View Poll Results: How do you like 'em?
I love them! They are neat



52
82.54%
They are a bit annoying...



3
4.76%
Don't care either way



8
12.70%
Voters: 63. You may not vote on this poll
Active Front Headlights: do you like it?
I didn't really notice the active headlights in action during my extended test drive a couple of weekends ago. I guess that could be a good thing if they weren't a distraction. However, I do wonder why Acura put bi-xenons in the TL but not in the RL... I did notice a difference between the high-beam halogens on the RL and the high-beam xeons and halogens on my Passat W8, as well as the A6 3.2's I have test driven. Just a small nit picky thing since I did end up putting a deposit down on a NBP/Parchment RL
Originally Posted by larryka
However, I do wonder why Acura put bi-xenons in the TL but not in the RL...
Originally Posted by rets
I seem to be the first one to vote...
Actually, I like the way it moves... but if I could switch on/off, it will be better.
Actually, I like the way it moves... but if I could switch on/off, it will be better.
Gitch is right, you can turn off the AFS is you prefer.
The RL has single xenons for regular beams. The high beam is halogen, I believe, so that it can come on immediately for a "flash to pass". Xenon would not work so well for this as it takes almost a second to achieve full brightness. It seems to work quite nice. I am not sure how the TL bi-xenons accomodates this.
The RL has single xenons for regular beams. The high beam is halogen, I believe, so that it can come on immediately for a "flash to pass". Xenon would not work so well for this as it takes almost a second to achieve full brightness. It seems to work quite nice. I am not sure how the TL bi-xenons accomodates this.
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by legendguy
The RL has single xenons for regular beams. The high beam is halogen, I believe, so that it can come on immediately for a "flash to pass". Xenon would not work so well for this as it takes almost a second to achieve full brightness. It seems to work quite nice. I am not sure how the TL bi-xenons accomodates this.
Originally Posted by rets
I seem to be the first one to vote...
Actually, I like the way it moves... but if I could switch on/off, it will be better.
Actually, I like the way it moves... but if I could switch on/off, it will be better.

I'm just curious, because my next car might be the RX400h and it also has that feature.
i have the TL and when i flash they flash in an instant, no delay at all. the way the xenons work on the car is, they have a filter in front of the bulb that direct the light down and a little less bright then the high beams would be. when you turn on ur high beams the filter shoots up and the light is directed upwards and brighter then the low beams. if you dont beleive me try this. turn on the head lights of a TL or any bi-xenon head lights and stand near the lights while someone turns on the high beams and you can actualy hear the filter shoot up. you might even hear it when you are sitting in the car.
I think the AFS feature is nice to have.
As for the high beams, I prefer having non-xenon high beams since xenons provide bright, focused light, but halogens provide bright, scattered light, which I think is more important for the highs to allow greater visibility. Plus, with two different spectrums of light being displayed, you see different things.
As for the high beams, I prefer having non-xenon high beams since xenons provide bright, focused light, but halogens provide bright, scattered light, which I think is more important for the highs to allow greater visibility. Plus, with two different spectrums of light being displayed, you see different things.
FWIW, as I mentioned in my earlier post, my Passat W8 has bi-xenons with halogens. When I have the high beams on, the xenons are unrestricted and the halogens are on. The light switch also has a position to turn off the halogens and just use the xenons for the high beams. You can't turn off the xenons and just use the halogens, but I personally don't see a reason to do so.
I would like to have bi-xenons on the RL, but it's not a deal breaker for me since it has so many other features.
I would like to have bi-xenons on the RL, but it's not a deal breaker for me since it has so many other features.
Originally Posted by phile
Just curious...does the RL's swiveling headlights have anything to do with it not having bi-xenons? I.e., does having the one prevent the other from being in place?
Hi Gitch -
Are you saying the Xenons aren't used for DRL on any car, or just on the RL? They are used as DRL on my W8, which means they're basically always on, so they are also used in conjunction with the halogens for flash-to-pass. I don't see why Acura couldn't have done something similar. I'm looking past it though, as I'm still planning on driving my new RL home some time this week.
Originally Posted by Gitch
I believe there is a relationship to the daytime running light setup, as the high beam halogen is used for the DRL. From what I've seen, Xenons aren't used for DRL, so requires a different configuration.
There's probably many ways to skin this cat (xenon-halogen combinations). The RL way seems to work just fine and gives excellent visibility, good high-beam response and good fog light positioning. My only wish is that the headlight "auto" position would not cause the headlight reminder to "ding-ding" when you get out of the car with the lights on. I would suggest that Acura reprogram this feature in future models since the lights will be shutting off shortly on their own anyway.
Originally Posted by legendguy
There's probably many ways to skin this cat (xenon-halogen combinations). The RL way seems to work just fine and gives excellent visibility, good high-beam response and good fog light positioning. My only wish is that the headlight "auto" position would not cause the headlight reminder to "ding-ding" when you get out of the car with the lights on. I would suggest that Acura reprogram this feature in future models since the lights will be shutting off shortly on their own anyway.
Originally Posted by rets
Gitch & legendguy, thanks... I'm sure the stupid car dealer forgot to tell me it could be shut off. 

