You should have just bought an Automatic transmission! Hahaha!
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You should have just bought an Automatic transmission! Hahaha!
I was at the car wash last night and as I was waiting for those guys to get done washing & drying it, I had a guy come up to me and start talking. He owned a black C5 Vette and asked me about my car, asked if I had anything done to it and all that.
Well then he saw one guy at the car wash try to pull up my car, but he didn't know how to drive stick so he called over someone else. This guy who owns the Vette says to me "If you're driving such an expensive car, why didn't you just spend the extra money and get the automatic transmission rather than the manual?"
I was in complete awe and wondering if this guy really owned that Vette or not. Turns out his Vette was auto also. I just told him "I know, maybe next time I'll have a little extra cash to get the auto!" hahaha.
That was classical!
Well then he saw one guy at the car wash try to pull up my car, but he didn't know how to drive stick so he called over someone else. This guy who owns the Vette says to me "If you're driving such an expensive car, why didn't you just spend the extra money and get the automatic transmission rather than the manual?"
I was in complete awe and wondering if this guy really owned that Vette or not. Turns out his Vette was auto also. I just told him "I know, maybe next time I'll have a little extra cash to get the auto!" hahaha.
That was classical!
#5
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I should have explained to the guy that the 6-Speed costs about $2500 more than the automatic. Maybe next time! Now he's gonna think I'm some cheap ass barely able to make payments on my ride.
#6
Cost Drivers!!!!
Stick is fun but it can get a little annoying. M5, would you say the same thing to C. Montoya or R.Schumacher? There is a reason they've gone to SM tranny.....you're going to it as well with the new m3.....
#7
'Cooter
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Shitside, Queens
Age: 46
Posts: 11,172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
o lord
too funny!!
where do i start??
first off, he's getting his car washed...i would b so scared if i owned a Vette...and second, who in their right minds buys a sports car with an automatic??
yikes!!!
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
where do i start??
first off, he's getting his car washed...i would b so scared if i owned a Vette...and second, who in their right minds buys a sports car with an automatic??
![EEK!](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/eek.gif)
Trending Topics
#8
Originally posted by Zapata
Stick is fun but it can get a little annoying. M5, would you say the same thing to C. Montoya or R.Schumacher? There is a reason they've gone to SM tranny
Stick is fun but it can get a little annoying. M5, would you say the same thing to C. Montoya or R.Schumacher? There is a reason they've gone to SM tranny
#9
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Somewhere between here and there, yet neither.
Posts: 9,151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Scooter
first off, he's getting his car washed...i would b so scared if i owned a Vette...and second, who in their right minds buys a sports car with an automatic??
yikes!!!
first off, he's getting his car washed...i would b so scared if i owned a Vette...and second, who in their right minds buys a sports car with an automatic??
![EEK!](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/eek.gif)
#10
Who Needs a Type-S?
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New York City
Age: 43
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Zapata
Stick is fun but it can get a little annoying. M5, would you say the same thing to C. Montoya or R.Schumacher? There is a reason they've gone to SM tranny.....you're going to it as well with the new m3.....
Stick is fun but it can get a little annoying. M5, would you say the same thing to C. Montoya or R.Schumacher? There is a reason they've gone to SM tranny.....you're going to it as well with the new m3.....
I'm sure Schuey enjoys manually shifting in his personal cars
#12
Cost Drivers!!!!
Originally posted by tuRb0mikEy
F1 technology has goten so advanced that the most dated thing in the car is the driver himself. clutch pedal shifting was elminated not because it's "annoying" but because a standard manual was way too slow. Button shifting aloows the driver to keep both hands on the wheel while cornering, which is what you need trying to control 800HP in a car that weighs 1500 pounds..
I'm sure Schuey enjoys manually shifting in his personal cars
F1 technology has goten so advanced that the most dated thing in the car is the driver himself. clutch pedal shifting was elminated not because it's "annoying" but because a standard manual was way too slow. Button shifting aloows the driver to keep both hands on the wheel while cornering, which is what you need trying to control 800HP in a car that weighs 1500 pounds..
I'm sure Schuey enjoys manually shifting in his personal cars
ok so why the hell would i want to take the hands off the wheel of my car when i am driving. Sure, it's fun and adds to the classic driving experience. You really need to be "one" with the car with the stick and it's an amazing feeling but i hate when people get all high and might about stick v. auto thing. However, SMGII is the way of the future. It isnt there yet but it is getting there. From a manufacturing standpoint it gives the company more control no how their car functions.
#14
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Somewhere between here and there, yet neither.
Posts: 9,151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by CO-CL-S
I've always thought there should be a test before some cars could be sold (like vettes), so idiots wouldn't get them!
