The 3.2 liter engine
#3
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Mundelein, IL
Age: 61
Posts: 1,687
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
The NSX engine is also built with exotic materials like titanium connecting rods. I'm guessing it's much lighter than the TL engine in addition to other "magic" that's worked into it.
You might get close, but short of adding a supercharger/turbo or rebuilding the engine, I'm not sure you'll equal the NSX numbers.
You might get close, but short of adding a supercharger/turbo or rebuilding the engine, I'm not sure you'll equal the NSX numbers.
#6
Retired MOD
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Age: 47
Posts: 3,995
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Re: The 3.2 liter engine
Originally posted by tls260
The nsx and tls have the same engines, at least there the same size 3.2 liters, how does the nsx engine get 290 horsepower, i want my tls to have 290, whats the deal.
The nsx and tls have the same engines, at least there the same size 3.2 liters, how does the nsx engine get 290 horsepower, i want my tls to have 290, whats the deal.
Here you go for more info Click Here
Enjoy.
#7
Retired MOD
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Age: 47
Posts: 3,995
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally posted by jbrown
what's really cool is when you stroke the 3.2 to 3.5 AND use headers, there's a stroked CL-S in SoFla with 315hp at the wheels!
what's really cool is when you stroke the 3.2 to 3.5 AND use headers, there's a stroked CL-S in SoFla with 315hp at the wheels!
Someone also have a TL-S with 335hp again at the flywheel. It was measured at the wheels and then by math came out with that number. I'm guessing 22-28 % lost.
Trending Topics
#8
¤ Club Inspire ¤
or go here for plenty of information on Honda's exotic car. www.nsxprime.com keep in mind...I'm a NSX FREAK, I know as much as I can without even owning the car.
TL/CL - J32A1/Type S - J32A2
NSX - 91-96 - C30B/97-02 - C32B
TL/CL - J32A1/Type S - J32A2
NSX - 91-96 - C30B/97-02 - C32B
#11
Comptech Freak
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 40
Posts: 6,555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: The 3.2 liter engine
Originally posted by tls260
The nsx and tls have the same engines, at least there the same size 3.2 liters, how does the nsx engine get 290 horsepower, i want my tls to have 290, whats the deal.
The nsx and tls have the same engines, at least there the same size 3.2 liters, how does the nsx engine get 290 horsepower, i want my tls to have 290, whats the deal.
as they have mentioned...it's different design and layout...
our 3.2 SOHC was carried over from the old TL...
the 3.2 DOHC is only available in NSX only....and it's a mid mounted engine...
they might have similar displacement and 30hp difference...but they are just like apple and orange...
#12
Advanced
Originally posted by ElegantTL
I hope you know that the NSX is a 3.2L DOHC VTEC Motor. Ours is a SOHC and it isn't the same engine. Ours is a J block..the NSX is a C series.
I hope you know that the NSX is a 3.2L DOHC VTEC Motor. Ours is a SOHC and it isn't the same engine. Ours is a J block..the NSX is a C series.
#14
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The NSX and TL/CL engines are quite different despite having the same displacement.
The NSX, at 3.66" and 3.07", has a larger bore and shorter stroke. Piston speeds generally dictate the extreme upper limit of an engine's RPM range, so the NSX uses a shorter stroke to keep the piston speeds in check. However, longer strokes generally provide more torque which is evident when comapring the TL and NSX engines as the TL has a longer stroke (3.39") but a smaller bore (3.50"). The NSX uses Titanium connecting rods to lighten the reciprocating assembly and allow for the engine to rev quicker (and ultimately, higher)
Another classic example of piston speeds dictating an engine's redline is the 3rd generation Integra. The GS-R/Type R and the RS/LS/GS/SE both had 1.8 liter motors, but that was due to rounding. The GS-R/Type R actually displaces 1797cc (or 1.797 liters) while the others displace 1834cc (1.834 liters) due to a difference in stroke. The GS-R's stroke, at 87.2mm, actually gave it the title of production car with the fastest average pistons speeds in the world. Since it revved to 8100rpm and had a relatively long stroke, Honda went to great lengths (which I will not discuss here as this post is already too damned long) to ensure it would survive at such speeds.
Bottom line: The displacement of the two motors is the same, but they are quite different in design, mission, and operation.
The NSX, at 3.66" and 3.07", has a larger bore and shorter stroke. Piston speeds generally dictate the extreme upper limit of an engine's RPM range, so the NSX uses a shorter stroke to keep the piston speeds in check. However, longer strokes generally provide more torque which is evident when comapring the TL and NSX engines as the TL has a longer stroke (3.39") but a smaller bore (3.50"). The NSX uses Titanium connecting rods to lighten the reciprocating assembly and allow for the engine to rev quicker (and ultimately, higher)
Another classic example of piston speeds dictating an engine's redline is the 3rd generation Integra. The GS-R/Type R and the RS/LS/GS/SE both had 1.8 liter motors, but that was due to rounding. The GS-R/Type R actually displaces 1797cc (or 1.797 liters) while the others displace 1834cc (1.834 liters) due to a difference in stroke. The GS-R's stroke, at 87.2mm, actually gave it the title of production car with the fastest average pistons speeds in the world. Since it revved to 8100rpm and had a relatively long stroke, Honda went to great lengths (which I will not discuss here as this post is already too damned long) to ensure it would survive at such speeds.
Bottom line: The displacement of the two motors is the same, but they are quite different in design, mission, and operation.