slo007, thanks for making this POLL.
ok, ok ok, stop it...... i own a TL.... WE DO NOT HAVE BI-XENONS!
whew, just had to get that out... now, as i repeat, we do not have bi-xenons.... its the same headlight, there is a mechanism that shoot the beam up.....
ONE XENON....... I REPEAT ONLY ONE
thank you
whew, just had to get that out... now, as i repeat, we do not have bi-xenons.... its the same headlight, there is a mechanism that shoot the beam up.....
ONE XENON....... I REPEAT ONLY ONE
thank you
Originally Posted by ayethetiense
ok, ok ok, stop it...... i own a TL.... WE DO NOT HAVE BI-XENONS!
whew, just had to get that out... now, as i repeat, we do not have bi-xenons.... its the same headlight, there is a mechanism that shoot the beam up.....
ONE XENON....... I REPEAT ONLY ONE
thank you
whew, just had to get that out... now, as i repeat, we do not have bi-xenons.... its the same headlight, there is a mechanism that shoot the beam up.....
ONE XENON....... I REPEAT ONLY ONE
thank you
correct me if iam wrong, bi xenon means that one xenon bulb is for low beam and high beam. so there are two lights in one which makes it a bi xenon headlight.
Originally Posted by tlxlr8s
correct me if iam wrong, bi xenon means that one xenon bulb is for low beam and high beam. so there are two lights in one which makes it a bi xenon headlight.
You are correct, it has nothing to do with 2 seperate lights on each side.
As an aside there are indeed many ways to accomplish light on a car, the 3 series (except the M3) uses AFS like headlights, it is a Bi-xenon system with a single bulb and a masking shutter, they also have a halogen light beside them which is used as the DRL and stalk flash (to pass etc). I perfer this to using Xenons for DRLs since the bulbs are quite expensive and halogens probably do just as good of a job in this application.
Vandy
In the Audi A8, LED lights are used for the DRLs, as they last longer and they don't sap much power. But of course, that's a car whose base price starts in the 70Ks, so you can't compare it with the RL.
Originally Posted by savageTL
You are correct, it has nothing to do with 2 seperate lights on each side.
As an aside there are indeed many ways to accomplish light on a car, the 3 series (except the M3) uses AFS like headlights, it is a Bi-xenon system with a single bulb and a masking shutter, they also have a halogen light beside them which is used as the DRL and stalk flash (to pass etc). I perfer this to using Xenons for DRLs since the bulbs are quite expensive and halogens probably do just as good of a job in this application.
Vandy
As an aside there are indeed many ways to accomplish light on a car, the 3 series (except the M3) uses AFS like headlights, it is a Bi-xenon system with a single bulb and a masking shutter, they also have a halogen light beside them which is used as the DRL and stalk flash (to pass etc). I perfer this to using Xenons for DRLs since the bulbs are quite expensive and halogens probably do just as good of a job in this application.
Vandy
check out this $452,500 supercar.
and its a mercedes SLR mclaren. i wonder why they did that
i quote from the web site "Bi-Xenon High Intensity Discharge low-beam headlamps with automatic level control, halogen high beams, clear high-impact polycarbonate lenses, and heated headlamp washers."
wierd that it says bi-xenon and has halogen high beams
http://www.mbusa.com/brand/container...R&class=05_SLR
and its a mercedes SLR mclaren. i wonder why they did that
i quote from the web site "Bi-Xenon High Intensity Discharge low-beam headlamps with automatic level control, halogen high beams, clear high-impact polycarbonate lenses, and heated headlamp washers."
wierd that it says bi-xenon and has halogen high beams
http://www.mbusa.com/brand/container...R&class=05_SLR
Originally Posted by CGTSX2004
As for the high beams, I prefer having non-xenon high beams since xenons provide bright, focused light, but halogens provide bright, scattered light, which I think is more important for the highs to allow greater visibility.
Originally Posted by 8-)
After having the RL for 2 weeks now, I agree with this point. But I think I have to take it one step further...I think I prefer the halogens for low beams too. (Heresy!) I have to use my high beams way more with the Xenon lows. Ok, maybe this is fodder for a separate thread.
Originally Posted by phile
I thought the RL comes with halogen DRLs? If so, can't you use it at night alongside the low beam xenon?
Originally Posted by 8-)
It does have halogen DRLs. I don't know if you can use them with the low beam xenons. Does anybody know? I do have the DRLs set to on if that matters.
Originally Posted by tlxlr8s
check out this $452,500 supercar.
and its a mercedes SLR mclaren. i wonder why they did that
and its a mercedes SLR mclaren. i wonder why they did that
Originally Posted by slo007
That's way too much money for a car. If it flew to the moon and back, I'd buy it. But to drive around town... 

Originally Posted by phile
Just curious...does the RL's swiveling headlights have anything to do with it not having bi-xenons? I.e., does having the one prevent the other from being in place?
Originally Posted by gitch
I believe there is a relationship to the daytime running light setup, as the high beam halogen is used for the DRL. From what I've seen, Xenons aren't used for DRL, so requires a different configuration.
If the low beams were halogen instead of Xenon, would they even bother with the active headlights? I'm thinking the active headlights are used only because of the directional nature of the Xenons. I'm still not digging the Xenons.