I've always thought there should be a test before some cars could be sold (like vettes), so idiots wouldn't get them!
#15
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by moomaster_99
What's wrong with an automatic Vette?
What's wrong with an automatic Vette?
#16
I've seen figures that 75-80% of Corvettes are sold as automatics. Not to stereotype these buyers, but the ones I have met are more "mature" in years and likely to remember the days when having an automatic was somewhat of a status symbol over the little people who had to drive manuals (which at that time were non-synchro'd and harder to drive). A lot of others also buy it simply becasue it is a Vette, they could care less if it had 180 or 400 hp and don't care to drive a manual. The other sterotype I would add is that "Joe Corvette Owner" thinks he is the baddest mofo in the world with the baddest car. Not surprising he'd look down his nose at your lowly BMW (<--his opinion of car).
As far as putting a Vette down the 1/4. Talking C5s here, stock for stock, the 6 speed, if well driven should have a bit of an edge over the auto. An "average driver" would be more consistent with the auto, though, and might likely garner a better time with it. Stall converters on the auto as well as lower gears and stickier tires could shift the edge both ways.
As far as putting a Vette down the 1/4. Talking C5s here, stock for stock, the 6 speed, if well driven should have a bit of an edge over the auto. An "average driver" would be more consistent with the auto, though, and might likely garner a better time with it. Stall converters on the auto as well as lower gears and stickier tires could shift the edge both ways.
#18
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Somewhere between here and there, yet neither.
Posts: 9,151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by M5 Lite
More drivetrain loss. Only negative for me. That extra 5% is huge in a car like the Corvette! That equates to 17hp less!
More drivetrain loss. Only negative for me. That extra 5% is huge in a car like the Corvette! That equates to 17hp less!
![Roll Eyes](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
Now your slower .1 sec in 1/4 vs. a professional driver, but still probably about .3 sec faster in the 1/4 vs. an average one.
#19
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by moomaster_99
Wow!!! That's really gonna hurt a Vette...![Roll Eyes](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
Now your slower .1 sec in 1/4 vs. a professional driver, but still probably about .3 sec faster in the 1/4 vs. an average one.
Wow!!! That's really gonna hurt a Vette...
![Roll Eyes](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
Now your slower .1 sec in 1/4 vs. a professional driver, but still probably about .3 sec faster in the 1/4 vs. an average one.
If you even look at the 0-60 times (in no way do they do this car justice), you'll notice that by 60MPH the automatic vette is already .2 seconds behind. That .2 seconds can be the difference later on between 13.1 seconds and 12.9 seconds in the 1/4 mile.
0-60 on Manual = 4.8 seconds
0-60 on Auto = 5.0 seconds
#20
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Somewhere between here and there, yet neither.
Posts: 9,151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by M5 Lite
Majority of Vette owners I've seen, they have done modifications to their cars. I don't know if I'm just in the wrong group of people or what, but to them, HP is everything! 17HP is ALOT!!!
If you even look at the 0-60 times (in no way do they do this car justice), you'll notice that by 60MPH the automatic vette is already .2 seconds behind. That .2 seconds can be the difference later on between 13.1 seconds and 12.9 seconds in the 1/4 mile.
0-60 on Manual = 4.8 seconds
0-60 on Auto = 5.0 seconds
Majority of Vette owners I've seen, they have done modifications to their cars. I don't know if I'm just in the wrong group of people or what, but to them, HP is everything! 17HP is ALOT!!!
If you even look at the 0-60 times (in no way do they do this car justice), you'll notice that by 60MPH the automatic vette is already .2 seconds behind. That .2 seconds can be the difference later on between 13.1 seconds and 12.9 seconds in the 1/4 mile.
0-60 on Manual = 4.8 seconds
0-60 on Auto = 5.0 seconds
#21
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by moomaster_99
plus an auto will tend to garner faster times then an a manual if both drivers are equal...ie average.
plus an auto will tend to garner faster times then an a manual if both drivers are equal...ie average.
#22
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Somewhere between here and there, yet neither.
Posts: 9,151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by M5 Lite
How so? Stock vs. Stock?
How so? Stock vs. Stock?
#23
Originally posted by moomaster_99
plus an auto will tend to garner faster times then an a manual if both drivers are equal...ie average.
plus an auto will tend to garner faster times then an a manual if both drivers are equal...ie average.
Originally posted by Pull_T
An "average driver" would be more consistent with the auto, though, and might likely garner a better time with it.
An "average driver" would be more consistent with the auto, though, and might likely garner a better time with it.
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
M5 Lite
How so? Stock vs. Stock?
