2nd gen type s horsepower HP per new SAE testing standards,
#1
2nd gen type s horsepower HP per new SAE testing standards,
does any1 know what our HP per new SAE testing standards is?
I know this has probably been asked before but i just got out of the shower, and im still wet/nude and needed an answer asap!
I know this has probably been asked before but i just got out of the shower, and im still wet/nude and needed an answer asap!
#6
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by drtoth
The j32a2 was never put in the New TL, it was a different Revision. I think our numbers are nearly the same as they were before.
#7
258(SAE corrected hp for 3g)/270(original hp for 3g) = .955
260 *.955 = 248.44 projected hp SAE corrected for UA5 Type S
225* .955 = 215 projected hp SAE corrected for UA5 Premium
hAppy hAllowEEn
260 *.955 = 248.44 projected hp SAE corrected for UA5 Type S
225* .955 = 215 projected hp SAE corrected for UA5 Premium
hAppy hAllowEEn
Trending Topics
#9
Senior Moderator
Either way it doesnt matter because our motors wernt tested with this correction. And the only way to know would be to have it tested. And id bet no one will pull the motor out of their car to be tested that way just to find out
#10
K-Fed's Stunt Double
I agree FST,
But I have seen so many road reviews where the Type S smoked the regular 04 TL
how can this be rated lower than the gen4? I thought overall our engine was better and is the best 3.2 litre, bar none excep the M3 of course.
But I have seen so many road reviews where the Type S smoked the regular 04 TL
how can this be rated lower than the gen4? I thought overall our engine was better and is the best 3.2 litre, bar none excep the M3 of course.
#11
On the way!
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Orlando, FL
Age: 56
Posts: 3,715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The J32A2 is a great engine because it produces a lot of hp/liter in stock form, and is able to use minor bolt-ons to bump it another 30-40hp. Not many engines put out almost 94 hp/liter in a naturally aspirated form.
I'd like to see some links for those road reviews though.
I'd like to see some links for those road reviews though.
#13
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by drtoth
not smoked
.1
but you can see it just by comparin
The TL is underrated I thought and on premium fuel it does 5.9 0-60?
.1
but you can see it just by comparin
The TL is underrated I thought and on premium fuel it does 5.9 0-60?
#14
I need 2 more gears
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Springvale, Maine
Age: 45
Posts: 3,228
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
I think the j32 actually produces 300 crank hp, but our shitty tranny's lose 35% of the power, so whp is actually 195-200. JK. I imagine the J32 and 3G TL engines would test the same using the new SAE standards. just my guess though.
#16
Originally Posted by njtls
does it really matter how much the new sae standards change our hp rating? its not gonna make it any faster or slower
#17
@ slide or die @
Originally Posted by sbuswell
I think the j32 actually produces 300 crank hp, but our shitty tranny's lose 35% of the power, so whp is actually 195-200. JK. I imagine the J32 and 3G TL engines would test the same using the new SAE standards. just my guess though.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1fatcrxnem1
3G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
22
06-01-2018 01:23 AM
Skirmich
2G TL (1999-2003)
37
09-15-2015 06:41 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
3
09-14-2015 10:48 AM