re-read my post.
Re-read my post.
![Owned](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/owned.gif)
#31
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by 03CoupeV6
I have a 2G and I have seat memory. ![Tongue](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
![Tongue](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
#32
should i spend more in
I have owned my 2g for 4 months now. I knew that I wanted a TL, but it was a hard decision betw. the 2g and the 3g. I've loved the 2g since the redesign back in 02. So I compared 03's and 04's. To myself the cars were basically the same vehicle minus the styling of course and a few other things. Such as the bluetooth, 10hp diff (I have a Type S w/ Navi), and other minor details. What made me choose the 2g over the 3g is b/c I'm not a fan of the new trend in automotive design. I don't know what it is called, I know it is Italian design w/ the long nose and short rear deck. But the 3g is just bulky to me while the 2g is more streamlined and "fit" i guess. Anywho, that is my take on the subject.
#33
My vote goes to the 2G for the classy exterior & the 3G for the updated interior. The 3g has a nicer aero kit though cuz i think it fits way better but i think the side markers r ricey and the back is ugly compared to the 2G imo
#34
Racer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Philly, PA
Age: 47
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 03CoupeV6
I believe that was "firm BUT compliant" not "firm AND compliant"
Re-read my post.
Re-read my post.
#35
Dragging knees in
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by gainful
ok, "firm but compliant", my car is white BUT black,.......Doesn't that sound funny?
The suspension can have a firm setting for a tight handling feel, but still comply with the driver's inputs.
![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
#36
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by Pure Adrenaline
Compliant means willing to comply, or being submissive.
The suspension can have a firm setting for a tight handling feel, but still comply with the driver's inputs.![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
The suspension can have a firm setting for a tight handling feel, but still comply with the driver's inputs.
![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
![Agree](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/agree.gif)
![Stupid](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/imwithstupid.gif)
#37
Originally Posted by ililillilillilil
My vote goes to the 2G for the classy exterior & the 3G for the updated interior. The 3g has a nicer aero kit though cuz i think it fits way better but i think the side markers r ricey and the back is ugly compared to the 2G imo
![Agree](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/agree.gif)
#40
the interior of the 3g is what makes me want one sooo bad.
i think the 2G exterior is still much more sexy. its nice and sleek and sporty, where the 3g is kind of a big tank. i also dont like the square exhaust tips on the 3G, but these are small things i can easily get over when im driving that 270hp beast, black on black 6spd with navi...oooooooo one day i will finally get one
probably wont be for a few years though, then i can participate in the 4g vs 3g thread!!
i think the 2G exterior is still much more sexy. its nice and sleek and sporty, where the 3g is kind of a big tank. i also dont like the square exhaust tips on the 3G, but these are small things i can easily get over when im driving that 270hp beast, black on black 6spd with navi...oooooooo one day i will finally get one
probably wont be for a few years though, then i can participate in the 4g vs 3g thread!!
![Tomato](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tomato.gif)