03TL-S Supercharged dyno @ 3.5psi
#1
291hp & 245 tq @ 3.5psi
Thread Starter
03TL-S Supercharged dyno @ 3.5psi
Some of you already knew that i purchased a used CT supercharged last month. After went throu few issues, my car is tune today and the result is good even I still have issue with low boost level. I have both hbp and hb s/c shaft pulley and only get 3.5 psi max. With hbp alone, I get like 1.5psi, and with bp s/c shaft pulley alone, I got like 2 psi??? My mechanic could not find any leak issue anywhere from air intake to the s/c and to the engine. I also just found out that I have small leak on the header today during dyno tune, but that should not cause drop like half the boost level isn't it? I'll fix it this weekend.
Anyway, here is the result after tunning from Church Automotive: max whp is 291.4 at aound 6600rpm, max torque is 245 at around 5250rpm. AFR is pretty much around 11.25. Tune using Greddy Ultimate. Temperature is around 86F, 45% humidity. If they let the engine cool down more instead just spray little bit of water on the engine and the s/c after tunning to get the number and if I fix my header leak, I might get few more hp, haha.
Compare with the dyno I had back in 2006 which before adding the S/C and thermoblock spacer, there is an increasing of 60whp and 50 tq.
Anyway, here is the result after tunning from Church Automotive: max whp is 291.4 at aound 6600rpm, max torque is 245 at around 5250rpm. AFR is pretty much around 11.25. Tune using Greddy Ultimate. Temperature is around 86F, 45% humidity. If they let the engine cool down more instead just spray little bit of water on the engine and the s/c after tunning to get the number and if I fix my header leak, I might get few more hp, haha.
Compare with the dyno I had back in 2006 which before adding the S/C and thermoblock spacer, there is an increasing of 60whp and 50 tq.
#5
Senior Moderator
if you dont have a leak id be inclined to say it may be the SC thats the problem?
Trending Topics
#8
291hp & 245 tq @ 3.5psi
Thread Starter
2-4k for s/c is alot, but if you want more power after having most if not all bolt on stuffs, and keep the car as daily driver, 60whp is not bad for 2-4k
#11
Senior Moderator
No, there could be something wrong with it since its only making that much. It should be making much more than that. The boost you do get is it stable or does it fluctuate?
#14
eh
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Aren't these sheets showing corrected power at the fly wheel? If so your actual wheel horse power will be a bit lower (whp). VERY strange you're only seeing 3.5 psi.
#15
291hp & 245 tq @ 3.5psi
Thread Starter
One other thing I think the reason of low boost is this s/c is the earlier model or pre-production model according to the seller. Anyway, car runs great tonight.
#16
Senior Moderator
Why is it corrected flywheel and not WHP??
The boost graph is pretty stable I think. I'll post the scan of the graph tomorrow, but it starts out at 2.5psi at 2750rpm, stay around 2.5 until around 3600rpm which it jump up to 3.2psi. Hold at those level and reach peak of 3.5psi at around 4800rpm. Slowly decline to 3.3psi until around 5600rpm, then gradually decline to 2.6psi at 6000rpm, then goes back up to 3psi at 6600rpm.
One other thing I think the reason of low boost is this s/c is the earlier model or pre-production model according to the seller. Anyway, car runs great tonight.
One other thing I think the reason of low boost is this s/c is the earlier model or pre-production model according to the seller. Anyway, car runs great tonight.
Early model or not i think something is wrong with the SC or something. It should produce more than 3.5. You may want to post this on the CL side. There are a few over there with much more knowledge on teh SC
#17
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (1)
The boost graph is pretty stable I think. I'll post the scan of the graph tomorrow, but it starts out at 2.5psi at 2750rpm, stay around 2.5 until around 3600rpm which it jump up to 3.2psi. Hold at those level and reach peak of 3.5psi at around 4800rpm. Slowly decline to 3.3psi until around 5600rpm, then gradually decline to 2.6psi at 6000rpm, then goes back up to 3psi at 6600rpm.
#18
Senior Moderator
#23
291hp & 245 tq @ 3.5psi
Thread Starter
I'm pretty sure the crank pulley is stock size because I bought them new from UR. I might have to double check.
As for the flywheel thing, from what I understand, dynapack measure hp at the wheels hub, so it still measure wheel horse power per se minus the drag on the rim, tire, and inertia. Dynapack hp will be always little higher (some say 5-10hp, and some say less than 10%) then dynojet hp (which measure at the wheel). Here is an good article talking about it. When tunning, dynapack is better to use because it can consistency give out the same measure for every test run.
http://home.earthlink.net/~spchurch/id12.html
As for the flywheel thing, from what I understand, dynapack measure hp at the wheels hub, so it still measure wheel horse power per se minus the drag on the rim, tire, and inertia. Dynapack hp will be always little higher (some say 5-10hp, and some say less than 10%) then dynojet hp (which measure at the wheel). Here is an good article talking about it. When tunning, dynapack is better to use because it can consistency give out the same measure for every test run.
http://home.earthlink.net/~spchurch/id12.html
#25
Senior Moderator
I'm pretty sure the crank pulley is stock size because I bought them new from UR. I might have to double check.
