XS Power 6MT Header Dyno
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,847
Likes: 223
From: South FL
XS Power 6MT Header Dyno
Got it taken care of this morning.
234HP
200/TQ
SAE corrected
It's just about on par with CT's #'s
Stock dyno done on my old car was 215HP 201 TQ
My old 6MT dyno'd the same HP & TQ with the CT's
The shop was 86 degrees though so I'm sure the #'s will be better with cooler air.
I'll post the graph tonight.
However.....
There was a probelm with the lead cables on the dyno. They were picking up RFI interference & it caused the TQ to not read correctly after Vtec switchover. So the TQ # was taken before that at 200 FT lbs. Might be a little higher. HP wasn't effected. The shop said they will give me a free run when they get new cables put in.
Keep in mind my 6mt now is a difference car then the old one.
The old one had an Icebox, my car now doesn't. The new car has spacers, the old didn't.
However the #'s are close to CT's headers, even if they are a few HP's short.
234HP
200/TQ
SAE corrected
It's just about on par with CT's #'s
Stock dyno done on my old car was 215HP 201 TQ
My old 6MT dyno'd the same HP & TQ with the CT's
The shop was 86 degrees though so I'm sure the #'s will be better with cooler air.
I'll post the graph tonight.
However.....
There was a probelm with the lead cables on the dyno. They were picking up RFI interference & it caused the TQ to not read correctly after Vtec switchover. So the TQ # was taken before that at 200 FT lbs. Might be a little higher. HP wasn't effected. The shop said they will give me a free run when they get new cables put in.
Keep in mind my 6mt now is a difference car then the old one.
The old one had an Icebox, my car now doesn't. The new car has spacers, the old didn't.
However the #'s are close to CT's headers, even if they are a few HP's short.
#2
Just to verify-
Old car - intake, comptech headers - 234 HP
New car - k&n with removed resonator, spacers, xs power headers, mugen cooling mods - 234 HP
Did your old car have the mugen mods or anything else?
Old car - intake, comptech headers - 234 HP
New car - k&n with removed resonator, spacers, xs power headers, mugen cooling mods - 234 HP
Did your old car have the mugen mods or anything else?
#4
Sounds like the XS delivers about the same to me... I've always beleived that a K&N dropin w/ removed resonator was about equal (maybe a little less) gain wise as the CT icebox. The spacers probably make up for the difference in gains between the K&N vs CT icebox...
Trending Topics
#10
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,847
Likes: 223
From: South FL
Not sure, the graph I have doesn't have RPM. It's MPH on the bottom. I may have to go back & have them print it out. Thought it was RPM. The IMRC is working I tested it before we pulled. If it wasn't working would that effect HP also? The HP curve is straight & even. The TQ is all over the place after vtec. (500-700 ft lbs)It dips & up down like crazy.
#14
Fuzzy, not to side track a bit but how much louder is it with the resonator off and how does it sound compare to a injen or aem CAI?
I already have a K&N drop in and am thinkin about gettin a AEM or Injen CAI for the sound.
I already have a K&N drop in and am thinkin about gettin a AEM or Injen CAI for the sound.
#15
Originally Posted by All Mine
Nice. I wonder if the AW's are the same way?
Quality wise i doubt they are the same as the XSPower's....but like someone said, a pipe is a pipe. I still wonder if the primarys are sized any different between the Comptechs and the XSPowers
#16
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,847
Likes: 223
From: South FL
Originally Posted by mefromuic
Fuzzy, not to side track a bit but how much louder is it with the resonator off and how does it sound compare to a injen or aem CAI?
I already have a K&N drop in and am thinkin about gettin a AEM or Injen CAI for the sound.
I already have a K&N drop in and am thinkin about gettin a AEM or Injen CAI for the sound.
#17
Originally Posted by fuzzy02CLS
Not sure, the graph I have doesn't have RPM. It's MPH on the bottom. I may have to go back & have them print it out. Thought it was RPM. The IMRC is working I tested it before we pulled. If it wasn't working would that effect HP also? The HP curve is straight & even. The TQ is all over the place after vtec. (500-700 ft lbs)It dips & up down like crazy.
