RDX vs. RL

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 09:56 PM
  #1  
GoHawks's Avatar
Thread Starter
2012 Cadillac CTS-V Coupe
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,196
Likes: 95
From: Southeast Michigan
RDX vs. RL

OK. There really isn't a comparison, but my RL is in to have ANOTHER door handle replaced. I had requested an MDX, but all of them were out, and they asked me if the RDX would do. Since I've never driven one, I willingly obliged.

I have to say that I am thoroughly impressed by this little CUV. The turbo provides a noticeable kick when it engages, and I would assume that if you dip into it much (as I find myself constatnly doing), it will negate the fuel economy benefits of the 4-banger. It doesn't feel like an SUV, it does feel like a little sports car.

Obviously I noticed some missings, like the fact that the rear windows don't have express up/down. No voice controls, although this model is a non-nav unit, so a nav version may have it.

Here is one comparison to the RL (should make this thread legal ). I notices that the noise compensation feature of the radio (not the noise cancellation) is much more noticeable with the RDX than it is with the RL. Driving with the sunroof open, you definitely noticed the volume increase as you accelerated to cruising speed, and then the volume lower as you came to a stop.

If I were looking to downsize, but still needed a wagon for the occasional times I would have light duty hauling needs, the RDX would be very high on my list.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 06:37 AM
  #2  
Alpha Geek
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 49
From: M@$$hole
The RDX "Tech" version has Voice recog.

I have both these vehicles in my household...(Me, 06 RL, G/F 07 RDX Tech)
I used the RDX the other day to go pickup my Honda Pushmower,and I love driving that just as much as my RL, and more in some ways....the RDX feels more like a sportscar than the RL does, and as GoHawks mentioned, that turbo kick really makes you smile!
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 10:35 AM
  #3  
DoctorTuna's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 323
Likes: 1
I have said this before but I would take a Turbo 3.5 RL over a 3.7 or even V8 anyday!! After sampling the Turbo 335xi I was sold on the turbo concept!!
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 11:02 AM
  #4  
robarsan's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 552
Likes: 12
From: Granite State
The RL is a great car, but I miss the punch of the Audi S4.

The 2010 plan for the Audi S4 has caught my interest. They're going from a V8 to a forced induction 6 cylinder. Some say it will be a combination of a Turbo and Supercharger. This will increase the fuel efficiency by 20% but still maintain the 340 HP.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 12:09 PM
  #5  
lland's Avatar
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 17
From: Wellington, FL
When I bought my RL, I had every intention of buying an RDX. I walked into the dealer. My salesman was busy so he threw me the keys to an RDX (Tech) and told me to bring it back "later." I had it for about four hours and decided there were more dislikes for me than likes...no memory seats, no power passenger seat, engine sounded strained, "cheap" feeling rear seat folding mechanism, rough (sporty?) ride, and more. When I got back, he threw me MDX keys and I ran some errands with it. Loved it but already have an '04 MDX (not ready to get rid of it yet) so the MDX wasn't really an option. Then he threw me the keys to the RL and told me to bring it back the next day (it was getting late). After an evening and night with the RL, I decided I liked it and after getting (what I considered to be) a very good deal, it was a done deal.

LL
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 12:54 PM
  #6  
black label's Avatar
Trolling Canuckistan
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,453
Likes: 811
From: 100 Legends Way, Boston, MA 02114
Did the 06 RL have SVC (speed volume compensation)? I didn't think it did.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 06:29 PM
  #7  
RL06tech's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 706
Likes: 26
Here is my take on the RDX vs RL. Personally I HATED the RDX. The turbo is horrible, although it doesn't have much lag it still does. When you rev the engine the boost quits about 1K rpms before redline, thus you get the dreaded off-on-off phenomenon. On sharp slow curves where you want to accelerate to exploit SHAWD the boost tends to hit like a hammer right in the middle of the turn, completely upsetting the vehicle dynamics. The ride is atrocious, on broken pavement at slow speeds it pogosticks as if were a suzuki samurai. The seats were good but the rest of the dash materials felt and looked rather cheap (for an Acura). Furthermore, the whoosh of the turbo is a constant reminder that its there. IMO its definitely the worst car Acura has ever put out, its like it was produced by a commitee of guys that never worked together. Honda's greatness is how all the "parts" seem to work harmoniously together to make a whole that is nicer than the individual parts, the RDX simply has no harmony.
I know my outlook is rather harsh but in 25 years of owning and driving Hondas it is simply the only one I have trully disliked. They tried to make a sport-luxury CRV and simply failed, a thoroughly halfbaked, platform sharing, disaster.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
navtool.com
Sponsored Sales & Group Buys
87
Jan 23, 2016 01:25 PM
adrian_s2k
1G RDX (2007-2012)
23
Jan 12, 2016 04:25 PM
San Yasin
2G RDX (2013-2018)
21
Sep 29, 2015 10:52 AM
dirleton
2G RDX (2013-2018)
6
Sep 29, 2015 08:26 AM
Froid
2G RDX (2013-2018)
3
Sep 27, 2015 06:16 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:54 AM.