How so? Stock vs. Stock?
#24
Who Needs a Type-S?
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New York City
Age: 43
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Zapata
i never said that clutch shifting was eliminated in f1 because annoying factor. Annoying is shifting in bumper to bumper traffic without ridding the clutch.
ok so why the hell would i want to take the hands off the wheel of my car when i am driving. Sure, it's fun and adds to the classic driving experience. You really need to be "one" with the car with the stick and it's an amazing feeling but i hate when people get all high and might about stick v. auto thing. However, SMGII is the way of the future. It isnt there yet but it is getting there. From a manufacturing standpoint it gives the company more control no how their car functions.
i never said that clutch shifting was eliminated in f1 because annoying factor. Annoying is shifting in bumper to bumper traffic without ridding the clutch.
ok so why the hell would i want to take the hands off the wheel of my car when i am driving. Sure, it's fun and adds to the classic driving experience. You really need to be "one" with the car with the stick and it's an amazing feeling but i hate when people get all high and might about stick v. auto thing. However, SMGII is the way of the future. It isnt there yet but it is getting there. From a manufacturing standpoint it gives the company more control no how their car functions.
#25
Cost Drivers!!!!
Originally posted by tuRb0mikEy
It's ok if you don't know how to drive manual...Really...enjoy that great tactile feel of pushing a plastic button while i relish in rowing thru 5 or 6 well placed gears..
It's ok if you don't know how to drive manual...Really...enjoy that great tactile feel of pushing a plastic button while i relish in rowing thru 5 or 6 well placed gears..
![Confused](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/confused.gif)
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#26
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Given your responses regarding auto being superior *at times*, I wonder why Ferrari, Lambo, Lotus don't have automatics in their lineups. Maybe some of you know something they don't.
![Roll Eyes](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
I know that Moo is going to stay automatic from his reasoning
.
Are you guys actually telling me that stock for stock, the CLS/6 will actually be only as fast as the CLS/Auto?
I would think that you guys would expect the CLS/6 to hit the 1/4 in about 14.3-14.5 stock vs. the 15.2 for the CLS/Auto.
Maybe, I'm just over analyzing this, maybe as moo said, "Now your slower .1 sec in 1/4".
I pity the fool who has sympathy for a Corvette driver who buys an automatic. I understand if it's a super tweaked car pushing 1000HP and having an auto, but come on, its a street 'racing' (whether you want to believe it or not) car.
BTW, Good morning
I need my coffee now.
![Confused](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/confused.gif)
![Roll Eyes](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
I know that Moo is going to stay automatic from his reasoning
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Are you guys actually telling me that stock for stock, the CLS/6 will actually be only as fast as the CLS/Auto?
I would think that you guys would expect the CLS/6 to hit the 1/4 in about 14.3-14.5 stock vs. the 15.2 for the CLS/Auto.
Maybe, I'm just over analyzing this, maybe as moo said, "Now your slower .1 sec in 1/4".
I pity the fool who has sympathy for a Corvette driver who buys an automatic. I understand if it's a super tweaked car pushing 1000HP and having an auto, but come on, its a street 'racing' (whether you want to believe it or not) car.
BTW, Good morning
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#27
Cost Drivers!!!!
Originally posted by M5 Lite
Given your responses regarding auto being superior *at times*, I wonder why Ferrari, Lambo, Lotus don't have automatics in their lineups. Maybe some of you know something they don't.
![Roll Eyes](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
I know that Moo is going to stay automatic from his reasoning
.
Are you guys actually telling me that stock for stock, the CLS/6 will actually be only as fast as the CLS/Auto?
I would think that you guys would expect the CLS/6 to hit the 1/4 in about 14.3-14.5 stock vs. the 15.2 for the CLS/Auto.
Maybe, I'm just over analyzing this, maybe as moo said, "Now your slower .1 sec in 1/4".
I pity the fool who has sympathy for a Corvette driver who buys an automatic. I understand if it's a super tweaked car pushing 1000HP and having an auto, but come on, its a street 'racing' (whether you want to believe it or not) car.
BTW, Good morning
I need my coffee now.
Given your responses regarding auto being superior *at times*, I wonder why Ferrari, Lambo, Lotus don't have automatics in their lineups. Maybe some of you know something they don't.
![Confused](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/confused.gif)
![Roll Eyes](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
I know that Moo is going to stay automatic from his reasoning
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Are you guys actually telling me that stock for stock, the CLS/6 will actually be only as fast as the CLS/Auto?
I would think that you guys would expect the CLS/6 to hit the 1/4 in about 14.3-14.5 stock vs. the 15.2 for the CLS/Auto.
