'03 TL-S vs. '94 GMC S-10 SS -- not quite as funny as it sounds

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-22-2004, 04:37 PM
  #1  
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: West Lafayette, IN
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'03 TL-S vs. '94 Chevy S-10 SS -- not quite as funny as it sounds

Now before you laugh and wonder why I'm asking, this is a modified 1994 S-10 SS.

It's my friend's, and he's curious how it would fare against my currently stock TL-S in a straight-out acceleration test. He and his father have made some mods to it. They put in a performace camshaft, a performance exhaust, shift kit (shifts faster), and lowered the gear ratio. The stock '94 S-10 SS had 180 hp; they have no idea how much this one has after the mods, but he has no problems chirping the tires when it enters second gear.

We won't have the opportunity to "test" this theory for a couple of weeks, probably, so in the meantime I wanted to know what you guys think the outcome would be.

*Title edited: CHEVY S-10, not GMC, duh
Old 02-23-2004, 09:49 AM
  #2  
I like to mod teh Bimmer
 
sweetride01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Tampa = Tampon
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, he should be putting out 190+ horsepower, and the changed gear ratios will help. But, it comes down to how much his truck weighs, an unless it's less than 2800 Ibs, he probably doesn't stand much of a chance.
Old 02-23-2004, 10:00 AM
  #3  
Dragging knees in
iTrader: (2)
 
Pure Adrenaline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Seattle Area
Age: 42
Posts: 12,434
Received 32 Likes on 21 Posts
That's it? That's all it's got?

You'll win.
Old 02-23-2004, 10:03 AM
  #4  
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: West Lafayette, IN
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
About the weight: according to him it's "light" but according to edmunds.com it's 5,000 lbs.

Yeah, I personally think I'll win too, I'm just a little wary because him and his dad have done some pretty amazing things to vehicles before...and although I've never ridden in the truck, from the way he drives it certainly looks like it can haul @ss. I guess we'll find out soon!
Old 02-23-2004, 10:05 AM
  #5  
Cruisin'
 
Lex300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Illinois
Age: 50
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't worry, it shouldn't be a problem.

A very good friend of mine has the same truck, though it's a '97. Had very similar mods and was quick, but not quite enough to take out a TL-S.

That is until now...we dropped an LT1 from a Z28 into it this past summer. Now, it's a whole different story. This was one hell of a project, but the truck is BAD! Quite the sleeper, too.
Old 02-23-2004, 10:28 AM
  #6  
Dragging knees in
iTrader: (2)
 
Pure Adrenaline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Seattle Area
Age: 42
Posts: 12,434
Received 32 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally posted by Lex300
Don't worry, it shouldn't be a problem.

A very good friend of mine has the same truck, though it's a '97. Had very similar mods and was quick, but not quite enough to take out a TL-S.

That is until now...we dropped an LT1 from a Z28 into it this past summer. Now, it's a whole different story. This was one hell of a project, but the truck is BAD! Quite the sleeper, too.
I would've gone with the LS1.
Old 02-23-2004, 10:43 AM
  #7  
Cruisin'
 
Lex300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Illinois
Age: 50
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Pure Adrenaline
I would've gone with the LS1.
Not if you knew how much he picked this motor up for! The LT1 is no slouch! Let's just say he got this motor, a freshly built trans, LT4 hot cam, custom ECU, custom mounts, headers, etc. for less than the price of a used LS1.
Old 02-23-2004, 11:09 AM
  #8  
Burning Brakes
 
T Ho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 1,175
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I would've gone with the LS1.
You would have paid 2x-3x the cost, and you would have had to do some major surgery on the front frame to get it in. OTOH, the LT1 is basically a drop-in, comparitively speaking.

Don't get me wrong- LS1 is probably the finest old-tech (meaning 2-valve pushrod) small block V8 ever built, but sometimes the cost outweighs the benefits.
Old 02-23-2004, 11:23 AM
  #9  
Cruisin'
 
Lex300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Illinois
Age: 50
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by T Ho
You would have paid 2x-3x the cost, and you would have had to do some major surgery on the front frame to get it in. OTOH, the LT1 is basically a drop-in, comparitively speaking.

Don't get me wrong- LS1 is probably the finest old-tech (meaning 2-valve pushrod) small block V8 ever built, but sometimes the cost outweighs the benefits.
Absolutely! The LT1 is much more of a "drop-in" swap vs. the LS1.

In this case, the LT1 was a more cost effective solution and a relatively install friendly option(considering we were doing the work ourselves).
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mlody
5G TLX (2015-2020)
85
12-04-2019 02:11 PM
MetalGearTypeS
3G TL Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
6
08-29-2016 08:28 PM
DerrickW
3G TL Performance Parts & Modifications
9
11-15-2015 05:52 PM
xsilverhawkx
2G TL Problems & Fixes
4
10-05-2015 11:00 AM
Brandle34
2G TL Problems & Fixes
4
09-23-2015 07:20 PM



Quick Reply: '03 TL-S vs. '94 GMC S-10 SS -- not quite as funny as it sounds



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:22 PM.