As for the flywheel thing, from what I understand, dynapack measure hp at the wheels hub, so it still measure wheel horse power per se minus the drag on the rim, tire, and inertia. Dynapack hp will be always little higher (some say 5-10hp, and some say less than 10%) then dynojet hp (which measure at the wheel). Here is an good article talking about it. When tunning, dynapack is better to use because it can consistency give out the same measure for every test run.
http://home.earthlink.net/~spchurch/id12.html
As for the flywheel thing, from what I understand, dynapack measure hp at the wheels hub, so it still measure wheel horse power per se minus the drag on the rim, tire, and inertia. Dynapack hp will be always little higher (some say 5-10hp, and some say less than 10%) then dynojet hp (which measure at the wheel). Here is an good article talking about it. When tunning, dynapack is better to use because it can consistency give out the same measure for every test run.
http://home.earthlink.net/~spchurch/id12.html
As for the dyno, it has no way of knowing what loss is due to the drivetrain. They can guess but unless they do a baseline with and without the trans attached its only that a guess. I would ask for the actual WHP dyno. If they put in a correction factor of just 10% you would be in the neighborhood of 260ish at the wheels. The TL is right around 20-25%
Last edited by fsttyms1; 08-20-2009 at 12:23 PM.
#26
291hp & 245 tq @ 3.5psi
Thread Starter
fsttyms1: you are GOD!
Stupid me! Back then, when I ordered UR pulley, I ask the local tune shop to order the "stock" size pulley set and install them for me. Parts arived and they installed and I never really check the box to see if that's the correct part until now! I just check the box and serial number on the crank pulley and it is "underdrive" size, not "stock" size that I want! Well, hope when I have a chance to replace the underdrive crank and put the stock acura crank pulley back on maybe next week, low boost issue can be resolve.
Question: since the crank pulley on my car right now is underdrive, so I use different belt size. What is belt part number for stock size pulley? Anyone know? I don't think I can use the same belt, do I?
Stupid me! Back then, when I ordered UR pulley, I ask the local tune shop to order the "stock" size pulley set and install them for me. Parts arived and they installed and I never really check the box to see if that's the correct part until now! I just check the box and serial number on the crank pulley and it is "underdrive" size, not "stock" size that I want! Well, hope when I have a chance to replace the underdrive crank and put the stock acura crank pulley back on maybe next week, low boost issue can be resolve.
Question: since the crank pulley on my car right now is underdrive, so I use different belt size. What is belt part number for stock size pulley? Anyone know? I don't think I can use the same belt, do I?
#32
wut.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rowland Heights, CA
Posts: 1,404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you have an underdriven pulley, you should be getting MORE psi.. anyone can tell you that.
Why do you think jproy went with an underdriven setup? He used it so he doesn't have to bother with making a smaller shaft pulley.
Why do you think jproy went with an underdriven setup? He used it so he doesn't have to bother with making a smaller shaft pulley.
#33
291hp & 245 tq @ 3.5psi
Thread Starter
lol, I told the shop that I want stock size, I didn't know they ordered the wrong part!
I only need the crank since the alternator one cant be use b/c of the s/c. How much is just the crank?
I only need the crank since the alternator one cant be use b/c of the s/c. How much is just the crank?
#34
291hp & 245 tq @ 3.5psi
Thread Starter
so then what the heck wrong with my car and the s/c??????? Steve: I want your s/c
#35
wut.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rowland Heights, CA
Posts: 1,404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I asked Jim why the underdriven pulley setup for HIS MP90 retrofit..
Quoted from Jim:
Because at the 9psi boost level with the MP62 kit the ratios of the pulleys make the MP62 spin at about 18,700rpm. That is way above the 16000rpm rev limit of the MP62 before it starts to generate tons of heat into the intake air charge. The UR underdrive pulley allows you to use a lightend crank pulley while lowering the crank diameter from 175mm to 141mm. This change happens to be just right to, in conjunction with the HB alternator pulley and stock 3.8" jackshaft pulley, run the blower at 12,700rpm which equates to ~9-10 psi on the J32A2 motor. If you kept the same ratios with the MP62 on the MP90 and spun it at 18,700rpm you would be making a very very hot almost 20psi of boost and would either blow out the sleeves or pop the heads off the block the first time you floored the car up to redline.
Cliffs: More boost with underdriven pulley.
Hold that thought Huy.. you might have the UR SC Pulley not an UD one.. so yeah.
Quoted from Jim:
Because at the 9psi boost level with the MP62 kit the ratios of the pulleys make the MP62 spin at about 18,700rpm. That is way above the 16000rpm rev limit of the MP62 before it starts to generate tons of heat into the intake air charge. The UR underdrive pulley allows you to use a lightend crank pulley while lowering the crank diameter from 175mm to 141mm. This change happens to be just right to, in conjunction with the HB alternator pulley and stock 3.8" jackshaft pulley, run the blower at 12,700rpm which equates to ~9-10 psi on the J32A2 motor. If you kept the same ratios with the MP62 on the MP90 and spun it at 18,700rpm you would be making a very very hot almost 20psi of boost and would either blow out the sleeves or pop the heads off the block the first time you floored the car up to redline.
Cliffs: More boost with underdriven pulley.
Hold that thought Huy.. you might have the UR SC Pulley not an UD one.. so yeah.
#38
291hp & 245 tq @ 3.5psi
Thread Starter
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Joe Avesyan
3G TL Performance Parts & Modifications
9
09-29-2015 03:57 PM
JarrettLauderdale
2G CL Dynograph Gallery
5
09-21-2015 07:51 PM