Maybe, I'm just over analyzing this, maybe as moo said, "Now your slower .1 sec in 1/4".
I pity the fool who has sympathy for a Corvette driver who buys an automatic. I understand if it's a super tweaked car pushing 1000HP and having an auto, but come on, its a street 'racing' (whether you want to believe it or not) car.
BTW, Good morning
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
well those are exotics M5
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
by the way M5, glad your back
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#28
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Zapata
well those are exotics M5
I think there would be mob of people waiting to raid those companies if they ever decided to go fully automatic
6MT will be faster than the auto. I'd say 14.3.
by the way M5, glad your back
well those are exotics M5
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
by the way M5, glad your back
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Well, if those exotics ever started selling automatics, then I'd probably :angry: :angry:
![Uzi](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/uzi.gif)
![Uzi](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/uzi.gif)
Its just not right! Manual tranny + Sports car go together, like Milk and Cookies!
#29
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Somewhere between here and there, yet neither.
Posts: 9,151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A lot of exotics have sequential shifter options.....![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
A guy with an SMG is gonna whup your ass time and time again v. a 6spd manual. An auto in any car over 300 hp isn't a bad decision...because that car is probably already fast enough. I understand the appeal of shifting....it's just not everyone needs to do it when you're packing that much power.
![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
A guy with an SMG is gonna whup your ass time and time again v. a 6spd manual. An auto in any car over 300 hp isn't a bad decision...because that car is probably already fast enough. I understand the appeal of shifting....it's just not everyone needs to do it when you're packing that much power.
#30
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by moomaster_99
A lot of exotics have sequential shifter options.....![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
A guy with an SMG is gonna whup your ass time and time again v. a 6spd manual. An auto in any car over 300 hp isn't a bad decision...because that car is probably already fast enough. I understand the appeal of shifting....it's just not everyone needs to do it when you're packing that much power.
A lot of exotics have sequential shifter options.....
![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
A guy with an SMG is gonna whup your ass time and time again v. a 6spd manual. An auto in any car over 300 hp isn't a bad decision...because that car is probably already fast enough. I understand the appeal of shifting....it's just not everyone needs to do it when you're packing that much power.
#31
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Somewhere between here and there, yet neither.
Posts: 9,151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by M5 Lite
SMG is still a 6-speed. Its no where near an automatic tranny.
SMG is still a 6-speed. Its no where near an automatic tranny.
#32
Originally posted by moomaster_99
A lot of exotics have sequential shifter options.....![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
A guy with an SMG is gonna whup your ass time and time again v. a 6spd manual. An auto in any car over 300 hp isn't a bad decision...because that car is probably already fast enough. I understand the appeal of shifting....it's just not everyone needs to do it when you're packing that much power.
A lot of exotics have sequential shifter options.....
![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
A guy with an SMG is gonna whup your ass time and time again v. a 6spd manual. An auto in any car over 300 hp isn't a bad decision...because that car is probably already fast enough. I understand the appeal of shifting....it's just not everyone needs to do it when you're packing that much power.
#33
Subie Dubie
Manuals are a dying breed. 90% of cars sold in this country are auto. Even in Europe a higher percentage than ever are autos. It's the technology of Formula One leading the way. It's called progress. Nothing wrong with you diehards who like your manuals, but you are in a HUGE minority, people are voting through their purchases. In some cars, turbos for instance the auto can be quicker. My beloved Merkur XR4TI with auto regularly kicked the crap out of the manual version in our club meets because i'd get that 15 pounds of boost and not lose it. Not flaming manual guys, just tired of hearing the old " it's not a sports car if it's not a manual" thing. A Corvette IS a sports car, auto or not.
#34
Moderator Alumnus
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Communist, NY
Posts: 9,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Funny a Vette driver said that, because the 6spd in the Vette is an $815 RPO.
With that said....the 01-02 regular Automatic Vettes with the optional 3.15 rear axel (2.73 is standard), is just as fast as the 00 6spd Vette (which come standard with 3.42s to this day)- so they haul ass. The Vette got a power boost in 2001.
With that said....the 01-02 regular Automatic Vettes with the optional 3.15 rear axel (2.73 is standard), is just as fast as the 00 6spd Vette (which come standard with 3.42s to this day)- so they haul ass. The Vette got a power boost in 2001.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mike Bertram
2G TL (1999-2003)
9
09-10-2015 09:27 AM
HeloDown
3G TL Problems & Fixes
4
09-08-2015 06:51 PM
asahrts
Member Cars for Sale
0
09-04-2015 05:55 PM
Trplezero
Car Parts for Sale
1
09-03-2015 10:25 PM