2002 3.5 TL-S vs. 2002 M3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-22-2001, 07:32 PM
  #1  
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
Sonny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Tallahassee
Age: 40
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2002 3.5 TL-S vs. 2002 M3

If you had a TL-S with the 3.5 upgrade, headers, exaust, springs, sways, that would essentially put HP at about 380+. Is this more than enpugh to take on a 2002 M3? The 3.5 upgrade ist the 335 HP option, not the 315 HP option.
Old 12-22-2001, 08:12 PM
  #2  
Advanced
 
AcuraAddict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: 2002 3.5 TL-S vs. 2002 M3

Originally posted by Sonny
If you had a TL-S with the 3.5 upgrade, headers, exaust, springs, sways, that would essentially put HP at about 380+. Is this more than enpugh to take on a 2002 M3? The 3.5 upgrade ist the 335 HP option, not the 315 HP option.
Prolly not. the 350+ C32, which is RWD with better weight distribution, can't even come all that close. Its still almost half a second slower.
Old 12-22-2001, 08:20 PM
  #3  
AC
Drifting
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,074
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If you're gonna spend all that money on an upgraded TL, why not just get an M3 to begin with? Then you won't have this problem.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mlody
5G TLX (2015-2020)
85
12-04-2019 02:11 PM
MetalGearTypeS
3G TL Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
6
08-29-2016 08:28 PM
navtool.com
3G MDX (2014-2020)
32
01-20-2016 11:43 AM
navtool.com
5G TLX Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
31
11-16-2015 08:30 PM
navtool.com
1G RDX Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
1
09-25-2015 05:15 PM



Quick Reply: 2002 3.5 TL-S vs. 2002 M3



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:36 PM.