#16
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: WPB, Florida
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Bitium
Sorry to correct you, but not at the wheels. 315hp at the flywheel.
Someone also have a TL-S with 335hp again at the flywheel. It was measured at the wheels and then by math came out with that number. I'm guessing 22-28 % lost.
Sorry to correct you, but not at the wheels. 315hp at the flywheel.
Someone also have a TL-S with 335hp again at the flywheel. It was measured at the wheels and then by math came out with that number. I'm guessing 22-28 % lost.
#17
Old TL vs. Current TL
Just to add a little something. The last generation TL had the 3.2 from the defunct Legend and shares NOTHING other than similar displacement with the current 3.2 that is an evolution of the Accord 3.0.
#18
¤ Club Inspire ¤
Re: Old TL vs. Current TL
Originally posted by SpoiledMan
Just to add a little something. The last generation TL had the 3.2 from the defunct Legend and shares NOTHING other than similar displacement with the current 3.2 that is an evolution of the Accord 3.0.
Just to add a little something. The last generation TL had the 3.2 from the defunct Legend and shares NOTHING other than similar displacement with the current 3.2 that is an evolution of the Accord 3.0.
#19
Re: Re: Old TL vs. Current TL
Originally posted by ElegantTL
Yep Yep. And the Accord 3.0 V6 came from the first gen CL.
Yep Yep. And the Accord 3.0 V6 came from the first gen CL.
#20
¤ Club Inspire ¤
Re: Re: Re: Old TL vs. Current TL
Originally posted by systek
thats what i was about to add...that 3.0 in the accord was in my 97 cl..which is the first time that 3.0 came out.
thats what i was about to add...that 3.0 in the accord was in my 97 cl..which is the first time that 3.0 came out.
#21
Re: Re: Re: Re: Old TL vs. Current TL
Originally posted by ElegantTL
beat you to the punch! :p :p haha..our engines originally came from a 97 CL...
beat you to the punch! :p :p haha..our engines originally came from a 97 CL...
one quibble, the cl had a plastic dressing on the strut bar that covered all the wires, hoses and even the master cylinder w/plastic that really tidied up the engine bay when detailed. i really hate how they short changed us on this engine bay by taking that out.
now i know some ppl hate plastic in the engine bay, but if you've seen the 97-99 cl, you know what i mean.
#22
¤ Club Inspire ¤
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Old TL vs. Current TL
Originally posted by systek
YEP, my cl was fun, but not nearly as fast as the tls
one quibble, the cl had a plastic dressing on the strut bar that covered all the wires, hoses and even the master cylinder w/plastic that really tidied up the engine bay when detailed. i really hate how they short changed us on this engine bay by taking that out.
now i know some ppl hate plastic in the engine bay, but if you've seen the 97-99 cl, you know what i mean.
YEP, my cl was fun, but not nearly as fast as the tls
one quibble, the cl had a plastic dressing on the strut bar that covered all the wires, hoses and even the master cylinder w/plastic that really tidied up the engine bay when detailed. i really hate how they short changed us on this engine bay by taking that out.
now i know some ppl hate plastic in the engine bay, but if you've seen the 97-99 cl, you know what i mean.
#23
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Old TL vs. Current TL
Originally posted by ElegantTL
oh reallly?! can you post a pic? I never knew that. haha..can we yank it from the CL and put it in our TL-S? :p
oh reallly?! can you post a pic? I never knew that. haha..can we yank it from the CL and put it in our TL-S? :p
here is the url to the whole car: http://members.cardomain.com/systek
#24
¤ Club Inspire ¤
I think it makes it look much cleaner. I think the people with the Accords can do it. hehe...oh yeah...man..the whole right side of the engine bay still resembles the 95-97 Accord V6's! haha. but then again..the whole car is a 5th Gen Accord.... :p
#25
Originally posted by ElegantTL-S
I think it makes it look much cleaner. I think the people with the Accords can do it. hehe...oh yeah...man..the whole right side of the engine bay still resembles the 95-97 Accord V6's! haha. but then again..the whole car is a 5th Gen Accord.... :p
I think it makes it look much cleaner. I think the people with the Accords can do it. hehe...oh yeah...man..the whole right side of the engine bay still resembles the 95-97 Accord V6's! haha. but then again..the whole car is a 5th Gen Accord.... :p
#28
Originally posted by ElegantTL-S
hehe..yeah. trickle down effect! honda/acura has no creativity.. :p
hehe..yeah. trickle down effect! honda/acura has no creativity.. :p
that is one thing that makes me :yack:
but at least it also means that i can service my own car cause the parts are all pretty much the same:
1. dropped my car myself
2. helped austin519 w/his ss brake lines
3. installed cai myself
4. on the cl, changed alt myself
5. on austin's tls, gave advice how to remove tls alternator
6. and the list goes on and on....
#29
¤ Club Inspire ¤
Very true......I agree totally. Only us car nuts will actually realize these things. the other people who buys these cars...don't have a single clue! ah well...at least Honda is making money....sort of...haha. The lawsuit against them right now on the tranny issue..
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SidhuSaaB
3G TL Problems & Fixes
18
05-30-2020 12:40 AM
joflewbyu2
5G TLX (2015-2020)
139
10-08-2015 11:16 AM
Yumcha
Automotive News
1
09-17-2015 09:01 PM
Mike Bertram
2G TL (1999-2003)
9
09-10-2015 09:27 AM