#19
You 6speed guys are lucky with driveline loss. I have a 01 w/headers, mufflers, pulley, k&n drop in, thermoblock spacers and I only pulled 215hp and 190tq on the dyno. That was of course after stapping it to the dyno after driving 30mins to get there and it was 82 degrees out also. That just sucks that you were doing that stock(for me that is ) Great numbers
#23
I just finished my install a few hours ago and there were no major issues. They fit perfect. The one thing that I recommend is that you get some better bolts. The ones that come in the box are crap! I snapped the first one that I was trying to tighten.
My car sounds great with no exhaust leaks now that I took off the DC headers. When I took it for a ride up to 120mph I didn't notice any difference compared to the DC's. It pulled nice and strong up top.
I'm glad that fuzzy02CLS could post his dyno. It confirms my comparison to the DC's and Comptechs. I guess we'll all wait and see about the long term on this product. BUT...for $150 bucks that duplicates Comptechs performance...who cares!
My car sounds great with no exhaust leaks now that I took off the DC headers. When I took it for a ride up to 120mph I didn't notice any difference compared to the DC's. It pulled nice and strong up top.
I'm glad that fuzzy02CLS could post his dyno. It confirms my comparison to the DC's and Comptechs. I guess we'll all wait and see about the long term on this product. BUT...for $150 bucks that duplicates Comptechs performance...who cares!
#24
fuzzy if you look at the dip in power before well before it goes crazy it looks like classic failed IMRC...i would if i were you request a new free dyno because that torque curve is usless and unacceptable...IMRC's can fail intermitantly. what happens is there's a plastic gear inside that starts loosing teeth at some point it will catch some times and not others...
#30
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,847
Likes: 223
From: South FL
fuzzy if you look at the dip in power before well before it goes crazy it looks like classic failed IMRC...i would if i were you request a new free dyno because that torque curve is usless and unacceptable...IMRC's can fail intermitantly. what happens is there's a plastic gear inside that starts loosing teeth at some point it will catch some times and not others...
#31
Originally Posted by Louie11
You 6speed guys are lucky with driveline loss. I have a 01 w/headers, mufflers, pulley, k&n drop in, thermoblock spacers and I only pulled 215hp and 190tq on the dyno. That was of course after stapping it to the dyno after driving 30mins to get there and it was 82 degrees out also. That just sucks that you were doing that stock(for me that is ) Great numbers
Fuzzy, thanks for doing that dyno.
#32
let's just say i wouldn't consider that dyno to be solid.
like typeR said, i had 2 dynos, within 2 weeks of each other. at the 4K mark there was a major drop off in torque and it went up a little and was very flat.
replaced IMRC w/ new one, torque now continues increasing at 4,000... yours has the big drop off.
notice drop off:
http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e235/cleancl/dyno.jpg
notice increase:
http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e2...ancl/dyno2.jpg
like typeR said, i had 2 dynos, within 2 weeks of each other. at the 4K mark there was a major drop off in torque and it went up a little and was very flat.
replaced IMRC w/ new one, torque now continues increasing at 4,000... yours has the big drop off.
notice drop off:
http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e235/cleancl/dyno.jpg
notice increase:
http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e2...ancl/dyno2.jpg
#33
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,847
Likes: 223
From: South FL
Yeah but it doesn't effect HP so much. My TQ is screwed up. The fact that it dyno's 230+ HP means the headers are about the same as CT's. CT's may be higher a little.. Even if the IMRC is screwed wouldn't fixing it mean higher #'s?
#36
I finally got in touch with someone at the dyno shop and will be dynoing friday(tomorrow) at 4:00pm, I cant wait!!!! Im hoping for numbers like Fuzzy, but i will always take a little more
Anthracite CLS6 with AEM intake and XSPower Headers
Anthracite CLS6 with AEM intake and XSPower Headers
#37
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,847
Likes: 223
From: South FL
Originally Posted by CleanCL
higher torque yes, as far as your PEAK HP number, not much.
#39
Originally Posted by chewi
I wish there was a group buy for them
Group Buy? For what? A cheaper price? Why don't you just go on ebay and get them? There are usually 5-10 auctions at the same time. This is the cheapest you willl ever get headers for our cars.
#40
on my dyno, i had the same problem with the shops dyno not reading the torque because of the cable that goes to the coil. the HP numbers would be correct, it needs the signal from the coil to register torque. Those are good numbers for those headers, and the price was outstanding.